PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Eva Gerdts

Publications and source records attributed to Eva Gerdts.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Left atrial size and risk of major cardiovascular events during antihypertensive treatment: losartan intervention for endpoint reduction in hypertension trial.

The influence of left atrial size on cardiovascular events during antihypertensive treatment has not been reported previously from a long-term, prospective, randomized hypertension treatment trial. We recorded left atrial diameter by annual echocardiography and cardiovascular events in 881 hypertensive patients (41% women) with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy aged 55 to 80 (mean: 66) years during a mean of 4.8 years of randomized losartan- or atenolol-based treatment in the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study. During follow-up, a total of 88 primary end points (combined cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occurred. In Cox regression, baseline left atrial diameter/height predicted incidence of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio: 1.98 per cm/m [95% CI: 1.02 to 3.83 per cm/m]; P=0.042) adjusted for significant effects of Framingham risk score and history of atrial fibrillation. Greater left atrial diameter reduction during follow-up was associated with greater reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy, absence of new-onset atrial fibrillation or mitral regurgitation during follow-up, and losartan-based treatment (B=-0.13+/-0.03 cm/m; P<0.001) in multiple linear regression, adjusting for baseline left atrial diameter/height. However, in time-varying Cox regression analysis, left atrial diameter reduction was not independent of left ventricular hypertrophy regression in predicting cardiovascular events during follow-up. In conclusion, left atrial diameter/height predicts risk of cardiovascular events independent of other clinical risk factors in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and may be useful in pretreatment clinical assessment of cardiovascular risk in these patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Association of hemoglobin delivery with left ventricular structure and function in hypertensive patients: Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction in Hypertension Study.

Several studies have shown associations of high levels of hemoglobin (Hgb) or blood viscosity with cardiac events and with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH). To assess the relations of LV mass and function with Hgb delivery (ie, the physiological carrier of oxygen), we calculated the product of Hgb concentration and Doppler-derived cardiac output in 864 hypertensive participants with electrocardiographic LVH (359 women) in the Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction in Hypertension echocardiography substudy. Among women, Hgb delivery was positively related to internal dimension, septal and posterior wall thicknesses, LV mass, endocardial and midwall fractional shortening, and peak A wave velocity and negatively to total peripheral resistance index, E/A ratio, deceleration time, and the isovolumic relaxation time. Among men, Hgb delivery was positively related to LV internal dimension, LV mass, and A velocity, and negatively to LV midwall shortening, relative wall thickness, peripheral resistance index, and E/A ratio. In multivariable analyses that adjusted for age, diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, and total cholesterol, hemoglobin delivery in women was related positively to LV fractional shortening, midwall shortening, LV mass mitral valve A velocity, and LV internal dimension and negatively to mitral valve deceleration time and isovolumic relaxation time. Among men, Hgb delivery had positive independent relations to mitral valve A velocity, LV internal dimension, midwall shortening, and LV mass and negative relations to the E/A ratio and relative wall thickness. Thus, in hypertensive LVH, higher oxygen delivery capacity is associated with higher LV mass and impaired early diastolic LV filling.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Impact of diabetes mellitus on regression of electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and the prediction of outcome during antihypertensive therapy: the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension Study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and with greater ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH); however, it is unclear whether diabetes attenuates regression of hypertensive LVH and whether regression of ECG LVH has similar prognostic value in diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensive individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 9193 hypertensive patients (1195 with diabetes) in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension Study were treated with losartan- or atenolol-based regimens and followed up with serial ECG and blood pressure determinations at baseline and 6 months and then yearly until death or study end. ECG LVH was defined with gender-adjusted Cornell voltage-duration product (CP) criteria >2440 mm . ms. After a mean follow-up of 4.8+/-0.9 years, patients with diabetes had less regression of CP LVH (-138+/-866 versus -204+/-854 mm . ms, P<0.001), remained more likely to have LVH by CP (56.0% versus 48.1%, P<0.001), and had higher rates of CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality and of the LIFE composite end point of CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, in-treatment regression or absence of ECG LVH by CP was associated with between 17% and 35% reductions in event rates in patients without diabetes but did not significantly predict outcome in patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive patients with diabetes have less regression of CP LVH in response to antihypertensive therapy than patients without diabetes, and regression of ECG LVH is less useful as a surrogate marker of outcomes in hypertensive patients with diabetes. These findings may in part explain the higher CV morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with diabetes, and the absence of a demonstrable improvement in prognosis in diabetic patients in response to regression of ECG LVH suggests a more complex interrelation between underlying LV structural and functional abnormalities and outcome in these patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Exercise performance during losartan- or atenolol-based treatment in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (a LIFE substudy).

The objective of the study was to assess the influence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy regression on exercise capacity in hypertensive patients. Doppler echocardiography was performed at rest and during exercise in 51 patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy before and after 1 year of randomized blinded losartan- or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment. After 1 year, blood pressure was comparably reduced by 32/14 and 27/13 mmHg, respectively, in the losartan and atenolol groups, but the atenolol group had higher mean LV mass index (118 vs 103 g/m2) and lower LV ejection fraction (61% vs 67%) and midwall shortening (15.8% vs 16.8%) (all p<0.05). Resting diastolic Doppler indices remained unchanged and did not differ between the groups. Peak oxygen uptake during exercise was virtually unchanged after 1 year and did not differ between the groups in spite of a lower peak exercise heart rate in atenolol-treated patients. In multivariate analysis, higher peak oxygen uptake at 1 year was associated with lower body mass index, and higher systolic blood pressure and shorter isovolumic relaxation time at peak exercise (multiple R2 = 0.51, p<0.01), while age, gender, heart rate increase during exercise, reduction in LV mass and study treatment did not enter. In conclusion, reduction in blood pressure and LV mass induced by losartan or atenolol treatment was not accompanied by improved exercise capacity after 1 year. The results may be explained by persistent impairment of myocardial relaxation influencing exercise capacity.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Impact of hypertension on left ventricular hypertrophy regression and exercise capacity in patients operated for aortic valve stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of concomitant hypertension on left ventricular hypertrophy regression and exercise capacity in patients operated for aortic stenosis. DESIGN: We performed echocardiography 1 week, 6- and 18-month postoperatively in 78 patients, aged 70 (28-86) years, who received Medtronic Hall (33), Biocor (8), Carpentier-Edwards S.A.V. (14) and Freestyle (23) prosthetic valves for severe aortic stenosis. Forty nine patients participated in treadmill tests with ergospirometry at the 6- and 18-month visits. RESULTS: Left ventricular mass index was comparably reduced in normotensive and hypertensive patients (34 vs. 40 g/m2 after 6 months, and 43 vs. 46 g/m2 after 18 months, ns). In multiple regression analysis, adjusting for baseline left ventricular mass index, larger reduction in left ventricular mass index was associated with younger age and having a Freestyle prosthesis, but not with gender or history of hypertension (multiple R2=0.68, p < 0.05). Exercise capacity assessed as peak oxygen uptake increased from early to late evaluation in normotensive patients (VO2max 24.27 vs. 27.08 ml/kg/min, p < 0.05) while remained unchanged in hypertensive patients (VO2max 22.2 vs. 21.1 ml/kg/min). In multiple regression analysis, higher improvement in exercise capacity was predicted by male gender, younger age and absence of hypertension, while no independent association was found with Freestyle prosthesis (multiple R2 = 0.37, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients operated for aortic stenosis, concomitant hypertension is associated with lack of improvement in exercise capacity in spite of early left ventricular hypertrophy reduction comparable to what is found in normotensive patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Electrocardiographic strain pattern and left ventricular diastolic function in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study.

BACKGROUND: Whether the typical electrocardiographic (ECG) strain pattern (Strain, in leads V5 and/or V6), which is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and LV systolic dysfunction, is independently associated with LV diastolic dysfunction is unknown. METHODS: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study enrolled hypertensive patients with ECG-LVH, of whom 10% underwent Doppler echocardiography. LV diastolic function measures included peak mitral E and A wave velocities and their ratio (E/A); E wave deceleration time (EDT); atrial filling fraction (AFF); and isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT). Normal filling pattern was defined by E/A < 1 with EDT >or= 150 and or=60 ms; abnormal relaxation by E/A < 1 with EDT > 250 ms or IVRT > 100 ms; pseudonormal filling pattern by E/A >or= 1 associated with IVRT > 100 ms or EDT > 250 ms; restrictive pattern by E/A >or= 1 with IVRT < 100 ms and EDT < 250 ms. A combined index of LV systolic-diastolic function was also computed (isovolumic time/ejection time, modified myocardial performance index). Of LIFE echo substudy participants with all needed ECG and Doppler data (n = 791), 110 (14%) had Strain. RESULTS: Strain was associated with male gender, African-American race, diabetes, history of coronary heart disease (CHD), higher systolic blood pressure (BP), LV mass and relative wall thickness, and higher prevalences of echo-LV hypertrophy and wall motion abnormalities, and with slower heart rate (all P < 0.05). Age, diastolic BP and LV ejection fraction were similar in patients with or without Strain. Diastolic parameters, and prevalences of different LV filling patterns, did not differ significantly between patients with versus those without Strain (all P > 0.1), but modified myocardial performance index was higher with Strain (P < 0.05). Findings were consistent in multivariate analyses. The association of Strain with higher modified myocardial performance index was no longer statistically significant after accounting for LV systolic function and wall motion abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive patients with ECG-LVH, the ECG Strain pattern did not identify independently those with more severe LV diastolic abnormalities.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with a history of atrial fibrillation: The Losartan Intervention For End Point Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the impact of antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic (ECG) left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment of hypertensive patients with AF to reduce the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality remains unclear. METHODS: As part of the Losartan Intervention For End point reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study, 342 hypertensive patients with AF and LV hypertrophy were assigned to losartan- or atenolol-based therapy for 1,471 patient-years of follow-up. RESULTS: The primary composite end point (cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction) occurred in 36 patients in the losartan group versus 67 in the atenolol group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39 to 0.88, p = 0.009). Cardiovascular deaths occurred in 20 versus 38 patients in the losartan and atenolol groups, respectively (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.99, p = 0.048). Stroke occurred in 18 versus 38 patients (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97, p = 0.039), and myocardial infarction in 11 versus 8 patients (p = NS). Losartan-based treatment led to trends toward lower all-cause mortality (30 vs. 49, HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.06, p = 0.090) and fewer pacemaker implantations (5 vs. 15, p = 0.065), whereas hospitalization for heart failure took place in 15 versus 26 patients and sudden cardiac death in 9 versus 17, respectively (both p = NS). The benefit of losartan was greater in patients with AF than those with sinus rhythm for the primary composite end point (p = 0.019) and cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Losartan is more effective than atenolol-based therapy in reducing the risk of the primary composite end point of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as stroke and cardiovascular death in hypertensive patients with ECG LV hypertrophy and AF.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared to atenolol: the Losartan Intervention For End Point Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate whether different antihypertensive treatment regimens with similar blood pressure reduction have different effects on new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether angiotensin II receptor blockade is better than beta-blockade in preventing new-onset AF. METHODS: In the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study 9,193 hypertensive patients and patients with electrocardiogram-documented left ventricular hypertrophy were randomized to once-daily losartan- or atenolol-based antihypertensive therapy. Electrocardiograms were Minnesota coded centrally, and 8,851 patients without AF by electrocardiogram or history, who were thus at risk of developing AF, were followed for 4.8 +/- 1.0 years. RESULTS: New-onset AF occurred in 150 patients randomized to losartan versus 221 to atenolol (6.8 vs. 10.1 per 1,000 person-years; relative risk 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55 to 0.83, p < 0.001) despite similar blood pressure reduction. Patients receiving losartan tended to stay in sinus rhythm longer (1,809 +/- 225 vs. 1,709 +/- 254 days from baseline, p = 0.057) than those receiving atenolol. Moreover, patients with new-onset AF had two-, three- and fivefold increased rates, respectively, of cardiovascular events, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure. There were fewer composite end points (n = 31 vs. 51, hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.94, p = 0.03) and strokes (n = 19 vs. 38, hazard ratio = 0.49, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.86, p = 0.01) in patients who developed new-onset AF in the losartan compared to the atenolol treatment arm of the study. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis showed that losartan (21% risk reduction) and new-onset AF both independently predicted stroke even when adjusting for traditional risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel finding is that new-onset AF and associated stroke were significantly reduced by losartan- compared to atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment with similar blood pressure reduction.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

Aortic valve sclerosis relates to cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension (a LIFE substudy).

This study investigated whether aortic valve (AV) sclerosis was associated with traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and CV events in hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, as previously demonstrated in the general population. AV sclerosis was associated with several CV risk factors and predicted CV events independently of prevalent CV disease and traditional CV risk factors, including LV mass and ejection fraction.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Aortic valve sclerosis and albuminuria predict cardiovascular events independently in hypertension: a losartan intervention for endpoint-reduction in hypertension (LIFE) substudy.

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve (AV) sclerosis and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) are both markers of atherosclerosis. We aimed to investigate whether they predicted cardiovascular (CV) events independently in patients with hypertension and electrocardiographic left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. METHODS: After 2 weeks of placebo treatment, clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic variables were assessed in 960 hypertensive patients from the LIFE Echo substudy who had electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy. Morning urine albumin and creatinine were measured calculating UACR. The presence of AV sclerosis was defined as valve thickening or calcification. Fifteen patients with mild AV stenosis were excluded. The patients were followed for 60 +/- 4 months and the composite endpoint (CEP) of CV death, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal myocardial infarction was recorded. RESULTS: A value of UACR above the median value of 1.406 was associated with higher incidence of CEP and CV death in patients with AV sclerosis (CEP: 18.8% v 9.0% P < 0.05, CV death: 7.1% v 0.7% P < 0.01) and in patients without AV sclerosis (CEP: 14.0% v 4.9% P < 0.001, CV death: 5.1% v 1.1% P < 0.01). In Cox regression analysis, AV sclerosis predicted CEP (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.52, P < .05), but not CV death (HR = 1.30 [0.62 to 2.70], NS) independently of logUACR (HR = 1.70 and HR = 3.25, both P < .001). After adjusting for the Framingham Risk Score, CV disease, diabetes, smoking, and treatment allocation, AV sclerosis predicted CEP (HR = 1.5, P < .05) but not CV death (HR = 1.4, NS) independently of logUACR (HR = 1.2, P = .09 and HR = 1.94, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, AV sclerosis predicted CEP but not CV death independently of UACR after adjusting for CV risk factors and treatment allocation, indicating that AV sclerosis and UACR might be markers of different aspects of the atherosclerotic process.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension.

CONTEXT: Increased baseline left ventricular (LV) mass predicts cardiovascular (CV) complications of hypertension, but the relation between lower LV mass and outcome during treatment for hypertension is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reduction of LV mass during antihypertensive treatment modifies risk of major CV events independent of blood pressure change. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort substudy of the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) randomized clinical trial, conducted from 1995 to 2001. A total of 941 prospectively identified patients aged 55 to 80 years with essential hypertension and electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy had LV mass measured by echocardiography at enrollment in the LIFE trial and thereafter were followed up annually for a mean (SD) of 4.8 (1.0) years for CV events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite end point of CV death, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, and fatal or nonfatal stroke. RESULTS: The composite end point occurred in 104 patients (11%). The multivariable Cox regression model showed a strong association between lower in-treatment LV mass index and reduced rate of the composite CV end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 per 1-SD (25.3) decrease in LV mass index; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.94; P = .009) over and above that predicted by reduction in blood pressure. There were parallel associations between lower in-treatment LV mass index and lower CV mortality (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.82; P = .001), stroke (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; P = .02), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.17, P = .33), and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88, P = .002), independent of systolic blood pressure and assigned treatment. Results were confirmed in analyses adjusting for additional CV risk factors, electrocardiographic changes, or when only considering events after the first year of study treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with essential hypertension and baseline electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy, lower LV mass during antihypertensive treatment is associated with lower rates of clinical end points, additional to effects of blood pressure lowering and treatment modality.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan compared with atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial.

BACKGROUND: An echocardiographic substudy of the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial was designed to test the ability of losartan to reduce left ventricular (LV) mass more than atenolol. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 960 patients with essential hypertension and LV hypertrophy (LVH) on screening ECG were enrolled at centers in 7 countries and studied by echocardiography at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years' randomized therapy. Clinical examination and blinded readings of echocardiograms in 457 losartan-treated and 459 atenolol-treated participants with > or =1 follow-up measurement of LV mass index (LVMI) were used in an intention-to-treat analysis. Losartan-based therapy induced greater reduction in LVMI from baseline to the last available study than atenolol with adjustment for baseline LVMI and blood pressure and in-treatment pressure (-21.7+/-21.8 versus -17.7+/-19.6 g/m2; P=0.021). Greater LVMI reduction with losartan was observed in women and men, participants >65 or <65 years of age, and with mild or more severe baseline hypertrophy. The difference between treatment arms in LVH regression was due mainly to reduced concentricity of LV geometry in both groups and lesser increase in LV internal diameter in losartan-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive treatment with losartan, plus hydrochlorothiazide and other medications when needed for pressure control, resulted in greater LVH regression in patients with ECG LVH than conventional atenolol-based treatment. Thus, angiotensin receptor antagonism by losartan has superior efficacy for reversing LVH, a cardinal manifestation of hypertensive target organ damage.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

[Hypertension and heart disease].

Hypertension commonly leads to heart disease, in particular left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure and coronary artery disease. Left ventricular hypertrophy and coronary artery disease are both often subclinical diseases in hypertensives. Symptomatic coronary artery disease in hypertension may be due to atherosclerosis in epicardial arteries, microvascular dysfunction, reduced fibrinolytic capacity, or left ventricular hypertrophy; the latter is present in 20-50% of patients with mild to moderate and in up to 90% of patients with severe hypertension. Left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension is associated with a twofold increase in risk of myocardial infarction, sudden death and stroke, and a fourfold increase in risk of heart failure. While coronary artery disease is the most common cause of heart failure in men, hypertension and in particular untreated isolated systolic hypertension is the most common cause in women. Heart failure symptoms may be subtle in hypertension, like tiredness or reduced physical capacity. Echocardiography can reveal subclinical heart disease as well as serve as a guide to correct diagnosis and treatment.

Coronary Disease↗
PubMed2004

Relation of impaired left ventricular filling to systolic midwall mechanics in hypertensive patients with normal left ventricular systolic chamber function: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertensive left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy commonly have diastolic dysfunction with preserved LV ejection fraction. LV systolic midwall shortening (MWS) may be impaired in hypertensive patients with normal LV ejection fraction. However, it is unclear whether impaired LV filling is related to depressed systolic midwall mechanics. METHODS: Echocardiographic measures of LV diastolic filling and systolic performance were compared in 632 unmedicated patients with stage II or III hypertension and LV hypertrophy determined by electrocardiogram, with LV ejection fraction >55% and <2+ mitral regurgitation. RESULTS: Stress-corrected LV MWS, an index of myocardial contractility, was lower in patients with abnormal as opposed to normal LV filling patterns (98% +/- 12% vs 102% +/- 10%, P <.001) and in patients with prolonged as opposed to normal isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) (98% +/- 13% vs 101% +/- 12%, P =.014). Stress-corrected MWS was <85% of predicted levels in more patients with abnormal LV filling patterns (11.8% vs 6.3%) or with long IVRT (> or =105 msec) (34% vs 21%, both P <.05). In regression analyses, lower stress-corrected MWS and higher LV mass were independent correlates of longer IVRT, while lower stress-corrected MWS was the only independent correlate of prolonged mitral valve deceleration time (P =.017). Higher LV mass had strong, statistically independent relationships to longer IVRT (by 0.3 g/msec) and decreased stress-corrected MWS (by 0.5 g/%; both P <.0001), independent of body size and age. CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate hypertension and target organ damage who have normal LV ejection fraction, impaired early diastolic LV relaxation (abnormal E/A ratio, prolonged IVRT and deceleration time) is associated with impaired LV systolic midwall mechanics independent of higher LV mass.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Blood pressure measurements by the Keito machine. Evaluation versus office blood pressure by physicians.

BACKGROUND: The Keito machine offers automatic measurements of blood pressure (BP), height and weight on insertion of coins and has been introduced in pharmacies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study comparing automatic BP measurements by the Keito machine to office BP measurements by physicians. METHODS: Patients scheduled for pre-catheterisation screening participated in the study. Their BP was first measured using the Keito machine, then by physicians. Office BP was recorded as the last of three consecutive BP measurements recorded with one-min intervals after a five-min rest in the sitting position. In a sub-study BP was measured simultaneously during the Keito measurement by a physician. RESULTS: In 390 consecutive patients average BP was significantly lower with the Keito machine compared to office BP measurements made by the physicians (136/75+/-19/8 mmHg versus 141/79+/-21/10 mmHg, both p<0.001). The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.56 (p<0.001) for systolic BP (SBP) and 0.53 (p<0.001) for diastolic BP (DBP). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference (+/-2 SD) for SBP and DBP of -5 (+/-37) and -4 (+/-17) mmHg, respectively. When defining hypertension (HT) as office SBP> or =140 and/or DBP> or =90 mmHg, the Keito method diagnosed 83% of the systolic and 62% of the diastolic hypertensive population correctly. The classification of systolic and diastolic normotensive was correct in 61% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Agreement between office and Keito BP is poor. The Keito machine underestimates SBP on average by 5 mmHg and DBP by 4 mmHg, which may be of significance for diagnosing HT and starting anti-hypertensive therapy. However, the difference can be much larger in individual patients. Therefore, the Keito machine cannot be recommended for medical screening of HT or as a replacement for follow-up by physicians.

Adult↗