PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Evert Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Evert Smith.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Orthopaedic surgery. Joint effort.

Hip replacement surgery is becoming increasingly specialised and evidence shows that, particularly in revision, surgery is best done by specialists. An audit of GPs suggests great variation in referral practice, with one-third prepared to refer to a 'generalist' orthopaedic surgeon. GPs need better communication with hospitals and knowledge of where specialists are available.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery.

Three femoral (Paprosky, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [AAOS], and Endo-Klinik) and 2 acetabular (Paprosky, AAOS) bone stock loss classification systems were evaluated for reliability. Four observers (2 consultants, 2 registrars) graded the bone loss in 25 patients using preoperative radiographs. Grading was repeated after a minimum of 2 weeks. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was investigated. The kappa statistic was used to assess levels of agreement. Intraobserver agreement ranged from poor to good. Interobserver agreement ranged from fair to moderate. The validity of the Paprosky classification system was evaluated, comparing preoperative bone stock loss assessment with intraoperative findings. Agreement levels of moderate (femoral classification system) to good (acetabular classification system) were achieved. Bone stock loss classification systems are shown to be inconsistent and unreliable.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

A new sign of inappropriate lower back pain.

The treatment of lower back pain constitutes a major problem for orthopaedic surgeons. Identifying the patients who have a non-organic component to their lower back pain is often difficult. Waddell et al. (Waddell G, McCulloch HA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Non-organic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine 1980; 5: 117-25) devised a set of five physical signs to assist in determining this. These signs are time consuming and can be difficult to interpret. We have developed a sign that is simple, quick and easy to perform. In a set of 94 patients, we have compared our sign with Waddell's signs. Our sign has a highly significant correlation with Waddell's signs (chi2 = 55.093, P < 0.001), and thus we would suggest it as an accurate alternative to Waddell's signs.

Adult↗