PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F A Allaërt

Publications and source records attributed to F A Allaërt.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Telemedicine: responsibilities and contractual framework.

The rapid growth of telemedicine has created a need for a definition of the responsibilities of the doctors involved. These responsibilities must be analyzed according the tort of negligence as a function of the level of competence of each doctor, their unequal access to the relevant information and their command of the telemedicine system. This analysis leads on to a study of the legal value of the electronic records kept and the ways in which the doctors are remunerated.

Clinical Competence↗

Legal requirements for tele-assistance and tele-medicine.

In dealing with tele-medicine including tele-diagnosis and tele-assistance, the legal and ethical components of medical liability must be satisfied. With medical tele-diagnosis, the spreading of medical liability is the main risk. How can we ensure a clear identification of the medical liabilities involved in cases where damage occurs? From a legal point of view, the spreading of the liability is not allowed and the use of tele-diagnosis must ensure a total transparence. As we cannot presently estimate the cost of a medical act based on the cost of the image records and the cost of image interpretation, it is necessary to establish a contract. Today the most convenient contract is similar to the contract between laboratories which implies that the liability is on the practitioner who has received the sample. In the future, other legal obligations may appear as tele-diagnosis develops. Indeed, with the increase in reliability in tele-diagnosis it could become a part of the medical obligation to use the latest technology. However, the excessive use of tele-assistance, when there is neither emergency nor medical isolation, is dangerous because it may affect the integrity and the quality of the traditional medical act. In general, medical practice without any clinical examination of the patient is contrary to medical ethics.

Ethics, Medical↗

Decision support system and medical liability.

Expert systems, which are going to be an essential tool in Medicine, are evolving in terms of sophistication of both knowledge representation and types of reasoning models used. The more efficient they are, the more often they will be used and professional liability will be involved. So after giving a short survey of configuration and working of expert systems, the authors will study the liabilities of people building and the using expert systems regarding some various dysfunctions. Of course the expert systems have to be considered only for human support and they should not possess any authority themselves, therefore the doctors must keep in mind that it is their own responsibility and as such keep their judgment and criticism. However other professionals could be involved, if they have participated in the building of expert systems. The different liabilities and the burden of proof are discussed according to some possible dysfunctions. In any case the final proof is inside the expert system by itself through re-computation of data.

Expert Systems↗