PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Avanzini

Publications and source records attributed to F Avanzini.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Long-term prognostic impact of repeated measurements over 1 year of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure in the elderly.

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) have been identified in western industrialized countries as major predictors of cardiovascular events in the elderly on the basis of measurements taken at a single visit. Considering the wide variability of blood pressure (BP) in older people, this study set out to assess the prognostic significance of measurements of SBP and PP taken over several months according to a monitoring scheme mimicking routine care. A total of 444 Italian general practitioners enrolled a cohort of 3858 unselected elderly outpatients and followed them up for 10 years. BP was recorded at recruitment, 1 week later and at quarterly visits during the first year. The average BP of these six visits was used to define the patient's BP status. During the 10-year follow-up, 1561 participants died, 709 from cardiovascular diseases. Proportional hazard regression analysis, adjusted for all main prognostic factors including antihypertensive treatment, showed that for each 10-mmHg increment in SBP and PP there were, respectively, 5 and 9% increases in risk for total mortality (TM) and 9 and 13% increases in risk for cardiovascular mortality (CVM) (all P < 0.01). However, including both SBP and PP in the model, only PP showed an independent, significant relationship with TM and CVM. In conclusion, prognostic information based on repeated measurements of PP is stronger than that given by SBP and consequently should be recommended in the definition of cardiovascular risk in the elderly.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Knowledge and perception of cardiovascular risk factors in Africa South of the Sahara].

The objectives of our study were to evaluate the perception and the knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) by the population and their management by health care workers (HCW) in Burkina Faso. The survey targeted specific socio-professional groups representative of Burkina Faso. The survey team administrated a questionnaire and measured some constants. The sampling method was empiric selection by quotas. The sample was composed of 2,000 subjects: 1,073 men, 927 women, 1,800 represents of the general population and 200 HCW. Of 1,800 non health workers, 1,475 had ever heard about hypertension. The representation of hypertension as "a disease" decreased with instruction level while its reprentation "a risk factor" increased with instruction level (p < 0.001). The main sources of information on CVRF were talks with parents and friends, radio broadcasting and discussion with HCW. One hundred and forty of 200 HCW defined hypertension as an elevation of blood pressure, mainly systolic (130 cases) according to WHO criteria. Hypertension was classified after alcohol, tobacco smoking, obesity as the fourth CVRF. One hundred and seventy seven of 302 cases of hypertension were previously unknown: 97 of the 125 old cases were treated and 74 had not normal blood pressure levels. Hypertension and other CVRF are not well-known in Burkina Faso population and are not well-managed by HCW. Political decision makers and donor institutions should pay more attention on the public health problem represented by hypertension and other CVRF in developing countries because of they are not communicable.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Assessment of absolute risk of death after myocardial infarction by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: GISSI-Prevenzione mortality risk chart.

AIMS: To present and discuss a comprehensive and ready to use prediction model of risk of death after myocardial infarction based on the very recently concluded follow-up of the large GISSI-Prevenzione cohort and on the integrated evaluation of different categories of risk factors: those that are non-modifiable, and those related to lifestyles, co-morbidity, background, and other conventional clinical complications produced by the index myocardial infarction. METHODS: The 11-324 men and women recruited in the study within 3 months from their index myocardial infarction have been followed-up to 4 years. The following risk factors have been used in a Cox proportional hazards model: non-modifiable risk factors: age and sex; complications after myocardial infarction: indicators of left ventricular dysfunction (signs or symptoms of acute left ventricular failure during hospitalization, ejection fraction, NYHA class and extent of ventricular asynergy at echocardiography), indicators of electrical instability (number of premature ventricular beats per hour, sustained or repetitive arrhythmias during 24-h Holter monitoring), indicators of residual ischaemia (spontaneous angina pectoris after myocardial infarction, Canadian Angina Classification class, and exercise testing results); cardiovascular risk factors: smoking habits, history of diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, blood total and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, fibrinogen, leukocytes count, intermittent claudication, and heart rate. Multiple regression modelling was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Generalizability of the models was assessed through cross validation and bootstrapping techniques. POPULATION AND RESULTS: During the 4 years of follow-up, a total of 1071 patients died. Age and left ventricular dysfunction were the most relevant predictors of death. Because of pharmacological treatments, total blood cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure values were not significantly associated with prognosis. Sex-specific prediction equations were formulated to predict risk of death according to age, simple indicators of left ventricular dysfunction, electrical instability, and residual ischaemia along with the following cardiovascular risk factors: smoking habits, history of diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, blood HDL cholesterol, fibrinogen, leukocyte count, intermittent claudication, and heart rate. The predictive models produced on the basis of information available in the routine conditions of clinical care after myocardial infarction provide ready to use and highly discriminant criteria to guide secondary prevention strategies. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Besides documenting what should be the preferred and practicable focus of clinical attention for today's patients, the experience of GISSI-Prevenzione suggests that periodically and prospectively collected databases on naturalistic' cohorts could be an important option for updating and verifying the impact of guidelines, which should incorporate the different components of the complex profile of cardiovascular risk. The GISSI Prevenzione risk function is a simple tool to predict risk of death and to improve clinical management of subjects with recent myocardial infarction. The use of predictive risk algorithms can favour the shift from medical logic, based on the treatment of single risk factors, to one centred on the patient as a whole as well as the tailoring of medical interventions according to patients' overall risk.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

PTX3, A prototypical long pentraxin, is an early indicator of acute myocardial infarction in humans.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is an important component of ischemic heart disease. PTX3 is a long pentraxin whose expression is induced by cytokines in endothelial cells, mononuclear phagocytes, and myocardium. The possibility that PTX3 is altered in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not yet been tested. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood samples were collected from 37 patients admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) with symptoms of AMI. PTX3 plasma concentrations, as measured by ELISA, higher than the mean+2 SD of age-matched controls (2.01 ng/mL) were found in 27 patients within the first 24 hours of CCU admission. PTX3 peaked at 7.5 hours after CCU admission, and mean peak concentration was 6.94+/-11.26 ng/mL. Plasma concentrations of PTX3 returned to normal in all but 3 patients at hospital discharge and were unrelated to AMI site or extent, Killip class at entry, hours from symptom onset, and thrombolysis. C-reactive protein peaked in plasma at 24 hours after CCU admission, much later than PTX3 (P<0.001). Patients >64 years old and women had significantly higher PTX3 concentrations at 24 hours (P<0.05). PTX3 was detected by immunohistochemistry in normal but not in necrotic myocytes. CONCLUSIONS: PTX3 is present in the intact myocardium, increases in the blood of patients with AMI, and disappears from damaged myocytes. We suggest that PTX3 is an early indicator of myocyte irreversible injury in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Effects of low-dose aspirin on clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients. Collaborative Group of the Primary Prevention Project (PPP)--Hypertension study.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs may affect blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive patients receiving drug treatment, but data on the effects of low-dose aspirin are scanty. This study assessed the effects of chronic treatment with low doses of aspirin (100 mg/day) on clinic and ambulatory systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP in hypertensives on chronic, stable antihypertensive therapy. The study was conducted in the framework of the Primary Prevention Project (PPP), a randomized, controlled factorial trial on the preventive effect of aspirin or vitamin E in people with one or more cardiovascular risk factors. Fifteen Italian hypertension units studied 142 hypertensive patients (76 men, 66 women; mean age 59 +/- 5.9 years) treated with different antihypertensive drugs: 71 patients were randomized to aspirin and 71 served as controls. All patients underwent a clinic BP evaluation with an automatic sphygmomanometer and a 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, at baseline and after 3 months of aspirin treatment. At the end of the study the changes in clinic SBP and DBP were not statistically different in treated and untreated subjects. Ambulatory SBP and DBP after 3 months of aspirin treatment were similar to baseline: deltaSBP -0.5 mmHg (95% confidence intervals [CI] from -1.9 to +2.9 mm Hg) and deltaDBP -1.1 mm Hg (95% CI from -2.5 to +0.3 mm Hg). The pattern was similar in the control group. No interaction was found between aspirin and the most used antihypertensive drug classes (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists). Despite the relatively small sample size our results seem to exclude any significant influence of low-dose aspirin on BP control in hypertensives under treatment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Effects of vitamin E on clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients. Collaborative Group of the Primary Prevention Project (PPP)--Hypertension study.

A randomized controlled open trial studied the effect of vitamin E supplementation (300 mg/day) on clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in 142 treated hypertensive patients. After 12 weeks, clinic BP decreased whether or not patients were randomized to vitamin E. Ambulatory BP showed no change in systolic BP and a small decrease in diastolic BP (-1.6 mm Hg, 95% confidence intervals from -2.8 to -0.4 mm Hg), approaching statistical significance in comparison to the control group (P = .06). Vitamin E supplementation thus seems to have no clinically relevant effect on BP in hypertensive patients already under controlled treatment.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1999

The long-term prognostic significance of repeated blood pressure measurements in the elderly: SPAA (Studio sulla Pressione Arteriosa nell'Anziano) 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In young and middle-aged people, both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure have a continuous, strong, and independent relationship with subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. These relationships are not well documented in older people and, until now, studies in the elderly do not provide homogeneous results on the importance of DBP compared with SBP as a cardiovascular risk factor. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether SBP and DBP are independent indicators of mortality risk in the elderly. DESIGN: An observational prospective cohort study to analyze the long-term prognostic significance of repeated SBP and DBP measurements in the elderly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 3858 outpatients 65 years or older (mean age [SD], 72.9 [4.9] years, 43.5% men) were selected randomly by 444 Italian National Health Service general practitioners in 1983. The population was followed up for 10 years. Crude and adjusted incidence rates of total and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed for classes of SBP and DBP based on the values recorded at the 2 initial visits 1 week apart and those measured during the first 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: During the 10-year follow-up, 74 patients (1.9%) were lost to follow-up and 1561 (41.3%) died, 709 (45.4% of all deaths) from cardiovascular causes. A positive continuous, graded, strong, and independent association was observed with both total (P<.001) and cardiovascular (P<.001) mortality for SBP but not for DBP. The pattern was similar in both sexes, in persons younger and older than 75 years, regardless of preexisting cardiovascular diseases, and whether they had been receiving antihypertensive treatment at baseline. There was no J-shaped mortality curve in the subjects with the lowest SBP and DBP. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that SBP, but not DBP, is a strong, positive, continuous, independent indicator of mortality risk in the elderly and should be stressed much more than DBP in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in this age group.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Control of hypertension in Italy: results of the "Study on Antihypertensive Treatment in General Practice (STAP)". Physicians Taking Part in STAP.

BACKGROUND: Various epidemiological surveys from different countries have documented the unsatisfactory control of arterial hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess the current status of treatment and control of hypertension in Italy. METHODS: A random sample of general practitioners (GP) working in several Aziende Sanitarie Locali (Local health offices-ASL) throughout Italy were invited to take part in the study. Each doctor had to recruit a random sample of 15-20 hypertensive patients receiving antihypertensive drugs among those attending his/her office for any reason. A standard medical history, specifically oriented to hypertension and its pharmacological treatment, was taken for each patient. Three blood pressure (BP) measurements were made, with the patient seated for at least 5 minutes, using an accurate automatic device (A&D UA-732), and the mean was taken as each patient's BP. RESULTS: A total of 73 GPs (17% of the invited sample), working in 14 Italian ASL (six in the north of the country, four in the center and four in the south and islands), agreed to participate in the study. They recruited an average of 17 patients each, for a total of 1204 hypertensive subjects (663 women and 541 men) 633 of whom were 65 years old or more, mean age 64 +/- 11 years, range 25-94 years. More than half (56%) had been taking antihypertensive drugs for at least five years; 42% were taking one drug, 40% two, 16% three and 2% four drugs. Respectively, 63% and 23% had systolic BP (SBP) > or = 140 and > or = 160 mmHg; 28% and 14% had diastolic BP (DBP) > or = 90 and 95 mmHg. In 71%, BP was < 160/95 mmHg, but only 33% had BP lower than 140/90 mmHg. BP control was similar in males and females, but worse in the elderly. Nine percent of patients complained of symptomatic side effects, usually mild. Only 8% admitted to poor compliance with the antihypertensive therapy, and their BP was significantly less well controlled. CONCLUSIONS: Control of BP in patients receiving antihypertensive drugs is still far from optimal in Italy, just as in other countries. This situation seems more related to the fact that doctors do not tackle the problem aggressively, than to the patients' degree of compliance with therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Use of beta-blocking agents in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: a case for evidence-based medicine? GISSI experience, 1984-1993. The Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulla Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) Investigators.

AIMS: Many clinical trials conducted in the 1970s and early 1980s have shown that the long-term use of beta-blockers after an acute myocardial infarction significantly reduces mortality and reinfarction rates. This study assessed the impact of these findings in clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the beta-blocker prescriptions for 36,817 patients with acute myocardial infarction included in three large randomized clinical trials (Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulla Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico--GISSI, 1, 2, and 3), conducted by a highly representative sample (about 75%) of Italian coronary care units in 1984-85, 1988-89 and 1991-93. RESULTS: The prescription of beta-blockers at discharge increased gradually from 8.5% in 1984-85 to 25.0% in 1988-89 and to 31.4% in 1991-93. A similar trend was apparent for beta-blocker prescriptions 6 months after acute myocardial infarction. The strongest predictors of beta-blocker prescription are the presence of post-infarctual angina and a history of arterial hypertension. Besides the classical contraindications, advanced age, transitory cardiac failure or arrhythmias in the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction are important predictors of nonprescription. CONCLUSION: The use of beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction in Italy has increased more than three-fold in the last decade, but they are still prescribed to too few patients, especially those at higher risk, for whom the expected benefit is greater.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Trends and determinants of calcium antagonist usage after acute myocardial infarction (the GISSI experience).

In the last decade, several clinical trials in patients with, or recovering from, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have evaluated the role of calcium antagonists in affecting patients' prognosis. Results have been disparate, with evidence of possible harm, no effect, or some benefit, depending on the agent used. We evaluated how the evidence from these trials has influenced the pattern of prescription of calcium antagonists and assessed the important determinants of use of these agents in patients after AMI. We analyzed retrospectively the prescription of calcium antagonists at discharge in all patients recovering from AMI enrolled in 3 large randomized clinical trials (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell' Infarto-1 [GISSI-1], GISSI-2, and GISSI-3) during the last 10 years. A progressive decrease in prescriptions for calcium antagonists was evident, from 47.2% in GISSI-1 to 35.1% in GISSI-2 to 19.0% in GISSI-3 (p<0.001). The presence of post AMI angina, history of hypertension, and occurrence of reinfarction were associated with a higher usage of calcium antagonists, whereas the use of beta blockers at discharge was a major independent negative determinant. Use of calcium antagonists for secondary prevention after AMI (i.e., without specific clinical indications for their use) decreased by approximately 60% (from 26.1% to 10.3%). The data indicate that the usage of calcium antagonists in GISSI studies has been strongly affected by the results of other large multicenter trials evaluating calcium antagonists. These agents are now prescribed in patients after AMI almost exclusively in the presence of specific indications such as systemic hypertension or angina.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

How informed general practitioners manage mild hypertension: a survey of readers of drug bulletins in 7 countries. International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB).

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether general practitioners (GP) who are readers of independent drug bulletins can be used as an international epidemiological observatory of the criteria adopted by "well informed" doctors in various countries in the management of mild hypertension. DESIGN: Questionnaire study of GPs' diagnostic criteria for mild hypertension, routine investigation and management of patients with this diagnosis. PARTICIPANTS: 206 GPs readers of independent drug bulletins in 7 countries, comprising 95 known systematic readers of a local bulletin and 111 randomly selected regular subscribers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate to the questionnaire. Diagnostic criteria, routine investigations, and treatment used for patients with mild hypertension. RESULTS: The study required two months for planning and implementation. Four countries out of eleven had a response rate < or = 50% and were excluded; the frequency of responses from other countries was 69%. The average diastolic blood pressure (DBP) considered diagnostic of mild hypertension range from 94 mm Hg (lower threshold) to 106 (upper threshold). A minority (17%) of GPs routinely request the minimum recommended laboratory tests to assess patients. GPs routinely advise non-drug measures before starting a drug. Most would not start drug treatment in patients without other risk factors and a DBP below 100 mmHg. The top first choice drugs were diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor blockers. Half of the doctors were able to quote some published guide to the management of mild hypertension, and 18% cited a relevant trial. Attitudes in diagnosing and treating mild hypertension differed widely between GPs and countries. CONCLUSIONS: GP readers of drug bulletins can be used quickly and inexpensively to assess the extent to which recommended diagnostic and therapeutic practices are accepted by "well informed" doctors. The results suggest that attitudes in managing mild hypertension vary widely among GPs and countries and differ remarkably from the recommendations of published guidelines.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Prognostic value of a history of hypertension in 11,483 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. GISSI-2 Investigators. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della, Sopravvivena nell'Infarto Miocardico.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of a history of hypertension in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with thrombolysis. DESIGN: Retrospective adjusted analysis of outcome data of patients with AMI randomly allocated to treatment in a controlled study of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin. SETTING: A highly representative sample (about 90%) of Italian Coronary Care Units. PATIENTS: Patients with (n = 3306) and without (n = 7406) a history of treated hypertension. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality during hospital stay and the next 6 months. RESULTS: Patients with a history of hypertension had a significantly higher mortality, both in hospital and during the next 6 months. The difference persisted also after a multivariate analysis including all major prognostic factors for in-hospital and 6-month mortality, respectively. Left ventricular failure and recurrent ischaemic events (angina and re-infarction) were also significantly more frequent in hypertensives both during their hospital stay and during follow-up study. CONCLUSIONS: A history of hypertension is a negative independent prognostic factor after acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis.

Aged↗