PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F B Horak

Publications and source records attributed to F B Horak.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Abnormal proprioceptive-motor integration contributes to hypometric postural responses of subjects with Parkinson's disease.

Subjects with Parkinson's disease exhibit abnormally short compensatory steps in response to external postural perturbations. We examined whether: (1) Parkinson's disease subjects exhibit short compensatory steps due to abnormal central proprioceptive-motor integration, (2) this proprioceptive-motor deficit can be overcome by visual-motor neural circuits using visual targets, (3) the proprioceptive-motor deficit relates to the severity of Parkinson's disease, and (4) the dysfunction of central dopaminergic circuits contributes to the Parkinson's disease subjects' proprioceptive-motor deficit. Ten Parkinson's disease subjects and 10 matched control subjects performed compensatory steps in response to backward surface translations in five conditions: with eyes closed, with eyes open, to a remembered visual target, to a target without seeing their legs, and to a target while seeing their legs. Parkinson's disease subjects were separated into a moderate group and a severe group based on scores from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and were tested off and on their dopamine medication. Parkinson's disease subjects exhibited shorter compensatory steps than did the control subjects, but all subjects increased their step length when stepping to targets. Compared with the other subject groups, the severe Parkinson's disease subjects made larger accuracy errors when stepping to targets, and the severe Parkinson's disease subjects' step accuracy worsened the most when they were unable to see their legs. Thus, Parkinson's disease subjects exhibited short compensatory steps due to abnormal proprioceptive-motor integration and used visual input to take longer compensatory steps when a target was provided. In severe Parkinson's disease subjects, however, visual input does not fully compensate because, even with a target and unobstructed vision, they still exhibited poor step accuracy. Medication did not consistently improve the length and accuracy of the Parkinson's disease subjects' compensatory steps, suggesting that degeneration of dopamine circuits within the basal ganglia is not responsible for the proprioceptive-motor deficit that degrades compensatory steps in Parkinson's disease subjects.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Multiple balance tests improve the assessment of postural stability in subjects with Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Clinicians often base the implementation of therapies on the presence of postural instability in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD). These decisions are frequently based on the pull test from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). We sought to determine whether combining the pull test, the one-leg stance test, the functional reach test, and UPDRS items 27-29 (arise from chair, posture, and gait) predicts balance confidence and falling better than any test alone. METHODS: The study included 67 subjects with PD. Subjects performed the one-leg stance test, the functional reach test, and the UPDRS motor exam. Subjects also responded to the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale and reported how many times they fell during the previous year. Regression models determined the combination of tests that optimally predicted mean ABC scores or categorised fall frequency. RESULTS: When all tests were included in a stepwise linear regression, only gait (UPDRS item 29), the pull test (UPDRS item 30), and the one-leg stance test, in combination, represented significant predictor variables for mean ABC scores (r2 = 0.51). A multinomial logistic regression model including the one-leg stance test and gait represented the model with the fewest significant predictor variables that correctly identified the most subjects as fallers or non-fallers (85% of subjects were correctly identified). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple balance tests (including the one-leg stance test, and the gait and pull test items of the UPDRS) that assess different types of postural stress provide an optimal assessment of postural stability in subjects with PD.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2006

Somatosensory influence on postural response to galvanic vestibular stimulation.

We investigated how postural responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation were affected by standing on a translating support surface and by somatosensory loss due to diabetic neuropathy. We tested the hypothesis that an unstable surface and somatosensory loss can result in an increase of vestibulospinal sensitivity. Bipolar galvanic vestibular stimulation was applied to subjects who were standing on a force platform, either on a hard, stationary surface or during a backward platform translation (9 cm, 4.2 cm/s). The intensity of the galvanic stimulus was varied from 0.25 to 1 mA. The amplitude of the peak body CoP displacement in response to the galvanic stimulus was plotted as a function of stimulus intensity for each individual. A larger increase in CoP displacement to a given increase in galvanic current was interpreted as an increase of vestibulospinal sensitivity. Subjects with somatosensory loss in the feet due to diabetes showed higher vestibulospinal sensitivity than healthy subjects when tested on a stationary support surface. Control subjects and patients with somatosensory loss standing on translating surface also showed increased galvanic response gains compared to stance on a stationary surface. The severity of the somatosensory loss in the feet correlated with the increased postural sensitivity to galvanic vestibular stimulation. These results showed that postural responses to galvanic vestibular stimulus were modified by somatosensory information from the surface. Somatosensory loss due to diabetic neuropathy and alteration of somatosensory input during stance on translating support surface resulted in increased vestibulospinal sensitivity.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Feedback equilibrium control during human standing.

Equilibrium maintenance during standing in humans was investigated with a 3-joint (ankle, knee and hip) sagittal model of body movement. The experimental paradigm consisted of sudden perturbations of humans in quiet stance by backward displacements of the support platform. Data analysis was performed using eigenvectors of motion equation. The results supported three conclusions. First, independent feedback control of movements along eigenvectors (eigenmovements) can adequately describe human postural responses to stance perturbations. This conclusion is consistent with previous observations (Alexandrov et al., 2001b) that these same eigenmovements are also independently controlled in a feed-forward manner during voluntary upper-trunk bending. Second, independent feedback control of each eigenmovement is sufficient to provide its stability. Third, the feedback loop in each eigenmovement can be modeled as a linear visco-elastic spring with delay. Visco-elastic parameters and time-delay values result from the combined contribution of passive visco-elastic mechanisms and sensory systems of different modalities.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Effects of light fingertip touch on postural responses in subjects with diabetic neuropathy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential benefits from lightly touching an external supporting device on automatic postural responses to support surface translations, in subjects with profound sensory neuropathy in the feet due to diabetes mellitus (DM-PN). METHODS: Eight subjects with DM-PN and 10 age matched controls were tested under randomly ordered conditions of no fingertip touch (NT), light touch (LT; <1 N), and heavy touch (HT, as needed) of a stationary touch plate, during three backward translation velocities of the support surface at 10, 20, and 30 cm/s. Dependent variables included response latencies, CoP velocity, and the slope of the relation between centre of pressure (CoP) velocity and translation velocity as a measure of response scaling. RESULTS: Postural response latencies were significantly longer and scaling of initial response magnitude in proportion to translation velocity was significantly smaller in the DM-PN subjects compared to the control subjects. LT had no significant effect on response latencies of the DM-PN patients. Fingertip touch increased the slope of the scaling of postural response magnitude in both groups. However, DM-PN subjects had to use HT to improve response scaling, whereas control subjects improved scaling with LT as well as HT. LT significantly increased rightward CoP velocity towards the touch plate in all subjects. CONCLUSIONS: LT did not reduce the latency or improve the scaling of automatic postural responses in subjects with peripheral neuropathy. The major effect of LT on the automatic postural responses of the DM-PN subjects was in increasing CoP velocity towards the side of the supporting device. HT in neuropathy subjects and LT in age matched control subjects increased the sensitivity of initial postural response scaling, suggesting that somatosensory substitution from a cane in the hand could be used to improve the magnitude of medium latency postural responses to slips and trips.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Contributions of altered sensation and feedback responses to changes in coordination of postural control due to aging.

We used multivariate kinematics and joint torque measurements during dynamic posturography to determine the relative contributions of changes in overall control gain, relative weighting of sensors, and noise-like effects on posture control in the elderly. Our results show that sway coordination and amplitude both change with age, but that changes in overall feedback gains do not explain these differences. We propose that increased sway of elderly subjects in platform sway-referenced conditions is due to sensory noise or decreased ability to detect small motions of the platform, while increased sway during visual sway-referencing is due to re-weighting of the various sensors.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Effects of deep brain stimulation and levodopa on postural sway in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify postural sway in subjects with Parkinson's disease and elderly controls, and determine the effects of Parkinson's disease, deep brain stimulation, levodopa, and their interactions on postural control during quiet stance. METHODS: Centre of foot pressure (CoP) displacement under each foot was measured during three 60 s trials of quiet stance with eyes open in 11 controls and six patients with Parkinson's disease. Subjects with Parkinson's disease were tested in four treatment conditions: off both deep brain stimulation and levodopa (off condition); on deep brain stimulation; on levodopa; and on both deep brain stimulation and levodopa. The variables extracted from CoP included: root mean square distance (rms), mean velocity, 95% power frequency (f(95%)), area of the 95% confidence ellipse (ellipse area), direction of its major axis (mdir), and postural asymmetry between the feet. RESULTS: rms and area of postural sway were larger than normal in subjects with Parkinson's disease in the off condition, increased further with levodopa, and significantly decreased with deep brain stimulation. Mean velocity and f(95%) were also larger than normal but were restored to normal by all treatments, especially by deep brain stimulation. The combined effect of deep brain stimulation and levodopa resulted in a postural sway that was an average of the effect of each treatment individually. Levodopa increased sway more in the mediolateral than in the anterior-posterior direction. Subjects with Parkinson's disease had asymmetrical mean velocity and f(95%) between the feet, and this asymmetry increased with levodopa but decreased with deep brain stimulation. The f(95%) of the CoP correlated with tremor, posture, and gait subcomponents of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with Parkinson's disease have abnormal postural sway in stance. Treatment with levodopa increases postural sway abnormalities, whereas treatment with deep brain stimulation improves postural sway. Quantitative evaluation of static posturography may be a useful adjunct to clinical measures in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Podokinetic after-rotation following unilateral and bilateral podokinetic stimulation.

Previous studies demonstrated an aftereffect of walking on a rotating treadmill, involving inadvertent circular navigation with eyes closed [podokinetic after-rotation (PKAR)]. We compared PKAR following unilateral and bilateral podokinetic (PK) stimulation to determine whether the left and right legs could be independently adapted. Each subject performed two sessions of PK stimulation, stepping in place with one foot on either side of the axis of a rotating disk. Subjects experienced bilateral stimulation (i.e., both left and right feet stepped on the rotating disk) in one session and unilateral stimulation (i.e., the left foot stepped on the rotating disk and the right foot stepped on a stationary surface) in the other. Following stimulation, we recorded foot lift-off and touchdown times and pelvic angular velocity while subjects stepped in place on a stationary surface. PKAR velocity following unilateral stimulation was lower than that following bilateral stimulation. Following bilateral stimulation, pelvic rotation was in the counterclockwise (CCW) direction during single-limb support on both the left and right sides. Immediately following left unilateral stimulation, subjects demonstrated CCW pelvic rotation during left single-limb support but not during right single-limb support. Across the first 13 strides, the difference between left and right sides diminished; pelvic angular velocity was then CCW during single-limb support on both sides. This suggests that both the adapted left and the unadapted right limb influenced the final PKAR response with information from the two limbs being integrated over the first few strides.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2002

Transfer of podokinetic adaptation from stepping to hopping.

Following stepping in-place on the surface of a rotating circular treadmill, a subject attempting to step in-place or walk in a straight line across the floor without vision will rotate relative to space. This adaptation, termed podokinetic after-rotation (PKAR), transfers to backward walking following forward walking on the rotating disk. We asked whether adaptation obtained during stepping in-place on the rotating disk would transfer to hopping on both feet. We hypothesized that subjects would demonstrate PKAR during both hopping and stepping, adding support to the hypothesis that PKAR is a centrally mediated adaptation of general locomotor trajectory that is not specific to the form of locomotion used while on the rotating disk. Subjects demonstrated PKAR during both hopping and stepping after stepping in-place on the rotating disk. The time courses of PKAR during hopping and stepping were similar, although the angular velocity amplitude of PKAR was lower in hopping than in stepping. This difference in amplitude suggests an incomplete transfer of PKAR.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

Postural responses to combinations of head and body displacements: vestibular-somatosensory interactions.

Postural responses to head displacements are triggered by the vestibular system; responses to body displacements are triggered by the somatosensory system. We examined the interaction of responses to combinations of head and support surface perturbations. Head displacements were always in the opposite direction of body displacements. The time between head and support surface perturbations was varied. We measured amplitude and latency of gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior EMGs for various head backward/body forward and head forward/body backward displacement combinations. These responses were compared to head-only or body-only displacement trials, which served as controls. Relative to controls, the latency of somatosensory-evoked responses to body displacement was longer and vestibular-evoked responses were absent or of low amplitude for combinations where head and support surface perturbations were presented closely in time (10-50 ms apart). These results illustrate complex integration of vestibular and somatosensory information, suggesting that the vestibulospinal and somatosensory-spinal pathways are not two isolated systems independently driving motor neurons. Rather, these pathways may influence one another at premotoneuronal levels where common circuitry may be shared by both systems.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture?

In this study, we examined flexibility in postural coordination by inducing transitions between postural patterns. Previous work demonstrated that the postural control system produces two task-specific postural patterns as a function of the frequency of support surface translation. For slow translation frequencies (<0.5 Hz), subjects ride on the platform reminiscent of upright stance (ride pattern), and for fast frequencies (> or =0.75 Hz) subjects actively fixed the head and trunk in space (head fixed pattern) during anterior-posterior platform motion. To study the adaptation of the postural control system, we had subjects stand on a support surface undergoing increases (from 0.2 to 1.0 Hz in 0.1-Hz steps) and decreases (from 1.0 to 0.2 Hz in 0.1-Hz steps) in translation frequency with the eyes open and closed. Kinematic measures of sagittal plane body motion revealed a gradual transition between these two postural patterns as a function of frequency scaling. In both the increasing and decreasing frequency conditions with visual input, center of mass displacements gradually decreased and increased, respectively, whereas upper-trunk (and head) displacement decreased gradually within the ride pattern until a head fixed pattern was observed without any significant changes in displacement for translation frequencies at and above 0.6 Hz. Without visual input, the scaling of the ride pattern was similar except the transition to the head fixed pattern never emerged with increasing frequency; instead, a less stable pattern exhibiting slow drift in head-trunk anterior-posterior motion (drift pattern) was observed at and above 0.5 Hz oscillations. The stability of the head fixed pattern at fast frequencies was clearly dependent on visual input suggesting that vision was more critical for trunk and head control in space at high than low translation frequencies. Head velocity was kept constant, and lower with vision, as translation frequency (and velocity) changed suggesting a head velocity threshold constraint across postural patterns. The gradual transition from the ride to the head fixed pattern was made possible by the recruitment of available degrees of freedom in the form of ankle, then knee, and then hip joint motion. In turn, the transition from the head fixed or drift pattern was made possible by the gradual suppression of available degrees of freedom in the form of reducing hip, then knee, and then ankle motion. The gradual change in postural kinematics without instabilities and hysteresis suggests that the ability to recruit and suppress biomechanical degrees of freedom allows the postural control system to gradually change postural strategies without suffering a loss of stability. The results are discussed in light of possible self-organizing mechanisms in the multisensory control of posture.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Perturbed step initiation in cerebellar subjects: 2. Modification of anticipatory postural adjustments.

Although ataxias of stance and gait are frequent manifestations of cerebellar disease, the number of human studies examining stance or gait in cerebellar subjects is limited. In the present study, we examined whether anticipatory postural adjustments were impaired in cerebellar subjects during perturbed and unperturbed step initiation. The first aim was to show possible abnormalities in timing, force and kinematic parameters of anticipatory postural adjustments in unperturbed stepping in cerebellar subjects. Second, we examined the ability of cerebellar subjects to modify anticipatory postural adjustments associated with step initiation in response to a backward translation. Finally, we asked whether cerebellar subjects (and controls) make use of predictive knowledge of perturbation amplitude in perturbed stepping. Only few abnormalities of anticipatory postural adjustments were found in cerebellar subjects compared to controls. Both in the unperturbed and perturbed step conditions, force production as well as step length and step velocity were reduced in cerebellar subjects compared to controls, suggesting compensatory slowing. Cerebellar subjects also appeared to be less able to use predictive information of perturbation amplitude to scale anticipatory postural adjustments than control subjects. Nevertheless, in unperturbed steps, temporal parameters of anticipatory postural adjustments were preserved in cerebellar subjects. When subjects voluntarily initiated a step in response to the surface translation, both control and cerebellar subjects adapted by executing the anticipatory postural adjustments for step more rapidly. Furthermore, both control and cerebellar subjects were able to use online information regarding perturbation amplitude to scale parameters of step initiation in perturbed stepping. Overall, our findings suggest that the cerebellum is neither critical for the basic motor program underlying unperturbed step initiation nor for many adaptive changes occurring during perturbed step initiation. Like its role in predictive scaling of automatic postural responses to external perturbations, the cerebellum appears to be important for predictive adaptation of anticipatory postural adjustments during step initiation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Fingertip touch improves postural stability in patients with peripheral neuropathy.

The purpose of this work was to determine whether fingertip touch on a stable surface could improve postural stability during stance in subjects with somatosensory loss in the feet from diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The contribution of fingertip touch to postural stability was determined by comparing postural sway in three touch conditions (light, heavy and none) in eight patients and eight healthy control subjects who stood on two surfaces (firm or foam) with eyes open or closed. In the light touch condition, fingertip touch provided only somatosensory information because subjects exerted less than 1 N of force with their fingertip to a force plate, mounted on a vertical support. In the heavy touch condition, mechanical support was available because subjects transmitted as much force to the force plate as they wished. In the no touch condition, subjects held the right forefinger above the force plate. Antero-posterior (AP) and medio-lateral (ML) root mean square (RMS) of center of pressure (CoP) sway and trunk velocity were larger in subjects with somatosensory loss than in control subjects, especially when standing on the foam surface. The effects of light and heavy touch were similar in the somatosensory loss and control groups. Fingertip somatosensory input through light touch attenuated both AP and ML trunk velocity as much as heavy touch. Light touch also reduced CoP sway compared to no touch, although the decrease in CoP sway was less effective than with heavy touch, particularly on the foam surface. The forces that were applied to the touch plate during light touch preceded movements of the CoP, lending support to the suggestion of a feedforward mechanism in which fingertip inputs trigger the activation of postural muscles for controlling body sway. These results have clinical implications for understanding how patients with peripheral neuropathy may benefit from a cane for postural stability in stance.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Assessments of axial motor control during deep brain stimulation in parkinsonian patients.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the globus pallidus internus or the subthalamic nucleus improves various components of postural and oromotor function and that some of the components correlate with changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: Six patients with Parkinson's disease were evaluated for four postural and two orofacial UPDRS items, and quantitative tests of posture adjustments and oromotor control were performed while the patients were on and off DBS. Measurements of postural adjustments included reactive force and latency before a voluntary step. The oromotor assessments involved velocity and amplitude changes during voluntary jaw movement. RESULTS: DBS significantly improved the total UPDRS motor score by an average of 44%, which included improvement of 18 to 54% in the postural and orofacial items. DBS also decreased foot lift-off latency significantly, but it produced a variable response to the preparatory postural force in the swing limb. DBS significantly improved jaw-opening velocity by 14 to 50% and jaw opening amplitude by 5 to 41%. Significant correlations for the percentage change from off and on DBS occurred among a few UPDRS items and foot lift-off latency and jaw-opening velocities. CONCLUSION: DBS in either the globus pallidus internus or the subthalamic nucleus induces improvements in bradykinesia of specific components of postural and oromotor control, which also can be measured by the postural and orofacial UPDRS items. In some Parkinson's disease patients, DBS results in improvements in force or amplitude control, although these changes are not reflected in changes in UPDRS postural and orofacial items. A battery of quantitative and clinical tests must be used to evaluate the effects of DBS on axial motor control adequately.

Electric Stimulation↗
PubMed2001

Effect of stance width on multidirectional postural responses.

The effect of stance width on postural responses to 12 different directions of surface translations was examined. Postural responses were characterized by recording 11 lower limb and trunk muscles, body kinematics, and forces exerted under each foot of 7 healthy subjects while they were subjected to horizontal surface translations in 12 different, randomly presented directions. A quasi-static approach of force analysis was done, examining force integrals in three different epochs (background, passive, and active periods). The latency and amplitude of muscle responses were quantified for each direction, and muscle tuning curves were used to determine the spatial activation patterns for each muscle. The results demonstrate that the horizontal force constraint exerted at the ground was lessened in the wide, compared with narrow, stance for humans, a similar finding to that reported by Macpherson for cats. Despite more trunk displacement in narrow stance, there were no significant changes in body center of mass (CoM) displacement due to large changes in center of pressure (CoP), especially in response to lateral translations. Electromyographic (EMG) magnitude decreased for all directions in wide stance, particularly for the more proximal muscles, whereas latencies remained the same from narrow to wide stance. Equilibrium control in narrow stance was more of an active postural strategy that included regulating the loading/unloading of the limbs and the direction of horizontal force vectors. In wide stance, equilibrium control relied more on an increase in passive stiffness resulting from changes in limb geometry. The selective latency modulation of the proximal muscles with translation direction suggests that the trunk was being actively controlled in all directions. The similar EMG latencies for both narrow and wide stance, with modulation of only the muscle activation magnitude as stance width changed, suggest that the same postural synergy was only slightly modified for a change in stance width. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the trunk displacement, as well as of CoP displacement, was modified based on the degree of passive stiffness in the musculoskeletal system, which increased with stance width. The change from a more passive to an active horizontal force constraint, to larger EMG magnitudes especially in the trunk muscles and larger trunk and CoP excursions in narrow stance are consistent with a more effortful response for equilibrium control in narrow stance to perturbations in all directions.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Somatosensory loss increases vestibulospinal sensitivity.

To determine whether subjects with somatosensory loss show a compensatory increase in sensitivity to vestibular stimulation, we compared the amplitude of postural lean in response to four different intensities of bipolar galvanic stimulation in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PNP) and age-matched control subjects. To determine whether healthy and neuropathic subjects show similar increases in sensitivity to galvanic vestibular stimulation when standing on unstable surfaces, both groups were exposed to galvanic stimulation while standing on a compliant foam surface. In these experiments, a 3-s pulse of galvanic current was administered to subjects standing with eyes closed and their heads turned toward one shoulder (anodal current on the forward mastoid). Anterior body tilt, as measured by center of foot pressure (CoP), increased proportionately with increasing galvanic vestibular stimulation intensity for all subjects. Subjects with peripheral neuropathy showed larger forward CoP displacement in response to galvanic stimulation than control subjects. The largest differences between neuropathy and control subjects were at the highest galvanic intensities, indicating an increased sensitivity to vestibular stimulation. Neuropathy subjects showed a larger increase in sensitivity to vestibular stimulation when standing on compliant foam than control subjects. The effect of galvanic stimulation was larger on the movement of the trunk segment in space than on the body's center of mass (CoM) angle, suggesting that the vestibular system acts to control trunk orientation rather than to control whole body posture. This study provides evidence for an increase in the sensitivity of the postural control system to vestibular stimulation when somatosensory information from the surface is disrupted either by peripheral neuropathy or by standing on an unstable surface. Simulations from a simple model of postural orientation incorporating feedback from the vestibular and somatosensory systems suggest that the increase in body lean in response to galvanic current in subjects with neuropathy could be reproduced only if central vestibular gain was increased when peripheral somatosensory gain was decreased. The larger effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on the trunk than on the body's CoM suggest that the vestibular system may act to control postural orientation via control of the trunk in space.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

Forward versus backward walking: transfer of podokinetic adaptation.

We asked whether podokinetic adaptation to walking on a circular treadmill transfers to different forms of locomotion. Subjects were blindfolded and asked to walk straight across the floor, in the forward and backward directions, following podokinetic (PK) stimulation that consisted of 30 min of forward walking-in-place on the perimeter of a disk rotating in the clockwise direction. During both forward and backward walking following forward-walking PK stimulation, subjects involuntarily walked along curved trajectories at angular velocities well above vestibular threshold, although they perceived that they were walking along straight paths. The curved paths of forward and backward walking were indistinguishable from one another. Transfer of PK adaptations acquired during forward walking on the turntable to backward walking trials suggests that the PK system controls general locomotor trajectory. Adaptation of the system thus influences forms of locomotion other than that used during acquisition of the adaptation. This transfer also supports the concept that forward and backward walking are controlled by neural networks that share common elements. An interesting feature of the transfer of PK adaptation is that for both forward and backward walking, subjects turned in a counterclockwise direction. As such, the direction of relative rotation between the trunk and feet was maintained for both forward and backward walking. However, the relationship of the lower extremities to the center of rotation was not preserved. The left limb was the inner leg during PK stimulation and forward walking after adaptation, but the left leg was the outer leg during backward walking. These results suggest that PK adaptation affects general locomotor trajectory via a remodeling of the rotational relationship between the trunk and the feet.

Adaptation, Physiological↗