PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Boullon

Publications and source records attributed to F Boullon.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Recommendations for use of everolimus after heart transplantation: results from a Latin-American Consensus Meeting.

Despite improvements during the last decades, heart transplantation remains associated with several medical complications, which limit clinical outcomes: acute rejection with hemodynamic compromise, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, allograft vasculopathy, chronic renal failure, and neoplasias. Everolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor, represents a new option for adjunctive immunosuppressive therapy. Everolimus displays better efficacy in de novo heart transplant patients than azathioprine for prophylaxis of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes of at least ISHLT grade 3A (P < .001), of allograft vasculopathy (P < .01), and of CMV infections (P < .01). These findings suggest that everolimus potentially play an important role as part of immunosuppressive therapy in heart transplant recipients. Heart transplant investigators from Latin America produced recommendations for everolimus use in daily practice based on available data and their own experience.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗
PubMed1996

Amrinone stimulation test: ability to predict improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after coronary bypass surgery in patients with poor baseline left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether the response to amrinone in patients with severe baseline left ventricular dysfunction can predict improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that the inotropic response to dobutamine can identify viable myocardium in the setting of chronic coronary disease and left ventricular dysfunction. However, increased oxygen demand stimulated by dobutamine can lead to superimposition of ischemia on the hibernating state, potentially confounding interpretation of results. Amrinone is an inotropic agent that does not critically augment myocardial oxygen demand and may be useful for identification of hibernating myocardium in the chronically ischemic state. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% referred for coronary artery bypass graft surgery underwent amrinone stimulation (1 mg/kg body weight). Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined before amrinone stimulation, 20 min after infusion and 21 days after bypass surgery. RESULTS: Baseline ejection fraction was 28 +/- 7% (mean +/- SD). Ejection fraction increased to 35 +/- 5% after amrinone stimulation (p < 0.0001) and to 33 +/- 6% after bypass surgery (p < 0.0001). Postbypass ejection fraction was significantly correlated with postamrinone ejection fraction (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the change in ejection fraction from baseline to after bypass surgery was highly correlated with the change in ejection fraction after amrinone stimulation (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001). Of 13 patients with an increase in ejection fraction > or = 10% after amrinone, all 13 had an increase of at least 8% and 11 (85%) of 13 had an increase > or = 10% after bypass surgery. In contrast, of 31 patients with an increase in ejection fraction < 10% after amrinone, only 2 (6%) had an increase > or = 10% (p < 0.0001) and 28 (90%) of 31 had an increase < 5% after bypass surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of myocardial contraction by amrinone in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and severe baseline left ventricular dysfunction predicts improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up. ERACI Group.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare freedom from combined cardiac events (death, angina, myocardial infarction) at 1-, 3- and 5-year follow-up in patients with multivessel disease randomized to either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has been an effective approach in patients with coronary artery disease, but its role in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is still controversial. METHODS: One-hundred twenty-seven patients with multivessel disease and lesions suitable for either form of therapy were randomized to either coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 64) or coronary angioplasty (n = 63). In this study we report the immediate results and freedom from combined cardiac events at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Demographic, clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups. There were no differences in in-hospital deaths, frequency of periprocedure myocardial infarction or need for emergency revascularization procedures between the two groups. At 1-year follow-up, there were no differences in mortality or in the incidence of myocardial infarction between the groups. However, patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting were more frequently free of angina, reinterventions and combined cardiac events than were patients treated with coronary angioplasty (83.5% vs. 63.7%, p < 0.005). In-hospital cost and cumulative cost at 1-year follow-up were greater for the coronary artery bypass grafting than for the coronary angioplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in major in-hospital complications between patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting or coronary angioplasty. Although at 1-year follow-up there were no differences in survival and freedom from myocardial infarction, patients in the coronary artery bypass grafting group were more frequently free from angina, reinterventions and combined events than were patients in the coronary angioplasty group.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

Aspirin and prophylaxis of thromboembolic complications in patients with substitute heart valves.

Anticoagulation therapy with acenocoumarin or with anticoagulants plus aspirin was given to 65 and 57 patients, respectively, with cardiac valve replacement. The follow-up was 1,462 months (22.5 months per patient) for the first group and 1,411 months (24.7 months per patient) for the second group. The frequency of embolic accidents was significantly lower in the group taking aspirin: Thirteen thromboembolic accidents were detected in patients receiving the anticoagulant and 3 in the group receiving the anticoagulant plus aspirin. These figures represent a 20.3 per cent incidence (one each 9.3 years of treatment) for the anticoagulant group and a 5.2 per cent incidence (one accident each 39.1 years of treatment) for the other group. The statistical significance between groups is p less than 0.005. There was no difference in the hemorrhagic risk between the two groups. We conclude that the use of an anticoagulant plus aspirin is a good and safe therapy for the prevention of thromboembolism in these patients.

Acenocoumarol↗