PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F C Barros

Publications and source records attributed to F C Barros.

95 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Health care of very low birth weight infants in Montevideo, Uruguay: a comparison between public and private sectors]

OBJECTIVE: To compare morbidity and mortality in very low birthweight infants admitted to public and private intensive care units in Montevideo, Uruguay. METHODS: Longitudinal design. All very low birth weight infants born in public hospitals of Montevideo between May 1st and October 31st, 1999, were included in the study and followed up until they were discharged from hospital, or died. The quality of care, and morbidity and mortality rates obtained in private intensive care units were compared with those observed in public intensive care units (infants who were never transferred). RESULTS: Of 141 infants, 19 were excluded from the study (13 died at the delivery room and six were transferred to intensive care units of other public hospitals). Of the remaining 122 infants, 61 were kept at the intensive care units of public hospitals, and 61 were transferred to a private unit. The infants who were transferred presented lower gestational age and increased neonatal depression. However, mortality among infants treated at intensive care units of public hospitals was twice as high (Hazard Ratio 1.8; 95%CI 1.1-3.4; P=0.04), especially in infants who weighed less than 1,000g (Hazard Ratio 2.4; 95%CI 1.1-5.5; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The health status of very low birth weight infants treated at intensive care units of public and private hospitals in Montevideo, Uruguay, was assessed. Mortality was lower, and health care was better in neonatal units of private hospitals.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Populational study of investigation of perinatal and infant deaths: methodology, validity of diagnosis and under-registration].

OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of the present study were to evaluate the percentage of under-registration of infant mortality in 1993 and compare it with the ones found 1982; to analyze the agreement between the official death certificates and the ones made by the referees. METHODS: The infant mortality of all children born in Pelotas, in 1993, was monitored through daily visits to hospitals, as it was done in 1982; monthly, cemeteries and public registration offices were visited to detect any deaths outside the hospitals. Besides the official death certificates, two independent referees established the underlying cause of death based on information from pediatricians, case-notes, autopsies and through a home visit to the parents of the children. RESULTS: The percentage of under-registration fell substantially from 24%, in 1982, to 5.4%, in 1993. The agreement between the official death certificates and the ones made by the referees showed satisfactory Kappas, unless for ill defined diseases such as sudden infant death, where the agreement was null. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that there was a significant fell of the under-registration for infant death in Pelotas, and the ill defined causes such as sudden infant death have been hidden by the diagnosis of pneumonia.

English Abstract↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Risk factors for suspicion of developmental delays at 12 months of age]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of positive screening test for developmental delays in a cohort of children born in Pelotas, Brazil in 1993, and their risk factors. METHODOLOGY: A sample of 20% (1,363 children) of a cohort of children born in Pelotas, Brazil, was studied at 12 months of age regarding their development. The Denver II Test was used. The children who failed in two or more items of the test were suspected of having development delay. A set of independent variables was chosen taking into account the hierarchical relations between risk factors according to the conceptual framework (socioeconomic, reproductive and environmental, birth conditions, childreńs care, nutrition and morbidity). Analyses were performed using Mantel-Haenszel X2 and multivariate technique through conditional logistic regression, to control for possible confounding. RESULTS: At 12 months of age, 34% (463) of the total of 1,363 children failed in the screening test. After adjusting for possible confounding variables, failure was associated with family lower income children (OR= 1.5), very low birth weight (OR= 4.0), gestational age less than 37 weeks (OR= 1.6), more than three siblings (OR= 1.9), and duration of breastfeeding less than three months (OR=1.6), or no breastfeeding (OR= 1.9). Children who presented weight/age at six months of age less or equal to -2 z score of the reference population presented a risk 10 times greater of having failure in the Denver II Test. CONCLUSIONS: This study reinforces the multiple etiology of development delays and the concept of cumulative risk effect. In this population those who are economically disadvantaged accumulate risk factors (social, economic and environmental) that may render to deficits in their development.

Journal Article↗