PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Camanni

Publications and source records attributed to F Camanni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Interaction of salbutamol and galanin on both basal and growth hormone releasing hormone-stimulated growth hormone secretion in humans.

Beta adrenergic receptors mediate the inhibitory influence of catecholamines on GH secretion in man, likely via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To further clarify the role of beta adrenergic receptors in the neural control of GH secretion, in 7 normal females (age 21-27 yr) we studied the interaction of salbutamol (SAL 0.08 mg/kg orally), a beta 2-adrenergic agonist, with GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) and/or galanin (GAL 15 micrograms/kg i.v.), a neuropeptide endowed with a GH-releasing effect which is likely mediated by concomitant stimulation of GHRH- and inhibition of somatostatin-secreting neurons. SAL inhibited the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 282.6 +/- 102.7 vs 1083.6 +/- 176.5 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.05) and, although not significantly, that to GAL (263.9 +/- 103.7 vs 418.4 +/- 70.4 micrograms/l/h). GAL enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise (2129.5 +/- 362.2 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.05) but SAL pretreatment inhibited this effect (1249.8 +/- 257.1 micrograms/l/h, p < 0.02) so that the GH response to the combined administration of GHRH, GAL and SAL overlapped with that to the neurohormone alone. In conclusion, our results show that the inhibitory influence of beta adrenergic activation on GH secretion overrides the stimulatory one of galanin. They strengthen the view that in man beta-adrenergic receptors and galanin modulate GH secretion having opposite influences aimed to balance the function of the GH-IGF-I axis.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1995

Metabolic modulation of the growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin in man.

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new potent synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man has never been evaluated. Hexarelin may act directly on specific pituitary receptors and indirectly on the hypothalamus. To elucidate its mechanism of action in man, we studied the interaction of hexarelin with glucose and free fatty acids (FFA), two metabolic factors known to inhibit both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulated GH secretion. Glucose is thought to inhibit GH secretion via stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release, whereas FFA could also act directly on somatotrope cells. Therefore, we investigated the effect of oral glucose (100 g) and lipid-heparin infusion (250 mL of a 10% lipid solution + 2,500 U heparin) on the GH response to a maximal dose (2 micrograms/kg intravenously [IV]) of hexarelin or GHRH in six normal men. Hexarelin elicited a clear-cut GH response (mean +/- SEM; peak, 62.6 +/- 8.0 micrograms/L) that was higher (P < .01) than that observed after GHRH (peak, 19.8 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L). Although similar increases in plasma glucose were observed with the two peptides, oral glucose almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 5.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 38.4 +/- 7.9 micrograms/L, P < .05). Similarly, lipid-heparin infusion nearly abolished the GH response to GHRH (peak, 4.9 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L, P < .01) while only blunting the somatotrope response to hexarelin (peak, 34.2 +/- 4.5 micrograms/L, P < .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Blunted GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone or combined with arginine in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

An increased spontaneous and stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion is well documented in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. On the contrary, in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) conflicting results arise from literature. In 14 patients with NIDDM, 7 normal weight (NWD) and 7 obese (OD), we investigated the somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH (1 microgram/kg) alone or combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg), which is able to enhance the GH response to GHRH, probably by inhibiting somatostatin release from hypothalamus. Baseline IGF-I, IRI FFA and glucose levels were also determined. Twelve healthy normal subjects (NS) and 12 obese patients (OP) were evaluated as control groups. GH but not IGF-I levels were higher (p < 0.05) in NS than in OP (1.5 +/- 0.5 vs 0.5 +/- 0.2 microgram/l). Insulin levels were higher (p < 0.05) in OP than in NS, NWD and OD (18.7 +/- 1.8 vs 8.7 +/- 0.5, 6.4 +/- 1.9 and 11.8 +/- 1.2 microU/l). FFA were higher (p < 0.05) in NWD. OD and OP than in NS (0.69 +/- 0.04, 0.70 +/- 0.04 and 0.65 +/- 0.06 vs 0.39 +/- 0.03 mmol/l). Plasma glucose was higher (p < 0.05) in diabetic patients than in normal and obese subjects. GH responses to GHRH in NWD, OD and OP were similar (AUC: 221.6 +/- 33.3, 206.0 +/- 35.9 and 177.2 +/- 57.3 micrograms/l/min, respectively) and all lower (p < 0.05) than that in NS (776.7 +/- 206.5 micrograms/l/min). ARG determined a significant increase of GHRH-induced GH release in all groups (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Reduced serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate in adrenal incidentalomas: a marker of adrenocortical tumour.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Reduced serum levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) have been shown in patients with Cushing's syndrome resulting from adrenocortical adenoma, in contrast with normal DHEAS levels in patients with Cushing's disease. The aim of this study was to verify whether patients with incidentally discovered adrenocortical adenomas also have reduced levels of DHEAS. DESIGN: Evaluation of serum DHEAS, serum and urinary cortisol, plasma ACTH and low dose dexamethasone suppression test in patients with adrenal incidentaloma and Cushing's syndrome. PATIENTS: Thirty-two patients with adrenal incidentaloma and, as controls, 17 patients with overt Cushing's syndrome, were studied. RESULTS: Serum DHEAS levels lower than normal were found in 21/24 (87.5%) patients with adrenocortical incidentaloma, but in only 1/8 patients with a mass of non-adrenocortical origin. This patient had massive bilateral metastatic infiltration of both adrenal glands and primary adrenal failure. The prevalence of low DHEAS levels in the two groups was significantly different (P = 0.0001). In patients with adrenocortical incidentaloma, the prevalence of low DHEAS levels was significantly higher (P = 0.0001) than that found for some hormonal alterations indicating pre-clinical hypercortisolism (high urinary cortisol, unsuppressed serum cortisol after low dose dexamethasone administration and low plasma ACTH). Low DHEAS levels were found in all patients with Cushing's syndrome due to adrenocortical adenoma but in none of those with Cushing's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the finding of low DHEAS levels can be considered a marker of the adrenocortical origin of an adrenal incidentaloma, provided adrenal failure has been excluded.

17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone↗
PubMed1995

Modulation of growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin in man.

Hexarelin (His-D-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) is a new synthetic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide. The mechanism of action of hexarelin in man is not fully elucidated. As for other GH-releasing peptides, an action on both the pituitary gland and the hypothalamus has been hypothesized. In the present study, we evaluated the modulation of GH-releasing activity of hexarelin in man. In a first experiment conducted on 6 healthy male volunteers, we studied the interaction of the maximally effective intravenous dose of hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg i.v.) with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 2 micrograms/kg i.v.) and somatostatin (2 micrograms/kg/h i.v.). In a second experiment involving another 6 male subjects, we evaluated the interaction of hexarelin with neuroactive substances, such as pirenzepine (0.6 mg/kg i.v.), pyridostigmine (120 mg p.o.) and arginine (0.5 g/kg i.v.), thought to modulate endogenous somatostatin secretion. Hexarelin induced a higher increase in GH levels as compared to GHRH (integrated output calculated as area under the curve AUC0-120 4,693 +/- 691 vs. 1,494 +/- 102 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.01). Coadministration of hexarelin and GHRH produced a higher GH response than hexarelin alone (AUC0-120 7,395 +/- 450 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.05). Somatostatin abolished the GH response to GHRH (AUC0-120 363 +/- 89 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.01), while it only blunted that to hexarelin (AUC0-120 1,314 +/- 297 micrograms.min/l, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1995

In obesity the somatotrope response to either growth hormone-releasing hormone or arginine is inhibited by somatostatin or pirenzepine but not by glucose.

It is known that spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion is reduced in obesity. On the other hand, it has been recently reported that, in obese subjects, plasma GH levels did not change during a hyperglycemic clamp. To further study the sensitivity of somatotrope cells to inhibitory influences in obesity, we studied the effect of somatostatin, pirenzepine, or glucose on the GH response to GHRH or arginine in 32 obese patients and 30 controls. Basal GH levels were lower in obese than in normal subjects (1.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.7 micrograms/L, P < 0.05), while insulin-like growth factor-I levels were similar in both groups (137.3 +/- 13.2 vs. 138.8 +/- 12.2 micrograms/L). In obese as well as in control subjects pirenzepine abolished the GH response to either GHRH (AUC0-120: 43.7 +/- 9.6 vs. 258.3 +/- 59.9 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.04 and 113.0 +/- 75.0 vs. 870.5 +/- 255 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.01, respectively) or arginine (6.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 118.7 +/- 55.9 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05 and 47.7 +/- 7.3 vs. 334.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.01, respectively). Differently from pirenzepine, glucose blunted the GH response to either GHRH or arginine in control subjects (260.8 +/- 38.3 vs. 479.5 +/- 83.9 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.03 and 294.8 +/- 46.3 vs. 625.1 +/- 139.1 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05, respectively), but failed to modify it in obese patients (193.7 +/- 39.4 vs. 172.4 +/- 33.6 micrograms/L.h and 121.1 +/- 43.4 vs. 155.1 +/- 39.7 micrograms/L.h, respectively). On the other hand, somatostatin deeply blunted the GHRH-induced GH release in obese patients (58.5 +/- 25.4 vs. 548.7 +/- 196.6 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.05) as well as in controls (181.4 +/- 44.4 vs. 759.7 +/- 46.6 micrograms/L.h, P < 0.04). In conclusion, our results show that, in obesity, the stimulated GH release is refractory to the inhibitory effect of glucose but not of pirenzepine, in spite of their likely common mechanism of action, i.e. increase of hypothalamic somatostatin release. Exogenous somatostatin is able to abolish GH secretion both in normal and obese subjects. These data suggest the existence of a peculiar inhability of hyperglycemia to trigger somatostatinergic release in obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin, a new synthetic hexapeptide, before and during puberty.

The objective of this study was to verify the GH-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide, hexarelin (HEX), before and during puberty. Ninety-six children (54 boys and 42 girls, aged 4.1-17.4 yr) were studied. Fifty-two of the children were prepubertal, and the other 44 were in pubertal stage II-IV. The GH response to 2 micrograms/kg HEX, iv (n = 56), was higher (P < 0.001) than that induced by 1 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 33). The iv dose of 2.0 micrograms/kg HEX induced a greater GH increase (P < 0.02) than the 1.0 microgram/kg dose. The GH-releasing effect of 10 mg HEX, orally, was greater (P < 0.03) than that of 1.0 microgram/kg GHRH, iv (n = 7). The iv dose of 2 micrograms/kg HEX elicited an increase in GH levels that was higher in pubertal children than in prepubertal children (77.5 +/- 8.5 vs. 39.4 +/- 4.4 micrograms/L; P < 0.001). Before puberty, there was no sex-dependent difference in the GH response to HEX. It increased during puberty (P < 0.05 and P < 0.002 for boys and girls, respectively), when it was higher (P < 0.05) in girls than in boys. In contrast, GH responses to GHRH were not related to sex differences and/or puberty. In conclusion, HEX is a potent and reproducible stimulus of GH secretion in children. The effect of HEX increases in puberty, with girls showing a more marked GH response.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Effect of 15-day treatment with growth-hormone-releasing hormone alone or combined with different doses of arginine on the reduced somatotrope responsiveness to the neurohormone in normal aging.

It is well known that both spontaneous and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion undergo an age-related decrease; in addition, there is supportive evidence that the GH hyposecretory state of aging is of hypothalamic origin. The aims of the study in 35 normal elderly subjects (20 males and 15 females aged 65-89 years) were to verify whether the low somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH (1 microgram/kg) can be primed by a daily GHRH treatment and whether the potentiating effect of both high intravenous (0.5 g/kg) and low oral (8 g) doses of arginine (ARG) on GH response to GHRH is maintained with time. In group A (N = 14) the GH response to GHRH on day 1 (AUC: 373.5 +/- 78.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1) was unchanged after 7 (3720 +/- 38 micrograms.l-1.h-1) and 15 days (377.9 +/- 63.8 micrograms.l-1.h-1) of daily GHRH administration. In group B (N = 6) the GH response to GHRH co-administered with iv ARG on day 1 (1614.2 +/- 146.2 micrograms.l-1.h-1) was higher (p < 0.05) than that of GHRH alone (group A) and persisted unchanged after 7 (1514.7 +/- 366.5 micrograms.l-1.h-1) and 15 days (1631.7 +/- 379.1 micrograms.l-1.h-1) of treatment. In group C (N = 15) the GH response to GHRH co-administered with oral ARG on day 1 (950.6 +/- 219.4 micrograms.l-1.h-1) was higher (p < 0.03) than that of GHRH alone (group A) but lower (p < 0.05) than that to GHRH plus iv ARG (group B).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Effect of galanin on basal and stimulated secretion of prolactin, gonadotropins, thyrotropin, adrenocorticotropin and cortisol in humans.

Galanin enhances both baseline and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion both in animals and in man. Although galanin has a clear influence on the secretion of other anterior pituitary hormones in animals, in man it increases prolactin (PRL) slightly but does not affect spontaneous thyrotropin (TSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) secretion. The aim of our study was to verify the effect of galanin on basal and releasing hormone-stimulated release of gonadotropins, PRL, TSH, ACTH and cortisol secretion. As GH release has been shown to be inhibited by corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), we also studied the effect of CRH on galanin-stimulated GH increase. The effect of porcine galanin (15 micrograms/kg iv infused in 60 min) alone and in combination with thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 200 micrograms iv bolus), CRH (100 micrograms iv bolus) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH, 100 micrograms iv bolus) on GH, PRL, TSH, ACTH, cortisol, FSH and LH secretion in seven normal young women (aged 25-30 years) was studied. Galanin infusion caused an increase in serum GH levels (p < 0.02) but failed to modify significantly the spontaneous PRL, LH, FSH, TSH, ACTH and cortisol secretion. The combined administration of TRH, GnRH and CRH caused a significant increase in PRL (p < 0.02), LH (p < 0.02), FSH (p < 0.02), TSH (p < 0.02), ACTH (p < 0.02) and cortisol (p < 0.05), but not in GH levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1995

Effect of arginine and pyridostigmine on the GHRH-induced GH rise in obesity and Cushing's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to clarify the mechanisms underlying growth hormone (GH) hyposecretion in Cushing's syndrome (CS) and in obesity. We studied the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone and combined with arginine or pyridostigmine, two substances likely to inhibit hypothalamic somatostatin release. DESIGN: Three tests with GHRH alone (1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 min) and combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg infused over 30 min) or pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg orally at -60 min) were performed 3 days apart and in random order in eight women with CS (five with ACTH-dependent and three with ACTH-independent hypercortisolism, age 18-56, BMI 26.1 +/- 1.5 Kg/m2) and 11 with OB (age 17-54, BMI 42.9 +/- 2.2 Kg/m2). Eleven normal women (age 23-50, BMI 21.9 +/- 0.3 Kg/m2) were studied as controls (C). MEASUREMENTS: Serum GH and IGF-I levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. The GH secretory responses were expressed either as absolute values (micrograms/L) or as areas under the curve (AUC, micrograms/L/h) calculated by trapezoidal integration. IGF-I concentrations were expressed as absolute values (micrograms/L) with reference to a pure recombinant IGF-I preparation. RESULTS: Basal GH levels in CS were similar to those registered in OB (mean +/- s.e.m. 0.7 +/- 0.1 vs 0.9 +/- 0.2 microgram/L) and lower than in C (3.4 +/- 0.5 microgram/L, P < 0.00001). On the other hand, IGF-I levels were similar in all groups. The GHRH-induced GH rise in CS was lower, though not significantly, to that observed in OB (AUC: 65.6 +/- 13.2 vs 192.5 +/- 61.7 microgram/L/h) and both GH responses were significantly lower than that of C (1029.9 +/- 98.0 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.00001). ARG enhanced the GHRH-induced GH release in CS (331.9 +/- 51.9 micrograms/L/h vs GHRH alone, P < 0.0001), OB (852.4 +/- 162.1 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0001) and C (3362.6 +/- 386.0 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0002). However, the GH response to GHRH plus ARG in CS was lower (P < 0.002) than that in OB which, in turn, was lower than that in C (P < 0.00001). Pyridostigmine significantly enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise in C (2808.5 +/- 221.2 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.00001) and, to a lesser extent, in OB (627.3 +/- 84.7 micrograms/L/h, P < 0.0002) but not in CS (102.9 +/- 25.0 micrograms/L/h). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the GH releasable pool is reduced in obesity and, to an even greater extent, in Cushing's syndrome. The inability of pyridostigmine and arginine to restore a normal GH response to GHRH in these conditions makes the existence of a hypothalamic somatostatinergic hyperactivity unlikely.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Arginine but not pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, enhances the GHRH-induced GH rise in patients with anorexia nervosa.

Pirenzepine, a muscarinic antagonist probably acting via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release, abolishes the growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated growth hormone (GH) rise in normal subjects but only blunts it in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). This finding suggested the existence in AN of an alteration of cholinergic system and/or somatostatinergic tone. To further investigate these mechanisms, in 11 AN women patients (age 18.8 +/- 0.9 years; BMI 13.4 +/- 0.4) we studied the GH response alone (1 microgram/Kg IV as a bolus at 0 min) and combined with pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg orally, 60 min before GHRH administration), a cholinesterase inhibitor, or arginine (ARG 30 g infused over 30 min starting at 0 min), two compounds probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) release. The GH response to GHRH preceded by a previous (120 min before) neurohormone administration also was studied. All these tests also were performed in 20 normal age-matched women (age 22.0 +/- 1.8 yrs; BMI20.1 +/- 2.4). Basal serum GH levels were higher in AN patients than in normal volunteers (NV) (10.3 +/- 3.4 versus 2.8 +/- 0.3 microgram/L; p < 0.001), whereas plasma IGF-I levels were lower in AN patients than in NV (43.3 +/- 10.6 versus 172.4 +/- 13.9 micrograms/L; p < 0.00001). In AN patients, GHRH administration induced a GH rise higher, though not significantly, than that in NV [delta area under the curve (AUC) 1173.6 +/- 167.6 versus 834.6 +/- 188.1 micrograms/L/h]. The GH response to the second of two consecutive GHRH boluses was lower (p < 0.01) than that of the first one either in AN patients or in NV (67.6 +/- 27.4 and 53.1 +/- 25.7 micrograms/L/h, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Effects of direct and indirect acetylcholine receptor agonists on growth hormone secretion in humans.

Cholinergic pathways in the central nervous system positively influence growth hormone (GH) secretion. In fact pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, enhances both basal and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion while, conversely, pirenzepine, an antagonist of muscarinic M1 receptors, inhibits the GH response to GHRH and to other physiological and pharmacological stimuli. The effect of the cholinergic system on GH secretion probably takes place via inhibition of the release of endogenous somatostatin. In this study in 36 normal adults (26 males and 10 females, age 22-35 years) we compared the effects of three cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine, 120 mg p.o., n = 19; neostigmine, 10 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6; physostigmine, 12.5 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 6) and bethanechol, a direct muscarinic receptor agonist that is mainly active on muscarinic M3 receptors (25 micrograms/kg i.v., n = 5), on both basal and GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.)-stimulated GH secretion. Pyridostigmine, neostigmine and physostigmine induced a significant GH increase (peak vs. basal levels, mean +/- S.E.: 10.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 13.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 0.5 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.004; and 14.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 2.7 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.025;, respectively). These drugs also induced a similar potentiation of the GH response to GHRH (peak: 48.3 +/- 5.6 vs. 16.2 +/- 2.2 micrograms/l, P = 0.0001; 49.2 +/- 2.2 vs. 19.9 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, P = 0.006; and 76.9 +/- 12.4 vs. 18.1 +/- 5.3 micrograms/l, P = 0.001, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Low doses of either intravenously or orally administered arginine are able to enhance growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing hormone in elderly subjects.

Reportedly, the responsiveness of somatotrope cells to GHRH is reduced in elderly humans but it is totally restored by arginine (ARG) which likely acts by inhibiting hypothalamic release of somatostatin. As this effect was observed after infusion of high doses of the amino acid, in this study, we compared the effect of iv administration of 30, 10 and 5 g ARG(group A, B and C, respectively) as well as oral administration of 8 g ARG(group D) on the GH response to 1 microgram/kg i.v.GHRH in 27 healthy elderly subjects (11 M and 16 F, age 70-86 yr, BMI 21-25 kg/m2). In group A (n = 7) 30 g i.v. ARG strikingly enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise (peak, mean +/- SE: 41.5 +/- 4.4 vs 11.7 +/- 5.3 micrograms/L, p < 0.05). Similarly, in group B (n = 6) and D (n = 7) 10 g i.v. and 8 g oral ARG enhanced the GH response to GHRH (20.9 +/- 4.7 vs 8.3 +/- 2.8 micrograms/L, p < 0.03 and 31.0 +/- 5.3 vs 11.4 +/- 3.4 micrograms/L, p < 0.03, respectively). In contrast, in group C (n = 7) 5 g i.v. ARG failed to modify the GHRH-induced GH rise (6.0 +/- 1.6 vs 3.5 +/- 0.9 micrograms/L). The GH responses to GHRH alone did not significantly differ amongst groups; the GH responses to GHRH and ARG were not significantly different among groups A, B and D and were greater than the GH response in group C. These results show that the GH response to GHRH in elderly subjects is enhanced even by low iv doses of arginine and by the orally administered amino acid, the lowest effective dose being 8 g. Moreover, they imply that the combined administration of GHRH and arginine may be a useful approach to restore the impaired function of the GH-IGF axis in aging.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Arginine enhances the growth hormone-releasing activity of a synthetic hexapeptide (GHRP-6) in elderly but not in young subjects after oral administration.

In man the GH-releasing hexapeptide His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2 (GHRP-6) has been shown to be active even after oral administration. On the other hand, it has been shown that arginine (ARG) totally restores the reduced somatotropic responsiveness to GHRH observed in aging. Based on the foregoing, in this study we verified the GH-releasing activity of oral GHRP-6 (300 micrograms/kg) in normal aging and the possible enhancing effect of 8 g oral ARG on the GH-releasing effect of GHRP-6. Eight young (age 24-32 yr) and 8 elderly (age 66-85 yr) subjects were studied. In all the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv) was also studied. Both IGF-I levels and the GH response to iv GHRH were lower in elderly than in young subjects (mean +/- SE, IGF-I: 65.1 +/- 9.1 vs 142.9 +/- 9.4 micrograms/L, p < 0.0001; GH peak: 5.4 +/- 1.0 vs 13.6 +/- 0.8 micrograms/L, p < 0.0001). Oral GHRP-6 administration induced a GH rise in elderly which was lower, though not significantly, than that in young subjects (GH peak: 9.9 +/- 2.0 vs 16.2 +/- 5.4 micrograms/L). Oral ARG administration enhanced the GHRP-6-induced GH rise in elderly (GH peak: 22.1 +/- 3.3 micrograms/L, p < 0.01 vs GHRP-6 alone) while failed to modify it in young subjects (GH peak: 13.5 +/- 3.4 micrograms/L). The GH response to oral ARG+GHRP-6 in elderly was higher than that to all stimuli in young adults (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1994

Interaction of free fatty acids and arginine on growth hormone secretion in man.

We studied the interaction between free fatty acids (FFAs) and arginine (ARG) on basal and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in 14 normal subjects. Compared with placebo, ARG induced a significant increase of GH secretion (334.0 +/- 157.5 v 36.9 +/- 27.6 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). The increased levels of FFAs (1.9 +/- 0.4 mEq/L), obtained by the infusion of a lipid-heparin emulsion, abolished the effect of ARG (55.8 +/- 45.6 v 334.0 +/- 157.5 micrograms/L/h, P < .05). GHRH-induced GH secretion was potentiated by ARG (2,009.9 +/- 463.2 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .05) and suppressed by lipid-heparin infusion (106.2 +/- 28.3 v 922.0 +/- 244.4 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). Moreover, the lipid-heparin infusion inhibited the potentiating effect of ARG on the GHRH-induced GH increase (527.9 +/- 113.6 v 2,009.9 +/- 463.2 micrograms/L/h, P < .01). These results confirm the strong inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion, showing that they are even able to inhibit the potentiating effect of ARG on the GH response to GHRH. Since ARG likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, the inhibitory effect of FFAs on GH secretion could take place directly at the pituitary level and/or at the hypothalamic level, counteracting the effect of ARG.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Pirenzepine decreases basal and stimulated GH secretion in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus.

Growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion has been described in diabetes mellitus and seems to be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes complications. As pirenzepine (PZ), a cholinergic muscarinic antagonist, is able to inhibit GH hypersecretion in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), we investigated whether PZ is also able to inhibit spontaneous and stimulated GH-release in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Ten non-obese well-controlled patients with NIDDM underwent in random order the following three double-blind one week treatments: placebo (PL), PZ at low dose (PL in the morning plus PZ 50 mg at 22 h) or high dose (PZ 50 mg at 8 h plus 100 mg at 22 h). Pirenzepine administration significantly (p < 0.05) decreased nocturnal GH release after both low and high dose (AUC, PL vs PZ: 107.3 +/- 26.5 vs 48.3 +/- 10.5 and 57.6 +/- 9.6 micrograms/L/h, respectively). The GH response to arginine infusion was significantly inhibited by PZ at high dose (AUC, 147.1 +/- 48.8 vs 444.7 +/- 194.3 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01), but not at low dose. Glucose, insulin, glucagon and somatostatin responses to arginine infusion were not changed by pirenzepine treatment. In conclusion, the muscarinic blockade by PZ is able to inhibit the spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion also in NIDDM without affecting insulin secretion.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Double blind randomized study using oral or injectable bromocriptine in patients with hyperprolactinaemia.

OBJECTIVE: A new long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine has become available for long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemic patients. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of injectable and oral forms of bromocriptine. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized study. All patients received either one injection of bromocriptine 50 mg intramuscularly and placebo tablets for 28 days (Group A) or one placebo injection and oral bromocriptine 7.5 mg daily for 28 days (Group B). PATIENTS: Twenty-three (12 patients for Group A and 11 patients for Group B) hyperprolactinaemia patients with (19 patients) or without (4 patients) CT/MRI evidence of tumour were studied. MEASUREMENTS: Plasma PRL levels and serum bromocriptine levels were assessed during a follow-up of 42 days. MRI and/or CT were evaluated before and 28 days after the beginning of the study. RESULTS: All patients had significant reductions of PRL levels from 1000 h and 1100 h of day 1 to 2000 h of day 35. Normoprolactinaemia was shown in eight patients of Group A and six of Group B on days 1-28. Normal PRL levels were still present in five patients of Group A and in one patient of Group B on day 35; only three patients of Group A had normoprolactinaemia on day 42. A significantly greater decrease in Group A in comparison with Group B was shown at 1200 h on day 1 and at all times as a percentage decrease from basal levels. Significantly higher levels of bromocriptine were shown in Group A at all timepoints studied. No difference was shown in tolerability and incidence of side-effects. CONCLUSION: Our data show that injectable bromocriptine more frequently induced a prolonged normoprolactinaemia than did the oral drug. Moreover, bromocriptine levels released during injectable bromocriptine were significantly higher than during oral bromocriptine. On the other hand no difference was shown in the tolerability of bromocriptine according to the route of administration.

Administration, Oral↗