PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Cognetti

Publications and source records attributed to F Cognetti.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Incidence of chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea depending on the timing of treatment by menstrual cycle phase in women with early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the factors associated with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) and to examine whether the phase of the menstrual cycle at chemotherapy start could affect the rate of CIA in premenopausal women with early breast cancer. METHODS: CIA was defined as the cessation of menses for at least 3 months during or after chemotherapy. Menstrual phase was defined as days 1-6, follicular phase as days 7-14, luteal phase as days 15-20 and premenstrual phase as days 21-28. Univariate and multivariate predictors of CIA were examined. RESULTS: Among 111 premenopausal women, univariate analysis showed a higher incidence of CIA in patients treated in the follicular phase rather than in other menstrual cycle phases (67.6% compared with 45.5%; P=0.03). The rate of CIA increased with age: 65.2% and 45.8% in patients aged >42 and </=42 years, respectively (P=0.05). Upon multivariate analysis these differences remained statistically significant and duration of chemotherapy of more than six cycles correlated significantly with the incidence of CIA (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The major implication of this analysis is that the timing of treatment within the menstrual cycle may potentially modulate the onset of CIA. This work and its future confirmation using prospective randomized trials would be useful in predicting the likelihood of CIA and in counseling breast cancer patients, especially those with a good prognosis who benefit less from chemical castration.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The combination of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel: a safe and active regimen in advanced non small-cell lung cancer patients. A phase I-II study.

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel given every three weeks is a tolerated and reasonably active regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a fixed dose of carboplatin with an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 and escalating doses of weekly paclitaxel with an initial dose of 50 mg/m2 with 10 mg/m2 increments at each level in untreated NSCLC patients (phase I study). The study continued with a phase II study. Thirty patients entered the phase I study. The MTD was: carboplatin AUC = 6 on days 1 and 28 plus paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 (1 hour) on days 1, 8,15, 28. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was severe neutropenia and cardiological toxicity. Subsequently, 42 patients entered the phase II study with the same treatment schedule. The 2-drug combination was globally well tolerated. The overall response rate (RR) was 42% [CI 95%: 26.3-57.7], stable disease (SD) 29% and progression (PD) 29%. The median duration of response was 8.0 mos (range: 1.0-19.0). The median time to progression was 8.0 mos (range: 7.0-19.0) and the median survival was 14.0 months (range: 9.0-19.0). The association of carboplatin AUC = 6 and weekly paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 proved to be manageable, active and extremely safe even in elderly patients (one third of all patients in our cohort). The survival results were interesting: the median survival time was 14 months (9-19 months) and the 1- and 2-year survival was 59% and 16%, respectively.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Preclinical and clinical results with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor Gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa)].

Since epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is involved in tumor proliferation and angiogenesis, and in the mechanisms of resistance to chemo- and hormono-therapy, it represents a unique promising target for anticancer treatment. Gefinitib (Iressa, ZD1839), an inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase activity able to bind the intracellular domain of the receptor, is at present in clinical development. In preclinical models Gefitinib induced a dose-dependent response rate in tumor xenografts obtained from different human cancer cells lines. The expression of EGFR in the prior tumor did not appear to be a predictive marker for Gefitinib sensitivity. Furthermore, long-term drug use was well tolerated in mice without inducing resistance. However, tumors started to grow again after treatment interruption. Laboratory findings and in vivo data have prompted the evaluation of Gefitinib administered as a single oral daily dose alone or in combination with conventional anticancer treatment.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (PELF) is more active than 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) and cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-FU (PELF) have both been reported to be superior to the combination 5-FU, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) in advanced gastric carcinoma. On the basis of the presence and dose intensity of the included agents, we hypothesised that PELF would be superior to FAMTX. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomised to receive PELF or FAMTX for a maximum of six cycles or until disease progression. RESULTS: The complete response (CR) rates to PELF and FAMTX were, respectively, 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 6% to 20%] and 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%; P = 0.003), and the objective response rates [CR plus partial response (PR) rates] 39% (95% CI 29% to 49%) and 22% (95% CI 13% to 30%; P = 0.009), thus significantly favouring the PELF combination. The survival rates after 12 months (30.8% versus 22.4%) and 24 months (15.7% versus 9.5%) were also higher among patients receiving PELF, but these differences were not statistically significant. The toxicities were qualitatively different but quantitatively similar. Both regimens seem to be feasible provided that careful patient monitoring is assured. CONCLUSIONS: PELF is significantly more active than FAMTX and deserves further research in the adjuvant setting.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Phase II study of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The aim of this phase II study is to determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced non-pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three chemotherapy-naïve patients were enrolled. Capecitabine 2500 mg/m(2)/day was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m(2) was administered as a 2-h infusion on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were assessable for toxicity and 39 for clinical activity: the main toxicity was grade 3 or 4 diarrhea, which occurred in 28% of the patients. The response rates were 44% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29.3% to 59.0%] and 48.7% (95% CI 33.0% to 64.4%) (intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively). The median overall survival was 20 months (95% CI 12-28). CONCLUSIONS: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer; therefore, the capecitabine dose we utilized is probably too high. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions. This combination may be preferable compared to a standard combination with infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin as it is more convenient and practical with similar efficacy. Thus, phase III trials are needed to clarify its role in the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Clinically meaningful response to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839) in non small cell lung cancer.

Preclinical research and ongoing clinical trials are validating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a suitable molecular target in cancer therapy. Here we report the case of a 39-year-old non-smoking man with heavily pretreated stage IV bronchioloalveolar NSCLC who was treated with gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839) at the dose of 250 mg/day, orally. Symptomatic relief was already detectable after 2 weeks of gefitinib therapy, pulmonary function tests readily improved, performance status went from 2 to 0 within 8 weeks, CT scan performed after 10 weeks of treatment showed nearly complete resolution of the clinical picture, and clinical remission was maintained up to 32 weeks. This case-report illustrates the potential of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition to induce clinically meaningful responses in heavily pretreated, advanced NSCLC patients and suggests that participation of such patients into clinical trials of signal transduction inhibitors should be encouraged.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Salvage chemotherapy for advanced sarcoma patients: a single-institution experience survey.

There is no standard salvage chemotherapy for patients with recurrent sarcoma following a first-line chemotherapy. A few therapeutic options are available and of limited efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine the activity and toxicity of salvage therapies in advanced sarcoma patients in our experience. A retrospective analysis of 41 case records of patients with recurrent sarcoma treated at our division between May 1995 and October 2000 was conducted. Several different therapy regimens were employed: dacarbazine (DTIC) in 16 patients; carboplatin (CBDCA) plus gemcitabine (GEM) in 9 patients; ifosfamide (IFO) in 10 patients; other regimens in 6 patients. A total of 153 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered (median, 3 cycles). Among 38 evaluable patients, seven partial responses were obtained (RR 18.4%). Treatment-related responses were: 2/15 in DTIC group; 1/8 in CBDCA/GEM group; 3/9 in IFO group; 1/6 in other regimens. Stable disease was obtained in 10 patients. Median time to treatment failure and median survival time were 5 months and 4.5 months, respectively. The main treatment-related toxicities were hematologic and gastrointestinal. Most of salvage chemotherapies for recurrent sarcoma patients have an unacceptably high treatment failure rate and do not appear to offer any quality of life advantages. Future clinical trials with high dose ifosfamide seem appropriate even if the use of investigational new drugs and novel strategies in these patients should be considered.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Perspectives in the clinical management of BRCA mutations carriers.

The recent identification of the breast cancer-associated genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is changing the clinical care provided to women at high-risk of breast cancer. We briefly review what is currently known about the clinical management of individuals who bear (or are suspected of bearing) genes mutations and which are the prevention strategies that would reduce the incidence and mortality of breast cancer in this subset of women.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

A phase II study of dose-intense ifosfamide plus epirubicin with hematopoietic growth factors for the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas; a novel sequential schedule.

PURPOSE: The efficacy and feasibility of a novel sequential schedule of high-dose ifosfamide (HD-IFO) and full-dose epirubicin (EPI) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was evaluated in adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). METHODS: Since November 1995, 22 chemotherapy-naive patients have been treated. HD-IFO was given as a continuous infusion at a total dose of 14-18 g/m2 per cycle, with mesna, over 6 to 8 days, q 3 weeks, twice. EPI was administered subsequently as an i.v. bolus at a total dose of 120-160 mg/m2, on days 1-2, q 2 weeks, twice. G-CSF was planned for each course of treatment as a daily subcutaneous injection for 7 days, starting 24 h after the end of the treatment. After the first four cycles, patients were evaluated for surgery and patients with locally inoperable or metastatic disease received further chemotherapy up to a maximum of eight cycles. RESULTS: The response of 19 patients could be assessed. One complete response (CR) and six partial responses (PRs) were achieved for an overall response rate of 37% (95% confidence interval, 15-59%). Noteworthy is that two of the six leiomyosarcoma patients responded to the HD-IFO treatment. The median survival period was 15 months. Most common toxicities included myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, and stomatitis. Six patients were hospitalized for complicated nadir fever. No severe renal and CNS toxicities were seen. Transient gross hematuria occurred in six patients and affected treatment in only one case. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: By the protraction of continuous infusion of HD-IFO over 6 to 8 days, ifosfamide-induced acute renal toxicity is avoided, while G-CSF support allows the delivery of the planned dose intensity in most of the patients. Although manageable in an oncology setting, the hematologic toxicity of such a regimen remains substantial. Moreover, in terms of efficacy and median survival, this regimen showed no benefits over a conventional-dose anthracycline-ifosfamide schema. Further evaluations of this novel ifosfamide-epirubicin schedule are not warranted, even if the HD-IFO regimen could be taken forward specifically for leiomyosarcomas in a phase II trial.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Cisplatin and escalating doses of paclitaxel and epirubicin in advanced ovarian cancer. A phase I study.

PURPOSE: The combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin is considered the standard regimen for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). A meta-analysis has shown that the incorporation of anthracyclines into first-line chemotherapy might improve long-term survival by 7-10%. We designed a phase I-II study in patients with AOC using a combination of a fixed dose of cisplatin with paclitaxel and epirubicin both given at escalating doses every 3 weeks. The objectives of this study were to determine both the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the antitumor activity of this combination. METHODS: Six different dose levels were planned. The starting doses were cisplatin 75 mg/m2, paclitaxel 140 mg/m2, and epirubicin 50 mg/m2. The doses of paclitaxel were escalated in 20-mg/m2 increments, alternating with 20-mg/m2 increments of epirubicin. Ten patients with AOC entered the phase I study. Three patients each were enrolled at level I and level II and four patients at level III, and at each level, 15 courses were administered. Patients received a median of five courses. RESULTS: Nonhematological toxicity was generally mild, except for grade 3 mucositis in one course at levels II and III, and grade 3 vomiting in one course at levels I and III. Hematological toxicities were grade 3-4 neutropenia in 60%, 47% and 60% of courses at levels I, II and III, respectively, and grade 3 anemia in one course at level III. At level III two of four patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity which was grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD was reached at level II with cisplatin 75 mg/m2, paclitaxel 160 mg/m2, and epirubicin 50 mg/m2. The phase II part of the study is currently ongoing.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Identification of the highest dose of docetaxel associable with active doses of epirubicin. Results from a dose-finding study in advanced breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel in combination with fixed doses of epirubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were given docetaxel, 60 mg/m2 in escalated doses by steps of 10 mg/m2, in association with two fixed doses of epirubicin (90 mg/m2, and 75 mg/m2). Since neutropenia was foreseen to be the most likely DLT, a third group with prophylactic G-CSF support was planned to define the MTD of docetaxel with 90 mg/m2 of epirubicin. Selected patients underwent pharmacokinetic evaluation of docetaxel. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients entered the study. At the first step (90 mg/m2 of epirubicin) the MTD was obtained at 60 mg/m2 of docetaxel. At the second step (75 mg/m2 of epirubicin) the MTD of docetaxel was 80 mg/m2. At the third step (epirubicin 90 mg/m2) G-CSF allowed a safe escalation of docetaxel up to 90 mg/m2. Neutropenia was the most common hematological adverse event. Without G-CSF, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 69% of cycles, of which 11% was complicated by fever. In G-CSF group, grade 4 neutropenia and neutropenic fever occurred in 31% and 3%, respectively. Most frequent non-hematological adverse effects were asthenia (45%), nausea (39%) and mucositis (36%). No patient developed congestive heart failure. Two toxic deaths occurred. Overall response rate was 73% in 42 out of 58 patients, with no apparent epirubicin dose-related effect. No statistically significant effect of the two doses of epirubicin was observed in docetaxel pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the toxicity profile, the docetaxel pharmacokinetics and the response rate observed, epirubicin 75 mg/m2 combined with docetaxel 80 mg/m2 can be recommended for further studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Formestane, a steroidal aromatase inhibitor after failure of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole and letrozole): is a clinical benefit still achievable?

BACKGROUND: There are few clinical data on the sequential use of aromatase inhibitors (AI). This paper focuses on the relevance of clinical benefit CB (CR + PR + SD > or = 6 months) in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (SAI) formestane (FOR). who had already received non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (nSAI): letrozole (LTZ) or anastrozole (ANZ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty postmenopausal women with MBC were analysed in this retrospective two-centre study with the sequence nSAI-FOR. When receiving ANZ, 1 of 11 achieved a complete response and 9 of 11 a stable disease > or = 6 months, and receiving LTZ 1 of 9 achieved a partial response and 4 of 9 a stable disease > or = 6 months. The analysis of the entire population treated with FOR showed an overall CB of 55% (11 of 20) with a median duration of 15 months and median time to progression (TTP) of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Formestane 250 mg once bi-weekly seems to be an attractive alternative third-line hormonal therapy for the treatment of patients with MBC, previously treated with nSAI.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced colorectal cancer: a dose-finding study.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are both active anticancer agents in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). The aim of this dose-finding trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the activity of the combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five chemotherapy-pretreated patients received the combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. Capecitabine was administered orally twice a day continuously for 14 days in doses ranging from 1,650 to 2,500 mg/m2/d, and oxaliplatin was administered as a two-hour infusion on day 1 using dose, ranges from 100 to 130 mg/m2 repeated every three weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were assessable for toxicity, and DLTs were diarrhea (grade > or = 3: 27%) and stomatitis (grade > or = 3: 9%) at dose level VI. Dose level V (capecitabine 2500 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2) was found to be the MTD. Hematological toxicity was minimal, overall neurotoxicity (grade 1-4) was 27% with 1% grade 3-4. A global response rate was 17% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2%-32%) and the median overall survival was 12 months. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose for further phase II studies is capecitabine 2,500 mg/m2/d with intermittent schedule and oxaliplatin 120 mg/m2 every three weeks. The toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal: diarrhea, stomatitis and vomiting. This combination should be studied in phase II trials in advanced colorectal.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

Serum tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS): a complementary tumor marker to CA 15-3 in the management of breast cancer.

The efficacy of CEA and CA15-3 tumor markers in monitoring breast cancer was evaluated in 1365 patients with either benign (n = 534) or malignant (n = 831) breast diseases. Thirty-nine breast cancer patients were monitored before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three hundred forty-nine patients were monitored during post-surgical follow-up for either a minimum of 5 years or until time of recurrence. Twenty-one patients with metastases were also monitored during chemotherapy. Elevated CA 15-3 and TPS levels were found in 28.6% and 30.0% of patients. CA 15-3 and TPS sensitivities rose to 71.9% and 66.3% in metastatic patients, respectively. The addition of TPS to CA 15-3 increased the sensitivity up to 44.4% in the overall population, and to 87.6% in patients with metastases. During post-surgical follow-up CA 15-3 was elevated in 65.7% and TPS in 61.3% of patients with recurrence. The combination of TPS and CA 15-3 increased the overall sensitivity by 12.7%. Longitudinal monitoring of metastatic patients undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated that, when positive, both CA 15-3 and TPS paralleled response to treatment. TPS monitoring may provide additional value when used in combination with CA15-3 during post-surgical follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Ifosfamide and epirubicin combination in untreated sarcomas: two treatment schedules.

BACKGROUND: The Epirubicin (EPI) and ifosfamide (IFO) combination has been widely tested in soft tissue sarcomas, even though the optimal schedule of drug administration has still to be defined. In this article, we reviewed the activity and the toxicity of two EPI- and IFO-based schedules in newly diagnosed sarcomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 22 patients (group A) received a 'concurrent' schedule of short-infusion IFO at total dose of 7.5-9 g/m(2) over 5 days plus iv bolus EPI at 90-120 mg/m(2)/cycle, repeated every 3 weeks. The other 22 patients (group B) received a 'sequential' schedule of dose-intense, continuous infusion IFO at a total dose of 14-18 g/m(2) for 2 cycles followed by bimonthly EPI at 120-160 mg/m(2)/cycle. Application of growth factors was planned for each course of treatment. RESULTS: Since 1994, 44 consecutive patients have been treated. The overall response rate was 35% with no significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of response rate (group A: 33%, group B: 37%), time to progression (group A: 7 months, group B: 8 months), and overall survival (group A: 12 months, group B: 15 months). General tolerance to treatment was better in group A. Gastrointestinal symptoms occurred significantly more often with the sequential regimen. Severe hematologic toxicity was common but no toxic deaths were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this limited experience, a concurrent schedule of EPI and IFO seems to be an appropriate management strategy in the front-line therapy of advanced sarcomas. Nevertheless, a randomized trial is warranted to define the optimal dosages to be used for further clinical trials.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

A re-evaluation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a serum marker for breast cancer: a prospective longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is still a widely used test for monitoring breast cancer, although recent reports discourage its routine use because of low sensitivity. This is a prospective study evaluating the efficacy of CEA and CA 15.3 in monitoring breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Serum CEA and CA 15.3 were measured in 2191 patients with either benign (n = 738) or malignant (n = 1453) breast diseases. Five hundred and forty-nine patients were monitored during postsurgical follow-up for either a minimum of 5 years or until time of recurrence. Fifty-three patients with metastases were also monitored during chemotherapy. RESULTS: Elevated CEA and CA 15.3 levels were found in 16.7% and 33.0% of patients, respectively. CEA sensitivity rose to 41.3% and CA 15.3 sensitivity rose to 80.8% in metastatic patients. The adjunct of CEA increased the CA 15.3 sensitivity by 6% in the overall population and by only 2.1% for patients with metastases. During postsurgical follow-up, CEA was elevated in 38.0% and CA 15.3 in 70.2% of patients with recurrence. The combination of CEA and CA 15.3 increased the overall sensitivity by only 1.4%. Longitudinal monitoring of 53 metastatic patients undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated that, when positive, both CEA and CA 15.3 paralleled response to treatment, although CA 15.3 was a significantly more powerful marker for determining response to treatment. The cost effectiveness ratio of CEA was clearly less favorable than that of CA 15.3. CONCLUSIONS: CEA monitoring should be considered an expensive and inefficient method of follow-up evaluation for breast cancer patients, and it provides no additional value when used in combination with CA 15.3.

Adenocarcinoma↗