Biomedical subjects

F Cuetos-Vega

Publications and source records attributed to F Cuetos-Vega.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

[Repetition of pseudo-words in Spanish children with specific language disorder: a psycholinguistic marker].

AIMS: To analyze whether repetition of nonwords (NWR) is a good method to differentiate between Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI), children with normal language development (NL), and children with articulation disorder (AD), and to study whether phonological and syllabical characteristics, which are present in nonwords used in this task, are compatible with a SLI explanation on the basis of the temporal auditory limitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen 5- and 6-year-old children with NL, 19 with SLI, and 19 with AD, performed verbal tasks (principally, lexical and verbal memory tasks), and two NWR tasks: one is formed by four nonwords series with frequent syllables, in accordance with the analysis of syllable frequency in Spanish, and the other task is formed by nonwords with infrequent syllables. RESULTS: Like in English, NWR is the best method to differentiate children with SLI and children with NL; yet children with a minor impairment, like AD, show deficits in this task. Therefore, this disorder could be considered as an 'intermediate zone' between NL and SLI. Then it seems that AD is not an unmixed impairment of production only, since in its origin there are difficulties linked with the formation of the phonological representations of the words. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to syllable frequency, results do not support the explanation on the basis of temporal auditory limitation in Spanish. Results are discussed in relation to other explanations: general limitation of processing, with special incidence of the phonological working memory, and connectionist perspectives.

Articulation Disorders↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Why do the aphasic patients produce semantic errors?].

INTRODUCTION: One of the most striking and surprising symptoms of the aphasic patients is the production of semantic errors. This kind of errors, which consists of replacing a word by another with a different but similar meaning, may appear when speaking, as it happens when a patient say dog in reference to a cat (semantic paraphasia), when reading as it happens when a patient reads dog where is writing cat (semantic paralexia), as well as in repetition or in writing. DEVELOPMENT: Some patients make these errors only in a specific linguistic modality (deep dyslexic patients make semantic errors in reading, deep dysphasic patients in repetition, etc.), but some patients make semantic errors in several modalities or even in all of them. Why these differences and what are the causes of these errors? Nowadays, models of linguistic processing built up from experiments with normal subjects provide us an answer to most of the above questions. From these models, by using appropriate tasks, it is possible to examine the reasons because of a patient makes certain errors. In fact, the results in different tasks help us to locate the deficit of each patient more than errors per se. It has been shown that sometimes the same type of error (e.g. a semantic paraphasia) can be caused by different processes in different patients. In this paper we will try to analyze which are the cognitive processes underlying semantic errors in each of the linguistic activities, when such processes are altered by injury, as well as to determine the best procedures to know what mechanisms are generating semantic errors in each aphasic patient.

Aphasia↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Dissociation of conceptual and linguistic information based on a case study].

INTRODUCTION: Grouping the stimuli that we perceive in abstract categories is basic to understand our surroundings. Research gathered in the last few years with neuroimage techniques and brain damaged patients shows the role of the left temporal area in the organization of the semantic categories. CASE REPORT: A young aphasic patient study is reported who, after a cerebral haemorrhagia in the left temporo-parieto-occipital area, shows significant semantic difficulties. The results of this woman in several linguistic and semantic tasks indicate that her difficulties are conceptual rather than linguistics, since she makes well any task that does not demand access to the meaning of the words, but she fails in those tasks which require to understand the concepts. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this patient show the key role that the left temporal area has in the organization of the semantic categories. As consequence of the injury in that zone, the patient shows an organization of the stimuli based more in associative criteria than taxonomic and guided by the experience and functional adaptation the daily routine.

Adult↗