Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX): report of the first prenatal mutation testing.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Dagna Bricarelli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Sotos syndrome is characterized by pre- and post-natal overgrowth, typical craniofacial features, advanced bone age, and developmental delay. Some degree of phenotypic overlap exists with other overgrowth syndromes, in particular with Weaver syndrome. Sotos syndrome is caused by haploinsufficiency of the NSD1 (nuclear receptor SET domain containing gene 1) gene. Microdeletions involving the gene are the major cause of the syndrome in Japanese patients, whereas intragenic mutations are more frequent in non-Japanese patients. NSD1 aberrations have also been described in some patients diagnosed as Weaver syndrome. Some authors have suggested a certain degree of genotype-phenotype correlation, with a milder degree of overgrowth, a more severe mental retardation, and a higher frequency of congenital anomalies in microdeleted patients. Data on larger series are needed to confirm this suggestion. We report here on microdeletion and mutation analysis of NSD1 in 59 patients with congenital overgrowth. Fourteen novel mutations, two previously described and one microdeletion were identified. All patients with a NSD1 mutation had been clinically classified as "classical Sotos," although their phenotype analysis demonstrated that some major criteria, such as overgrowth and macrocephaly, could be absent. All patients with confirmed mutations shared the typical Sotos facial gestalt. A high frequency of congenital heart defects was present in patients with intragenic mutations, supporting the relevance of the NSD1 gene in the pathogenesis of this particular defect.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome (NBCCS) in infants may pose significant challenges to clinicians owing to its variable expressivity and age-related manifestations. METHODS: We report two paediatric cases of NBCCS who presented initially with a non-specific phenotype. RESULTS: In case 1, a diagnosis of NBCCS was possible only after the father was interviewed and found to present with two major criteria for the disease. Subsequent molecular testing confirmed the diagnosis. In case 2, molecular testing of the infant and his father had diagnostic value as neither satisfied fully the current diagnostic criteria for NBCCS. CONCLUSIONS: Presence of the few clinical manifestations of NBCCS that appear in infants, typically congenital malformations and skeletal abnormalities, should prompt clinicians to conduct in-person interviews with both parents. In general, paediatricians should refer both parents of infants who are suspected of having an inherited condition to clinical geneticists for expert examination, given the potential unreliability of reported medical history.
OBJECTIVES: SCN1A mutations were recently reported in several patients with severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI). The authors analyzed SCN1A mutations in 93 patients with SMEI and made genotype-phenotype correlation to clarify the role of this gene in the etiology of SMEI. METHODS: All patients fulfilled the criteria for SMEI. The authors analyzed all patients for SCN1A mutations using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography. If a patient's chromatogram was abnormal, the authors sequenced the gene in the patient and both parents. RESULTS: SCN1A mutations were identified in 33 patients (35%). Most mutations were de novo, but were inherited in three patients. Parents carrying the inherited mutations had either no symptoms or a milder form of epilepsy. A greater frequency of unilateral motor seizures was the only clinical difference between patients with SCN1A mutations and those without. Truncating mutations were more frequently associated with such seizures than were missense mutations. The percentage of cases with family history of epilepsy was significantly higher in patients with SCN1A mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral motor seizures may be a specific clinical characteristic of SMEI caused by SCN1A mutations. Ten percent of SCN1A mutations are inherited from an asymptomatic or mildly affected parent, suggesting that SMEI is genetically heterogeneous. The increased frequency of familial epilepsy indicates that other genetic factors may contribute to this disorder.
Here we describe a foetus with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), cerebral malformations and a 46,XY,der(1),t(1;6)(p36.3;q25.2) karyotype owing to a familial cryptic translocation segregating in three generations. A balanced translocation was present in the mother, the maternal uncle, the aunt and the grandmother. A female first cousin with dysmorphisms, hydrocephalus and mental retardation was a carrier of a partial trisomy 1p and a partial monosomy 6q. Multiple miscarriages were present in the family pedigree. Parents of the foetus had three other pregnancies: a male with a balanced translocation, and two foetuses with 1p36.3-pter monosomy and 6q25.2-qter trisomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Only a few reports on supernumerary r(1) chromosomes associated with a clinical phenotype have been published. We describe two unrelated patients with congenital malformations and developmental delay who were found to have a de novo supernumerary r(1) in 50% (Case 1) and 80% (Case 2) of the examined cells. Conventional cytogenetic techniques (QFQ, CBG, and DA-DAPI), complemented by fluorescence in situ hybridization studies using alpha satellite probes, showed that both small marker chromosomes (SMCs) primarily consisted of the centromere and heterochromatin of chromosome 1, a conclusion that was also supported by chromosome 1 painting. In an attempt to establish phenotype-genotype correlations, a further investigation was performed using YACs mapped to the chromosome 1 pericentromeric region. A fluorescent signal was evident after hybridization with Y934G9 (1q21) in Case 1 and Y959C4 (1p11.1-12) in Case 2. Partial trisomy of unique sequences flanking pericentromeric sequences is shown to underlie the clinical phenotype in both patients. This evidence should be taken into account when SMCs are ascertained, particularly in prenatal diagnosis.
We report on a series of 453 mentally retarded subjects investigated for fragile X syndrome from 1982 to July 1995. The 22% rate of efficiency of FRAX positivity indicated a significant preselection by the clinicians. However, this rate dropped to 11% in the last year. Since 1992, Southern blot analysis was extended to include family members of the 87 positive subjects, for a total of 442 individuals examined with the probe StB12.3. In addition to premutated (118), fully mutated (148), and pre/full mutation mosaic subjects (27), 14 atypical cases were found. Some of these cases are described in more detail. In particular, we report on the hybridization and polymerase chain reaction data of 2 fragile X subjects with full mutation and a 2.8-kb allele and 1 with full mutation and a 2.4-kb allele. An intellectually normal male with 18% of fraXq27.3 and an unmethylated full mutation is also described. Finally, a mentally retarded child with only a lower allele of 2.7 kb is presented.
A girl carrying a de novo balanced 13-14 robertsonian translocation showed a clinical phenotype with severe hypotonia, hyperextensible joints, frontal bossing, asymmetric face, no mental retardation, severe scoliosis and motor delay. In situ hybridization analysis on chromosome spreads revealed the presence of the two centromeres in the rearranged chromosomes. Molecular analysis on genomic DNA showed the presence in the proposita of two chromosomes 14 of maternal origin and no chromosome 14 from the father indicating a maternal monocentric uniparental disomy for chromosome 14 (mUPD14). Our patient shows several similarities with other reported cases of mUPD14, suggesting imprinting of a region(s) of chromosome 14 and defining a possible mUPD14 Syndrome.
Standard banding cytogenetic techniques do not always allow to define the size of chromosome rearrangements involving reciprocal translocations. Fluorescent in situ hybridization of chromosome-specific libreries allowed the rapid and unequivocal characterization of three chromosome rearrangements: a reciprocal translocation involving chromosome 11 and 22, an other involving chromosome 5 and 16 and at least a rearrangement involving chromosomes 5 and 11.
Campomelic dysplasia (Cd) occurs combined with sex reversal resulting in XY females. The recent identification of candidate genes for sex determination/differentiation and of a sex determining region on the human Y chromosome prompted the authors to study these genes for mutations in patients with Cd and sex reversal. In a total of five cases, no evidence for a mutation in the genes SRY, ZFY, ZFX, MEA and some anonymous Y-linked sequences was found. In addition to Southern analysis, gene expression of ZFY, ZFX and MEA was found to be normal as well. It is concluded that sex reversal in this condition is due to mutation in a so far unidentified gene which may act secondary to the testis-determining factor (TDF).
As the knowledge of parental origin and meiotic stage of nondisjunction is the prerequisite to evaluation of the possible etiological factors in trisomy 21, we have examined 343 families with at least one Down syndrome child. Of these, 322 were primary trisomies, including 24 mosaics, and 21 were structural rearrangements. This study was carried out by analysing chromosome 21 cytogenetic heteromorphisms and molecular RFLPs. In our study first maternal meiotic nondisjunction (75.3%) is the most common mechanism leading to primary trisomies. In the 24 mosaic cases, the most frequent error occurred at the first meiotic division (83%). The origin of structural rearrangements was maternal in 15 of 21 cases. Trisomy 21q21q was due to an isochromosome, and not to a translocation.
To test the hypothesis that meiotic nondisjunction may be caused by reduced chiasma frequency, hence recombination, we investigated 60 families with a trisomic child affected with Down syndrome (DS). We analyzed cytogenetic heteromorphisms (CH) and a number of restriction fragment length polymorphisms spanning regions 11.1 through 22.3 of 21q in both parents, in the DS child and, when available (21 families), in a normal sib. The parental origin and meiotic stage of nondisjunction were determined by combining the results of both CH and RFLP analysis. Crossover events were detected as switches in the parental haplotype expected in both DS and normal sibs. Available recombination frequency data were used to calculate the expected number of crossover events in nondisjoined and in normally segregating chromosomes, given the allele combination present in each family. The observed number of crossover events in normal meioses and in second-division nondisjunctions were consistent with the calculated figures. However, a significant reduction in the observed number of crossover events was found in nondisjoined chromosomes derived from errors in the first meiotic division and, in particular, in the proximal portion of 21q.
In a series of 156 females and 149 males with a Down syndrome (DS) child, a case-control study was performed to evaluate the effect of abdominal-pelvic exposure to diagnostic x-rays prior to conception on nondisjunction (ND). Cytogenetic analysis using QFQ banding allowed unequivocal identification of ND parents as cases. Partners of ND parents were treated as control group. Odds ratio for the association of x-rays exposure and ND occurrence (stratified for sex and age) was 1.85 (borderline to significance: with a 95% confidence interval 1-3.44). Such an association appeared highly significant in older fathers and borderline to significant in younger mothers, when age groups were analyzed separately. By comparing mean parental ages at birth of the propositus, the prevalence of exposure to x-rays appeared moderately associated with aging in control parents of both sexes. Furthermore, the mean age of unexposed ND parents of paternally derived SD cases was the same as the referent population's, suggesting that age is not a risk factor for ND in the male, except for being associated with increasing exposure risk. Conversely, risk attributable to x-rays exposure in the female appears to be progressively diluted with increasing age, by strongly age-dependent high risk, presumably due to biologic factors that are not affected by environmental exposure.
After primary trisomy, "de novo" 21q21q trisomy is the most frequent chromosomal aberration responsible for Down syndrome. This rearrangement is more commonly referred to as a Robertsonian translocation or centric fusion product than as an isochromosome, e.g., t(21q;21q) instead of i(21q); however, in practice, it has not so far proved possible to distinguish between these alternatives. The aim of this work was to establish which of the two alternatives is acceptable.
Several studies have attempted to define the role of parental age in determining the prevalence of 47, +21 according to the origin of nondisjunction. This report analyzes the original data of 197 informative families from Italy and reviews the available literature (96 families from Denmark and 201 from other countries). Mothers whose gametes showed nondisjunction are treated as cases, and those with normal meiosis as controls within each study. To utilize the data fully, maternal age at birth of a 47, +21 individual is treated as a continuous variable in a nonparametric comparison. The combined evidence indicates that nondisjunction in the female is associated with a significant age difference between cases and controls which is mostly due to errors in the second meiotic division. It may be inferred that in the general population, aging enhances nondisjunction at both first and second division in the female, while aging in the male is presumably associated mostly (or only) with first division errors. Implications and alternative models are discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.