PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F De Guarrini

Publications and source records attributed to F De Guarrini.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

[Effective dose in X-ray examinations: comparison between spiral CT and urography in the study of renal colic].

AIM: The aim of this study was to calculate the effective dose in patients with renal colic undergoing spiral CT examination and IVU examination, and to verify the ability of the systems to measure the effective dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dose measurements were carried out for both diagnostic techniques by employing an anthropomorphic phantom with thermoluminescence detectors (TLDs) fitted inside the phantom. The data so obtained were compared with dose estimations based on published tables, which allow to obtain the effective dose on the basis of the experimental value of common dose indicators, the performance of the equipment and the setting of the acquisition parameters for such examinations. RESULTS: The absorbed dose inside the phantom had an homogeneous distribution during the spiral CT examination, while during the IVU there were significant differences in the absorbed dose between different zones of the body, due to the geometry of the x-ray beam. The mean effective dose, which corresponds to the average of values absorbed by males and females, measured by TLD dosimeters for spiral CT examination was 3.3 time that for IVU. For both spiral CT and IVU the dose to the male was significantly lower than that to the female, owing to the anatomic position of female gonads that are completely exposed to the x-ray radiations during the study, while male gonads lie outside of the exposed area. Both methods for estimating the effective dose in spiral CT, based on CTDI value, significantly underestimated the value derived from experimental TLDs measurement. The evaluation of effective dose in IVU, based on the measurement of the skin dose in air, overestimated the measurement performed by TLDs. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Dose measurement performed by TLD dosimeters fitted inside an anthropomorphic phantom has the advantage of calculating experimentally the absorbed dose in different anatomic districts. However, the method is quite difficult, and introduces some imprecisions due to the simplified morphology of the phantom and the measuring system of TLDs (+/- 10%). Another possibility is to make theoretical estimations on the basis of simple dose measurements. Also these methods are affected by many factors that may introduce imprecisions, such as the patient geometry which has a considerable effect on the dose distribution inside the body. Therefore the methods of measurement based on CTDI value can provide only rough estimations of effective dose. The same considerations can be applied to IVU; in this case the theoretical estimations are based on skin dose measurements, which are very accurate but cannot foresee the behaviour of x-rays inside the patient. As regards the diagnostic procedures evaluated, the gonadic absorbed dose has a greater effect on the effective dose value as a consequence of the weight tissue ratio Wt. In this respect we should underline that, while female gonads are completely irradiated during spiral CT and IVU examinations, the male gonads are exposed only to diffuse radiation; this entails a great difference between the effective dose to the male and that to the female. For this reason the effective dose should be expressed not only for the average man (that is the mean value between males and females), but also distinguishing by patient sex. Although the comparison of different evaluating methods confirmed the difficulties in obtaining the exact effective dose, all the measurements performed with IVU and spiral CT showed that the effective dose for CT is 3.3 times that for IVU. However, the excellent image quality obtained by spiral CT and the high intrinsic contrast of stones probably makes it possible to reduce the dose with this technique, preserving an acceptable quality of the diagnostic images.

Colic↗
PubMed1997

Wiener spectrum of radiographic systems: comparison of different evaluation methods.

The noise power spectrum, or Wiener spectrum, of the radiographic mottle is a fundamental quantity in film-screen image quality evaluation. In this paper, using a high-quality computerized microdensitometer, two different acquisition and calculation methods for noise evaluation are compared. The first one is the classic (unidimensional) method used in film noise evaluation: a long and narrow slit (10 x 400 microns2) is used to delimit the microdensitometer light beam and the transmission data are collected by scanning the sample in a rectilinear pattern. A section of the two-dimensional Wiener spectrum is thus obtained. The second (two-dimensional) method is similar to that used in digital image noise evaluation: a square slit is used on the microdensitometer window and data are collected by scanning the sample on a square pattern. To evaluate the effect of different sampling frequencies, our data were acquired both selecting a 50 x 50 microns2 square slit and a 20 x 20 microns2 square slit. The two-dimensional Wiener spectrum thus obtained is then reduced to a unidimensional function. The measurements were made on two different films (Kodak Ortho G e Kodak T-MAT G) exposed with the same screen (Kodak Lanex Regular). These films have the same sensitivity but a different emulsion structure. One film (Ortho G) is made of irregular halide silver grains and the other (T-MAT G) of tabular grains. A satisfactory agreement between the two procedures was found which makes the comparison of data from the laboratories using microdensitometers and those using TV-grabbing system for film-screen evaluation meaningful.

Physical Phenomena↗
PubMed1993

The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity.

The comparative evaluation of radiographic screen-film systems presents several problems from both the theoretical and the experimental points of view. From the theoretical point of view the main difficulties are related to the choice of the parameters best suited to express the "overall quality" of a system. This quantity is expressed as a product of image quality index and system sensitivity. As image quality index we assumed the signal-to-noise power ratio: this index depends in an explicit way on contrast, resolution and noise of the system. From the experimental point of view the main problem is that to measure some basic quantities, sophisticated and expensive equipment, like computer-controlled microdensitometers, is generally required. In this paper, we report the Italian Association of Biomedical Physicists Task group suggestions for measuring the basic physical parameters (with particular reference to the use of cost-effective equipment and for purchasing specification drafting). Using synthetic quality indices, the evaluation criteria of radiographic materials are directly derived from the general theory of radiographic image perception.

Physical Phenomena↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[A protocol for evaluating screen-film systems].

When a competition is made for the supply of sensitive photographic material, each USL is asked, in a time scan of one or more years, to evaluate the characteristics of the screen-film systems proposed by the various companies. In the last years the authors had several opportunities to check different screen-film systems for many Friuli-Venezia Giulia hospitals. For this reason they have set an evaluation form tested after following changes and recently employed in its final version. The check form is reported on in this paper with some personal considerations originated by the authors' experience. The technical parameters which must be evaluated are reported, together with the instrumentation needed to perform the technical examination, the examination modality, and the score-attributing criteria. The evaluation form is very flexible for it allows each Radiology Department to evaluate each parameter in a personal way and to fit it to its own needs.

Clinical Protocols↗