Generic versus brand-name medicinal products: are they really interchangeable?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
Biomedical subjects
F De Ponti
Publications and source records attributed to F De Ponti.
Review article: clinical implications of enteric and central D2 receptor blockade by antidopaminergic gastrointestinal prokinetics.
Antidopaminergic gastrointestinal prokinetics (bromopride, clebopride, domperidone, levosulpiride and metoclopramide) have been exploited clinically for the management of motor disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract, including functional dyspepsia, gastric stasis of various origins and emesis. The prokinetic effect of these drugs is mediated through the blockade of enteric (neuronal and muscular) inhibitory D2 receptors. The pharmacological profiles of the marketed compounds differ in terms of their molecular structure, affinity at D2 receptors, ability to interact with other receptor systems [5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) and 5-HT4 receptors for metoclopramide; 5-HT4 receptors for levosulpiride) and ability to permeate the blood-brain barrier (compared with the other compounds, domperidone does not easily cross the barrier). It has been suggested that the serotonergic (5-HT4) component of some antidopaminergic prokinetics may enhance their therapeutic efficacy in gastrointestinal disorders, such as functional dyspepsia and diabetic gastroparesis. The antagonism of central D2 receptors may lead to both therapeutic (e.g. anti-emetic effect due to D2 receptor blockade in the area postrema) and adverse (including hyperprolactinaemia and extrapyramidal dystonic reactions) effects. As the pituitary (as well as the area postrema) is outside the blood-brain barrier, hyperprolactinaemia is a side-effect occurring with all antidopaminergic prokinetics, although to different extents. Extrapyramidal reactions are most commonly observed with compounds crossing the blood-brain barrier, although with some differences amongst the various agents. Prokinetics with a high dissociation constant compared with that of dopamine at the D2 receptor (i.e. compounds that bind loosely to D2 receptors in the nigrostriatal pathway) elicit fewer extrapyramidal signs and symptoms. A knowledge of central and peripheral D2 receptor pharmacology can help the clinician to choose between the antidopaminergic prokinetics to obtain a more favourable risk/benefit ratio.
Antiemetics↗
Triptans and gastric accommodation: pharmacological and therapeutic aspects.
In the past decade, several studies have reported a significant delay of gastric emptying induced by the anti-migraine agent sumatriptan (a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B/D receptor agonist) in healthy human beings. In patients with functional dyspepsia, sumatriptan improves gastric accommodation after food consumption and reduce perception of gastric distension, hence relieving epigastric symptoms. Recent studies have established that impaired accommodation after food consumption is a major patho-physiological mechanism in functional dyspepsia and restoration of accommodation is considered to be a potential therapeutic target. The precise site of action of sumatriptan in humans is at present unknown, although recent studies carried out using a canine model indicate that sumatriptan exerts its action on gastric accommodation through 5-HT1B receptors, since both GR127935 and SB216641 (respectively, non selective 5-HT1B/D and selective 5-HT1B receptor antagonists) fully antagonised the effects of sumatriptan. Gastric relaxation and enhanced accommodation to a distending stimulus seem to be a class effect of triptans, since it occurs not only with sumatriptan, but also with second-generation triptans (rizatriptan and naratriptan), at least in a canine model. In dyspeptic patients, administration of triptans would be able to restore gastric accommodation after a meal and to improve symptoms of early satiety, confirming the therapeutic potential of 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists in functional dyspepsia.
Animals↗
Colonic smooth muscle responses in patients with diverticular disease of the colon: effect of the NK2 receptor antagonist SR48968.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the pathophysiology of diverticular disease. AIM: To compare passive and active stress and the response to carbachol of colonic smooth muscle specimens from patients with diverticular disease and patients with colon cancer. The effect of the NK2 receptor antagonist, SR48968, on electrically evoked contractions of circular muscle was also investigated. PATIENTS: Sigmoid colon segments were obtained from 16 patients (51-83 years) undergoing elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease and 39 patients (50-88 years) undergoing left hemicolectomy for non-obstructive sigmoid colon cancer. METHODS: Isometric tension was measured on circular or longitudinal taenial muscle. Strips were stretched gradually to Lo (length allowing the development of optimal active tension with carbachol) and were also exposed to increasing carbachol concentrations. The effects of atropine, tetrodotoxin and SR48968 on electrically evoked (supramaximal strength, 0.3 ms, 0.1-10 Hz) contractions of circular strips from 8 patients with diverticular disease and 19 patients with colon cancer were also studied. RESULTS: Both passive and active stress in circular muscle strips obtained from patients with diverticular disease was higher than in patients with colon cancer (P < 0.05). Electrically evoked contractions were significantly reduced by atropine in all preparations and were virtually suppressed by combined SR48968 and atropine. Tetrodotoxin suppressed electrically evoked contractions only in patients with colon cancer, whereas a tetrodotoxin-resistant component was identified in patients with diverticular disease. CONCLUSIONS: The changes in both passive and active stress in specimens from patients with diverticular disease may reflect circular smooth muscle dysfunction. Acetylcholine and tachykinins are the main excitatory neurotransmitters mediating electrically evoked contractions in human sigmoid colon circular muscle.
Aged↗
Diagnosis and therapy of irritable bowel syndrome.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common gut functional diseases, affecting 10-20% of people worldwide. Although most patients do not seek medical help, the disease accounts for huge costs for both patients and health-care systems and worsens significantly patients' quality of life. Diagnosis is based on the identification of symptoms according to Manning, Rome I and Rome II criteria and exclusion of alarm indicators. IBS symptoms overlap with those of coeliac disease, lactose intolerance, food allergies and bile salt malabsorption. The treatment of IBS is centred on an excellent doctor-patient relationship along with drugs targeting the predominant symptom, especially during exacerbations. Current pharmacological remedies are unsatisfactory due to the high number of patients complaining of lack of response and/or symptom recurrence. Although useful in some IBS patients, the validity of psychotherapy deserves further investigation. A wide array of potentially useful drugs are currently under consideration in pre-clinical trials. A better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying IBS may help to develop more effective drugs for this disease.
Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
Pharmacology of serotonin: what a clinician should know.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Gastrointestinal Agents↗
5-HT4 receptors contribute to the motor stimulating effect of levosulpiride in the guinea-pig gastrointestinal tract.
BACKGROUND: The dopamine D2 receptor antagonist levosulpiride is a substituted benzamide derivative, whose gastrokinetic properties are exploited clinically for the management of functional dyspepsia. However, for other benzamide derivatives, such as cisapride and mosapride, agonism towards serotonin 5-HT4 receptors is considered the main mechanism leading to gastrointestinal prokinesia. AIMS: To assess whether levosulpiride is able to activate 5-HT4 receptors in the guinea-pig isolated gastrointestinal tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Circular muscle strips from gastric antrum, and colonic longitudinal muscle strips were used to detect electrically stimulated neurogenic contractions. The effect of levosulpiride was assessed in the absence and presence of GR125487, a selective 5-HT4 receptor antagonist. Furthermore, potential interaction of levosulpiride with 5-HT3 receptors and tissue cholinesterases was assessed in unstimulated ileal longitudinal muscle-myenteric plexus preparations. RESULTS: Antral and colonic strip contractions were cholinergic/tachykinergic in nature. Micromolar concentrations of levosulpiride potentiated submaximal responses, through a mechanism competitively antagonized by GR125487 (pKB=9.4). In LMMPs, levosulpiride slightly affected contractions caused by the 5-HT, receptor agonist 2-methyl-5-HT, and had no effect on contractions to exogenous acetylcholine. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that levosulpiride acts as a moderate agonist at the 5-HT4 receptor. This property, together with antagonism at D2 receptors, may contribute to its gastrointestinal prokinetic effect.
Animals↗
Review of the implications of dietary tryptophan intake in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric disorders.
In this review, we address the possible role of the essential amino acid L-tryptophan or its metabolic derivative 5-hydroxytryptophan in the modulation of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) synthesis and thereby in affecting the pathophysiology of central and peripheral nervous system disorders, including depression and irritable bowel syndrome. L-Tryptophan may represent a link between apparently disparate functional disorders and is of interest for general gastroenterologists, neurogastroenterologists, and neurologists. On the basis of estimates showing that approximately 20% of patients with functional bowel disorders seeking care in referral centres have psychiatric comorbidity, we attempt to provide a conceptual framework for defining the possible role of L-tryptophan in this population.
5-Hydroxytryptophan↗
Use of anti-asthmatic drugs in Italy: analysis of prescriptions in general practice in the light of guidelines for asthma treatment.
UNLABELLED: Our aim was to analyse anti-asthmatic drug utilisation in primary health care in a Northern Italian region in the light of guidelines for asthma treatment. METHODS: We collected all prescriptions for anti-asthmatic agents reimbursed in 1998 in six local health authorities (overall population: 1,909,192 inhabitants) of Emilia Romagna (Northern Italy). The asthmatic cohort was defined as the population of subjects aged 20-44 years receiving at least one prescription of an anti-asthmatic agent devoid of indications for transient respiratory diseases. In order to include routine users, the asthmatic cohort was restricted to those subjects with at least one prescription in the first quarter of 1998. Anti-asthmatic agents were classified according to their therapeutic role as follows: maintenance therapy for mild-moderate asthma (Mm); maintenance therapy for severe asthma (Ms); quick relief for mild attack (Qm) and quick relief for severe attack (Qs). RESULTS: The asthmatic cohort included 11,518 subjects; of these, 47% received only one prescription in 1998. The most frequent regimens were Mm+Qm (25%) and Qm alone (23%). Some regimens appeared not to be in accordance with international recommendations. The main reasons were lack of drugs for quick relief (36%), use of long-term beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (Ms drugs) without quick-relief or anti-inflammatory agents (10% of the cohort and 56% of the recipients of Ms drugs) and presence of fixed-dose combinations (27%). In 76% of the patients treated with Mm drugs (mainly inhaled steroids), the total amount of drugs prescribed over the 1-year period covered less than 150 days. CONCLUSIONS: The use of anti-asthmatic drugs in general practice in Italy does not seem to comply with the international recommendations especially with regard to the use of quick-relief agents. Active interventions to implement guidelines and monitor the choice of drug regimens are warranted.
Adult↗
Clinical findings and anti-neuronal antibodies in coeliac disease with neurological disorders.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the clinical and immunological features of coeliac disease patients with neurological disorders. In a large series of adult coeliac disease patients, we investigated the prevalence of neurological disorders and anti-neuronal antibodies, along with the clinical course. METHODS: Neurological symptoms were investigated in 160 consecutive patients (120 F, 40 M) with biopsy-proven coeliac disease. Anti-neuronal antibodies to central/enteric nervous systems were investigated in all neurological patients, 20 unaffected ones and 20 controls. RESULTS: Thirteen (8%) patients had neurological disorders, including epilepsy (n = 3), attention/memory impairment (n = 3), cerebellar ataxia (n = 2), peripheral neuropathy (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 1), Moyamoya disease (n = 1) and Steinert's disease (n = 1). No significant demographic or clinical differences (gastrointestinal or other gluten-related signs) were found between patients with and without neurological involvement. In all but 2 of the 13 cases, the neurological disorder preceded diagnosis ofcoeliac disease. Neurological symptoms improved or disappeared in 7 patients who started a gluten-free diet within 6 months after neurological onset, and in none of 4 patients who began later. Prevalence of central nervous system anti-neuronal antibodies was significantly higher in neurological (61%) than in other patients (5%) (P = 0.0007) or controls (0%) (P = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Coeliac disease can sometimes present in the guise of a neurological disorder, which may greatly improve when a gluten-free diet is started promptly. Therefore, the possible presence of coeliac disease needs to be carefully considered in patients with cerebellar ataxia, epilepsy, attention/memory impairment or peripheral neuropathy.
Adolescent↗
Gastric motor effects of triptans: open questions and future perspectives.
Sumatriptan is a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist of documented efficacy in relieving migraine and associated symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. In the past decade, several studies reported an important delay of gastric emptying induced by sumatriptan in healthy humans. The impact of this gastric motor effect of sumatriptan in migraineurs is difficult to predict: a further delay in gastric emptying could be detrimental (i.e. increased nausea and epigastric symptoms) in patients already having delayed gastric emptying. However, in patients with functional dyspepsia, sumatriptan is also reported to improve gastric accommodation to a meal and reduce perception of gastric distention, hence relieving epigastric symptoms. Thus, reduced visceral perception could be a mechanism involved in reducing nausea during a migraine attack. Paradoxically, sumatriptan is reported both to relieve the nausea of a migraine attack and to have nausea as a side effect. Although careful analysis of the time of onset of nausea may offer a clue as to the origin of this symptom, available data do not support definite conclusions, all the more so because the gastric motor effect of second-generation triptans are still unexplored. Taken together, the available evidence warrants further studies to clarify the following issues: first, the mechanism responsible for the gastric motor effect of sumatriptan [receptor subtype(s) involved; central vs peripheral mechanism]; secondly, the effects on gastric motility/visceral sensitivity of second-generation triptans (which are 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists) and more recent selective 5-HT1D receptor agonists (proposed as investigational antimigraine agents with less potential to induce coronary vasoconstriction through 5-HT1B receptors); finally, the possible use of drugs improving gastric accommodation to a meal in the management of those dyspeptic patients with impaired fundic relaxation/altered visceral sensitivity.
Forecasting↗
Organising evidence on QT prolongation and occurrence of Torsades de Pointes with non-antiarrhythmic drugs: a call for consensus.
BACKGROUND: The growing list of non-antiarrhythmic drugs associated with QT prolongation and the relevant regulatory interventions have generated concern for two reasons. First, QT prolongation is sometimes viewed as an intrinsic effect of a whole therapeutic class (for example, antihistamines), whereas, in many cases, it is displayed only by some compounds within a given class of non-antiarrhythmic drugs because of an effect on cardiac repolarisation. Second, drug-induced Torsades de Pointes are still considered idiosyncratic, totally unpredictable adverse drug reactions, whereas a number of risk factors for their occurrence is now recognised. OBJECTIVES: In order to increase awareness among prescribing physicians that many non-antiarrhythmic drugs can affect cardiac repolarisation, we would like to propose a comprehensive and updated list of QT-prolonging drugs that should be a starting point to maintain a "consensus list" to be periodically updated. METHODS: The drug list was generated by performing a Medline search, by using published lists as starting points to retrieve the relevant references quoted in each article and by considering the International Registry for Drug-induced Arrhythmias maintained by the Georgetown University and mainly based on the FDA approved labelling. RESULTS: The drug list presented in this paper: (1) includes virtually all non-antiarrhythmic drugs with QT-prolonging potential, (2) organises the available information on each drug at different levels of clinical relevance and (3) is as up-to-date as possible in order to provide a fast track for the clinical pharmacologist to retrieve the original publications. CONCLUSIONS: This list should be considered as a starting point to call for consensus on: (1) the criteria used to generate the list, (2) possible ways to implement the use of this list as a quick reference for clinicians, for instance by providing a "proarrhythmic score" for each drug, and (3) inclusion/exclusion of a given agent into the list on the basis of evidence that may not be available to us.
Animals↗
Review article: the pharmacological treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction.
Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome) can be defined as a clinical condition with symptoms, signs and radiological appearance of acute large bowel obstruction unrelated to any mechanical cause. Recent reports of the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors in relieving acute colonic pseudo-obstruction have fuelled interest in the pharmacological treatment of this condition. The aim of the present review is to outline current perspectives in the pharmacological treatment of patients with acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. The best documented pharmacological treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome is intravenous neostigmine (2-2.5 mg), which leads to quick decompression in a significant proportion of patients after a single infusion. However, the search for new colokinetic agents for the treatment of lower gut motor disorders has made available a number of drugs that may also be therapeutic options for Ogilvie's syndrome. Among these agents, the potential of 5-hydroxytryptamine-4 receptor agonists and motilin receptor agonists is discussed.
Acute Disease↗
Intestinal motor stimulation by the 5-HT4 receptor agonist ML10302: differential involvement of tachykininergic pathways in the canine small bowel and colon.
5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)4 receptor agonists stimulate gut motility through cholinergic pathways, although there are data suggesting that noncholinergic (tachykininergic) excitatory pathways may also be involved. Differences may exist between the small bowel and colon. Our aims were: (i) to compare the prokinetic effect exerted by the 5-HT4 receptor agonist ML10302 in the canine small bowel and colon in vivo; and (ii) to investigate the role of tachykininergic pathways in mediating this response. In fasting, conscious dogs, chronically fitted with electrodes and strain-gauge force transducers along the small bowel and colon, intravenous injection of ML10302 (35 microg kg-1) immediately stimulated spike activity and significantly increased propagated myoelectrical events at both intestinal levels. In the small bowel, the effects of ML10302 were unchanged by previous administration of the selective NK1 tachykinin receptor antagonist SR140333, the NK2 tachykinin receptor antagonist SR48968, or the NK3 tachykinin receptor antagonist SR142801. In the colon, all tachykinin receptor antagonists significantly inhibited stimulation of spike and mechanical activity by ML10302, without affecting ML10302-induced propagated myoelectrical events. Atropine (100 microg kg-1 i.v.) suppressed the stimulatory effect of ML10302 at both intestinal levels. In conclusion, the 5-HT4 receptor agonist ML10302 induced significant prokinesia both in the small bowel and colon through activation of cholinergic pathways. Tachykininergic pathways are not involved in the ML10302-induced prokinesia in the small bowel, but they play an important role in mediating the colonic motor response to ML10302.
Algorithms↗
Tachykinin-dependent and -independent components of peristalsis in the guinea pig isolated distal colon.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In the intestine, tachykinins regulate motility by participating in neuromuscular and neuro-neuronal transmission. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that colonic propulsion is regulated by an interplay between tachykinergic and cholinergic transmission. METHODS: Propulsion was elicited by intraluminal distention of a thin rubber balloon, which traveled from the oral to the anal end of guinea pig isolated distal colon segments. The overall contribution of endogenous tachykinins to colonic propulsion was examined by blocking NK1, NK2, and NK3 receptors simultaneously. RESULTS: NK2-receptor blockade by MEN 11420 inhibited propulsion, whereas blockade of NK(1) by SR 140333 or of NK3 receptors by SR 142801 had minor effects on motility. Blockade of muscarinic or nicotinic receptors by hyoscine or hexamethonium decelerated peristalsis up to propulsion arrest. In the presence of partial muscarinic receptor blockade, the NK1-receptor antagonist SR 140333 and the NK2-receptor antagonist MEN 11420 markedly inhibited propulsion. Propulsion was also inhibited by the NK3-receptor antagonist SR 142801 in the presence of partial nicotinic receptor blockade. The simultaneous administration of the 3 tachykinin antagonists inhibited propulsion by 50%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the existence of an interplay between tachykinergic and cholinergic pathways during peristalsis and the importance of endogenous tachykinins acting at multiple receptor sites in the control of colonic propulsion.
Animals↗
Irritable bowel syndrome: new agents targeting serotonin receptor subtypes.
Although the past few years have seen an exponential growth of compounds of potential interest for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal (GI) tract disorders, the gap that still exists between basic and clinical research is easily noticed if one considers the relative paucity of drugs that have received marketing authorisation for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Traditional efficacy outcomes in drug development for IBS include the ability of the compound to affect GI tract motility (i.e. to exert a prokinetic or an antispasmodic effect), which is thought to be of importance if a motor disorder is the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. More recently, altered visceral sensitivity to a distending stimulus has been suggested to be a key pathophysiological feature, at least in some patients, and has become a target for therapeutic interventions. However, there is now growing consensus that the primary outcome measure in the treatment of functional disorders are those that reflect overall control of the patient's symptoms (pain, diarrhoea, constipation) in everyday situations such as the clinical global improvement scales. Although, in general, guidelines on the design of treatment trials for functional GI tract disorders advise against subcategorisation of patients according to the main symptom (because of symptom instability), subcategorisation indeed makes sense especially in IBS (constipation- or diarrhoea-predominant). Compounds with a specific indication for each subpopulation of patients are now emerging. The rationale for investigations on serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptor ligands in IBS rests mainly on the fact that serotonin, which may be released by enterochromaffin-like cells in the GI tract as well as from other sources, has a number of well documented motor effects on the GI tract and can produce hyperalgesia in several experimental models. Serotonin receptors belonging to the 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 subtype are the most extensively studied in gastroenterology, although hitherto 'orphan' receptor subtypes, such as the 5-HT7 and the 5-HT(1B/D) receptors, are now emerging. Among 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, alosetron was recently approved for the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant IBS and is an example of a compound that, at least theoretically, may act at multiple levels: by inhibiting visceral sensitivity, by increasing compliance, and by inhibiting excitatory 5-HT3 receptors located on both ascending and descending neuronal pathways involved in peristalsis. For this reason, 5-HT3 receptor antagonists may slow transit, hence the specific indication of alosetron in diarrhoea-predominant IBS. However, alosetron has been recently withdrawn by the manufacturer because of safety concerns. Hypomotility remains an attractive therapeutic target in IBS and the new generation of prokinetics includes several partial agonists at the 5-HT4 receptor, such as tegaserod (HTF-919) and prucalopride (R0-93877). In addition, preliminary evidence suggests that 5-HT4 receptors may also be involved in the modulation of visceral sensitivity. Second-generation 5-HT4 receptor agonists seem to be devoid of the QT-prolonging effects observed in some clinical circumstances with cisapride and may be more active at the colonic level. Piboserod (SB-207266A) is a 5-HT4 receptor antagonist under development for the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant IBS. Finally, interest in 5-HT7 and 5-HT(1B/D) receptor subtypes stems from the observation that the former receptors mediate smooth muscle relaxation (at least in the human colon), whereas sumatriptan (a 5-HT(1B/D) receptor agonist) can affect GI tract motility and visceral sensitivity.
Clinical Trials as Topic↗
QTc and psychotropic drugs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗