PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Donia

Publications and source records attributed to F Donia.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Malignancy in renal recipients.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients are more susceptible to cancer than are persons in the general population. If malignancies of the skin are excluded for geographic variation, a cancer incidence of 4% to 7% in transplant recipients is usual. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to find the incidence, histopathological types, and outcome of malignancy in kidney transplant recipients in Kuwait. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1972 and October 2004, more than 1500 kidney recipients were followed. After excluding recipients who left the country soon after transplantation, we reviewed the medical records of the remaining 1171 kidney recipients (724 male and 447 female patients of ages 3 to 76 years) at the time of transplantation. Kidney grafts were obtained from 968 living and 203 deceased donors. Records were retrospectively reviewed for the incidence, clinical presentation, histopathological patterns, and outcome of cancer. RESULTS: Fifty-six malignant lesions (4.8%) were diagnosed in 51 recipients (28 men and 23 women, aged 15 to 66 years), who had received grafts from 44 living and seven cadaveric donors. Malignancy was diagnosed 4 to 288 months after transplantation. The most commonest types were posttransplantation lymphoma and Kaposi's sarcoma. Posttransplantation cancer presented earlier in female and in adult recipients and following decreased donor transplantation. Kaposi's sarcoma appeared earlier than posttransplantation lymphoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Less than 40% of recipients with malignancy are alive.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The area under the concentration-time curve versus trough and peak blood level monitoring in renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine.

OBJECTIVE: The area under the concentration-time curve of cyclosporine microemulsion is the best measure of the absorption and beneficial effects in renal transplant recipients. We sought to determine the best method of monitoring cyclosporine levels in these patients. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of peak cyclosporine blood levels and area under the curve monitoring were performed for 1 year in 65 renal transplant recipients (study group). Cyclosporine trough levels and peak cyclosporine blood levels were correlated with the calculated area under the curve. Cyclosporine trough levels were monitored in equal numbers of matched controls. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute rejection, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, proteinuria, serum creatinine levels, or graft and patient outcomes between the groups (P = .1). Peak cyclosporine blood levels guided by calculating the area under the curve were found to be 27% to 32% lower than previously reported. The correlation coefficient was <70% for cyclosporine trough levels (P < .02) and >90% for peak cyclosporine blood levels (P < .001) when related to the calculated area under the curve. The calculated area under the curve was approximately 6000 ng/mL/h following transplantation, gradually decreasing to approximately 3000 ng/mL/h at 1 year. Both appeared to the acceptable therapeutic values. CONCLUSION: Calculating the area under the curve using trough and peak blood levels versus using isolated readings for either of these levels alone is the most effective method of monitoring cyclosporine in recipients undergoing renal transplant.

Adolescent↗