PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Escobar

Publications and source records attributed to F Escobar.

41 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

[Trabeculectomy for secondary glaucoma caused by metastasis of breast carcinoma].

A 40 year old female presented with secondary glaucoma and loss of vision due to anterior pole metastasis of breast carcinoma. Trabeculectomy was performed after chemotherapy failed to control the uveal metastases. Ocular pressure control was obtained post-surgically and resulted in excellent visual rehabilitation during the next ten months prior to her demise.

Adult↗

Detecting vascular access dysfunction.

Access flow (QACC) is a major determinant of patency. Access recirculation (AR > 2%), normalized venous intra-access pressure (vPIA/MAP), and QACC are used to detect access dysfunction. We compared these three measures of access function (ultrasound dilution to measure AR and QACC). A total of 779 measurements were performed on 58 arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and 114 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts (1-8/access) over 13 months, and the access parameters at the beginning of each period were related to access events within that period. Pump blood flow averaged > 420 ml/min. AR occurred uncommonly (3.8%), and in half the cases, resulted from technical error by staff. In accesses that thrombosed or underwent intervention for stenosis, AR was present in only 3 of 11 AVFs and 8 of 57 PTFE accesses. When AR was present in grafts, QACC averaged 270 +/- 23, and access thrombosis followed unless intervention occurred. In grafts, vPIA/MAP averaged 0.34 +/- 0.01 in those remaining patent, 0.52 +/- 0.08 in those that had undergone intervention, and 0.54 +/- 0.04 in those that had thrombosed. QACC averaged 1,121 +/- 26, 605 +/- 45, and 550 +/- 65 ml/min, respectively, in the three groups. By contrast, QACC differed significantly in patent AVFs (1,053 +/- 35) compared with failing AVFs (363 +/- 48), but vPIA/MAP did not. AR is thus a late manifestation of access failure. QACC is the best diagnostic test of access dysfunction in AVFs. Interpretation of vPIA/MAP in grafts is enhanced by periodic QACC measurements.

Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical↗

Detection of access strictures and outlet stenoses in vascular accesses. Which test is best?

The location of stenoses within an access may influence the diagnostic value of access monitoring tests. Whereas decreasing access flow (QACC) should occur with both venous outlet stenoses and strictures within the body of the access, normalized intra-access venous pressure (vPIA/MAP) depends on location of the venous needle relative to the lesion. The authors determined the value of vPIA/MAP and direct measurement of percent access recirculation (AR) and QACC in detecting venous outlet stenoses and strictures. Abnormal access studies were evaluated by Doppler ultrasound and fistulography. Well functioning grafts and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) have no AR; QACC averages 1,101 +/- 26 and 1,073 +/- 35 mL/min, and vPIA/MAP ratios are 0.34 and 0.16, respectively. Venous outlet stenoses (n = 36) or strictures (n = 32) were detected before thrombosis or intervention in 172 vascular accesses at risk. QACC in accesses with stricture was significantly lower than in those with venous outlet stenosis (361 +/- 11 vs 526 +/- 43 ml/min), as was less than prescribed blood flow (423 +/- 7 ml/min). AR was not detected in any access with stricture and in only 4 of 36 accesses with outlet stenosis. vPIA/MAP was elevated with venous outlet stenosis but not with strictures. The findings of QACC being less than blood pump flow without AR by dilution methods differentiated strictures from venous outlet stenoses.

Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical↗