PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F F Evans-Martin

Publications and source records attributed to F F Evans-Martin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of stimulation or blockade of central nicotinic-cholinergic receptors on performance of a novel version of the rat stimulus discrimination task.

This study evaluated the effects of two central nicotinic-cholinergic receptor agonists and an antagonist on performance accuracy of a rat, delayed stimulus discrimination task (DSDT). Rats were trained to discriminate between an auditory and visual stimulus by pressing a right or left lever. To diminish the rat's ability to use mediating spatial strategies to solve the task, computer automated, retractable doors separated the animal from the levers during delay intervals, thus reducing positioning at the lever. After stable baselines were achieved, rats were grouped and administered placebo (saline) and nicotine, lobeline or mecamylamine in a randomized dose series. Each group received two complete series of the selected compound on different occasions. Mecamylamine impaired DSDT accuracy in a dose-dependent manner while optimal doses of nicotine and lobeline significantly improved accuracy. Nicotine differed from lobeline in regard to its interaction with a dose of mecamylamine (1.0 mg/kg) that had not impaired DSDT accuracy. Combined administration of lobeline and mecamylamine was followed by a significantly increased level of DSDT accuracy that was similar to the improvement following administration of lobeline alone. In contrast, combined administration of nicotine and mecamylamine did not result in increased DSDT accuracy. Furthermore, lobeline administration similarly improved accuracy of trials associated with both the light and the tone, while nicotine improved accuracy of trials associated with the light to a much greater degree. These data suggest that the increases in DSDT accuracy associated with lobeline may be expressed through non-nicotinic mechanisms or a nicotinic receptor which is not blocked by mecamylamine.

Animals↗

Evaluation of two rodent delayed-response memory tasks: a method with retractable levers versus a method with closing doors.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare two similar rodent memory tasks developed in our laboratory that employ stimulus discrimination and delayed response (light and tone stimuli and variable length delays) and to determine their sensitivity to the muscarinic-acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antagonist, scopolamine hydrobromide (SCOP HBr), and its quaternary (methylbromide) analog (SCOP MBr). Male Wistar rats were trained in either an open chamber that employed retracting levers (RLM) during the delays, or a method that utilized closing doors (CDM) that separated the rats from the levers during delays to reduce positional (nonmnemonic) strategies. When the rats were well trained, dose-effect studies (microg/kg doses, s.c., 30 min before test sessions) of SCOP HBr or MBr were performed. Baseline performance was characterized by delay-dependent decreases in accuracy in both methods except when the tone was the stimulus in the RLM. SCOP HBr impaired performance in both tasks at the higher doses tested, although the effects were more consistent in the CDM task and accuracy associated with each stimulus was affected similarly. Surprisingly, SCOP MBr also impaired performance of each task, especially when the tone was the stimulus, while accuracy associated with the light was not affected in the CDM task. Overall, the results indicated that the CDM was a somewhat more reliable task, appearing to reduce positional strategies with less variability in response to the mAChR antagonists, although some stimulus-modality specific effects were noted. It also appears important to consider the peripheral effects of mAChR antagonists (and potential central effects of quaternary mAChR antagonists) when interpreting results from behavioral studies, especially those involving conditional discrimination and delayed response.

Acoustic Stimulation↗