PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F G Morrisey

Publications and source records attributed to F G Morrisey.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Contemporary challenges for Catholic healthcare.

In this article, Father Morrisey uses a legal approach to analyze the challenges facing Catholic healthcare in a time of rapid change, drawing his observations from his work with Catholic healthcare institutions both in Canada and in the United States.

Canada↗

Church law's role in collaborations. Principles to guide Catholic healthcare providers contemplating new arrangements.

To ensure the success of collaborative arrangements between Catholic and non-Catholic organizations, Catholic providers are advised to look at Church law in canonical and civil documents and at the role of Church law in arrangements between parties. First, Catholic healthcare providers should identify persons subject to Church law as they become engaged in apostolic activities such as providing healthcare on behalf of the Church. They need to distinguish among physical persons, moral and juridic persons, and associations of the faithful and other persons. To verify whether a party is a juridic person, Catholic healthcare providers must turn to historical documents. When cooperative arrangements are made between parties, they must consider a number of elements of Church law if the work is to remain Catholic. These include acquired rights and obligations, administration of temporal goods, observance of moral teachings, and respect of applicable legislation. The law places no limits on the types of arrangements that religious institutes can enter into. However, when cooperative arrangements are being considered between Catholic and non-Catholic religious institutes, the moral issues involved must be taken into consideration. In such arrangements all parties should clearly determine beforehand common purposes, structures, and rights and obligations involved, so that there will not be any misunderstandings along the way.

Catholicism↗

Juridic status: canonical provisions, possible applications.

The 1983 Code of Canon Law presents the basic legislation regarding juridic persons, which are entities brought into existence to assist in carrying out the Church's mission. Juridic persons by nature are perpetual and are not directly identified with their members. The private juridic person, a concept introduced in the 1983 code, operates collegially on behalf of its members or noncollegially on behalf of the things that constitute it. A ministry that receives private juridic status does not share as integrally in the Church's name. The latter therefore has more duties to fulfill in regard to observance of Church law, particularly that concerning the administration of temporal goods. The goods of a private juridic person, in contrast, are not ecclesiastical and thus are not subject to canon law. Instead, the private juridic persons' statutes provide norms for their administration. Canon law in establishing juridic persons enables the ministries they represent to last beyond the lives of those who initiated the ministries. Juridic persons offer both security and possibilities for concerted apostolic activity in the Church.

Catholicism↗

Canonical duties, liabilities of trustees and administrators.

The new Code of Canon Law outlines a number of duties of those who have responsibility for administering the Church's temporal goods. Before assuming office, administrators must pledge to be efficient and faithful, and they must prepare an inventory of goods belonging to the juridic person they serve. Among their duties, administrators must: Ensure that adequate insurance is provided; Use civilly valid methods to protect canonical ownership of the goods; Observe civil and canon law prescriptions as well as donors' intentions; Collect and safeguard revenues, repay debts, and invest funds securely; Maintain accurate records, keep documents secure, and prepare an annual budget; Prepare an annual report and present it to the Ordinary where prescribed; Observe civil law concerning labor and social policy, and pay employees a just and decent wage. Administrators who carry out acts that are invalid canonically are liable for such acts. The juridic person is not liable, unless it derived benefit from the transaction. Liability is especially high when the sale of property is involved or when a contract is entered into without proper cannonical consent. Although Church law is relatively powerless to punish those who have been negligent, stewards, administrators, and trustees must do all they can to be truthful to the responsibility with which they have been entrusted.

Catholicism↗

Alienation and administration. System restructuring often entails four types of canonical acts.

When applying canon law to healthcare transactions, difficulties often arise in determining whether the transaction or restructuring in question constitutes a canonical act of alienation or an act of administration. Changes in system governance may leave local property titles untouched, suggesting that no alienation has taken place, but loss of Catholic identity or a reduced ability to carry out the Church's mission may indeed constitute alienation. Often in restructurings, four types of canonical acts are involved: alienation of property (alienation in the strict sense), acts that can jeopardize the stable patrimony (sometimes called alienation in the broad sense), acts of ordinary administration, and acts of extraordinary administration. While alienation concerns the divestiture of ownership, the general purpose of administration is to preserve goods. Acts of extraordinary administration require certain formalities of consent before they can be carried out. However, the intervention of the Holy See is not required, as it is for acts of alienation. The permission may be granted in principle, before a formal offer is received; after an offer is received; or, in some cases, by a "blanket" indult. A restructuring can amount to an alienation unless care is taken to verify to maintain certain reserved powers, thus ensuring that the work is still under the direction or canonical control of the sponsoring religious institute or diocese. Joint ventures, however, seldom involve insoluble canonical problems. Each situation must be evaluated individually and care taken to ensure that the requirements of both eccleslastical and secular law are met.

Canada↗