PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Ginestal

Publications and source records attributed to F Ginestal.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A new approach to cardiac valve replacement through a small midline incision and inverted L shape partial sternotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming more popular as an alternative technique in some cardiac operations. We report our experience with an inverted 'L' ministernotomy in 25 patients and describe the technical details of this new approach. METHODS: From June 1996 to February 1997 we performed 25 ministernotomy approaches for cardiac surgery, 17 aortic and 7 mitral valve replacements and 1 atrial septal defect closure. A comparison group included all patients (n = 126) operated on for mitral or aortic valve replacement through a median sternotomy since June 1996. RESULTS: Ventilatory support, Intensive Care Unit stay and hospital stay were 8.3 h (SD = 4 h), 25 h (SD = 8 h) and 5.5 days (SD = 3 days) in the L ministernotomy group and 11.5 h (SD = 5), 53 h (SD = 11) and 9.1 days (SD = 4 days) in the median sternotomy group (P < 0 05). Mortality and morbidity are similar to conventional sternotomy (hospital mortality 4% vs. 5.5%; P not significant). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that inverted L ministernotomy for cardiac surgery is a safe approach and can offer some advantages over the conventional approach.

Aortic Valve↗

[Aortic valve replacement via ministernotomy].

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is arising as an alternative technique in some cardiac operations. We present the first aortic valve replacement via ministernotomy. We describe in detail the technique of ministernotomy and the limitations that this new approach would have. We conclude with the advantages of minimally invasive cardiac surgery over conventional approach and review other techniques described in the literature.

Aortic Valve↗

[The emergency heart transplant].

From the International Registry on Cardiac Transplantation we can not infer a higher mortality in urgent or emergent Cardiac Transplantation. The data in the Spanish Registry and in the literature show that the risk is higher in these patients compared to non urgent transplantation, implying ethical considerations which are discussed in the article. A different approach to urgent transplantation could be based on previous circulatory support, or heart assist systems as a bridge to transplantation.

Assisted Circulation↗