Biomedical subjects

F H Engbers

Publications and source records attributed to F H Engbers.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

A comparison of the effects of propofol and midazolam on memory during two levels of sedation by using target-controlled infusion.

UNLABELLED: We examined memory during sedation with target-controlled infusions of propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded five-way, cross-over study in 10 volunteers. Each active drug infusion was targeted to sedation level 1 (asleep) and level 4 (lethargic) as determined with the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. At the target level of sedation, drug concentration was clamped for 30 min, during which time neutral words were presented. After 2 h, explicit memory was assessed by recall, and implicit memory by using a wordstem completion test. Venous drug concentrations (mean +/- SD) were 1350 ng/mL (+/-332 ng/mL) for propofol and 208 ng/mL (+/-112 ng/mL) for midazolam during Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale level 4; and 1620 ng/mL (+/-357 ng/mL) and 249 ng/mL (+/-82 ng/mL) respectively during level 1. The wordstem completion test frequencies at low level sedation were significantly higher than spontaneous frequencies (8.7% + 2.4%; P: < 0.05 in all cases), and lower than during placebo (33.6% + 23%) (P: < 0.05 in all cases, except P: = 0.076 for propofol at level 4). Clinically distinct levels of sedation were accompanied by small differences in venous propofol or midazolam concentrations. This indicates steep concentration-effect relationships. Neutral information is still memorized during low-level sedation with both drugs. The memory effect of propofol and midazolam did not differ significantly. IMPLICATIONS: Implicit memory can occur during different states of consciousness and might lead to psychological damage. In 10 volunteers, implicit memory was investigated during sedation with propofol and midazolam in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. To compare the effects of both drugs, they were titrated using a computer-controlled infusion system to produce similar high and low levels of sedation.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Target-controlled infusion systems: role in anaesthesia and analgesia.

Drug delivery by target-controlled infusion (TCI) allows automatic adjustments of the infusion rate of a drug to maintain a desired target concentration. Since drug effect is more closely related to blood concentration than to infusion rate, drug delivery via TCI is capable of creating stable blood concentrations of intravenous anaesthetics and analgesics. In this article the concept and history of TCI are described. The rational administration of TCI requires an appropriate pharmacokinetic data set and knowledge of the concentration-effect relationship; therefore, general pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of intravenous anaesthetics and analgesics are also addressed. Intraoperative investigations have demonstrated that TCI drug delivery allows rapid titration to a desired effect. The use of TCI for postoperative analgesia is still experimental, but TCI can, in part, overcome the disadvantages associated with continuous infusions and patient-controlled analgesia regimens in the postoperative period. Although TCI is capable of creating stable blood concentrations, when the target concentration is changed the resulting effect correlates better with a theoretical effect site concentration. The efficacy of TCI systems that can perform effect-site steering are still to be explored.

Analgesia↗

PubMed1999

Effect-site modelling of propofol using auditory evoked potentials.

Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) were used to monitor central nervous system effects during induction and recovery from anaesthesia produced by infusion of propofol 30 mg kg-1 h-1 in 22 healthy male patients. Non-parametric and parametric modelling techniques were used successfully to calculate the parameter keo which linked pharmacokinetic with pharmacodynamic aspects of drug action in only 15 of the study patients. In the non-parametric analysis, keo was found to have a mean value of 0.2 (range 0.1-0.36) min-1. Estimation of keo allowed calculation of the effect-site concentration (Ce50) associated with 50% of AEP effect for the population (2.08 micrograms ml-1; 95% confidence limits 1.7-2.45). There were no significant differences between keo values calculated by non-parametric and individual parametric modelling techniques. During recovery, 50% of patients demonstrated evidence of waking at an effect-site concentration of 2.28 micrograms ml-1.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Target-controlled infusion of alfentanil for postoperative analgesia: contribution of plasma protein binding to intra-patient and inter-patient variability.

We have examined the influence of plasma protein binding on inter-individual and intra-individual variability in the effective postoperative analgesic concentration (EAC) of alfentanil and on the performance of the target-controlled infusion system used. Ten patients received standardized anaesthesia and target-controlled alfentanil for postoperative analgesia. Analgesia was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Plasma protein binding of alfentanil was assessed at four different times (on arrival in the recovery room, at 21:00 on the day of surgery and at 09:00 and 21:00 on the first postoperative day). Bias and inaccuracy were examined on the day of surgery and on the first postoperative day. Unbound fractions of alfentanil varied from 5 to 15% and varied in time. In general, the unbound fractions on the day of surgery were higher than those on the first postoperative day. Thirty-nine percent of inter-individual variability in the EAC of alfentanil (range 33-140 ng ml-1) at the onset of therapy could be explained by protein binding. At the other observation times, correlations between unbound fraction and EAC were only moderate. Bias on the day of surgery was -19% and 12% on the first postoperative day (ns). Inaccuracy was 23% and 18%, respectively (ns). We conclude that inter-individual variations in plasma protein binding can explain a significant portion of inter-individual variability in the EAC of alfentanil in the early postoperative phase.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacodynamic interaction of eltanolone and alfentanil during lower abdominal surgery in female patients.

We have studied the influence of eltanolone on intraoperative alfentanil requirements in 18 female patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery receiving target-controlled infusions of eltanolone and alfentanil. While target concentrations of eltanolone were maintained constant, target concentrations of alfentanil changed in response to the presence or absence of responses. With serum eltanolone concentrations increasing from 500 to 2000 ng ml-1, the EC50 of alfentanil for suppression of responses to surgical stimulation decreased from 233 to 9 ng ml-1. The findings suggest that the interaction between eltanolone and alfentanil is synergistic.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetics of propofol during conscious sedation using target-controlled infusion in anxious patients undergoing dental treatment.

Infusion of propofol by a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system is effective in achieving conscious sedation for anxious patients presenting for dental surgery. It is a common clinical observation that anxious patients require more anaesthetic drugs than non-anxious individuals. In study 1 we have defined blood propofol concentrations necessary for conscious sedation in both anxious (n = 23) and non-anxious (n = 18) patients. The pump performance of the TCI system, using Gepts' pharmacokinetic model, was evaluated in these two patient groups. Subsequently, clearance of propofol was compared in the two groups. Mean measured venous serum propofol concentrations obtained between 20 and 35 min after the optimal sedation level was reached were 1.6 (SD 0.2) micrograms ml-1 in the anxious patients compared with 1.7 (0.3) micrograms ml-1 in the control group (study 1) and 1.4 (0.27) micrograms ml-1 in study 2. The pump systematically overpredicted measured propofol concentrations in both groups (study 1). There was no significant difference in propofol clearance between the two groups. In study 2, an optimized set of microconstants was derived which should more accurately predict the pharmacokinetic profile of the anxious population and this set was tested prospectively in another group of 12 anxious dental patients. Bias and precision with the optimized kinetic set were significantly less than the values obtained in study 1. We conclude that there was no significant pharmacokinetic differences between anxious and non-anxious subjects receiving subanaesthetic doses of propofol for conscious sedation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Target-controlled infusion of alfentanil for postoperative analgesia: a feasibility study and pharmacodynamic evaluation in the early postoperative period.

We have examined the feasibility of target-controlled infusion of alfentanil (TCIA) and the pharmacodynamics of alfentanil in the early postoperative period. Patients were allocated randomly to one of the three groups to receive balanced anaesthesia with bolus injections of fentanyl (group F), sufentanil (group S) or alfentanil (group A). In the recovery room all patients received the same analgesic regimen, comprising TCIA. To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative analgesia, pain scores were measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and patients indicated a need for additional analgesia. EC50, the concentration at which, with a 50% probability, patients reported adequate analgesia, was estimated using logistic regression. Six patients did not complain of pain. The time from the last intraoperative bolus injection of opioid until patients complained of postoperative pain was shorter (P < 0.05) in group A (mean 68 min) than in group F (101 min) and group S (136 min). The time to onset of satisfactory analgesia was comparable in the three groups (median 18 min in group F, 15 min in group S and 14 min in group A). EC50 of alfentanil was determined in 28 patients; mean values were 26 ng ml-1 (group F), 39 ng ml-1 (group S) and 52 ng ml-1 (group A). We conclude that TCIA, under the conditions studied, resulted in a fast onset of adequate analgesia, irrespective of the opioid administered during operation. Also, there was no effect of opioids administered during operation on postoperative pharmacodynamics of alfentanil.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil when given for induction of anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Propofol and alfentanil often are combined during induction of anesthesia. However, the interaction between these agents during induction has not been studied in detail. The influence of alfentanil on the propofol concentration-effect relationships was studied for loss of eyelash reflex, loss of consciousness, and hemodynamic function in 20 unpremedicated ASA physical status 1 patients aged 20-55 yr. METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into four groups to receive a computer- controlled infusion of alfentanil with target concentrations of 0, 50, 200, or 400 ng/ml (groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). While the target concentration of alfentanil was maintained constant, patients received a computer- controlled infusion of propofol, with an initial target concentration of 0.5-1 microgram/ml, that was increased every 12 min by 0.5-1 microgram/ml. Every 3 min, the eyelash reflex and state of consciousness were tested an an arterial blood sample was taken for blood propofol and plasma alfentanil determination. The propofol-alfentanil concentration-response relationships for loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness were determined by nonlinear regression, and for the percentage of change in systolic blood pressure and heart rate by logistic regression. RESULTS: The patient characteristics did not differ significantly among the four groups. The patients in groups A and B continued to breathe adequately, whereas all patients in groups C and D required assisted ventilation. End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure remained less than 46 mmHg in all patients. With plasma alfentanil concentrations increasing from 0 to 500 ng/ml, the EC(50) of propofol decreased from 2.07 to 0.83 microgram/ml for loss of eyelash reflex and from 3.62 to 1.55 microgram/ml for loss of consciousness. With plasma alfentanil concentrations increasing from 0 to 500 ng/ml, the blood propofol concentrations associated with a 10% decrease in systolic blood pressure and heart rate decreased from 1.68 to 0.17 microgram/ml and from 2.36 to 0.04 microgram/ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Alfentanil significantly reduces blood propofol concentrations required for loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness. In addition, alfentanil enhances the depressant effects of propofol on systolic blood pressure and heart rate. Hemodynamic stability, therefore, does not increase in patients receiving propofol in combination with alfentanil compared to those receiving propofol as the sole agent for induction of anesthesia.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Remote controlled prolonged conscious sedation for gynaecological radiotherapy.

Conscious sedation with subanaesthetic doses of propofol is an effective technique for the management of highly anxious patients in dentistry. Prolonged administration of propofol to achieve conscious sedation in spontaneously breathing patients without an airway adjunct has not been reported previously. We describe the management of target-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for 21 h in a patient undergoing gynaecological radiotherapy.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗

PubMed1995

First-pass pulmonary retention of sufentanil at three different background blood concentrations of the opioid.

Using a double-indicator technique, we have studied, in 10 patients undergoing aorto-coronary bypass surgery, first-pass pulmonary retention of sufentanil. Pulmonary retention was studied at three pseudo steady-state background blood concentrations of 2.8 (0.66), 6.9 (1.2) and 15.9 (2.6) ng ml-1, respectively, produced by a computer-controlled infusion. Mean first-pass pulmonary retentions at these concentrations were 68 (95% confidence intervals 62-73), 65 (60-70) and 60 (52-67)%, respectively. First-pass pulmonary retention of sufentanil was significantly lower at the highest background concentration compared with the lowest background concentration. First-pass pulmonary retention of sufentanil was partly saturable in the range of concentrations used for clinical purposes.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

PubMed1995

Computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil versus patient-controlled administration of morphine for postoperative analgesia: a double-blind randomized trial.

This study compared the efficacy of computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil (CCiA) with patient-controlled administration of morphine (PCAM) for postoperative analgesia. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups to receive either an intravenous CCiA or PCAM regimen. Pain scores measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) and the number of valid demands were used as variables to evaluate the efficacy of the postoperative analgesic therapy. In addition, the bias and inaccuracy of the pharmacokinetic data set of alfentanil used in the CCiA program were examined by determining the median performance error (MDPE), and the median absolute performance error (MDAPE). The onset of satisfactory analgesia was faster (P < 0.05) in the CCiA group (median: 20 min) than in the PCAM group (median: 50 min). The total number of demands was lower (21 vs 34, P < 0.05) and the time when the VAS score was > 3.0 was shorter (P < 0.05, 12% of the time) in the CCiA group than in the PCAM group (21% of the time). The MDPE and MDAPE were 8% and 22%, respectively. The maximum alfentanil concentrations associated with pain and the minimum effective analgesic concentrations of alfentanil varied considerably both inter- and intraindividually. In conclusion, compared to a standard intravenous PCAM regimen, a CCiA is faster in onset of analgesia and is as effective in providing postoperative analgesia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Performance of computer-controlled infusion of propofol: an evaluation of five pharmacokinetic parameter sets.

Computer-controlled infusion of propofol is used with increasing frequency for the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The performance of computer-controlled infusion devices is highly dependent on how well the implemented pharmacokinetic parameter set matches the pharmacokinetics of the patient. This study examined the performance of a computer-controlled infusion device when provided with five different pharmacokinetic parameter sets of propofol in female patients. The infusion rate-time data that had been stored on a disk from 19 female patients who had been given propofol by computer-controlled infusion, using the pharmacokinetic parameter set from Gepts et al. (Anesth Analg 1987;66:1256-63), were entered into a computer simulation program to recalculate predicted propofol concentrations that would have been obtained with four other pharmacokinetic parameter (Shafer et al., Anesthesiology 1988;69:348-56; Kirkpatrick et al., Br J Anesth 1988;60:146-50; Cockshott et al., Br J Anesth 1987;59:941P; Tackley et al., Br J Anesth, 1989;62:46-53) sets of propofol, had these been implemented. The performance error (PE) was determined for each measured blood propofol concentration, on the basis of each of the five pharmacokinetic parameter sets. Then, for each of the five pharmacokinetic parameter sets, the performance in the population was determined by the median absolute performance error (MDAPE), the median performance error (MDPE), the wobble (the median absolute deviation of each PE from the MDPE), and the divergence (the percentage change of the absolute PE with time). The MDPE and MDAPE were compared between the parameter sets by the multisample median test. The initially used pharmacokinetic parameter set from Gepts et al. resulted in a MDPE of 24% and MDAPE of 26%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1995

The pharmacodynamic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during lower abdominal surgery in women.

BACKGROUND: Propofol and alfentanil are frequently combined to provide general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil for several clinically relevant end points. METHODS: Twenty-one women, aged 20-55 yr, scheduled for lower abdominal surgery, were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to one of three groups to receive a computer-controlled infusion of propofol with target concentrations of 2, 4, or 6 micrograms/ml. In addition, all patients received computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil (initial target concentration 50 ng/ml). While the target concentration of propofol was maintained constant, the target concentration of alfentanil was varied in steps of 10-50 ng/ml according to the presence or absence of patient responses to perioperative stimuli. Arterial blood samples for alfentanil and propofol determination were taken at clinically relevant stimuli. Alfentanil-propofol interactions for laryngoscopy, intubation, skin incision, the opening of the peritoneum, and awakening were determined by logistic regression over the three groups (n = 21). The alfentanil concentrations associated with a 50% probability (EC50s) of suppression of responses to intraabdominal surgical stimuli, as determined by logistic regression in the individual patients, were related to corresponding mean blood propofol concentrations by nonlinear regression analysis. RESULTS: With blood propofol concentrations increasing from 2 to 10 micrograms/ml, the EC50 of alfentanil decreased from 170 to 25 ng/ml for laryngoscopy, from 280 to 23 ng/ml for intubation, from 259 to 9 ng/ml for the opening of the peritoneum, and from 209 to 16 ng/ml for the intraabdominal surgical stimuli. With plasma alfentanil concentrations increasing from 10 to 150 ng/ml, the EC50 of propofol for the regaining of consciousness decreased from 3.8 to 0.8 microgram/ml. DISCUSSION: We defined the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil for suppression of responses to perioperative stimuli during lower abdominal surgery. We conclude that propofol reduces alfentanil requirements for all studied clinical end points. In addition, alfentanil decreases propofol concentrations at which patients regain consciousness.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1994

The Leiden anaesthesia simulator.

We describe an anaesthesia simulator capable of simulating all possible situations during anaesthesia. The Leiden anaesthesia simulator (LAS) may be used with most commercially available anaesthesia equipment and monitors, which are connected to the simulated patient as they are to a patient. A commercially available intubation manikin attached to an electromechanical lung model represents the patient. The lung allows both spontaneous and mechanical ventilation. Compliance, resistance, tidal volume and ventilatory frequency may be altered by a controlling computer. Carbon dioxide production and oxygen uptake are simulated. Physiological signals (ECG, arterial, pulmonary arterial and central venous pressure waveforms) generated by a signal generator under software control provide input to the monitors. All types of ECG disturbances may be simulated. There are facilities for simulating non-invasive arterial pressure measurement and pulse oximetry. A series of physiological models is being developed to control interactions between the cardiovascular and respiratory variables. During a simulation session, a pre-defined scenario is presented to the trainee. The task of the trainee is to diagnose and treat the problem as if in real life. The simulator experiences on the LAS were judged as highly realistic by 28 subjects. This simulator is currently being used for teaching and training of anaesthetists, trainees and anaesthesia personnel and for research.

Anesthesiology↗

PubMed1993

Pharmacodynamics of alfentanil as a supplement to propofol or nitrous oxide for lower abdominal surgery in female patients.

BACKGROUND: Although propofol and alfentanil are given in combination in clinical practice, the pharmacodynamic interaction between these drugs has not been described. METHODS: The pharmacodynamics of alfentanil when given as a supplement to propofol were studied in 10 ASA physical status 1 female patients (group P) undergoing lower abdominal surgery and compared to the pharmacodynamics of alfentanil when given as a supplement to nitrous oxide (group N, n = 10). Anesthesia was induced by either computer-controlled infusion of propofol and alfentanil at target concentrations of 3 micrograms/ml and 100 ng/ml (group P) or computer-controlled infusion of 400 ng/ml alfentanil as a supplement to nitrous oxide and oxygen (ratio 2:1; group N). The target concentration of alfentanil was varied to patient responses, and the nitrous oxide and propofol concentrations were maintained constant. A sigmoid Emax model was fitted to response/no response data versus plasma alfentanil concentrations at intubation, skin incision, and the opening of the peritoneum in both groups and for the intraabdominal part of surgery in the individual patients. In addition, the speed of recovery in both groups was determined by a deletion-of-p's test. RESULTS: The EC50 (the concentration at which, with a 50% probability, the patients did not respond to the surgical stimuli) of alfentanil during propofol anesthesia was 92 ng/ml for intubation, 55 ng/ml for skin incision, 84 ng/ml for the opening of the peritoneum, and 66 +/- 38 ng/ml (mean +/- SD) for the intraabdominal part of surgery. The corresponding values during nitrous oxide anesthesia were significantly higher: 429 ng/ml for intubation, 101 ng/ml for skin incision, and 206 +/- 65 ng/ml for the intraabdominal part of surgery (P < 0.001). The speed of recovery was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The alfentanil requirements in ASA physical status 1 female patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery are less when given as a supplement to propofol (4 micrograms/ml) compared to 66% N2O.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1993

Computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil for postoperative analgesia. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Although computer-controlled infusion (CCI) of alfentanil has been shown to be effective intraoperatively, this technique has not been validated for postoperative use. Therefore, the authors examined the efficacy of this technique in providing postoperative pain relief. The study comprised both a validation of published pharmacokinetic data sets and the definition of the minimum effective analgesic concentrations after major orthopedic surgery. METHODS: The bias and inaccuracy of the implemented pharmacokinetic data set were examined, in 20 patients who had undergone major orthopedic surgery, by determination of the median performance error (MDPE) and median absolute performance error (MDAPE). The performance of two other published pharmacokinetic data sets was also examined by simulating the plasma concentrations that would have been predicted, had these data sets been implemented. The minimum effective analgesic concentrations (MEAC) were determined at the following time points: at the onset of pain, at 9:00 PM on the day of surgery, and at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM on the first postoperative day. RESULTS: Measured plasma concentration-time profiles generally were parallel to the target concentration-time profiles. The MDPE and MDAPE obtained were 12% and 28%, respectively. The MEACs ranged from < 1 to 175 ng/ml and showed substantial interindividual variability. The median MEACs at the four study times were 59, 52, 65, and 43 ng/ml. The MEAC at 9:00 PM on the first postoperative day was significantly lower than those at the other study times (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil provides adequate postoperative analgesia. The study demonstrated that pharmacokinetic data sets that are useful for intraoperative CCI of alfentanil are equally valid in the postoperative phase. Although required plasma concentrations of alfentanil are reasonably stable in time, interindividual variations are large, necessitating individual titration.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Pharmacodynamics of propofol in female patients.

Although the clinical properties of propofol have been studied extensively, the pharmacodynamics have not yet been described fully. We studied the propofol concentration-effect relationships for loss of eyelash reflex, loss of consciousness, and hemodynamic changes in 18 female patients, ASA physical status 1, aged 20-49 yr. Propofol was given by computer-controlled infusion. The initial target concentration of 0.5-1 microgram/ml was increased every 12 min by 0.5-1 microgram/ml until the patients lost consciousness. Every 3 min, loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness were tested and an arterial blood sample was taken for analysis of the blood propofol concentration. The concentration-response relationships for loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness were defined by fitting a sigmoid Emax function (where Emax = the maximum effect that can be reached; i.e., 100% of the patients showing loss of eyelash reflex or loss of consciousness) to the response/no response data versus the propofol concentration, using nonlinear regression. The effect of propofol on hemodynamic parameters was analyzed by linear regression. The propofol concentrations at which 50% and 90% of the patients showed loss of eyelash reflex were 2.07 and 2.78 micrograms/ml, respectively. The corresponding values for loss of consciousness were 3.40 and 4.34 micrograms/ml. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased with increasing blood propofol concentration. The correlation coefficients for the decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure versus the blood propofol concentration were r2 = -0.663 and r2 = -0.243, but heart rate did not change. In conclusion, propofol concentrations inducing loss of eyelash reflex are less than those inducing loss of consciousness.

Adult↗