PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F H Shaw

Publications and source records attributed to F H Shaw.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Toward reconciling inferences concerning genetic variation in senescence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Standard models for senescence predict an increase in the additive genetic variance for log mortality rate late in the life cycle. Variance component analysis of age-specific mortality rates of related cohorts is problematic. The actual mortality rates are not observable and can be estimated only crudely at early ages when few individuals are dying and at late ages when most are dead. Therefore, standard quantitative genetic analysis techniques cannot be applied with confidence. We present a novel and rigorous analysis that treats the mortality rates as missing data following two different parametric senescence models. Two recent studies of Drosophila melanogaster, the original analyses of which reached different conclusions, are reanalyzed here. The two-parameter Gompertz model assumes that mortality rates increase exponentially with age. A related but more complex three-parameter logistic model allows for subsequent leveling off in mortality rates at late ages. We find that while additive variance for mortality rates increases for late ages under the Gompertz model, it declines under the logistic model. The results from the two studies are similar, with differences attributable to differences between the experiments.

Aging↗

Genetic components of variation in Nemophila menziesii undergoing inbreeding: morphology and flowering time.

The standard approaches to estimation of quantitative genetic parameters and prediction of response to selection on quantitative traits are based on theory derived for populations undergoing random mating. Many studies demonstrate, however, that mating systems in natural populations often involve inbreeding in various degrees (i.e. , self matings and matings between relatives). Here we apply theory developed for estimating quantitative genetic parameters for partially inbreeding populations to a population of Nemophila menziesii recently obtained from nature and experimentally inbred. Two measures of overall plant size and two of floral size expressed highly significant inbreeding depression. Of three dominance components of phenotypic variance that are defined under partial inbreeding, one was found to contribute significantly to phenotypic variance in flower size and flowering time, while the remaining two components contributed only negligibly to variation in each of the five traits considered. Computer simulations investigating selection response under the more complete genetic model for populations undergoing mixed mating indicate that, for parameter values estimated in this study, selection response can be substantially slowed relative to predictions for a random mating population. Moreover, inbreeding depression alone does not generally account for the reduction in selection response.

Asteraceae↗

Quantitative genetics of response to competitors in Nemophila menziesii: a field experiment.

Recent investigations of evolution in heterogeneous environments have begun to accommodate genetic and environmental complexity typical of natural populations. Theoretical studies demonstrate that evolution of polygenic characters depends heavily on the genetic interdependence of the expression of traits in the different environments in which selection occurs, but information concerning this issue is scarce. We conducted a field experiment to assess the genetic variability of the annual plant Nemophila menziesii in five biotic regimes differing in plant density and composition. Significant, though modest, additive genetic variance in plant size was expressed in particular treatments. Evidence of additive genetic tradeoffs between interspecific and intraspecific competitive performance was found, but this result was not consistent throughout the experiment. Two aspects of experimental design may tend to obscure genetically based tradeoffs across environments in many previously published experiments: (1) inability to isolate additive genetic from other sources of variation and (2) use of novel (e.g., laboratory) environments.

Analysis of Variance↗