To perform or not D2 extended lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer in the West. Effectiveness and limits.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F J Lacueva.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anal abscess is a frequent acute proctological disorder and whether the underlying fistula should be treated at the same time when the abscess is drained remains controversial. We examined indications for drainage alone versus drainage plus fistulotomy in terms of recurrence and continence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a randomized prospective study of 200 consecutive patients with anal abscess. One group received drainage alone, while in the other group drainage plus fistulotomy was performed when a subcutaneous-mucosa, low transsphincteral, or intersphincteral fistula was found. Delayed progressive fistulotomy with suture threads was performed in cases of high transsphincteric or suprasphincteric fistula. RESULTS: The internal opening of the fistula track was found in 83% of the patients. The recurrence rate was related to the surgical technique employed: 29% in the group with drainage alone and 5% in the group for which treatment of the fistula track was attempted. The incontinence rate was also related to the surgical option. In those receiving drainage and treatment of the fistula track incontinence was restricted mostly to patients with delayed fistulotomy (36.7%), compared to 2.8% of patients when simple fistulotomy was performed. There was no incontinence in the drainage alone group. CONCLUSION: Drainage of anal abscess with fistulotomy can be safely performed in cases of subcutaneous, intersphincteral, or low transsphincteral fistulae with a minimal recurrence rate. However, drainage alone and posterior treatment of the fistula track is recommended for high transsphincteral or suprasphincteral fistulae.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of some chemotherapeutic agents used to treat gastric carcinoma patients may be impaired by the presence of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and the status of p53. A modulation of P-gp expression by p53 or other alterations during tumorigenesis have been reported. The authors analyzed P-gp expression in relation to p53 and histopathologic features in gastric carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-one resected gastric carcinomas and mucosa distant from the tumor were assessed for P-gp expression by immunohistochemistry with C494 and JSB-1 antibodies. p53 expression was also immunohistochemically assessed by DO7 antibody in tumor samples. P-gp and p53 expression were semiquantitatively analyzed according to the percentage of stained cells. Histologic type, grade, vessel invasion, and stage were also studied. RESULTS: Moderate or high P-gp expression was detected in gastric carcinoma in 29 cases (71%) and in gastric mucosa remote from the tumor in 36 cases (88%). This reduction in P-gp expression was observed in 22% of the carcinomas, all but 1 being p53 immunonegative tumors. Thus, 8 (42%) of the p53 immunonegative carcinomas showed a loss of P-gp expression compared with their distant gastric mucosa. All p53 immunopositive carcinomas coexpressed P-gp. No correlation between P-gp expression and histologic type, grade, vessel invasion, or stage was found. CONCLUSIONS: P-gp expression in gastric carcinomas is frequent and coexpression with p53 is found. The analysis of P-gp expression in carcinomas and distant mucosa show that it is not regulated by p53, but a loss of P-gp detected in some of these carcinomas is mainly associated with a lack of p53 protein accumulation.
AIMS: Most chemotherapeutic regimens used against gastric carcinoma include anthracyclines whose effectiveness can be impaired by the presence of P-glycoprotein. In order to obtain a reliable pattern of P-glycoprotein expression in these tumours an immunohistochemical study using a panel of anti-P-glycoprotein antibodies was performed in frozen and paraffinized tissues. METHODS AND RESULTS: Frozen and paraffinized samples from 25 gastric carcinomas were immunohistochemically analysed using a panel of four anti-P-glycoprotein monoclonal antibodies including C219, MRK16, JSB-1 and C494. Semiquantitative analysis indicated that moderate or high P-glycoprotein levels were detected in 40% to 76% of gastric adenocarcinomas, depending on the anti-P-glycoprotein antibody used. The antibody C494 was the most sensitive in detecting P-glycoprotein in both frozen and paraffinized gastric carcinoma samples. Moreover, C494 showed a pattern of staining exclusively associated with the plasma membrane, in contrast to the cytoplasmic with reinforcement of plasma membrane pattern displayed by the other three antibodies. Significant differences in P-glycoprotein levels were obtained when C494 and MRK16 were used in frozen tissues. Finally, detection of P-glycoprotein in frozen samples did not improve when compared to paraffinized ones. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that P-glycoprotein is frequently expressed in gastric adenocarcinomas, and the use of C494 complemented by JSB-1 is recommended for reliable detection of P-glycoprotein in this neoplasm.
Early gastric cancer recurrence is sometimes difficult to diagnose even by protocols using imaging techniques and tumor markers. We report a gastric cancer recurrence diagnosed by the appearance of a Sister Mary Joseph's nodule that illustrates the lack of sensitivity of these methods. We also discuss the protocol we currently follow for these patients.
In this study we used a cost-outcome analysis to evaluate our follow-up protocol for patients who had been resected for gastric cancer. We designed a descriptive cross-sectional trial through consecutive sampling of patients who had undergone resection of gastric carcinoma and were followed in our outpatient department during 1991. Serological (CEA) and or imaging procedures were pathologic at least two months prior to the onset of symptoms in 33% of recurrences. No significant correlation was found between serum CEA levels and CEA tumor tissue staining in patients who recurred. Only 17% of patients who relapsed underwent further treatment (surgery and chemotherapy) with no improvement found in terms of survival. The overall cost per year has been estimated at US$ 6118. Our results show that serological levels of CEA and available imaging techniques for routine follow-up provide little advantage in diagnosing gastric cancer recurrence over clinical surveillance alone.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.