[Interactive attention between practitioner and specialist].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Kuntschen.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hyperprolactinemia causes a certain number of clinical syndromes whose sequels vary much depending on the age group. It is a common affection as frequent in women as in males and it necessitates prolonged treatment. It may have several causes, the most frequent ones are: adverse drug reactions, prolactinomas, disturbed distribution of dopamine and hyperthyroidism. Evaluation includes repeated measurements of prolactin, T4, and TSH, a radiologic work-up including a CT-scan or magnetic resonance imaging. In the case of a prolactinoma the choice of treatment depends on size and evolution of the adenoma. Bromocriptine permits to correct hyperprolactinemia in the majority of cases. After adequate treatment of pituitary adenoma these are no contraindications for pregnancy, once fertility has returned.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The case is reported of a 36-year-old woman presenting with progressive hypercalcemia which led to the diagnosis of adrenocortical insufficiency of recent origin. Adrenal failure developed soon after septic shocks in this heparin anticoagulated patient post leg amputation for Buerger's disease. The clinical, biological and radiological (CT scan) data are consistent with bilateral adrenal hemorrhage as the cause of primary adrenal insufficiency. The pathogenesis of hypercalcemia in this condition is discussed.
The effect of glibenclamide treatment on insulin-mediated glucose disposal was studied in eight C-peptide-negative type I diabetic patients. The patients were studied twice by the euglycemic insulin clamp technique. One of the two experiments was preceded by glibenclamide treatment at the dose of 5 mg, three times daily for 15 days; half of the patients had the first test before and the second test after sulfonylurea treatment, and vice versa. Insulin was infused for four periods of 2 h each sequentially at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 mU kg-1 min-1; for each insulin infusion period, the steady state plasma free insulin levels were comparable with or without glibenclamide. The mean +/- SEM plasma glucose concentration was 88 +/- 2 mg/dl in both experiments. The insulin-mediated glucose disposal rate was greater with glibenclamide during the first insulin infusion period (which generated plasma free insulin levels within the physiological range) 2.68 +/- 0.32 mg kg-1 min-1 with glibenclamide vs. 1.97 +/- 0.20 mg kg-1 min-1 without glibenclamide (P less than 0.005). However, glucose disposal rates did not differ in the diabetic patients with or without glibenclamide treatment during the second, third, and fourth insulin infusion periods, which generated plasma free insulin levels in the supraphysiological range. These results provide evidence for an extrapancreatic effect of glibenclamide at low insulin concentrations during euglycemic clamping in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. However, this effect was not reflected clinically in either an increased rate of hypoglycemic reactions or decreased insulin needs during the short term period of treatment.
Sensitivity to insulin in vivo was studied in six Type 1 diabetic patients without residual insulin secretion and without clinical insulin resistance, and in eight non-diabetic subjects, using the euglycaemic insulin clamp technique. Insulin was infused for four periods of 2 h sequentially at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mU X kg-1 X min-1; for each insulin infusion period the steady-state plasma free insulin levels were comparable in the diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. The mean +/- SEM plasma glucose concentration was 4.9 +/- 0.03 mmol/l in the diabetic subjects (coefficient of variation of plasma glucose values: 5.7 +/- 0.7%) and 4.6 +/- 0.01 mmol/l in the control subjects (coefficient of variation: 5.1 +/- 0.6%). Insulin-mediated glucose disposal was lower in the diabetic than in the non-diabetic subjects at the two lower insulin infusion rates (mean +/- SEM = 2.03 +/- 0.27 versus 4.8 +/- 0.64 mg X kg-1 X min-1 at the first insulin infusion rate, p less than 0.01, and 5.59 +/- 0.59 versus 8.36 +/- 0.61 mg X kg-1 X min-1 at the second insulin infusion rate, p less than 0.01). However, insulin-induced glucose uptake did not differ significantly between the two groups at the third and fourth rates of insulin infusion. These results show that impaired insulin sensitivity in Type 1 diabetes is dependent on insulin concentration.
In vivo sensitivity to insulin was assessed by the euglycaemic insulin clamp technique in 5 type I diabetic subjects without residual insulin secretion and in 5 non-diabetic control subjects. Insulin was infused at increasing rates of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mU/kg/min in 4 periods of 2 hours. The diabetic subjects were resistant to insulin during the 1st and 2nd insulin infusion periods corresponding to the rates of 0.5 and 1.0 mU/kg/min, when compared to the non-diabetic subjects. However, glucose disposal rates were similar in the diabetic and control subjects at the 2 higher insulin infusion rates (2.0 and 5.0 mU/kg/min). Thus insulin resistance in type I diabetes is dependent on insulin concentration.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.