Transplantation of liver grafts from living donors into adults.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Humans↗
Biomedical subjects
F L Delmonico
Publications and source records attributed to F L Delmonico.
Control of antidonor antibody production with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with chronic rejection.
BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation, chronic rejection is a major cause of late allograft loss. Recent studies indicate that a subset of chronic rejection is associated with anti-HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) and complement C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC). Since rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil has been found to limit antidonor B-cell responses in recipients with acute humoral rejection, we sought to determine whether a similar immunosuppressive regimen might be effective in patients with 'chronic humoral rejection'. METHODS: Four renal allograft recipients with 'chronic humoral rejection' were prospectively identified. The diagnosis was based on: (1) progressive rise in serum creatinine over 12 months; (2) typical pathologic features by light microscopy (transplant arteriopathy and glomerulopathy); (3) widespread C4d deposits in PTC by immunofluorescence; (4) detection of 'de novo' DSA at the time of biopsy. Maintenance immunosuppression was CsA, prednisone and azathioprine (n=3) or prednisone and azathioprine (n=1). Rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil was initiated in all patients, 12 hr after cyclosporine and azathioprine discontinuation. RESULTS: At diagnosis, the mean serum creatinine was 3.9 mg/dl (range: 3.3 to 5.4 mg/dl). DSA was an IgG directed against HLA class II (n=3) or class I (n=2), that is one patient had both anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies. Pretreatment antibody titers varied between 1:8 and 1:128. Rescue therapy was associated with a rapid and sustained decrease in antibody titers. In two patients, DSA became undetectable after 9 months and a repeat biopsy performed after 12 months revealed a decrease in C4d deposition in PTC. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a decrease in DSA production can be induced in renal allograft recipients with 'chronic humoral rejection' by using an immunosuppressive regimen that combines tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Limitation of antidonor antibody synthesis may be important for the treatment or the prevention of chronic rejection in organ transplantation.
Adult↗
Acute humoral rejection in renal allograft recipients: I. Incidence, serology and clinical characteristics.
BACKGROUND: Acute rejection (AR) associated with de novo production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a clinicopathological entity that carries a poor prognosis (acute humoral rejection, AHR). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of AHR in renal allograft recipients, and to further analyze the antibodies involved. METHODS: During a 4-year period, 232 renal transplants (Tx) were performed at our institution. Assays for DSA included T and B cell cytotoxic and/or flow cytometric cross-matches and cytotoxic antibody screens (PRA). C4d complement staining was performed on frozen biopsy tissue. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients (35%) suffered at least one episode of AR within the first 3 months: 51 had steroid-insensitive AR whereas the remaining 30 had steroid-sensitive AR. No DSA were found in patients with steroid-sensitive AR. In contrast, circulating DSA were found in 19/51 patients (37%) with steroid-insensitive AR, and widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries were present in 18 of these 19 (95%). In at least three cases, antibodies were against donor HLA class II antigens. DSA were not found in the remaining 32 patients but C4d staining was positive in 2 of 32. The DSA/C4d positive (n=18) and DSA/C4d negative (n=30) groups differed in pre-Tx PRA levels, percentage of re-Tx patients, refractoriness to antilymphocyte therapy, and outcome. Plasmapheresis and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil rescue reversed rejection in 9 of 10 recipients with refractory AHR. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the patients with steroid-insensitive AR had evidence of AHR, often resistant to antilymphocyte therapy. Most cases (95%) with DSA at the time of rejection had widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries, suggesting a pathogenic role of the circulating alloantibody. Combined DSA testing and C4d staining provides a useful approach for the early diagnosis of AHR, a condition that often necessitates a more intensive therapeutic rescue regimen.
Acute Disease↗
Managing the highly sensitized transplant recipient and B cell tolerance.
The detection of anti-donor-HLA antibodies in a renal allograft recipient's serum, either at the time of or after transplantation, is usually associated with specific antibody-mediated clinical syndromes. These can be divided temporally into three categories: hyperacute rejection, acute humoral rejection and chronic humoral rejection. With the identification of new immunosuppressive drug combinations, more-effective control of alloantibody production has been recently achieved in humans. Thus, prevention and/or treatment of antibody-mediated allograft injury are now possible. Ultimately, the induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism may allow us to overcome the problem of allosensitization and accept an allograft without chronic immunosuppression.
Animals↗
Transplant kidneys sooner: discard fewer kidneys.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Algorithms↗
Approach to the management of allograft recipients following the detection of hepatitis B virus in the prospective organ donor.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a highly infectious blood-borne pathogen that can be transmitted by a solid organ allograft and result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in the management of HBV infection prompt a reappraisal of the approach to the management of allograft recipients from cadaver donors previously exposed to HBV, because of the on-going shortage of organ donors. This report reviews current knowledge regarding the risk of HBV transmission by an organ from cadaver donors testing positive for markers of HBV infection and makes recommendations for the evaluation, treatment, and surveillance of the allograft recipients.
Hepatitis B↗
The kidney transplant program at the Massachusetts general hospital.
Between February 1963 and December 2000, 1,627 kidney transplants were performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital. The majority (62%) were from cadaveric donors, although in recent years (1996-2000) 52% have been allografts from living donors, with an increase in living unrelated donors. The introduction of CsA and OKT3 in 1984 was associated with a significant improvement in actuarial renal allograft survival, although a persistent late attrition of allografts continues beyond the first year after transplantation. As reported in other centers, current actuarial survival for living unrelated allografts is superior to that of cadaveric allografts, and is quite similar to that observed in recipients of non-HLA identical living-related transplants. Our preliminary laparoscopic donor nephrectomy experience is encouraging as excellent allograft survival and function has been observed, with minimal morbidity associated with the procedure and a low rate of conversion to open nephrectomy. Recent changes in immunosuppressive protocols have resulted in lower early acute rejection rates, however the incidence of delayed graft function remains unchanged in cadaveric renal transplantation. The role of humoral immunity in allograft rejection has been progressively clarified and new approaches to control donor specific alloantibody production have been shown to be effective. Current clinical studies are ongoing to determine the optimal type and dose of calcineurin inhibitors beyond the first year after transplantation and to study whether avoidance of steroids is safe and feasible. Finally, an innovative tolerance induction protocol using the mixed chimerism approach has been successfully accomplished in selected patients with end-stage renal disease secondary to multiple myeloma. These encouraging observations emphasize that major changes from current immunosuppressive regimens are likely to occur over the next few years as more approaches to tolerance induction are explored clinically.
Graft Rejection↗
First report of the United Network for Organ Sharing Transplant Tumor Registry: donors with a history of cancer.
BACKGROUND: Severe organ shortages have led to donor pool expansion to include older individuals, patients with hypertension, diabetes, and a past history of cancer. Transmission of cancer from cadaveric donors is a risk of transplantation and carries a high mortality rate. METHODS: During a 33 month period, UNOS recorded 14,705 cadaveric donors of which 257 had a past history of cancer (PHC). A total of 650 organs (397 kidneys, 178 livers, and 75 hearts) were transplanted from these 257 donors. Type of cancer, tumor-free interval at organ procurement, and whether any PHC donor transmitted a tumor to the recipient were analyzed. RESULTS: Three PHC donor tumor types (skin, brain, genitourinary) were associated with 549 of the transplanted organs (85%). Twenty-eight recipients of PHC donor organs developed posttransplantation tumors (18 skin, 2 PTLD, 8 solid cancers). During a mean follow-up of 45 months (range 30-61 months), no recipients of organs from PHC donors developed a donor derived cancer. The majority (71.5%) of all non-skin and non-CNS system cancer donors had a cancer-free interval of greater than five years. CONCLUSIONS: Risks of cancer transmission from donors with a history of non-melanoma skin cancer and selected cancers of the CNS appear to be small. Risks of tumor transmission with certain other types of cancer may be acceptable, particularly if the donor has a long cancer-free interval prior to organ procurement while certain other cancers pose a high transmission risk. Selective use of PHC donors may permit expansion of the donor pool.
Cadaver↗
Consensus statement on the live organ donor.
OBJECTIVE: To recommend practice guidelines for transplant physicians, primary care providers, health care planners, and all those who are concerned about the well-being of the live organ donor. PARTICIPANTS: An executive group representing the National Kidney Foundation, and the American Societies of Transplantation, Transplant Surgeons, and Nephrology formed a steering committee of 12 members to evaluate current practices of living donor transplantation of the kidney, pancreas, liver, intestine, and lung. The steering committee subsequently assembled more than 100 representatives of the transplant community (physicians, nurses, ethicists, psychologists, lawyers, scientists, social workers, transplant recipients, and living donors) at a national conference held June 1-2, 2000, in Kansas City, Mo. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Attendees participated in 7 assigned work groups. Three were organ specific (lung, liver, and kidney) and 4 were focused on social and ethical concerns (informed consent, donor source, psychosocial issues, and live organ donor registry). Work groups' deliberations were structured by a series of questions developed by the steering committee. Each work group presented its deliberations to an open plenary session of all attendees. This information was stored and shaped into a statement circulated electronically to all attendees for their comments, and finally approved by the steering committee for publication. The term consensus is not meant to convey universal agreement of the participants. The statement identifies issues of controversy; however, the wording of the entire statement is a consensus by approval of all attendees. CONCLUSION: The person who gives consent to be a live organ donor should be competent, willing to donate, free from coercion, medically and psychosocially suitable, fully informed of the risks and benefits as a donor, and fully informed of the risks, benefits, and alternative treatment available to the recipient. The benefits to both donor and recipient must outweigh the risks associated with the donation and transplantation of the living donor organ.
Health Status↗
Cadaver donor screening for infectious agents in solid organ transplantation.
The transmission of infection by a cadaver donor organ can result not only in loss of the allograft but also in death of the immunosuppressed recipient. Despite the shortage of cadaver organ donors, every donor must be evaluated thoroughly for the potential transmission of infectious disease, because the consequences of the organ donor events can have a profound effect on the transplant outcome. This review summarizes current knowledge about serological screening of organ donors to determine the suitability of organs from cadaver donors for transplantation.
Cadaver↗
Chronic renal allograft dysfunction: a role for mycophenolate mofetil?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Analyzing risk factors of renal transplant outcome.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cadaver↗
A novel united network for organ sharing region kidney allocation plan improves transplant access for minority candidates.
BACKGROUND: We report the consequences of a novel kidney allocation system on access of non-Caucasians (NC) to kidney transplantation. This new plan has provided a balance of allocation determinants between time waiting, HLA match, and geography (population density between donor and recipient center). METHODS: Three sequential systems of regional allocation were analyzed: period I (September 1994 to September 1996), period II (September 1996 to November 1997), and period III (December 1997 to March 1 1999). Periods II and III are reflective of the new allocation plan. RESULTS: During periods II and III, the NC rate of kidney transplantation increased closer to the NC proportion on the wait list, comparatively exceeding the national UNOS data. There was no statistical difference in regional mean wait time between Caucasian and NC. Improvements in access to transplantation for NCs between period I and periods II and III appear to be related to changes in geographic allocation weight from local unit to population density points, to the inclusion of the entire region in the plan, and to the deletion of intermediate degrees of B/DR mismatching in the revised plan. Despite the increased proportion of NCs on the wait list from period I to period III, the percentage difference between the proportion of NCs waiting on the list and the proportion NCs receiving a transplant fell from 7.8% to 4.9%. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that this new allocation plan was associated with improved access of minority candidates to transplantation. The broadening of geographic allocation and the alteration of HLA points appear to permit a more favorable opportunity for renal transplantation to NC candidates. selection, compared to the UNOS formula. In this report, we analyze the consequences of the Region 1 allocation system on the access of non-Caucasian (NC) candidates to cadaver donor kidney transplantation.
Health Services Accessibility↗
Outcome of transplantation of organs procured from bacteremic donors.
BACKGROUND: Transplantation of organs from donors who are bacteremic is controversial. We examined the outcome of recipients of solid organs from donors with bacteremia and/or fungemia at the time of organ recovery. METHODS: All organ donors from a single organ procurement organization between January 1990 and December 1996 were retrospectively analyzed. We calculated rates of transmission from bacteremic or fungemic donors to their recipients and compared the graft and patient survival rates for recipients of these organs with those for recipients of organs from non-bacteremic donors. RESULTS: There were 95 (5.1%) bacteremic donors from a total of 1775, from whom 212 recipients received organs. Forty-six (48%) of the bacteremic donors had pathogens in their blood. Among the 101 recipients of organs from these, no evidence of transmission could be documented. (0% transmission rate, 95% CI 0-3). The remaining 49 donors had either Staphylococcus epidermidis or other unlikely pathogens recovered from the blood. Examination of the 111 recipients of organs from these donors also found no evidence for transmission (0% transmission rate, 95% CI 0-3). Of the 212 recipients, 193 (91%) received a mean of 3.8+/-2.5 days of antibiotics postoperatively. The 30-day graft and patient survival for recipients of organs from bacteremic donors was not significantly different from recipients of organs from nonbacteremic donors (P = 0.695 for patient survival, and P = 0.310 for graft survival). CONCLUSIONS: Organs transplanted from bacteremic donors do not transmit bacterial infection or result in poorer outcomes. Use of organs from these donors could help increase organ availability.
Adult↗
Evaluation of pre- and posttransplant donor-specific transfusion/cyclosporine A in non-HLA identical living donor kidney transplant recipients. Cooperative Clinical Trials in Transplantation Research Group.
BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of donor specific transfusion (DST) have become controversial in the cyclosporine era. This study was performed to evaluate the potential benefits of a new protocol for administering DSTs in the perioperative period. METHODS: Non-HLA identical living donor kidney transplant recipients were randomized prospectively to control or to receive a DST 24 hr before transplant and 7-10 days posttransplant. All patients received similar immunosuppression according to protocol. RESULTS: The protocol had 212 evaluable patients (115 transfused and 97 control). There were no differences in 1- and 2-year graft and patient survival, causes of graft failure, incidence and types of infection, repeat hospitalization, or the ability to withdraw steroids. Immunological hyporesponsiveness (by mixed lymphocyte culture) occurred more frequently in transfused patients (18%) than controls (3%) (P = 0.04). Blood stored for > or =3 days was associated with fewer early rejections than blood stored < or =2 days. Overall, class II antigen mismatches were associated with more rejection episodes than class I antigen mismatches. However, transfused patients, but not control patients, with more class I antigen mismatches were more likely to have rejections. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of DSTs by the method described had no practical influence on patient or graft survival for up to 2 years. However, donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was more common in transfused patients (18 vs. 3%). Longer follow-up will be needed to determine whether DST will be associated with long-term benefit.
Blood Preservation↗
The clinical usefulness of the renal allograft biopsy in the cyclosporine era: a prospective study.
BACKGROUND: The renal allograft biopsy is generally accepted as the gold standard for clarifying the cause of renal dysfunction. However, the clinical usefulness of this procedure has rarely been studied prospectively, nor have most studies included follow-up of patients to delineate the influence of the biopsy on clinical outcome. In this study, we evaluated prospectively the clinical usefulness of the allograft biopsy in renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine (CyA). METHODS: During a 21-month period, 82 biopsies were performed. In 54 instances (47 patients), we outlined a presumed diagnosis and tentative treatment plan before the procedure. After the biopsy, a definitive diagnosis was made and an appropriate patient management approach was instituted. We analyzed the incidence of change in patient management that resulted from histological findings. All patients were followed to monitor their response to treatment and allograft survival. In cases of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection (ACR) or cyclosporine (CyA) toxicity, clinical and laboratory data from the day of the biopsy were reviewed to determine their diagnostic value. RESULTS: One biopsy specimen was inadequate for definitive interpretation. The biopsy findings resulted in a change in patient management in 22 (41.5%) of the remaining 53 cases (change group). The incidence of altered patient management was 38.7% in biopsy specimens taken in the first month, 55.6% between 1 and 12 months, and 38.5% after 1 year posttransplantation. A change in management was required in 2 of 2 patients with chronic allograft dysfunction, in 44.4% of the 45 patients with acute allograft dysfunction, and in none of the patients with delayed graft function (n=6). Within the first week of treatment 19 of 22 (86.4%) in the change group and 25 of 31 (80.6%) in the no change group had a positive response to therapy. The 1-year allograft survival rate was also similar between the two groups. None of the clinical and laboratory data was useful in distinguishing ACR from CyA toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Renal allograft biopsy findings alter patient management recommendations in approximately 40% of patients in whom a presumptive diagnosis had been made on the basis of clinical and laboratory findings. Patients who had a change in patient management because of biopsy findings demonstrated a response to therapy and allograft survival similar to those of patients who had no alteration in management plan after the biopsy.
Adult↗
Evolving trends in liver transplantation: an outcome and charge analysis.
BACKGROUND: Due to the limited supply and increased demand for donor livers, waiting times are progressively lengthening, which may lead to transplantation at more advanced and less cost-effective stages of disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and hospital charges of liver transplantation during two recent eras to identify areas for providing more cost-effective care. METHODS: A total of 144 primary liver allografts were performed from 1991 to 1996. Patient characteristics, outcome measures, and hospital charges were compared for patients receiving allografts between 1991 and 1993 (group A) versus those receiving grafts between 1994 and 1996 (group B) using unpaired Student t tests for continuous data and chi-squared tests for categorical data. RESULTS: In comparing groups A and B, no significant differences in patient demographics, relative contraindications, or indication for transplantation existed; median waiting time from date of listing until transplant increased from 88 days to 159 days; and a shift in UNOS priority status at time of transplantation occurred, as the percentage of patients requiring inpatient care increased from 58% to 75% (P=0.034). Despite this, patient hospital and 1-year survival significantly improved from 75.0% to 90.3% (P=0.016), and from 68.1% to 88.9% (P=0.002), respectively. Total hospital charges, without correction for inflation, were $174,908+/-16,388 in A and $193,525+/-14,444 in B (P=0.288). The increased charges were associated with longer inpatient length of stay (LOS) before transplant, resulting in increased pretransplant charges from $24,088+/-4134 (A) to $39,490+/-6,196 (B) (P=0.011). Room and service (54%) was the largest pretransplant contributor to charges, while blood products (23%), room and service (21%), organ acquisition (13%), and operating room charges (11%) contributed the most after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Longer waiting times resulting in transplantation at later stages of disease have occurred, leading to longer pretransplant LOS and its associated charges. Despite more advanced disease, patient survival rates have significantly improved with fewer infection-related deaths. LOS pretransplant, blood products, and operating room services represent potential areas for providing more cost-effective care.
Adolescent↗
In vivo generation of C4d, Bb, iC3b, and SC5b-9 after OKT3 administration in kidney and lung transplant recipients.
BACKGROUND: OKT3 monoclonal antibody therapy results in an acute clinical syndrome (ACS) associated with the release of tumor necrosis factor and sequestration of neutrophils in the lungs. We have previously shown that inhibition of tumor necrosis factor does not completely eliminate OKT3-ACS, suggesting that other factors also contribute to the ACS. The current studies analyzed complement activation in vivo during the first hour after OKT3 administration. METHODS: Renal (n=4) and lung (n=4) transplant recipients received OKT3 as treatment for rejection and induction therapy, respectively. Complement activation products C4d, Bb, iC3b, and SC5b-9 were measured by ELISA. Hemodynamic parameters were also monitored in the lung transplant recipients. Neutrophil expression of CD11a, CD11b, and CD18 was monitored by flow cytometry. Controls included patients receiving methylprednisolone for rejection (n=4), two adults with adult respiratory distress syndrome who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and normal volunteers (n=5). P values less than 0.05 (*) were considered significant. RESULTS: Increases in the plasma levels of C4d, Bb, iC3b, and SC5b-9 were observed in seven of eight patients after OKT3 administration. Mean values (n=8) at 0, 15, and 60 min (in microg/ml) were as follows-C4d: 1.865, 2.644*, and 2.607*; Bb: 0.245, 0.411, and 0.385; iC3b: 10.881, 17.242*, and 15.145*; and SC5b-9: 0.232, 0.269, and 0.302*. An increase in CD11b and CD18 and a decrease of CD11a on neutrophils in parallel with complement activation was observed. In lung transplant recipients, C3 activation correlated with increases in mean pulmonary and central venous pressures (P<0.05). As compared with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which activated classical and alternative pathways, OKT3 predominantly activated complement by the classical pathway. Methylprednisolone pulses did not activate complement. CONCLUSIONS: Complement activation is an early event after OKT3 administration and is associated with the increased expression of adhesion molecules on neutrophils and with pulmonary hemodynamic changes. Effective therapeutic approaches to the control of early monoclonal antibody side effects may require measures that limit complement activation in addition to reducing cytokine activity.
Adult↗