[Possibility of transmission of HBV through intradermal injection].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F L Yu.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The [3H]XTPs are used widely to monitor RNA synthesis in vitro. Recently, we discovered that they reflected only 40-45% of the true rate of nuclear RNA synthesis. Thus, when [8-14C]GTP was used, 1466 pmol [8-14C]GMP was incorporated per mg DNA/10 min. On the other hand, when [8-3H]GTP was used, only 564 pmol [8-3H]GMP was incorporated per mg DNA/10 min. There are three obvious factors that could have contributed to this greater than 2-fold difference in the apparent incorporation rate: commercial [8-3H]GTP sample was contaminated with substances causing the assay medium to be less efficient in RNA synthesis; 3H exchange occurred during acid washing of the [3H]RNA; and there was a greater quenching effect on [3H]RNA. Experiments were designed to test each of these alternatives. We are able to conclude that none of the above three are contributing factors. Our data also show that the 3H label was removed after it was incorporated into RNA. Similar differences were observed when 3H and 14C labeled pairs of ATP, UTP and CTP were compared. Furthermore, when nuclei were fractionated into nucleolar and nucleoplasmic fractions and carried out RNA synthesis, the loss of 3H label was observed mainly from the nucleoplasmic fraction.
Previous studies suggested multiple sites of action of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in vivo to inhibit rat liver nuclear RNA synthesis--it impairs nucleolar DNA template function and inhibits RNA polymerase II activity. We have previously shown that AFB1 activated in vitro inhibits nucleolar RNA synthesis. The question is whether AFB1 can inhibit RNA polymerase II under these in vitro conditions. Male Sprague-Dawley rats, 200 g, were injected i.p. with 0.6 mg AFB1 and liver nuclei were isolated 2 h later. When the total nuclear free RNA polymerases were extracted and assayed in the absence and presence of alpha-amanitin (3.2 micrograms/ml), we found that only alpha-amanitin-sensitive (i.e., RNA polymerase II) activity was inhibited (97%). DEAE-Sephadex chromatography confirmed this result. When total nuclear free RNA polymerases were incubated with AFB1 activated in vitro under conditions producing 70% inhibition of nucleolar RNA synthesis, no inhibition was observed for either alpha-amanitin-sensitive or -resistant activities. Similar results were obtained with low and high (28 and 167 micrograms/ml) concentrations of AFB1. This was further confirmed using highly purified RNA polymerase II. We conclude that AFB1 inhibition of RNA polymerase II activity in vivo is not a result of direct interaction of AFB1 to the enzyme.
When rat liver nuclear chromatin was sonicated in buffer containing 0.35 M (NH4)2SO4 to release the engaged RNA polymerases, a potent inhibitor was also released. This inhibitor elicited dramatic inhibition of RNA synthesis regardless of whether the free or engaged RNA polymerase was used. On further analysis, it became apparent that the site of inhibition was on the DNA template, not on the enzyme. This inhibitor could be extracted into 0.25 N HCl by the standard procedure for the isolation of histones. This acid-soluble inhibitor, showing typical histone band on gel, was RNase A and DNase I resistant, but was sensitive to both pronase and snake venom phosphodiesterase digestion, as well as to 0.1 N KOH hydrolysis. Furthermore, when [14C]adenine labeled poly-ADP-ribosylated histones were digested by snake venom phosphodiesterase, the release of radioactivity was in parallel to the loss of inhibitor activity. We conclude that the inhibitor substances are poly-ADP-ribosylated histones and propose that the poly-ADP-ribosylated histones rather than the histones are the natural suppressors of the gene.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the endogenous engaged RNA polymerase I were used as specific probes to monitor the physiologically inactive and active nucleolar chromatin template function, respectively. Actinomycin D bound preferentially to the physiologically active regions of rat liver nucleolar chromatin in vivo.
The literature on various isolated carcinogen-DNA adducts indicates clearly that the binding of chemical carcinogens to DNA is highly specific. Since DNA in eukaryotic cells is complexed with chromosomal proteins and organized into transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin, chemical carcinogens also might show binding specificities at the chromatin level. Using Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the endogenous engaged RNA polymerase I as specific probes to monitor respectively the physiologically inactive and active nucleolar chromatin template function, this paper reports that aflatoxin B1, after metabolic activation either in vivo or in vitro, binds preferentially to the physiologically active regions of rat liver nucleolar chromatin, and that this binding specificity is largely lost after the removal of chromosomal proteins from the nucleoli.
The effect of methylazoxymethanol acetate on rat liver nuclear and nucleolar RNA synthesis is investigated at various doses (5 to 50 mg/100 g body weight) and for various lengths of time (1 to 24 hr). The results show that this carcinogen is a potent inhibitor of both nuclear and nucleolar RNA synthesis. Like other carcinogens studied previously in this laboratory, e.g., N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene, aflatoxin B1, and actinomycin D, methylazoxymethanol acetate inhibits RNA synthesis at multiple sites. It impairs chromatin template function and selectively inhibits the activity of RNA polymerase II. Experimental evidence suggests the mechanism of inhibition of RNA polymerase II activity is due to a decrease in catalytic efficiency rather than in the total number of the enzyme. In addition, it is found that methylazoxymethanol acetate induces a dramatic condensation of nucleoplasmic chromatin.
Rat-liver nucleoli (10-15 micrograms DNA) were digested with either 0.6 or 3 units of DNase I for various times (up to 1 h). RNA synthesis was then measured in the absence or presence of 3 units of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. It was found that the nucleolar chromatin supporting the endogenous engaged RNA polymerase I transcription was completely destroyed in 3 min with either concentration of DNase I. The nucleolar chromatin template transcribed by E. coli RNA polymerase retained 50% of its original capacity even 60 min after 3 units of DNase I digestion. When hybridization experiments were conducted, it was found that the DNAs derived from both levels of DNase-I-digested nucleoli were incapable of forming hybrids with the labelled nucleolar RNA synthesized by the engaged RNA polymerase I from the untreated nucleoli. Since the engaged RNA polymerase I transcribes only the physiologically active genes of the nucleolar chromatin, and the RNA transcripts represent active gene product, these data suggest that DNase I digestion has completely destroyed the active genes of the nucleolar chromatin, and E. coli RNA polymerase is able to transcribe the inactive nucleolar chromatin template.
Recent studies from this laboratory have shown that several chemical carcinogens, i.e., aflatoxin B1, N-OH-2-acetyl-aminofluorene, actinomycin D, and methylazoxymethanol acetate, when administered in vivo, have all produced a selective and dramatic inhibition of rat liver nuclear RNA polymerase II activity. To determine whether this inhibition is related to carcinogenesis, aflatoxin B1 is used as a model system to test tissue, sex, and animal species specificity that is known to be characteristic of carcinogenesis. The results show that aflatoxin B1 (3 mg/kg body weight, i.p., 2h) inhibits RNA polymerase II activity only in the target tissue, liver, and not in the non-target tissues, e.g., lung and brain. It inhibits liver RNA polymerase II activity preferentially in male over female rats, and has no effect on mouse liver RNA polymerase II activity. These results are in good agreement with the specificities of aflatoxin B1 carcinogenesis in the whole animal systems. Furthermore, with the four principal aflatoxins tested, the order of inhibitor effect on RNA polymerase II is: B1 greater than G1 greater than B2, G2. It is concluded, therefore, that the inhibition of RNA polymerase II activity and carcinogenesis are likely to be related and that it is theoretically sound to use this inhibition as a diagnostic tool to screen potential carcinogens.
In an earlier report, it was shown that aflatoxin B1 treatment strongly inhibits rat liver nucleolar RNA synthesis (Yu, F. L. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 3245-3251). The present paper is an attempt to elucidate the mechanism of this inhibition. Two h after aflatoxin B1 injection (0.3 mg/100 g body weight), rat liver nucleolar RNA synthesis, in vitro, was inhibited by an average of 90%. This inhibition could result from (a) inhibited RNA polymerase I activity per se, (b) impaired nucleolar DNA template, or (c) impaired nucleolar chromatin. Earlier studies found that the total RNA polymerase I activity was not affected by aflatoxin B1 treatment. In the present work the total nucleolar DNAs from control and from aflatoxin B1-treated groups were isolated and compared for template efficiencies in directing RNA synthesis with solubilized RNA polymerase I from the control group. No difference was found. However, when nucleolar chromatin function was analyzed, it was found that aflatoxin B1 treatment resulted in a dramatic reduction in the RNA chain elongation rate to only 13% of the control. The chain number, which is a measure of the number of engaged enzymes transcribing the nucleolar chromatin initiated in vivo, was only slightly reduced (33%). Furthermore since it was found that aflatoxin B1 treatment did not increase RNase activity in the treated nucleoli, the dramatic decrease in RNA chain elongation is therefore believed to be the major mechanism of aflatoxin B1 inhibition of rat liver nucleolar RNA synthesis. DNase I digestion of the nucleolar chromatin suggests that aflatoxin B1 treatment may have altered the conformation of the transcriptionally active regions of the nucleolar chromatin.
When isolated rat liver nuclei and nucleoli are compared for RNA synthesis in vitro, the rate of nucleolar RNA synthesis is found to be more than 10 times higher. In order to understand this high rate of nucleolar transcription, DNA from both nuclear and nucleolar fractions was isolated and compared for the ability to direct RNA synthesis with homologous RNA polymerases. No difference between these two templates is evident. On the other hand, when the total nuclear and nucleolar RNA polymerases are isolated and compared on a per-unit-weight-of-DNA basis, it becomes clear that the nucleolus has a 10-fold higher RNA polymerase concentration than the nucleus. This result suggests that RNA polymerase I concentration rather than the nucleolar DNA template efficiency is responsible for the observed high rate of nucleolar transcription under the normal steady-state condition.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
It is well known that actinomycin D, a carcinogen, inhibits DNA-dependent RNA synthesis. The interpretation of this inhibition has been that this carcinogen binds specifically to the deoxyguanosine moiety of a DNA molecule, and thus blocks the template function. This paper presents evidence which suggests that this single mechanistic interpretation of actinomycin D action may not be adequate in eukaryotic cells. Thirty minutes after actinomycin D injection (250 microg/100 g body weight), rat liver nuclear RNA synthesis was inhibited by 81% and nucleolar RNA synthesis was inhibited by 98%. In order to determine whether this inhibition is due to an inhibition of DNA template function or of the RNA polymerase activity, the total nuclear free and engaged RNA polymerases were solubilized and the individual RNA polymerase species were partially purified by DEAE-Sephadex column chromatography. It was found that while the overall enzyme activities of RNA polymerase I and III were not affected, there was a selective inhibition of RNA polymerase II activity (42%). This result suggests that actinomycin D, like aflatoxin B1 and N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene, inhibits nuclear RNA synthesis at multiple sites; it inhibits nucleolar RNA synthesis by blocking the nucleolar DNA template function, and it inhibits messenger RNA synthesis by inhibiting at least partially the enzyme RNA polymerase II activity per se.
This paper reports the evidence for the existence of multiple sites of action of aflatoxin B1 in relation to its inhibition of rat hepatic nuclear RNA synthesis. Two hours after aflatoxin B1 injection (0.3 mg/100 g body weight), rat hepatic nuclear and nucleolar RNA synthesis, in vitro, were inhibited 70 and 90% respectively. When total nuclear free and engaged RNA polymerases were solubilized and assayed in the presence of alpha-amanitin (3.2 micrograms/ml), only alpha-amanitin-sensitive activity was reduced (50 to 70%) by aflatoxin B1. DEAE-Sephadex column chromatography confirmed this finding and further demonstrated that RNA polymerase II was the activity selectively inhibited. Since aflatoxin B1 dramatically inhibited nucleolar RNA synthesis, but had little effect on RNA polymerase I activity per se, it is concluded, therefore, that, in addition to its direct inhibitory effect on the enzymic function of RNA polymerase II, aflatoxin B1 must also cause impairment of the nucleolar DNA template function.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study attempts to identify the site(s) of action of N-hydroxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (N-OH-AAF) in relation to its inhibition of rat hepatic nuclear RNA synthesis. Two hr after N-OH-AAF injection (3 mg/100 g body weight), rat hepatic nuclear synthesis and nucleolar RNA synthesis in vitro were inhibited by 60 and 80%, respectively. When total nuclear RNA polymerases were solubilized and assayed in the presence of alpha-amanitin (3.2 mug/ml), only alpha-amanitin-sensitive activity was reduced (50%) by N-OH-AAF. Diethylamino-ethyl-Sephadex column chromatography confirmed this finding and further demonstrated that RNA polymerase II was the activity selectively inhibited. Since N-OH-AAF dramatically inhibited nucleolar RNA synthesis but had little effect on RNA polymerase I activity, per se, we therefore concluded that, in addition to its direct inhibitory effect on the enzymic function of RNA polymerase II, N-OH-AAF must also cause impairment of the nucleolar DNA template function.