PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Leynadier

Publications and source records attributed to F Leynadier.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Latex allergy diagnosis: in vivo and in vitro standardization of a natural rubber latex extract.

For the diagnosis of IgE-mediated (immediate) hypersensitivity to natural rubber latex (NRL), skin prick testing with extracts of latex gloves has been widely used, but such extracts are difficult to standardize. The present study aimed to produce on an industrial scale an NRL extract from freshly collected NRL and to evaluate, calibrate, and standardize the extract by both in vivo and in vitro testing. The source material, latex of the rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis (clone RRIM 600), was frozen immediately after collection in Malaysia and shipped in dry ice to Stallergènes SA, France. Protein and allergen profiles were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), immunoblotting, isoelectric focusing (IEF), crossed immunoelectrophoresis (CIE), and crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis (CRIE). Allergen quantification was effected by RAST inhibition. The capacity of the preparation to elicit immediate hypersensitivity reactions in vivo was measured by skin prick testing in 46 latex-allergic patients and 76 nonallergic control subjects. SDS-PAGE and immunoblot profiles of the extract and an NRL standard (E8) provided by the US Food and Drug Administration were almost identical, disclosing several distinct IgE-binding proteins with apparent molecular weights of 14, 20, 27, 30, and 45 kDa, conforming to reported molecular weights of several significant NRL allergens. An arbitrary index of reactivity (IR) of 100 was assigned to the extract at 1:200 dilution (w/v), having a protein content of 22 micrograms/ml. Skin prick testing of latex-allergic patients and controls using the extract at 100 IR revealed 93% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% negative predictive value, and 96% positive predictive value. In conclusion, a skin prick test reagent for diagnosis of type I NRL allergy was successfully standardized. The reagent was demonstrated to contain most, if not all, of the currently known clinically significant NRL allergens, and it showed high sensitivity and specificity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

[Drug allergy].

Drug allergies represent about 10% of all adverse drug reactions. According to the Gell and Coombs classification, they are based on immunological mechanisms, with sensitization during the first contact, and later a clinical and (or) biological reaction after the second contact. Metabolism of drugs, often genetically determined, results in reactive metabolites which conjugate with endogenous proteins to become immunogenic. Anaphylaxis induced by myorelaxant drugs and beta-lactams, and delayed type drug eruptions are discussed as examples. All acute drug reactions are not, however, anaphylactic. Many exanthematous reactions occurring during antibiotic treatment are in fact caused by a virus.

Anesthetics↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy and safety of mizolastine in seasonal allergic rhinitis. The Rhinase Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Mizolastine is a new, nonsedating antihistamine under clinical investigation for treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimally active dose of once-daily mizolastine in seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, parallel study involved 494 patients randomly allocated to mizolastine (5, 10, or 15 mg) or placebo for 2 weeks. RESULTS: Physicians' assessments indicated the superiority of 10 and 15 mg mizolastine to placebo in reducing total symptom scores (P=.002), nasal scores (P=.004), and ocular scores (P=.007) at day 7. Patients' diaries showed a significant change from baseline in daily symptom scores as early as day 2 (P=.01) in 10- and 15-mg mizolastine groups in comparison to placebo, but this was not maintained throughout the study. No additional benefits were demonstrated during the second week of treatment in terms of efficacy. Adverse events were slightly more frequent in the 15-mg mizolastine group. CONCLUSION: This study conforms mizolastine is an effective and well tolerated antihistamine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis; 10 mg is the optimal dose.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The allergenic properties of fresh and preserved Hevea brasiliensis latex protein preparations.

The allergenic properties of the proteins of two lyophilized fractions of fresh natural rubber latex obtained by ultracentrifugation, the C serum and the sedimented bottom or lutoid fraction, have been compared with those of the serum proteins of two samples of high ammonia latex (HAL) [A]HALS obtained from HAL stored for more than 1 year, and [M]HALS derived from HAL stored for 6 weeks before ultracentrifugation and lyophilization. The most potent source of allergenic polypeptides both for skin prick testing of latex-sensitive patients and for immunoblots of their blood serum was the lutoid fraction of fresh latex. Skin prick tests and immunoblots of patients' sera showed that the allergenicity of the ammoniated latex decreased during storage. Skin prick tests using fractions of [A]HALS, C serum and lutoid proteins obtained after passage through a Sephacryl S300 column showed that the components of all three preparations which eluted in the largest volumes were almost equally effective in provoking the largest number of responses. Immunoblots of the sera of 43 latex-sensitive individuals showed that the majority (66%) of sera of the adult allergic patients reacted with a polypeptide of 19 kD. No characteristic pattern of binding latex polypeptides could be recognized in the sera from patients who were also asthmatic or from those who had an anaphylactic response to latex proteins.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[What is allergy?].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

False Positive Reactions↗
PubMed1996

Chronic generalized eczema caused by multiple dye sensitization.

Textile dye sensitization is rare; its low incidence (1.4% to 5.8%) is most likely because dye contact allergy is not suspected and therefore not tested. The greatest number of positive test results are obtained for disperse dyes. We report an uncommon observation of severe and chronic textile dye dermatitis with positive patch test results to Disperse Blue 106, Disperse Blue 124, Disperse Brown 1, Disperse Yellow 3, and p-aminophenol.p-aminophenol, Disperse Blue 124, and Disperse Blue 106 are derived from p-phenylenediamine, but this allergen seems to be unreliable as a detector of textile dye allergy. The admittedly allergic capacity of disperse dyes and the increasing fabrication of synthetic fibers (acrylics and polyesters) usually colored with this group of dyes could induce more frequent textile sensitization.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Toxicoderma caused by prednisone and prednisolone. Value of skin tests in the screening of cross sensitivity].

INTRODUCTION: Allergic reactions to general corticosteroid therapy are uncommon. CASE REPORT: We report a patient with systemic lupus erythematousus who developed skin rash after initiation of prednisone then prednisolone therapy. Histology evidence suggested leukocytoclastic vasculitis. The skin tests (prick tests, intradermoreactions and patch-tests) using a battery of injectable corticosteroids showed a highly positive reaction to prednisolone, methylprednisolone and dexamethasone on the intradermo-reactions 24 hours later. Histology examination of a positive-response showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with eczematiform alterations of the epidermis compatible with a drug reaction. The skin tests however were negative for betamethasone, triamcinolone, paramethasone and hydrocorticose. The patient was treated with betamethasone and no skin reaction was observed. DISCUSSION: Skin tests, particularly intradermo-reactions read 24 hours later would appear to be useful in identifying possible cross-sensitivity.

Aged↗