Does nonchemical inhibition of respiratory output occur during mechanical ventilation?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Lofaso.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pressure support (PS) is characterized by a pressure plateau, which is usually generated at the ventilator level (PS(vent)). We have built a PS device in which the pressure plateau can be obtained at the upper airway level (PS(aw)) or at the alveolar level (PS(A)). The effect of these different PS modes was evaluated in seven healthy men during air breathing and 5% CO(2) breathing. Minute ventilation during air breathing was higher with PS(A) than with PS(aw) and lower with PS(vent) (16 +/- 3, 14 +/- 3, and 11 +/- 2 l/min, respectively). By contrast, there were no significant differences in minute ventilation during 5% CO(2) breathing (25 +/- 5, 27 +/- 7, and 23 +/- 5 l/min, respectively). The esophageal pressure-time product per minute was lower with PS(A) than with PS(aw) and PS(vent) during air breathing (29 +/- 26, 44 +/- 44, and 48 +/- 30 cmH(2)O. s, respectively) and 5% CO(2) breathing (97 +/- 40, 145 +/- 62, and 220 +/- 41 cmH(2)O. s, respectively). In conclusion, during PS, moving the inspiratory pressure plateau from the ventilator to the alveolar level reduces pressure output, particularly at high ventilation levels.
This study was designed to determine the responses of lung volume and respiratory resistance (Rrs) to decreasing levels of continuous negative airway pressure (CNAP). Twenty normal subjects were studied in the basal state and under CNAP levels of -5, -10, and -15 hPa. Rrs was measured by the forced oscillation technique (4-32 Hz). End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and tidal volume (VT) were measured by whole body plethysmography. Rrs was extrapolated to 0 Hz (R(0)) and estimated at 16 Hz (R(16)) by linear regression analysis of Rrs vs. frequency. Specific Rrs, SR(0) and SR(16), were then calculated as R(0) (EELV + VT/2) and R(16) (EELV + VT/2), respectively. EELV significantly decreased, whereas R(0), R(16), SR(0), and SR(16) significantly increased, as the CNAP level decreased (P < 0.0001 for all). At the lowest CNAP level, R(0) and R(16) reached 198 +/- 13 and 175 +/- 9% of their respective basal values. The CNAP-induced increase in R(0) was significantly higher than that in R(16) (P < 0.004). Our results demonstrate that the CNAP-induced increase in Rrs does not result from a direct lung volume effect only and strongly suggest the involvement of other factors affecting both intrathoracic and extrathoracic airway caliber.
The hypothesis that, in neuromuscular and chest wall diseases, improvement in central respiratory drive explains the effects of night-time ventilation on diurnal gas exchanges was tested. The effects at 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 yrs of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) on arterial blood gas tension, pulmonary function, muscle strength, sleep parameters, respiratory parameters during sleep and ventilatory response to CO2 were evaluated in 16 consecutive patients with neuromuscular or chest wall disorders. As compared with baseline, after IPPV daytime arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2) increased (+2.3 kPa at peak effect) and arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2) and total bicarbonate decreased (-1.8 kPa and -5 mmol x L(-1), respectively) significantly; vital capacity, total lung capacity, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient did not change; the apnoea-hypo-opnoea index and the time spent with an arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2) value <90% decreased (-24 and -101 min, respectively), sleep efficiency and mean Sa,O2 increased (+16% and +5%, respectively); and ventilatory response to CO2 increased (+4.56 L x min(-1) x kPa(-1)) significantly. The reduction in Pa,CO2 observed after IPPV correlated solely with the increase in the slope of ventilatory response to the CO2 curve (r=-0.68, p=0.008). In neuromuscular or chest wall diseases, improvement of daytime hypoventilation with nocturnal intermittent positive pressure ventilation may represent an adaptation of the central chemoreceptors to the reduction of profound hypercapnia during sleep or reflect change in the quality of sleep.
In posterior rhinomanometry (PRM), oropharyngeal pressure is measured using a tube placed between the tongue and the hard palate. For valid results the patient must position the tongue and soft palate so that both the oropharynx and nasopharynx remain open. A high rate of failure of conventional PRM has been reported in normal individuals. In patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS), upper airway abnormalities may further increase the failure rate. This study proposes a modification of the technique in which protrusion of the tongue enhances pressure transmission between the nasopharynx and the mouth. In eight normal subjects, resistance was similar when measured by both methods. Of 24 OSAS patients, conventional PRM was unsuccessful in 11. In the remaining 13 patients, a significant correlation between the two methods was found, but resistance was lower by "tongue-out" than by conventional PRM, consistent with a decrease, during tongue protrusion, in retropalatal resistance, which is a component of the "nasal" resistance measured by PRM. In 26 OSAS patients, unilateral nasal resistance values measured by "tongue-out" PRM were similar to those measured by anterior rhinomanometry. When the "tongue-out" method was used routinely in 541 snorers, failure rates were 1.1% in the 272 non-OSAS patients and 3.7% in the 269 OSAS patients. These results indicate that posterior rhinomanometry with tongue protrusion is a highly effective tool for measuring nasal resistance in snorers.
The goal of this study was to compare the isolated and combined effects of two treatments being used to reduce nasal airflow resistance (NR): an internal nasal mechanical dilator (Nozovent; Prevancure; Sté Pouret, Paris, France) and a topical decongestant, fenoxazoline hydrochloride (Aturgyl; Synthelabo; Le Plessis-Robinson, France). The study was performed in 17 healthy subjects. NR was estimated by active posterior rhinometry at a 0.5 L/s flow under four conditions: in the basal state, with the internal nasal mechanical dilator, after treatment with fenoxazoline hydrochloride, and with both fenoxazoline hydrochloride and the mechanical dilator. The mean NR (+/- SD) decreased from 1.65+/-0.54 cm H2O/L/s in the basal state to 1.02+/-0.27 cm H2O/L/s with the mechanical dilator (p < 0.001), 1.03+/-0.47 cm H2O/L/s with fenoxazoline hydrochloride (p < 0.001), and 0.48+/-0.15 cm H2O/L/s with both the mechanical dilator and fenoxazoline hydrochloride (p < 0.001). The decreases in NR observed after using either the mechanical dilator (deltaNR(N)) or fenoxazoline hydrochloride (deltaNR(A)) were not significantly different. The decrease in NR observed with both (deltaNR(N + A)) was not significantly different from the sum deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A): 1.16+/-0.53 cm H2O/L/s vs 1.25+/-0.63 cm H2O/L/s, respectively (p > 0.05). deltaNR(N + A) strongly correlated with deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A): deltaNR(N + A) = 0.80 (deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A)) + 0.15 (r = 0.96; p < 0.0001). However, the slope of the regression line of deltaNR(N + A) vs deltaNR(N) + deltaNR(A) was significantly lower than unity (p < 0.003). These results demonstrate that, although not totally additive, the effects of using the mechanical dilator and fenoxazoline hydrochloride are cumulative. Further studies that include patients with nasal obstruction would allow us to better evaluate the benefit of a therapy combining both treatments.
OBJECTIVE: Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is an integral part of the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). CPT imposes additional respiratory work that may carry a risk of respiratory muscle fatigue. Inspiratory pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a new mode of ventilatory assistance designed to maintain a constant preset positive airway pressure during spontaneous inspiration with the goal of decreasing the patient's inspiratory work. The aim of our study was 1) to evaluate respiratory muscle fatigue and oxygen desaturation during CPT and 2) to determine whether noninvasive PSV can relieve these potential adverse effects of CPT. METHODS: Sixteen CF patients in stable condition with a mean age of 13 +/- 4 years participated to the study. For CPT, we used the forced expiratory technique (FET), which consisted of one or more slow active expirations starting near the total lung capacity (TLC) and ending near the residual volume. After each expiration, the child was asked to perform a slow, nonmaximal, diaphragmatic inspiration. After one to four forced breathing cycles, the child was asked to cough and to expectorate. A typical 20-minute CPT session consisted of 10 to 15 FET maneuvers separated by rest periods of 10 to 20 breathing cycles each. During the study, each patient received two CPT sessions in random order on two different days, at the same time of day, with the same physiotherapist. During one of these two sessions, PSV was provided throughout the session (PSV session) via a nasal mask using the pressure support generator ARM25 designed for acute patients (TAEMA, Antony, France). The control session was performed with no nasal mask or PSV. Both CPT sessions were performed without supplemental oxygen. Lung function and maximal inspiratory pressures (PImax) and expiratory pressures (PEmax) were recorded before and after each CPT session. RESULTS: Mean lung function parameters were comparable before the PSV and the control sessions. Baseline pulse oximetry (SpO2) was significantly correlated with the baseline vital capacity (% predicted) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (% predicted). PSV was associated with an increase in tidal volume (Vt) from 0.42 +/- 0.01 liters to 1.0 +/- 0.02 liters. Respiratory rate was significantly lower during PSV. SpO2 between the FET maneuvers was significantly higher during PSV as compared with the control session. SpO2 decreases after FET were significantly larger during the control session (nadir: 91.8 +/- 0. 7%) than during the PSV session (93.8 +/- 0.6%). Maximal pressures decreased during the control session (from 71.9 +/- 6.1 to 60.9 +/- 5.3 cmH2O, and from 85.3 +/- 7.9 to 77.5 +/- 4.8 cmH2O, for PImax and PEmax, respectively) and increased during the PSV session (from 71.6 +/- 8.6 to 83.9 +/- 8.7 cmH2O, and from 80.4 +/- 7.8 to 88.0 +/- 7.4 cmH2O, for PImax and PEmax, respectively). The decrease in PEmax was significantly correlated with the severity of bronchial obstruction as evaluated based on baseline FEV1 (% predicted). Forced expiratory flows did not change after either CPT session. The amount of sputum expectorated was similar for the two CPT sessions (5.3 +/- 5.3 g vs 4.6 +/- 4.8 g after the control and PSV session, respectively; NS). Fifteen patients felt less tired after the PSV session. Ten patients reported that expectoration was easier with PSV, whereas 4 did not note any difference; 2 patients did not expectorate. Nine patients expressed a marked and 5 a small preference for PSV, and 2 patients had no preference. The physiotherapists found it easier to perform CPT with PSV in 14 patients and did not perceive any difference in 2 patients. DISCUSSION: Our study in CF children shows that respiratory muscle performance, as evaluated based on various parameters, decreased after CPT and that significant falls in oxygen saturation occurred after the FET maneuvers despite the quiet breathing periods between each FET cycle. These unwanted effects of CPT were
BACKGROUND: The introduction of advanced anti-G protection into agile fast fighter aircraft may result in the regular use of positive pressure breathing (PPB) for G protection by aircrew. Since PPB results in an external additional work of breathing (WoB), we compared the mechanical performance of the pneumatic and electronic O2 regulators designed for "Mirage 2000" and "Rafale" aircraft. HYPOTHESIS: Since mask pressure is regulated by the electronic device in relation to flow, mask pressure will remain constant throughout the respiratory cycle, so that PPB-related additional WoB will be less with the electronic regulator. METHODS: In a bench dynamic study performed with a sinusoidal pump, we measured variations in mask pressure (deltaP) and calculated WoB at 0, 3 and 6 kPa of PPB (0, 30 and 60 cm H2O, respectively), for 0.5, 1 and 2 L of volume and for 10, 15 and 20 cycles per minute of respiratory rate. RESULTS: We found that, compared with the pneumatic device, inspiratory and expiratory WoB with the electronic device were respectively lower by approximately 25% (p < 0.05) and by approximately 10% (NS) at 3 and 6 kPa of PPB, for all respiratory conditions. Nevertheless, we also observed remaining variations in mask pressure with the electronic regulator, due to complex impedance of the inspiratory circuit, since the device uses the pressure measured into the regulator. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the electronic control of mask pressure is relatively efficient but that the device would be improved by placing the site of the pressure measurement into the mask.
A reduction in arterial PCO2 is an important cause of respiratory muscle inhibition during pressure support (PS). A nonchemical inhibition of respiratory activity during PS has also been demonstrated. This nonchemical inhibition of inspiratory activity is not observed with all modes of mechanical ventilation. In fact, the higher is the initial flow rate provided by the ventilator, the more efficient the nonchemical inhibition of respiratory activity. Currently, PS is the ventilatory support technique which provides the highest initial inspiratory flow. However, these new physiological findings should facilitate the development of more effective ventilatory support techniques.
BACKGROUND: Airway obstruction after anesthesia may be caused or exaggerated by residual neuromuscular block, with loss of muscle support for collapsible upper airway structures. METHODS: Six male volunteers were studied before treatment, during stable partial neuromuscular block with vecuronium at a mean train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 50% (95% CI, 36-61%), and after reversal by neostigmine. Catheter-mounted transducers were placed in the pharynx and esophagus to estimate, respectively, the upper airway resistance, and the work of breathing (calculated as the time integral of the inspiratory pressure developed by the respiratory muscles, esophageal pressure time product) during quiet breathing, during breathing 5% carbon dioxide, and while breathing with an inspiratory resistor. Breathing with pressure at the airway opening held at pressures from -5 to 40 cm H2O were also tested to assess airway collapsibility. RESULTS: Although breathing through a resistor increased upper airway resistance from 1.2 (0.67, 1.72) cm H2O x l(-1) x s to 2.5 (1.32, 3.38) cm H2O x l(-1) x s, and carbon dioxide stimulation reduced resistance to 0.8 (0.46, 1.33) cm H2O x l(-1) x s, no effect of partial neuromuscular block (mean TOF ratio, 52%) on upper airway properties could be shown. CONCLUSIONS: Neuromuscular block with a TOF ratio of 50% can be present yet clinically difficult to detect in patients recovering from anesthesia. This degree of block has no effect on airway patency in volunteers, even during challenge. Airway obstruction during recovery from anesthesia thus is more likely to be caused by residual effects of general anesthetic agents or centrally acting analgesics, either alone or perhaps in concert with residual neuromuscular block.
We measured upper airway caliber and lung volumes in six normal subjects in the sitting and supine positions during 20-s periods in normogravity, hypergravity [1.8 + head-to-foot acceleration (Gz)], and microgravity ( approximately 0 Gz) induced by parabolic flights. Airway caliber and lung volumes were inferred by the acoustic reflection method and inductance plethysmography, respectively. In subjects in the sitting position, an increase in gravity from 0 to 1. 8 +Gz was associated with increases in the calibers of the retrobasitongue and palatopharyngeal regions (+20 and +30%, respectively) and with a concomitant 0.5-liter increase in end-expiratory lung volume (functional residual capacity, FRC). In subjects in the supine position, no changes in the areas of these regions were observed, despite significant decreases in FRC from microgravity to normogravity (-0.6 liter) and from microgravity to hypergravity (-0.5 liter). Laryngeal narrowing also occurred in both positions (about -15%) when gravity increased from 0 to 1.8 +Gz. We concluded that variation in lung volume is insufficient to explain all upper airway caliber variation but that direct gravity effects on tissues surrounding the upper airway should be taken into account.
We studied eight heavy snorers with upper airway resistance syndrome to investigate potential effects of sleep on expiratory airway and lung resistance, intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, hyperinflation, and elastic inspiratory work of breathing (WOB). Wakefulness and non-rapid-eye-movement sleep with high- and with low-resistance inspiratory effort (H-RIE and L-RIE, respectively) were compared. No differences in breathing pattern were seen across the three conditions. In contrast, we found increases in expiratory airway and lung resistance during H-RIE compared with L-RIE and wakefulness (56 +/- 24, 16 +/- 4, and 11 +/- 4 cmH2O . 1(-1) . s, respectively), with attendant increases in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (5.4 +/- 1.8, 1.4 +/- 0.5, and 1.3 +/- 1.3 cmH2O, respectively) and elastic WOB (6.1 +/- 2.2, 3.7 +/- 1.2, and 3.4 +/- 0.7 J/min, respectively). The increase in WOB during H-RIE is partly caused by the effects of dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation produced by the increased expiratory resistance. Contrary to the Starling model, a multiple-element compliance model that takes into account the heterogeneity of the pharynx may explain flow limitation during expiration.
To determine whether nonchemical inhibition of respiratory activity occurs during inspiratory pressure support (IPS) ventilation (IPSV), respiratory motor output (in 9 subjects), obtained by calculating transdiaphragmatic pressure-time products, and central respiratory output (in 5 subjects), obtained by integrating the electromyographic activity of the diaphragm (EMGdi) during mechanical inspiratory time, EMGdi per minute, and electrical inspiratory time, as determined from onset to peak EMGdi, were compared during spontaneous ventilation (control) and IPSV with (IPS+CO2) and without (IPS) correction of hypocapnia. Both IPS and IPS+CO2 induced significant decreases in transdiaphragmatic pressure-time products (46 +/- 31 and 53 +/- 23%, respectively), EMGdi during mechanical inspiratory time (49 +/- 12 and 57 +/- 14%, respectively), EMGdi per minute (65 +/- 22 and 69 +/- 15%, respectively), and electrical inspiratory time (73 +/- 8 and 65 +/- 6%, respectively). Because correction of hypocapnia failed to eliminate the marked inhibition of both respiratory and central motor output seen with IPS, we conclude that nonchemical inhibition of respiratory activity occurs during IPSV.
Esophageal pressure amplitude (DeltaPes), inspiratory pulmonary resistance (RLI) and inspiratory flow limitation score (FS) are used as indices of upper airway obstruction for the titration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). This study was designed to determine whether oscillatory respiratory resistive impedance at 16 Hz (RFO) might be proposed as an alternative index. Eleven OSAS patients were studied during a night of polysomnography-controlled nCPAP titration. Nasal flow (V) and airway opening and esophageal pressures (Pao and Pes, respectively) were continuously measured during nasal breathing, and forced-flow oscillations (FO) were applied for 5 min at each nCPAP level. RLI was calculated by linear regression analysis of resistive pressure versus V over inspiration. R FO was obtained by linear regression analysis of respiratory resistive impedance versus frequency. Application of FO affected neither sleep nor pulmonary mechanics. RFO correlated with RLI in all patients. RFO did not correlate with DeltaPes in two patients, and was not significantly related to FS in five patients. This study demonstrates the applicability of the FO technique in sleeping patients receiving nCPAP, and the reliability of RFO for assessing pulmonary resistance. RFO might therefore be proposed as a quantitative index of airway obstruction for nCPAP titration.
A bench study followed by a clinical trial were performed to evaluate the mechanical characteristics of five (commercially available) expiratory valves used for home ventilators, as well as the potential clinical impact of differences between these valves. In the in vitro study, expiratory valve resistance was evaluated under unvarying conditions, whereas dynamic behaviour was evaluated by calculating the imposed expiratory work of breathing during a simulated breath generated by a lung model. Differences in resistance and imposed expiratory work of up to twofold and 150%, respectively, were found across valves. We then conducted a randomized crossover clinical study to compare the effects of the least resistive (Bennett) and most resistive expiratory valves (Peters) in 10 intubated patients receiving pressure support ventilation. There were no significant differences regarding blood gases or respiratory parameters except for the oesophageal pressure-time product (PTPoes), which was significantly increased by the Peters valve (236+/-113 cmH2O x s x min(-1) versus 194+/-90 cmH2O x s x min(-1)). An analysis of individual responses found that the Peters valve induced substantial increases in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), PTPoes, and expiratory activity in those patients with the greatest ventilatory demand. In conclusion, differences between home expiratory valve resistances may have a clinically relevant impact on the respiratory effort of patients with a high ventilatory demand.
This study aimed to assess the ability of an auto-nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) device (REM + auto; NPBFD, Nancy, France) to predict the optimal constant nCPAP level. The apnoea/hypopnoea detection facility of the auto-nCPAP device was deliberately disabled and nasal mask pressure vibration detection was the only mode of pressure setting. The auto-nCPAP device was tested on 10 previously untreated patients with obstructive sleep apnoea during a single night, with ambulatory polysomnography performed in a conventional hospital room; the efficacy of the fixed pressure determined by the auto-nCPAP device was assessed by an ambulatory full polysomnography 2 weeks after the initiation of treatment at home. The fixed nCPAP pressure was effective (apnoea/hypopnoea and arousal indices <10 events x h(-1)) in all but two of the 10 patients studied. When the fixed nCPAP pressure was increased by 2 cmH2O in these two patients, sleep and respiration were normalized. Since only 12 ambulatory polysomnographic recordings were used to determine the effective nasal continuous positive airway pressure level, and as the device restored normal breathing and sleep in all 10 patients, it was concluded that this method of nasal continuous positive airway pressure titration may improve cost-effectiveness and reduce waiting lists in sleep laboratories.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the hemodynamic effects of graded arousals during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep in patients with partial upper airway obstruction during sleep without obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea, overnight beat-to-beat BP was recorded in six patients. SETTING: At the end of each nonapneic obstructive event, EEG responses were graded as follows: grade 2, grade 1, and grade 0 were defined as increased high-frequency EEG lasting >15 s, 3 to 15 s, and no EEG arousals according to the American Sleep Disorders Association, respectively. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The following were observed during grade 0, 1, and 2 EEG patterns (mean+/-SD): systolic pressure increased by 7.1+/-1.5, 11.7+/-1.9, and 14.2+/-3.4 (p<0.005), respectively; diastolic pressure increased by 4.6+/-0.6, 6.7+/-1.7, and 9.4+/-3.0 (p<0.005), respectively; heart rate increased by 2.9+/-0.4, 3.9+/-2.2, and 8.6+/-4.6 (p<0.005), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that nonapneic-nonhypopneic obstructive events are followed by arterial systemic pressure increases whose magnitude varies with the grade of the arousal.
The goal of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three treatments aiming to reduce nasal airflow resistance (NR): an external nasal strip device (Respir+), an internal nasal mechanical dilator (Nozovent), and a topical decongestant (Pernazène). NR was estimated by active posterior rhinometry at both a 0.5 L/s flow (NRF) and a 1 cm H2O pressure (NRP), under four conditions: in the basal state, with Respir+, with Nozovent, and after treatment with Pernazène. The efficacy of each treatment was assessed by the percentage changes in NRF and NRP (%NRF and %NRP, respectively). The study was performed in 15 healthy subjects. The efficacy of the treatments was significantly different, depending on whether it was evaluated by NRF or by NRP (p<0.02), with %NRF and %NRP values, respectively, equal to the following: 88+/-20% and 91+/-14% with Respir+, 58+/-17% and 70+/-13% with Nozovent, and 55+/-29% and 69+/-22% with Pernazène. NRF remained unchanged with Respir+, whereas it significantly decreased with Nozovent and Pernazène (p<0.0001). No significant difference was observed between the effects of the two latter treatments. These results demonstrate that Nozovent, which involves no risk of side effects or drug interactions, is an effective treatment to improve nasal breathing. Nozovent might therefore be recommended as an alternative to topical decongestants, for certain subjects presenting with nasal obstruction.