PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Luchette

Publications and source records attributed to F Luchette.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Penetrating esophageal injuries: multicenter study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define the period of time after which delays in management incurred by investigations cause increased morbidity and mortality. The outcome study is intended to correlate time with death from esophageal causes, overall complications, esophageal related complications, and surgical intensive care unit length of stay. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study involving 34 trauma centers in the United States, under the auspices of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-institutional Trials Committee over a span of 10.5 years. Patients surviving to reach the operating room (OR) were divided into two groups: those that underwent diagnostic studies to identify their injuries (preoperative evaluation group) and those that went immediately to the OR (no preoperative evaluation group). Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, Student's T test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The study involved 405 patients: 355 male patients (86.5%) and 50 female patients (13.5%). The mean Revised Trauma Score was 6.3, the mean Injury Severity Score was 28, and the mean time interval to the OR was 6.5 hours. There were associated injuries in 356 patients (88%), and an overall complication rate of 53.5%. Overall mortality was 78 of 405 (19%). Three hundred forty-six patients survived to reach the OR: 171 in the preoperative evaluation group and 175 in the no preoperative evaluation group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the two groups in the following parameters: number of patients, age, Injury Severity Score, admission blood pressure, anatomic location of injury (cervical or thoracic), surgical management (primary repair, resection and anastomosis, resection and diversion, flaps), number of associated injuries, and mortality. Average length of time to the OR was 13 hours in the preoperative evaluation group versus 1 hour in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 134 in the preoperative evaluation group versus 87 in the no preoperative evaluation group (p < 0.001), and 74 (41%) esophageal related complications occurred in the preoperative evaluation group versus 32 (19%) in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.003). Mean surgical intensive care unit length of stay was 11 days in the preoperative evaluation group versus 7 days in the no preoperative evaluation group (p = 0.012). Logistic regression analysis identified as independent risk factors for the development of esophageal related complications included time delays in preoperative evaluation (odds ratio, 3.13), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grade >2 (odds ratio, 2.62), and resection and diversion (odds ratio, 4.47). CONCLUSION: Esophageal injuries carry a high morbidity and mortality. Increased esophageal related morbidity occurs with the diagnostic workup and its inherent delay in operative repair of these injuries. For centers practicing selective management of penetrating neck injuries and transmediastinal gunshot wounds, rapid diagnosis and definitive repair should be made a high priority.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against CD18 (rhuMAb CD18) in traumatic hemorrhagic shock: results of a phase II clinical trial. Traumatic Shock Group.

BACKGROUND: Activated neutrophils have been shown to play a pivotal role in resuscitation injury after traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Blocking the adhesion of neutrophils with a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against CD18 (rhuMAb CD18) may reduce resuscitation injury but increase the risk of infection. This was a dose-finding phase II study to determine safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical outcome parameters for additional studies. METHODS: This was a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized (3:1), double-blind phase II trial enrolling 116 blunt and penetrating trauma patients from 14 trauma centers over a 9-month period. Patients with hypotension (blood pressure < or =90 mm Hg) from hemorrhagic shock were given a single intravenous dose of rhuMAb CD18 or placebo. The three doses tested were 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg. The drug was administered within 4 hours of the hypotensive episode and no later than 6 hours from time of injury. Exclusion criteria included head injury resulting in Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 8 or a history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the trauma center. An independent Drug Safety and Monitoring Review Board periodically reviewed unblinded data for safety issues and to give approval for dose escalation. RESULTS: Minor and major infection rates in rhuMAb CD18 groups were comparable to placebo. There was no evidence of antibody formation against rhuMAb CD18. Linear PK was observed within the dose range studied. Duration of neutrophil binding was dose-dependent, with 2 mg/kg resulting in greater than 90% neutrophil CD18 receptor saturation for approximately 48 hours. The mortality was 6.7% (2 of 30) in the placebo group, 4.8% (1 of 21) in the 0.5-mg/kg group, 8.5% (4 of 47) in the 1-mg/kg group, and 0% (0 of 18) in the 2-mg/kg group. The study was not powered for efficacy, and none of the efficacy variables demonstrated statistical significance. Favorable trends were seen in the 2-mg/kg group as compared with placebo in median intensive care unit length of stay (5 vs. 9 days) and median time on ventilator (34 vs. 72 hours). CONCLUSIONS: A single 2-mg/kg dose of rhuMAb CD18 maintains greater than 90% saturation of neutrophil CD18 receptors for approximately 48 hours in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock undergoing resuscitation. There was no trend toward increased infection. A larger trial is needed to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of rhuMAb CD18, perhaps using more reliable endpoints.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Impact of the in-house trauma surgeon on initial patient care, outcome, and cost.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of having attending trauma surgeons with added qualifications in surgical critical care present for the initial resuscitation at a regional trauma center. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of patients admitted between August of 1994 and December of 1995 from our trauma registry. The patients were categorized by the call preference of the admitting physician as in-house (IH) or call-back from home (CB), day of admission (weekend vs. weekday), time of admission (AM VS. PM), and a value of the injury severity scale < or = 15 or > 15. Demographics, admission vital signs, Injury Severity Scale, Glasgow Coma Score, and elapsed time to diagnostic, therapeutic, and/or operative interventions were studied. The effect on intensive care unit length of stay, mortality, and hospital cost for resuscitation were also studied. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1,043 patients. The IH and CB groups each included two attending surgeons. IH significantly reduced the average time to completion of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (22 vs. 34 minutes; p < 0.05), therapeutic intervention (21 vs 38 minutes; p < 0.05), and transport to the operating room (206 vs. 312 minutes; p < 0.05) during the AM compared with CB. There was no difference in these times for the PM admissions. There was no significant difference in intensive care unit length of stay. Among patients with severe head and thoracoabdominal injury (Abbreviated Injury Score > 4 and 3, respectively) there was no difference in mortality. Analysis of cost for emergency room resuscitation in severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score > or = 15), seen during weekdays, was significantly less when evaluated by IH (IH = $5,097 vs. CB = $6,779; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During the initial resuscitation of patients with severely injured during the weekdays, IH significantly reduced the cost, and elapsed time to diagnostic testing, therapeutic intervention, and to the operating room, respectively. IH reduced fatalities compared with CB.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Inhaled nitric oxide in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide has been shown to improve oxygenation in select patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical response to four concentrations of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) in 20 patients with ARDS. METHODS: All patients with ARDS were eligible for the study. ARDS was defined as (1) the presence of a predisposing factor; (2) a PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200; (3) bilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph; and (4) absence of evidence of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery wedge pressure < 18 mm Hg. Patients received each of four doses (1, 15, 30, and 60 ppm) in random order, each for a 3-hour period. Cardiovascular variables were continuously monitored, and arterial and mixed venous blood gas measurements were obtained at 30 minutes and 3 hours. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 20 patients demonstrated a significant increase in their PaO2/FiO2 (> 20% increase) when treated with inhaled NO. The administration of inhaled NO was associated with an increase in oxygenation at doses of 1, 15, and 30 ppm, but not 60 ppm. Increasing NO dose to more than 1 ppm did not significantly improve response. Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased with increasing NO concentration, but this did not reach statistical significance. Nine of the 13 responding patients and 2 of the 7 nonresponding patients survived. CONCLUSION: Inhaled NO was successful in increasing PaO2/FiO2 by > 20% in 65% of the surgical patients in this trial. Response to NO could not be predicted by initial PaO2/FiO2 or pulmonary artery pressures. A trial of inhaled NO at a dose of < 10 ppm may be helpful in ARDS patients requiring increasing FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1992

Decreased mesenteric blood flow in experimental multiple organ failure.

Disorders of mucosal blood flow may contribute to gut barrier dysfunction in multiple organ failure (MOF). We evaluated alterations of mesenteric microcirculation in a rat model of MOF. Male Wistar rats received 1 mg/g body weight of zymosan A in 4 ml of mineral oil by intraperitoneal injection and were studied on Days 1, 3, and 5 following injection. A control group received no zymosan. The experimental group also received a fluid resuscitation regimen of 0.9 N saline subcutaneously equal to 0.1 ml/g body weight on the day of zymosan injection and 0.05 ml/g body weight daily thereafter. Day 1 animals tended toward a statistically significantly lower mean arterial pressure versus controls (86.6 +/- 8 mm Hg versus 106 +/- 5 mm Hg, F = 0.09 by ANOVA). Significant arteriolar vasoconstriction occurred on Days 1 and 3 versus control (70 +/- 4 microns and 57 +/- 8 microns versus 96 +/- 3 microns, F = 0.0002). Laser doppler velocity, indicating red blood cell velocity, expressed as a percentage of control paralleled this vasoconstriction (70 +/- 9 and 72 +/- 7%, respectively). We conclude that mesenteric arteriolar vasoconstriction occurs accompanied by decreased red blood velocity. We believe that this is indicative of decreased mesenteric perfusion in this zymosan model of MOF and that survival to Day 5 is associated with a reversal of these microcirculatory changes.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Utility of an oral examination in a surgical clerkship.

To evaluate the utility of the oral examination in a surgical clerkship, we designed a prospective and randomized study to relate the subjective impressions of experienced examiners with an objective measure of cognitive knowledge. The examiners were asked to score the student's performance as honors, high satisfactory, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory, according to their subjective impression of the student's ability. Student performance was grouped according to oral examination performance. The cognitive performance in the honors group was significantly better than that of the other groups (Student's t-test, p = 0.05). There was a significant difference in cognitive performance for oral examination groups throughout the rotations (analysis of variance, p = 0.000; Kruskal Wallis, p = 0.05). The oral examination is useful to identify a high level of cognitive achievement but cannot discriminate between groups of median to low competence. It should be used for educational feedback, career counseling, residency recommendations, and professional development.

Achievement↗
PubMed1992

Experience as a surgeon determines resident knowledge.

BACKGROUND: This is a prospective study that compares operative experience with performance on the American Board of Surgery Inservice Training Examination (ABSITE) to establish the primacy of procedural experience in the graduate training environment. METHODS: Operative experience was determined from a computerized log of surgical procedures. The Report D of the 1991 ABSITE was used to assign each test item to specific operative procedures and to determine the frequency of the correct response (Fcr) for each item. The fraction of operative procedures (Fs) was determined for each category of surgical procedures (Fs = Number of procedures as surgeon/Total number of procedures). The Fcr was compared to the Fs by use of the Pearson correlation coefficient with significance at 95% confidence. RESULTS: Forty-two residents reported doing 8357 surgical procedures as surgeon in 12 months. Report D contained 209 test items. Of these, 162 items could be assigned to 26 categories of surgical procedures. The Fcr correlated directly with the Fs (p = 0.002, r = 0.605). CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation exists between the experience of surgical residents as surgeon and their performance on the ABSITE:

Clinical Competence↗