PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F M Abboud

Publications and source records attributed to F M Abboud.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1990

Mechanism of decreased baroreceptor activity in chronic hypertensive rabbits. Role of endogenous prostanoids.

We examined the contribution of endogenous prostanoids to baroreceptor activation in chronic renal hypertension. Baroreceptor activity was recorded from the vascularly isolated carotid sinus during slow ramp increases in pressure in rabbits anesthetized with pentothal and chloralose. Mean arterial pressure averaged 133 +/- 4 mmHg in hypertensive rabbits (one kidney, one wrap, n = 12) and 85 +/- 3 mmHg in normotensive rabbits (one kidney, no wrap, n = 13). Baroreceptor activity was decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) in the hypertensive compared with the normotensive rabbits. The decreased baroreceptor activity could not be explained by decreased distensibility of the carotid sinus (sonomicrometers). Inhibition of the endogenous formation of prostanoids with intrasinus administration of indomethacin (50 microM) decreased baroreceptor activity in normotensive (P less than 0.05) but not in hypertensive rabbits over a wide range of pressures. At a pressure of 120 mmHg, activity declined from 61 +/- 14 spikes/s before indomethacin to 47 +/- 12 spikes/s with indomethacin, i.e., a drop of 24 +/- 4%. In contrast, corresponding values in hypertensive rabbits averaged 41 +/- 13 and 40 +/- 12 spikes/s (-1 +/- 2%). Intrasinus prostacyclin, on the other hand, increased activity in both groups: at 120 mmHg activity increased from 62 +/- 9 to 92 +/- 15 spikes/s (51 +/- 17%) in normotensive rabbits and from 29+/- 7 to 47 +/- 14 spikes/s (68 +/- 23%) in hypertensive rabbits. Neither indomethacin nor prostacyclin (n = 5) influenced the pressure-diameter relation of the carotid sinus. The increase in prostacyclin (6-keto-PGF 1 alpha) formation by the sinus in response to its exposure to arachidonic acid (10 microM) was significant (P less than 0.05) in the normotensives (1,627 +/- 344%; n = 5) but not in the hypertensives (583 +/- 353%; n = 5). We conclude that the decreased baroreceptor activity in chronic hypertension may not be caused by decreased distensibility of the vascular wall of the sinus and that endogenous prostanoids that contribute to baroreceptor activation in normotensive rabbits fail to do so in hypertensive rabbits. This appears to be due to decreased formation of prostacyclin rather than decreased sensitivity of the baroreceptors to prostacyclin. The results suggest a new mechanism that contributes to chronic baroreceptor resetting in hypertension.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Effects of alcohol intake on blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity in normotensive humans: a preliminary report.

Although several epidemiological studies have shown an association between alcohol consumption and high blood pressure, the mechanisms involved in the pressor effect of alcohol are not clear. We hypothesized that alcohol might increase blood pressure at least in part by increasing sympathetic nerve activity. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of seven normotensive subjects (mean age +/- s.e.m. 24.0 +/- 1.5 years), we investigated the effects of oral administration of alcohol (0.75 g/kg body weight, diluted in orange juice) or vehicle on arterial blood pressure, heart rate and muscle sympathetic nerve activity, measured directly in the peroneal nerve by microneurography. Plasma ethanol levels increased from 0 (control) to a range of 47.7 +/- 7.6 to 53.3 +/- 5.0 mg/dl 30 min after alcohol intake. This increase in plasma ethanol was accompanied by a significant increase (P less than 0.05) in mean blood pressure, heart rate and sympathetic nerve activity. The vehicle did not affect any of these parameters. Our data suggest that acute oral administration of a moderate dose of alcohol induces a pressure effect through activation of sympathetic nervous outflow.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Peripheral and central mechanisms of baroreflex resetting.

1. A change in the arterial pressure-sympathetic activity or heart rate relation (baroreflex resetting) can result from resetting of baroreceptors ('peripheral' resetting) or from an altered coupling within the central nervous system of afferent baroreceptor to efferent nerve activities ('central' resetting). 2. 'Peripheral' resetting involves a shift in the pressure-baroreceptor activity curve in the direction of the prevailing level of arterial pressure, e.g. after elevations in pressure, the baroreceptor pressure threshold (Pth) is increased and activity reduced at equivalent pressures and vascular strains. 3. 'Peripheral' resetting occurs during the diastolic phase of a cardiac cycle (instantaneous resetting), after brief exposure to elevated pressure (acute resetting), and during chronic hypertension or when chronic structural changes in the vasculature have occurred (chronic resetting). 4. Mechanisms include: (i) changes in the mechanical properties of the vessel wall that may alter the tension on the receptors; (ii) ionic mechanisms operating at the neuronal membrane such as activation of Na+,K+-ATPase; and (iii) release of endothelial factors that may modulate baroreceptor sensitivity. 5. Acute resetting of baroreceptors can be prevented or attenuated when the sustained elevations in pressure are pulsatile rather than static. Increases in flow increase carotid sinus nerve activity at constant pressure and strain and decrease the Pth of baroreceptors. 6. 'Central' resetting can involve neural-humoral interactions or an altered responsiveness of central neurons mediating the baroreflex to changes in afferent baroreceptor activity. 7. During static pressure, the continuous baroreceptor discharge causes significant 'central' resetting, i.e. sympathetic activity escapes from baroreflex inhibition. In contrast, during pulsatile pressure, the pulse phasic baroreceptor discharge minimizes 'central' resetting causing sustained sympathetic inhibition.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Pulsatile activation of baroreceptors causes central facilitation of baroreflex.

The reflex decrease in arterial pressure is greater and more sustained with elevated pulsatile than with elevated static carotid sinus pressure. The purpose of this study was to relate afferent baroreceptor activity (BRA) and efferent sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) during static and pulsatile pressure to evaluate the influence of pulsatile pressure on the central mediation of the baroreflex. The carotid sinuses were isolated in 11 dogs anesthetized with chloralose. Both vagosympathetic trunks were cut and both carotid sinuses exposed to static and pulsatile pressures over a range of mean carotid sinus pressures (40-180 mmHg). BRA was recorded from one carotid sinus nerve, and the other intact carotid sinus served to initiate reflex changes in lumbar or renal SNA and arterial pressure. For the same mean carotid sinus pressure, pulsatile pressure caused significantly greater inhibition of SNA than static pressure. More importantly, for the same or lesser levels of baroreceptor activity per second, pulsatile pressure caused significantly greater inhibition of SNA than static pressure. The inhibition of SNA was not sustained (i.e., there was "adaptation") with continuous baroreceptor input during static pressure, whereas the inhibition of SNA was sustained (i.e., there was no significant adaptation) with the phasic input during pulsatile pressure. Increases in pulse frequency from 1.4 to 2.5 and 3.7 Hz caused progressively less inhibition of SNA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Prostaglandins in carotid sinus enhance baroreflex in rabbits.

The purpose of this study was to examine the possible influence of endogenous prostaglandins in the carotid sinus on the arterial baroreflex. Lumbar sympathetic nerve activity (LSNA) and arterial pressure were recorded during step increases in isolated carotid sinus pressure in rabbits anesthetized with chloralose. Baroreflex responses were facilitated after intrasinus administration of prostacyclin (PGI2; 5 and 10 microM, n = 6) or arachidonic acid (10 microM, n = 12). PGI2 (10 microM) increased the slope of the carotid sinus pressure-LSNA relation (gain) from -0.32 +/- 0.09 to -1.19 +/- 0.38 spikes.s-1.mmHg-1 and decreased the pressure at which 50% of the maximum inhibition of LSNA occurred (EP50) from 127 +/- 5 to 98 +/- 4 mmHg (P less than 0.05). Similar responses were observed with arachidonic acid. Baroreflex responses were attenuated after intrasinus administration of indomethacin (40 and 80 microM, n = 5) or aspirin (1 and 2 mM, n = 7). Indomethacin (80 microM) decreased the gain of the baroreflex from -1.02 +/- 0.24 to -0.47 +/- 0.16 spikes.s-1.mmHg-1 and increased the EP50 from 121 +/- 6 to 133 +/- 7 mmHg (P less than 0.05). Both indomethacin (80 microM) and aspirin (2 mM) reduced the maximum percent inhibition of LSNA significantly. The results indicate that prostaglandins within the carotid sinus facilitate the baroreflex control of LSNA. The attenuation of the baroreflex after inhibition of cyclooxygenase suggests that endogenous prostaglandins contribute to the activation of baroreceptors during increases in carotid sinus pressure.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Influence of ventilation and hypocapnia on sympathetic nerve responses to hypoxia in normal humans.

The sympathetic response to hypoxia depends on the interaction between chemoreceptor stimulation (CRS) and the associated hyperventilation. We studied this interaction by measuring sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) to muscle in 13 normal subjects, while breathing room air, 14% O2, 10% O2, and 10% O2 with added CO2 to maintain isocapnia. Minute ventilation (VE) and blood pressure (BP) increased significantly more during isocapnic hypoxia (IHO) than hypocapnic hypoxia (HHO). In contrast, SNA increased more during HHO [40 +/- 10% (SE)] than during IHO (25 +/- 19%, P less than 0.05). To determine the reason for the lesser increase in SNA with IHO, 11 subjects underwent voluntary apnea during HHO and IHO. Apnea potentiated the SNA responses to IHO more than to HHO. SNA responses to IHO were 17 +/- 7% during breathing and 173 +/- 47% during apnea whereas SNA responses to HHO were 35 +/- 8% during breathing and 126 +/- 28% during apnea. During ventilation, the sympathoexcitation of IHO (compared with HHO) is suppressed, possibly for two reasons: 1) because of the inhibitory influence of activation of pulmonary afferents as a result of a greater increase in VE, and 2) because of the inhibitory influence of baroreceptor activation due to a greater rise in BP. Thus in humans, the ventilatory response to chemoreceptor stimulation predominates and restrains the sympathetic response. The SNA response to chemoreceptor stimulation represents the net effect of the excitatory influence of the chemoreflex and the inhibitory influence of pulmonary afferents and baroreceptor afferents.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Contrasting effects of hypoxia and hypercapnia on ventilation and sympathetic activity in humans.

We compared the effects of isocapnic hypoxia (IHO) and hyperoxic hypercapnia (HC) on sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) recorded from a peroneal nerve in 13 normal subjects. HC caused greater increases in blood pressure (BP), minute ventilation (VE), and SNA [53 +/- 14% (SE) during HC vs. 21 +/- 7% during IHO; P less than 0.05]. Even at equivalent levels of VE, HC still elicited greater SNA than IHO. However, apnea during HC caused a lesser (P less than 0.05) increase in SNA (91 +/- 26% compared with apnea on room air) than apnea during IHO (173 +/- 50%). Hypercapnic hypoxia resulted in a greater absolute increase in VE (23.6 +/- 2.8 l/min) than the additive increases due to HC alone plus IHO alone (18.0 +/- 1.8 l/min, P less than 0.05). SNA also increased synergistically by 108 +/- 23% with the combined stimulus compared with the additive effect of HC alone plus IHO alone (68 +/- 19%; P less than 0.05). We conclude that 1) HC causes greater increases in VE and SNA than does hypoxia; 2) for the same increase in VE, hypercapnia still causes a greater increase in SNA than hypoxia; however, during apnea, hypoxia causes a much greater increase in SNA than hypercapnia; 3) the inhibitory influence of ventilation on SNA is greater during hypoxia (i.e., predominantly peripheral chemoreceptor stimulation) than hypercapnia (i.e., predominantly central chemoreceptor stimulation); and 4) combined hypoxia and hypercapnia have a synergistic effect on SNA as well as on VE.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Determinants of sensitization of carotid baroreceptors by pulsatile pressure in dogs.

The threshold pressure of single baroreceptor units is decreased after compared with before exposure to pulsatile pressure according to previous studies in our laboratory. The purpose of the present study is to characterize the determinants of sensitization of arterial baroreceptors by pulsatile pressure. Carotid sinus nerve activity was recorded in dogs anesthetized with chloralose. Two indexes of baroreceptor "sensitivity" were obtained by comparing nerve activity before and immediately after exposure of the isolated carotid sinus to pulsatile pressure for periods up to 10 minutes. Sensitization occurred 1) when the threshold pressure of single baroreceptor units determined with a slow nonpulsatile ramp decreased after as compared with before pulsing and 2) when multiple unit activity increased after as compared with before pulsing at various mean levels of static pressure. Sensitization was evident after pulsing at mean pressure of 50 and 100 mm Hg, but not at 150 and 200 mm Hg, and was caused by the pulsatile change in diameter or deformation and not by the pulsatile change in wall tension. The magnitude of the effect was directly related to the duration of the pulsing period and to the frequency and amplitude of the pressure pulses. The sensitization could not be explained by increased diameter (sonomicrometers) or strain of the carotid sinus at the same pressure after pulsing; thus, there was an increase in "strain sensitivity" that outlasted the period of pulsing by up to several minutes. In most experiments the shift from static to pulsatile pressure at 50 and 100 mm Hg caused an increase in nerve activity, yet sensitization occurred after pulsing when one would have expected postexcitatory hyperpolarization or depression of activity upon return to static pressure. The sensitization was not caused by the release of prostacyclin from the endothelium since it was not reduced after endothelial denudation or inhibition of cyclooxygenase with indomethacin (30-80 microM) or ibuprofen (250 microM). We speculate that sensitization of baroreceptors by pulsatile pressure may contribute to the decreased sympathetic activity after periods of elevated pulse pressure (e.g., after exercise). We also propose that the decreased sensitivity of baroreceptors after acute elevation of arterial pressure (acute resetting) may be offset in part by the sensitizing effect of increased pulsatile stretch.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Rheoreceptors in the carotid sinus of dog.

The arterial baroreceptors are known to be sensitive to changes in pressure but there are no known sensors in the cardiovascular system for changes in flow. We tested the hypothesis that changes in flow at constant pressure alter carotid sinus multi-unit nerve activity. In anesthetized dogs with vascularly isolated carotid sinuses, increases in flow at constant pressure resulted in increases in carotid sinus nerve activity in relation to the increase in flow. The increased activity during flow was not caused by an increase in strain of the sinus wall but was directly related to the increase in shear stress (36.6 +/- 11.7% increase in activity per dyne/cm2; 1 dyne = 0.1 MN). The pressure threshold of single baroreceptor units was determined during a slow pressure ramp with and without flow. Flow caused a significant decrease in pressure threshold from 81.1 +/- 6.1 mmHg (1 mmHg = 1.333 x 10(2) Pa) in the absence of flow to 69.3 +/- 5.7 mmHg with flow. We conclude that there are arterial "rheoreceptors" in the carotid sinus that respond to flow at constant pressure and strain. The results with single baroreceptor units indicate also that baroreceptors may be sensitized by increases in flow. Thus, changes in flow per se in addition to changes in arterial pressure may be important determinants of reflex circulatory adjustments.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Mechanisms of resetting of arterial baroreceptors: an overview.

Arterial baroreceptors are reset when their afferent nerve activity is reduced at an equivalent arterial pressure and vascular strain. Resetting occurs as a result of stretch of the baroreceptors, usually during an acute or chronic rise in arterial pressure. It may be seen during the diastolic phase of a cardiac cycle (instantaneous resetting), after brief exposure to a sustained elevation of pressure (acute resetting), and after chronic elevation of pressure or in physiologic or pathologic states associated with structural changes in the vascular regions of baroreceptors (chronic resetting). The mechanisms reviewed here include mechanical, ionic and chemical factors. Viscoelastic properties of the carotid sinus and aortic arch may explain the instantaneous resetting that occurs with each cardiac cycle when activity begins in early systole and stops in early diastole. Viscoelastic properties and ionic mechanisms may play a role in acute resetting. Inhibition of Na+K+ ATPase reduces the magnitude of acute resetting. The release of chemicals from the endothelium may modulate baroreceptor activity. Exogenous prostacyclin suppresses and indomethacin augments acute resetting in the rabbit, suggesting that the release of endogenous prostacyclin during a rise in arterial pressure attenuates resetting. Changes in pulsatility and blood flow also may modulate baroreceptor activity. The addition of pulsatile pressure at an increased mean pressure attenuates resetting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Effects of pulse frequency on single-unit baroreceptor activity during sine-wave and natural pulses in dogs.

1. Previous studies using sine-wave pulses have shown that changes in pulse frequency do not alter single-unit activity per unit time. Since baroreceptor activity is phasic with most of the activity occurring in systole, we reasoned that the lack of effect of pulse frequency is due to the associated reciprocal change in duration of systole with sine-wave pulses. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that change in frequency using natural arterial pulses alters baroreceptor unit activity per unit time. 2. In chloralose-anaesthetized dogs the isolated carotid sinus was connected to an electromagnetic pressure converter driven by a voltage generator that controlled pulse pressure and sine-wave pulse rate. To generate a natural pulse the converter was driven by the output from the pressure channel used to record arterial pressure. Systolic and diastolic pressures were maintained constant by a pressurized air source and an adjustable control on the voltage generator. The rate of natural pulses was decreased by electrical stimulation of the peripheral right vagus nerve which slowed the heart rate of the dog. 3. Decreases in sine-wave rate by approximately 73 pulses/min (from 156 +/- 2 to 83 +/- 1 pulses/min) at a mean pressure of 114 +/- 8 mmHg (n = 13) did not alter activity per unit time (28 +/- 3 vs. 29 +/- 3 spikes/s). 4. In contrast, decreases in natural pulse rate by an average of 78 pulses/min (from 182 +/- 7 to 104 +/- 15 pulses/min) at a comparable mean pressure (104 +/- 7 mmHg) (n = 9) decreased activity per unit time by 28% from 32 +/- 4 to 23 +/- 4 spikes/s (P less than 0.05). Similar findings were observed in five of six single units using an intact (normally perfused) carotid sinus preparation in dogs with heart block and cardiac pacing. 5. The results indicate that a change in natural pulse rate is an important determinant of single-unit baroreceptor activity.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1988

Activated endothelial cells in culture suppress baroreceptors in the carotid sinus of dog.

Vascular stretch increases the activity of arterial baroreceptors along with the production and release of substances from the endothelium. We hypothesized that endothelial factors modulate the sensitivity of baroreceptors during increases in arterial pressure. Baroreceptor activity was recorded from single fibers innervating the isolated carotid sinus of dogs anesthetized with chloralose after removal of the endothelium (balloon denudation) and after replacing into the denuded sinus bovine aortic endothelial cells cultured on microcarrier beads. The endothelial cells were activated with either the calcium ionophore A23187 (2 microM) or bradykinin (10 microM). The threshold pressure (n = 7) determined with a slow ramp increase in static pressure averaged 73 +/- 7 (SEM) mm Hg during exposure to naked beads and was increased significantly (96 +/- 18 mm Hg; p less than 0.05) during exposure to endothelial cell cultures. During stepwise increases in pressure, activity (n = 6) averaged 14 +/- 5, 40 +/- 8, and 54 +/- 8 spikes/sec at 75, 125, and 175 mm Hg during exposure to naked beads and decreased significantly to 2 +/- 2, 30 +/- 11, and 35 +/- 12 spikes/sec at equivalent pressures during exposure to the cell cultures. The activity was restored after replacement of the cell cultures with naked beads. The suppressed activity was not caused by changes in carotid sinus diameter or strain (sonomicrometers) or by the chemical activators that were also added to the naked beads. The results indicate that chemically activated endothelial cells release an inhibitory factor that suppresses baroreceptor activity.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Potentiation of sympathetic nerve responses to hypoxia in borderline hypertensive subjects.

We tested the hypothesis that sympathetic nerve responses to stimulation of chemoreceptors by hypoxia are exaggerated in borderline hypertensive humans. We compared responses to isocapnic hypoxia in eight borderline hypertensive subjects and eight normotensive control subjects matched for age, sex, weight, and height without a family history of hypertension. Measurements of heart rate, mean blood pressure, minute ventilation, and sympathetic nerve activity to muscle were made before and during hypoxia. We also measured responses to a period of voluntary apnea during hypoxia. There were no significant differences between the increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and ventilation in response to hypoxia in the two groups. However, during hypoxia sympathetic activity in the hypertensive subjects increased by 40.6 +/- 13.6% (mean +/- SE), greater than the increase of 20.4 +/- 5.0% in the control subjects (p less than 0.05). In six hypertensive and six control subjects, when apnea was performed during hypoxia, sympathetic activity increased by 605.0 +/- 294.3% in the hypertensive subjects and by only 52.8 +/- 17.3% in the control subjects (p less than 0.001). We conclude that the chemoreceptor reflex is enhanced in borderline hypertensive subjects and results in exaggerated increases in sympathetic nerve activity during hypoxia. This enhanced chemoreceptor reflex is especially obvious when the inhibitory influence of breathing and thoracic afferent activity is eliminated by apnea. This exaggerated response may contribute to excess sympathetic activity in borderline hypertensive subjects and to adverse consequences of sleep apnea in hypertensive subjects.

Apnea↗
PubMed1988

Epinephrine facilitates neurogenic vasoconstriction in humans.

Numerous studies have suggested that epinephrine may facilitate neural release of NE. There have been no studies in humans that demonstrate the functional significance of this action. To determine whether epinephrine facilitates neurogenic vasoconstriction in humans, we contrasted forearm vasoconstrictor responses to a reflex stimulus (lower body negative pressure [LBNP]) and to intraarterial NE before, during, and 30 min after infusion of epinephrine (50 ng/min) or isoproterenol (10 or 25 ng/min) into a brachial artery. These doses had no systemic effects. We reasoned that if prejunctional stimulation of beta receptors by epinephrine and isoproterenol had functional significance, the vasoconstrictor response to LBNP would be potentiated in comparison to the response to NE (postjunctional mechanism). Studies were done on 23 normal male volunteers. Forearm blood flow was measured with a strain gauge plethysmograph and intraarterial pressure was recorded. The ratio of vasoconstrictor responses to LBNP/NE was used as an index of neural release of the neurotransmitter NE. This ratio increased during infusions of both epinephrine and isoproterenol. 30 min after epinephrine the vasoconstrictor response to LBNP (n = 15) was augmented from +9.9 +/- 2.2 (SE) resistance units (RU) before epinephrine to +16.4 +/- 3.2 RU (P less than 0.05); whereas the response to NE (n = 8) tended to decrease from +8.8 +/- 3.1 RU before to +4.2 +/- 1.2 RU after epinephrine (P greater than 0.05). In contrast, 30 min after isoproterenol the vasoconstrictor responses to LBNP and NE were the same as before isoproterenol. The augmented ratio of responses to LBNP/NE after epinephrine and not after isoproterenol supports the concept that epinephrine, but not isoproterenol, is taken up by the adrenergic terminal, is released subsequently during reflex stimulation, and augments the release of the neurotransmitter NE. These experiments provide the first hemodynamic evidence in humans that epinephrine and isoproterenol facilitate neurogenic vasoconstriction. The sustained effect of epinephrine in contrast to isoproterenol suggests that the late facilitation by epinephrine is related to its neural uptake and subsequent release.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

New insights into the influence of pulsatile pressure on the arterial baroreceptor reflex.

Pulsatile arterial pressure as compared to static pressure has important influences on baroreceptor activation and on the central mediation of the baroreflex. First, the static pressure-baroreceptor activity curve is sigmoid and the slope or gain peaks abruptly at pressures near 100 mmHg. In contrast, the pulsatile pressure-activity curve is linear over a wide range of pressure and the maximum gain is reduced. Second, exposure of baroreceptors to elevated levels of static pressure causes a rapid resetting or desensitization of the receptors within minutes. Baroreceptor resetting is absent or blunted when the elevated pressure is pulsatile. Third, inhibition of sympathetic activity is greater during pulsatile vs. static pressure even when baroreceptor activity per unit time is less. This central facilitation of the baroreflex is related to the lack of adaptation of central neurons to the pulse phasic afferent activity. The results indicate: 1) the extended linear range of the pressure-activity relation during pulsatile pressure may enable the baroreceptors to accurately detect changes in arterial pressure over a wider pressure range than that predicted from experiments using static pressure; and 2) pulsatile pressure can reduce resetting and promote reflex inhibition of sympathetic activity both by sensitizing the baroreceptors and by centrally facilitating the reflex.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Sympathetic activation by hypoxia and hypercapnia--implications for sleep apnea.

In normal humans, both hypoxia and hypercapnia result in sympathetic nerve activation, and when combined, i.e. hypoxic hypercapnia, synergistically increase sympathetic activity. Apnea during the hypoxic and hypercapnic stress results in further increases in sympathetic activity. Borderline hypertensive humans have exaggerated sympathetic nerve responses to hypoxia. Hypertensives are also prone to sleep apnea. We suggest that sleep apnea may result in very high levels of sympathetic activity which may contribute to daytime hypertension and/or precipitate cardiovascular catastrophe in hypertensive people during sleep.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Modulation of cardiovascular reflexes by arginine vasopressin.

Arginine vasopressin (AVP), a potent vasoconstrictor, does not raise arterial pressure in normal humans or neurally intact animals, even during infusions that achieve pathophysiological plasma concentrations. It has been proposed that this is because AVP facilitates the baroreflex control of the circulation. We performed a series of investigations to test this hypothesis, and to determine sites at which AVP might act to augment the baroreflex. In anesthetized rabbits, vasopressin (36 pmol.kg-1.min-1) increased discharge from both medullated and nonmedullated single fibres from aortic baroreceptor nerves during elevations in aortic arch pressure. Similarly, vasopressin (36 pmol.kg-1.min-1) increased the response of left ventricular mechanoreceptor single fibre discharge to elevations of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. These observations suggest that sensitization of high and low pressure baroreceptors is one mechanism by which vasopressin may facilitate baroreflexes. In a further series of experiments in sinoaortic denervated anesthetized rabbits, vasopressin (18 pmol.kg-1.min-1) facilitated vagally mediated reflex inhibition of renal sympathetic nerve activity during volume expansion. In humans, AVP (0.37 pmol.kg-1.min-1) raised plasma AVP to an antidiuretic level (22 +/- 4 fmol/mL), but did not change blood pressure or the baroreflex control of heart rate or forearm vascular resistance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗