PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F M Ferrante

Publications and source records attributed to F M Ferrante.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Interpleural analgesia after thoracotomy.

We examined the effects of the following variables on interpleural analgesia after thoracotomy: addition of epinephrine to local anesthetic, thoracostomy drainage, two-catheter placement, and location of catheter tips. Twenty patients were randomized to have one catheter (paravertebral tip location) or two catheters (paravertebral and lateral thoracic wall tip locations). Interpleural catheters were sutured to the parietal pleura by the surgeon at time of wound closure. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine through the single catheter or 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with or without 1:200,000 epinephrine through each of the two catheters while supine. Bupivacaine concentrations in whole blood and in thoracostomy drainage fluid were assayed by gas chromatography. Actual content of bupivacaine in the drainage fluid was calculated. Degree of analgesia was assessed by verbal numerical pain scores over the first 4 h and opioid demand thereafter. Addition of epinephrine to bupivacaine did not influence the degree of analgesia. Approximately 30%-40% of any administered dose of bupivacaine was lost via the thoracostomy tube over a 4-h period. There was no correlation between the true initial dose (100 mg minus thoracostomy drainage) and Cmax. Use of two catheters resulted in significantly less opioid requirements after an initial 8-h period. Failure to achieve adequate interpleural analgesia in postthoracotomy patients may be related to loss of anesthetic via thoracostomy drainage, presence of extravasated blood and tissue fluid in the pleural space, and possibly sequestration and channeling of flow of local anesthetic by restricted motion of an operated lung.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Bupivacaine↗
PubMed1991

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to compare the efficacy of demand-dose patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) for treatment of pain during labor and delivery. Forty patients were randomized to receive 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl (2 micrograms/mL) through CEI at 12 mL/h or through demand-dose PCEA. Patients using PCEA could demand 3 mL every 10 min without restriction. Analgesia in both groups was comparable. However, there was a significant reduction in total bupivacaine consumption (in milligrams) associated with the use of PCEA (mean +/- SEM: CEI = 76.1 +/- 8.5 mg; PCEA = 42.2 +/- 5.9 mg; 45% reduction). The hourly bupivacaine consumption during the first (CEI = 15.8 +/- 0.6 mg/h; PCEA = 8.8 +/- 1.1 mg/h) and second (CEI = 17.2 +/- 1.2 mg/h; PCEA = 6.8 +/- 1.2 mg/h) stages of labor was also reduced. Overall, this represented a 47% "sparing" of bupivacaine use per hour with PCEA. Similar reductions occurred in the use of fentanyl. The reductions in analgesic requirement, however, were not associated with a reduction in the degree of motor blockade or in the cephalad extent of sensory blockade. A significant dose-sparing effect was associated with the use of demand-dose PCEA as compared with standard CEI for analgesia during labor and delivery.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

The difference between acute and chronic pain.

Acute and chronic pain are different clinical entities. Acute pain is provoked by a specific disease or injury, serves a useful biologic purpose, is associated with skeletal muscle spasm and sympathetic nervous system activation, and is self-limited. Chronic pain, in contrast, may be considered a disease state. It is pain that outlasts the normal time of healing, if associated with a disease or injury. Chronic pain may arise from psychological states, serves no biologic purpose, and has no recognizable end-point. Both acute and chronic pain are an enormous problem in the United States, costing 650 million lost workdays and $65 billion a year. The therapy of acute pain is aimed at treating the underlying cause and interrupting the nociceptive signals. The therapy of chronic pain must rely on a multidisciplinary approach and should involve more than one therapeutic modality.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1988

A statistical model for pain in patient-controlled analgesia and conventional intramuscular opioid regimens.

A statistical model was developed: 1) to compare the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and traditional intramuscular (IM) opioids for pain relief in 40 patients after total knee replacement and, 2) to evaluate pain cycles associated with each technique. Hourly visual analog pain scores were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and time-series analysis. Hourly verbal analog pain scores were used to determine predominant pain levels. According to ANOVA, PCA was no more effective than were IM opioids. Time-series analyses documented a complete cycle of pain every 5.3 hours in patients receiving IM opioids but no pain cycle with use of PCA. Analysis of PCA verbal analog scores demonstrated self-administration of opioids to "moderate" levels of pain relief with use of PCA, not to complete analgesia. These results suggest that certain patients may not envision complete postoperative analgesia as being possible. Hence, they self-administer opioids for pain relief with PCA according to their expectations. Population characteristics may modify PCA efficacy. These characteristics should be delineated and the use of PCA targeted to appropriate patients.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of alkalinization of lidocaine on the pain of skin infiltration and intravenous catheterization.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that alkalinization of lidocaine decreases the pain of skin infiltration in surgical patients. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, prospective study. SETTING: Preoperative holding units, Brigham and Women's Hospital. PATIENTS: 184 adult surgical patients. INTERVENTIONS: We compared the efficacy of 1% lidocaine with and without 0.1 mEq/ml of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) for relief of pain of (1) skin infiltration and (2) intravenous (i.v.) catheterization prior to surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients evaluated the intensity of pain using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). There were no differences between study groups (lidocaine with NaHCO3, n = 89; lidocaine alone, n = 95) with respect to site of catheterization or catheter gauge used. Lidocaine plus NaHCO3 caused significantly less pain on skin infiltration (median VAS = 4; range = 0 to 51) than did lidocaine alone (VAS = 8; range = 0 to 48; p < 0.008). Pain of i.v. catheterization also did not differ between groups. There was a weak correlation between catheter gauge and pain of i.v. catheterization (r = -0.19; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pain resulting from skin infiltration of lidocaine solutions can be diminished by adding NaHCO3. However, catheter size is more important than the presence or absence of NaHCO3 in determining the pain of i.v. catheterization.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) for myofascial pain syndrome of the head, neck, and shoulders using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study design with comparison to an internal standard consisting of trigger point injections (TPI). METHODS: Patients (n = 23) were randomly assigned to receive either: (1) SPGB with 4% lidocaine, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with saline placebo or (2) SPGB with saline placebo, then TPI with 1% lidocaine, and finally SPGB with 4% lidocaine. Each respective treatment within each protocol was given sequentially at 1-week intervals for both groups. Prior to the first treatment, all patients assessed their average intensity of pain and pain at that particular moment using a visual analog pain scale. Pain intensity and pain relief were reassessed 30 minutes after each treatment and at 6 hours, 24 hours and 1 week using visual analog pain and pain relief scales. Pain intensity and pain relief data were transformed into natural logarithm units, and the statistical significance of SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus SPGB with placebo, SPGB with 4% lidocaine versus TPI, and TPI versus SPGB with placebo were tested by mixed-model analysis of variance. The magnitude of the differences in pain intensity and pain relief ratings were also compared via computation of 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The analgesic effect of SPGB with 4% lidocaine was no better than placebo. Mixed-model analysis of variance revealed improved analgesia with administration of TPIs as compared to SPGB with 4% lidocaine and placebo over the entire week of observations (pain relief scores). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that SPGB with 4% lidocaine is no more efficacious than placebo and less efficacious than administration of standard trigger point injections in the treatment of myofascial pain of the head, neck, and shoulders.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of the 2-chloroprocaine metabolite, diethylaminoethanol, in blood and serum.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: 2-Chloroprocaine is rapidly metabolized in the blood to yield 2-chloro-para-aminobenzoic acid (an inactive metabolite) and diethylaminoethanol (DEAE). DEAE possesses local anesthetic activity. The only reported assay for DEAE is a colorimetric method. METHODS: Clinical samples of whole blood and serum were obtained from patients receiving stepped intravenous infusions of 3% 2-chloroprocaine. A high pH-dependent liquid-liquid extraction step with diethyl ether was used to eliminate interfering peaks in high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Separation and quantitation were performed using HPLC on a polymeric-reversed phase column with a mobile phase consisting of 10% or 20% acetonitrile (for whole blood or serum analysis, respectively) in 50 mm aqueous sodium phosphate buffer, pH = 11.50. The elution order of DEAE and its analogues was tested to interpret the HPLC separation mechanism. RESULTS: Extraction recovery of DEAE from whole blood was 67 +/- 13.5%, from serum, 71 +/- 12.2%, and from water, 75 +/- 2.9%. The high pH value of the mobile phase resulted in sharp, well-resolved peaks with run times of approximately 8 minutes using 20% acetonitrile. The lower limit of detection was 5 ng/mL of DEAE from a 1-mL sample. The elution order of DEAE and its analogues indicated that separation was based on the hydrophobicity of the analytes rather than polar group interactions occurring with silica-based stationary phase. CONCLUSIONS: A new, simple and rapid HPLC method for extraction and measurement of DEAE in whole blood or serum samples is reported here.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Radiofrequency sacroiliac joint denervation for sacroiliac syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radiofrequency (RF) denervation of the sacroiliac (SI) joint has been advocated for the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome, yet no clinical studies or case series support its use. METHODS: We report the results of a consecutive series of 50 SI joint RF denervations performed in 33 patients with sacroiliac syndrome. All patients underwent diagnostic SI joint injections with local anesthetic before denervation. Changes in visual analog pain scores (VAS), pain diagrams, physical examination (palpation tenderness over the joint, myofascial trigger points overlying the joint, SI joint pain provocation tests, and range of motion of the lumbar spine), and opioid use were assessed pre- and postdenervation. RESULTS: The criteria for successful RF denervation were at least a 50% decrease in VAS for a period of at least 6 months; 36.4% of patients (12 of 33) met these criteria. Failure of denervation correlated with the presence of disability determination and pain on lateral flexion to the affected side. The average duration of pain relief was 12.0 +/- 1.2 months in responders versus 0.9 +/- 0.2 months in nonresponders (P < or = 0.0001). A positive response was associated with an atraumatic inciting event. Successful denervation was associated with a change in the pain diagram and a reduction in the pattern of referred pain, a normalization of SI joint pain provocation tests, and a reduction in the use of opioids. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that RF denervation of the SI joint can significantly reduce pain in selected patients with sacroiliac syndrome for a protracted time period. Moreover, certain abnormal physical findings (i.e., SI joint pain provocation tests) revert to normal for the duration of the analgesia.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A two-person technique for epidural needle placement and medication infusion.

Traditional techniques of epidural needle placement have not proved satisfactory in patients who have had a previous laminectomy and may have epiduroarachnoiditis. A two-person technique was developed to: 1) simplify performance of difficult, epidural needle placement; 2) allow both resident and staff a simultaneous "hands-on" teaching experience; 3) allow a painless method of medication administration in patients with altered epidural anatomy; and 4) allow a simple method for determination of epidural space pressures. A glass syringe and extension tubing filled with saline are connected to the epidural needle. The needle is advanced by the operator while the pressure is monitored by the assistant. Once in the epidural space, the extension tubing is held vertically to act as a manometer. The column of saline falls and fluctuates with heart beat, providing verification of correct needle placement. Medication is placed in the barrel of the syringe and allowed to infuse by gravity. The two-person technique has achieved both patient and resident acceptance, and allows a painless method of medication administration in patients with altered epidural space anatomy.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Survey of opioid use in chronic nonmalignant pain patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Opioids have been accepted as appropriate treatment for acute and cancer pain, but remain controversial for use with chronic nonmalignant pain. Clinicians are concerned about efficacy, tolerance, addiction, and unwanted side effects. METHODS: The aim of this study was to survey chronic pain patients who were taking opioids for their pain, to determine the incidence of these adverse conditions. Two hundred seventeen patients who were being treated for their pain at two different pain centers completed a medication questionnaire. The most common diagnosis was low back pain. One hundred twelve patients reported taking oral opioids for their pain. RESULTS: Of the patients who reported taking opioids for their chronic pain, 83% felt that the opioids were moderately beneficial in relieving their pain; 25% felt that the opioid had not lost its ability to relieve the pain over time; 35% reported that they did not need to increase their medication; 36% expressed no fear of addiction or dependence; and 56% reported having no unwanted side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that chronic nonmalignant pain patients taking opioids for their pain reported some tolerance, fear of addiction, and side effects when taking opioids. However, despite these concerns, some of these patients felt that opioid therapy was very beneficial. Further investigations are needed to determine which patient characteristics predict benefit from opioid therapy for nonmalignant pain.

Chronic Disease↗