PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Münster

Publications and source records attributed to F Münster.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

[Dynamic magnetic resonance tomography in aortic valve insufficiency: methodologic comparison with aortography and color Doppler echocardiography].

To evaluate the usefulness of cine-MRI for the quantitative assessment of aortic valve regurgitation, 31 patients (54 +/- 15 years of age; 22 M, 9 F) and 10 normal volunteers underwent a multi-modality imaging protocol comparing cine-MRI with color Doppler echocardiography and contrast aortography. Twenty-one patients had aortic regurgitation with an associated transvalvular gradient, 10 patients had pure valve incompetence. Aortic insufficiency as assessed by the signal void from regurgitant flow on cine-MRI was best analyzed on transversal tomograms. Both the volume of the signal void caused by turbulence above a threshold velocity, and the ratio of the diameters of the regurgitant jet and the outflow tract (dAL-Jet/DLVOT) were found to correlate closely with the (Seller's) angiographic regurgitant score by r = 0.86 each (p < 0.001), and the color Doppler echocardiographic index by r = 0.74 and 0.89, respectively (p < 0.001). Cine-MRI failed to differentiate the angiographic grades I and II, however, clearly separated grades II, III, and IV in contrast to other non-invasive imaging modalities. Moreover, a semiquantitative index derived from cine-MRI allowed a rapid assessment of the severity of regurgitation, similar to color Doppler echocardiography and the semiquantitative angiographic Seller's score. Thus, cine-MRI volumetric evaluation of transvalvular flow turbulences provides a useful and reproducible means to quantify aortic regurgitation. It also allows serial atraumatic investigations as a diagnostic alternative to color Doppler examination in patients less suitable for echocardiographic evaluation and may prove helpful in monitoring the natural course of aortic valve disease.

Adult↗

[Practical application of digital therapy verification].

The following describes the technical details which are of importance preparing portal radiographs using digital luminescence radiography. There are some advantages to this method: In comparison with the conventional portal radiographs using a low speed film, the new doses is ten to thirty times less than generally required. Double exposure techniques can be more easily applied than with conventional portal films. The contrast may be subsequently manipulated. In addition the dynamic range of the radiation detector is automatically adjusted to the exposure range. These facts may improve the verification quality. However, there are also some disadvantages: You need more apparatus, and the whole procedure is more time-consuming. Using typical examples we shall compare the procedure of digital portal radiographs and its results to traditional techniques.

Cobalt Radioisotopes↗

[Comparative contrast media studies using conventional film-screen systems and digital luminescence radiography].

This is a report on the clinical application of digital luminescence radiographs compared to conventional x-rays during examinations with contrast medium. We present selected examinations of the period October to December 1988. By a constant quality of hard copies the digital examinations are equal to conventional x-rays. Regions of little difference in density are better represented by digital luminescence radiographs.

Contrast Media↗