PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Massoud

Publications and source records attributed to F Massoud.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

The role of routine laboratory studies and neuroimaging in the diagnosis of dementia: a clinicopathological study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the neuropathological diagnoses of longitudinally followed patients with potentially reversible causes of dementia and to examine the results of the "dementia work-up," especially neuroimaging, by comparison with the pathological diagnosis. DESIGN: A neuropathologic series of 61 consecutive patients, with review of clinical, laboratory, neuroimaging, and pathological results. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, forty-eight (79%) had a clinical diagnosis of probable or possible Alzheimer's disease (AD). Compared with the pathological diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnosis of AD were 96% and 79%, respectively. Of the 61 patients, 9 had abnormal laboratory tests, the correction of which did not improve the subsequent course. These patients were found to have AD8 and frontotemporal dementia on pathology. In two patients, neuroimaging was helpful in the clinical diagnoses of frontotemporal dementia and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Neuroimaging revealed cerebrovascular disease in 18 patients, only two of whom were suspected clinically. Pathology confirmed AD in 17 and PSP in 1 of these patients. Sensitivity and specificity for the clinical diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease in comparison with pathology were 6% and 98%, respectively. With the added information from neuroimaging, that sensitivity increased to 59% and specificity decreased to 81%. CONCLUSIONS: All cases with abnormal laboratory or neuroimaging results had AD or some other neurodegenerative disease on pathology. The "dementia work-up" did not reveal any reversible causes for dementia in this group of patients. Neuroimaging may have a role, especially in the diagnosis of possible AD with concomitant cerebrovascular disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

A clinicopathological comparison of community-based and clinic-based cohorts of patients with dementia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease, the distribution of pathological causes, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of 2 different groups of patients with dementia. DESIGN: Retrospective clinicopathological study. SETTING: A memory disorder clinic in a university hospital and a multiethnic community. PATIENTS: Sixty-three patients from a memory disorder clinic and 26 patients from a large community-based study who underwent autopsy after clinical evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differential distribution of clinical and pathological findings, with clinicopathological correlations. RESULTS: Clinic patients were younger at diagnosis, more educated, and more likely to be white. Of the 63 clinic patients we evaluated, 29 (46%) had a pathological diagnosis of definite AD, 15 (24%) had a diagnosis of mixed AD, and 19 (30%) had a diagnosis of another type of dementia. The pathological diagnoses in the community patients were distributed as follows: 6 (23%) had definite AD, 6 (23%) had mixed AD, 6 (23%) had cerebrovascular disease, and 8 (31%) had another type of dementia. The difference in distribution of pathological diagnoses between these 2 groups was only significant for cerebrovascular diseases. For patients seen at the clinic, the sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis of AD was 98% and the specificity was 84%; for the community group, the sensitivity was 92% and the specificity was 79%. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis was not statistically significant between the groups of clinic patients and community patients. Dementia associated with cerebrovascular disease was more prevalent in the community sample. This difference may be attributable to clinical and demographic differences between the 2 groups.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1996

Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for microprolactinomas: 10 to 20 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Transsphenoidal adenomectomy is an effective treatment fo r microprolactinomas. However, postoperative recurrence of hyperprolactinemia is not rare. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term outcome of women with microprolactinomas operated on by transsphenoidal approach. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 64 women with microprolactinomas who underwent transsphenoidal adenomectomy and were followed for 10 to 20 years. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 58 women (90%) had normal plasma prolactin concentrations (<20 microg/L). After a mean of 3.3 years, during which the women were asymptomatic with normoprolactinemia, 25 (43%) had a relapse of hyperprolactinemia (> or = 20 microg/L). However, their evolution varied. Fifteen women had symptomatic hyperprolactinemia. Computed tomography (CT) scans showed recurrent microadenomas in 2 women. The other 10 women had only hyperprolactinemia. Of these women, 5 had transient hyperprolactinemia (29 +/- 4 microg/L) for 5 years, after which prolactin declined to normal 13 +/- 3 microg/L). The remaining five patients had elevated prolactin (31 +/- 3 microg/L) throughout the follow-up period (10 to 20 years). CT scan did not show recurrent adenomas in these women. Thirty-three women remained normoprolactinemic and asymptomatic for a mean period of 12 years (range, 10 to 20 years). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, most of the patients with late relapse of hyperprolactinemia have slight functional hyperprolactinemia and remain asymptomatic with no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Adenoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) as a screening tool for delirium in the emergency room.

The objective of this study was to compare the results of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) obtained by a trained non-physician interviewer to those obtained by a geriatrician, among a sample of elderly patients seen in an emergency room. A group of 110 elderly patients (> or =66 years) were evaluated in the emergency room by a lay interviewer. The geriatrician conducted an interview in the presence of the lay interviewer. Subsequently, the geriatrician and the lay interviewer completed a CAM checklist independently. Kappa statistics, sensitivity, specificity, positivity predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the geriatrician's and lay interviewer's results with the CAM diagnostic algorithm were compared. The kappa coefficient was 0.91, the sensitivity 0.86, the specificity 1.00, the PPV 1.00, and the NPV 0.97. In conclusion, the CAM used by a trained lay interviewer in the emergency room is sensitive, specific, reliable and easy to use for the identification of patients with delirium. The under-recognition and under-treatment of delirium is a major health issue and has important clinical and financial implications. The implementation of systematic screening in populations at risk could increase the rate of early detection and lead to the appropriate management of delirious patients.

Aged↗