PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Menichetti

Publications and source records attributed to F Menichetti.

70 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe hospital infections.

Imipenem/cilastatin as a single agent or in combination with amikacin was used as empirical treatment of severe hospital infections. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for efficacy and the overall response rate was 62% with imipenem/cilastatin alone and 80% with imipenem/cilastatin in combination with amikacin. The highest response rate was obtained in urinary tract infection (75%) and in pneumonia (70%) and the lowest response rate (50%) was observed in bacteremia of unknown origin and in skin and soft tissue infections. Eight failures were observed and seven of them occurred in patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin alone. Two deaths occurred, both in patients with bacteremia. Imipenem/cilastatin treatment was interrupted early in 3 patients because the pathogen developed resistance during therapy and in 2 other patients because of side effects. In our study imipenem/cilastatin proved to be efficacious and well tolerated. The addition of an aminoglycoside to imipenem/cilastatin might improve its efficacy and prevent pathogens from becoming resistant during therapy. Therefore this association would seem to be advisable for the therapy of bacteremic infections and for those caused by difficult pathogens.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Viridans streptococci septicemia in cancer patients: a clinical study.

Viridans streptococci septicemia was documented in ten cancer patients, 7 of whom were neutropenic (less than 1000/mmc). Pneumonia was presumed to be the source of bacteremia in six patients. Viridans streptococci isolated from sputum culture in an immunocompromised host must be regarded as the potential etiological agent, then further characterized and checked for antibiotic sensitivity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Treatment of infections by staphylococci and other gram-positive bacteria with teicoplanin: an open study.

Teicoplanin, 200-400 mg (3-6 mg/kg) daily iv or im, was used to treat 71 episodes of infection. The average duration of treatment was 22 days. The 64 evaluable episodes comprised 24 skin/soft tissue, 20 osteoarticular, ten urinary tract and one ventriculo-atrial shunt infections; one case of primary bacteraemia, three of endocarditis, two of pneumonia and three of pleural empyema. Fifty-five episodes were treated with teicoplanin monotherapy and nine with teicoplanin in association to other antibiotics. Overall 61% (39/64) of the evaluable infections were cured, 25% (16/64) improved and 14% (9/64) failed. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent pathogen, with 46 isolates. Infections by both methicillin-sensitive and resistant Staph. aureus strains showed favourable clinical and microbiological responses to teicoplanin. Side effects were observed in eight of the 64 episodes (12.5%). Bronchospasm was observed in two other cases at the beginning of therapy and the antibiotic administration was discontinued. Teicoplanin is an effective and well tolerated antibiotic for infections by Gram-positive bacteria, and it is effective against methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Effects of the new glycopeptide antibiotic teicoplanin on platelet function and blood coagulation.

Teicoplanin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic, is structurally related to ristocetin, an antibiotic known to induce human platelet agglutination and, thus, thrombocytopenia and thromboembolic side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of teicoplanin on platelet function in vitro and ex vivo and on blood coagulation ex vivo. In the in vitro studies, spontaneous platelet aggregation; platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen, and ristocetin; and the release of beta-thromboglobulin from platelets were assessed. Platelets from healthy subjects were incubated with teicoplanin at final concentrations of 100, 1,500, 5,000, and 10,000 micrograms/ml. The maximal achievable concentration with therapeutic doses is 100 micrograms/ml. When compared with saline, teicoplanin at concentrations of 100 and 1,500 micrograms/ml had no effect on platelet function, but at concentrations of 5,000 and 10,000 micrograms/ml, it induced greater spontaneous platelet aggregation (P less than 0.01) and inhibited platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen, and ristocetin (P less than 0.01). Teicoplanin at concentrations of 100, 1,500, and 5,000 micrograms/ml did not induce the release of beta-thromboglobulin, in contrast to teicoplanin at a concentration of 10,000 micrograms/ml and ristocetin at a concentration of 1.5 mg/ml (P less than 0.01). In the ex vivo studies, platelet count, bleeding time, plasma beta-thromboglobulin, platelet aggregation induced by ADP, ristocetin, and epinephrine, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, thrombin clotting time, and serum fibrinogen degradation products were evaluated at days 0, 3, and 6 and at 72 h after the end of therapy. All subjects completed the study without evidence of side effects. When compared with the pretreatment values, none of the values from these assays showed a significant change at any time during and after treatment. We concluded that platelet function and blood coagulation are not affected by therapeutic concentrations of teicoplanin and that in vitro platelet function is affected only by concentrations of teicoplanin far in excess of those that are clinically achievable.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Prospective randomized clinical trial of teicoplanin for empiric combined antibiotic therapy in febrile, granulocytopenic acute leukemia patients.

The increasing prevalence of bacteremia caused by gram-positive bacteria in granulocytopenic acute leukemia patients prompted us to evaluate, in a prospective randomized trial, the role of teicoplanin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic, when it was added to amikacin plus ceftazidime, as an empiric therapy of fever in these patients. Of 47 evaluable episodes, 22 were treated with the teicoplanin regimen and 25 were treated with the combination of amikacin and ceftazidime. The overall response to therapy of patients treated with teicoplanin was slightly better (82% improvement) than that obtained with amikacin plus ceftazidime (52%). The response rate of patients with gram-positive bacteremias was 80% (4 of 5) to the regimen that included teicoplanin; 25% (1 of 4) of the patients treated with amikacin plus ceftazidime responded to treatment; and for patients with gram-negative bacteremias, the response rates were, respectively, 100% (4 of 4) and 70% (7 of 10). The better results obtained with amikacin-ceftazidime-teicoplanin treatment were most evident in patients with profound (less than 100/mm3) and persistent neutropenia (83 versus 30% improvement). Furthermore, a good response rate of patients with gram-positive bacteremias (seven of eight; 87% improvement) was achieved in a small group of bone marrow transplant patients who were all treated with amikacin-ceftazidime-teicoplanin. No severe side effects were documented in any patient. Teicoplanin, as a drug administered as a single daily dose, seems to be a safe and useful anti-gram-positive agent when used in combination with amikacin-ceftazidime as an empiric therapy of febrile episodes in granulocytopenic acute leukemia patients.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1987

Effects of the monobactam antibiotic aztreonam on platelet function and blood coagulation.

The effects of the new monobactam antibiotic aztreonam on platelet function and blood coagulation were evaluated both in vitro and ex vivo. In the in vitro studies carried out on platelets from 6 healthy volunteers, therapeutic concentrations of aztreonam had no effect on platelet function. Aztreonam inhibited platelet aggregation only at concentrations far in excess of those clinically achievable. In the ex vivo studies carried out in 11 patients with aztreonam-sensitive infections, aztreonam, 1 g t.i.d. intravenously, did not produce any effect on platelet function and blood coagulation. We conclude that therapeutic doses of aztreonam appear not to affect haemostasis.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗
PubMed1987

[Immuno-allergic reactions to cotrimoxazole in a hospital population].

By a study of 87 oncologic hospitalized patients, affected by serious infectious complications and treated with high-dose antibiotic therapy including co-trimoxazole, the authors evaluate the allergic and immunologic reactions to the drug on clinical and serological basis and try to outline the pathogenic implicated mechanisms.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed1986

Norfloxacin versus pipemidic acid in complicated urinary tract infections due to susceptible pathogens: a comparative clinical trial.

Norfloxacin (NOR) was compared to pipemidic acid (PA) in complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by pathogens susceptible to both agents to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the new 4-quinolone derivative. Sixty-five patients were randomly allocated to receive NOR or PA, 400 mg bid for 7 days, and the results evaluated for treatment efficacy at 5 weeks after completion of therapy. Overall microbiological cure was significantly greater in NOR-treated patients, as 19 of 26 were cured (73%), compared to only 16 of 39 (41%) in the PA group (p less than 0.05). Failures and relapses, considered together, were significantly (p less than 0.05) less frequent in patients treated with NOR (4/26) than in those receiving PA (18/39). Clinical response was strictly related to microbiological outcome: NOR had a broader antibacterial spectrum than PA and in this study seemed to be more efficacious in the treatment of complicated UTIs caused only by bacteria susceptible to both agents. This may be related to greater antibacterial activity and/or tissue penetration by NOR, which is thus to be preferred, according to the results of our study, in the treatment of complicated UTIs.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ceftriaxone versus aztreonam plus cefazolin for infections in cancer patients with adequate neutrophil counts.

In a prospective randomized trial, 154 febrile episodes in cancer patients with adequate neutrophil counts (greater than 1,000 cells/mm3) were treated with either ceftriaxone (72 episodes) or aztreonam plus cefazolin (82 episodes). Documented infections represented almost half of the febrile episodes. The overall response rates among the 144 evaluable episodes were similar for the two regimens: 76% (51/67) with ceftriaxone versus 82% (63/77) with aztreonam plus cefazolin (p = 0.41, not significant). Although not statistically significant, the response rate of the microbiologically documented infections was slightly better in patients treated with the double beta-lactam combination (85% vs. 65%, p = 0.16) and clinically documented infections showed a better response in the group of patients receiving monotherapy (87% vs. 59%, p = 0.12). No serious adverse effects were observed during this study and both regimens were well tolerated. Ceftriaxone or the combination of aztreonam plus cefazolin showed a similar efficacy as empirical therapy for infections in cancer patients with adequate neutrophil counts.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Empiric antimicrobial therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patients. Randomized prospective comparison of amikacin plus piperacillin with or without parenteral trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole.

In a prospective randomized trial parenteral trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole was added to amikacin plus piperacillin in order to compare triple-drug antibiotic combination with a standard regimen as empiric therapy of fever in patients with granulocytopenia. One hundred and sixty-one episodes were evaluated; 74 episodes with amikacin plus piperacillin and 87 episodes with amikacin plus piperacillin plus trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole. The overall response to therapy (63% vs. 84%) as well as the response of microbiologically documented infections (60% vs. 82%) was significantly better in patients treated with the triple-drug combination (p less than 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences in response to antibiotics at different infection sites or with regard to any single pathogen was found between the two groups. Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole seemed to be responsible for additional toxicity (nausea and vomiting) when added to amikacin plus piperacillin, but these side-effects were clearly related to the rate of infusion of trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole. The findings of this study support the use of a three-drug versus a two-drug combination as empiric antibiotic regimen in febrile granulocytopenic patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Choroidal granuloma caused by atypical mycobacterium in a patient with AIDS: a case report.

The case presented is a chorioretinal granuloma in a patient with AIDS. The neoformation appeared to be caused by atypical mycobacterium, although it was not possible to isolate the germ. The chorioretinal infection caused by atypical mycobacterium in patients with AIDS occurs very rarely and has so far been described only as a post-mortem finding.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Visceral leishmaniasis in a patient treated for polyarteritis nodosa.

We report a case of visceral leishmaniasis in a patient receiving steroids and cyclophosphamide for polyarteritis nodosa. The clinical presentation of leishmaniasis, with fever, pancitopenia and hypergammaglobulinemia may be confused with a reactivation of vasculitis or with other non-infectious conditions such as haematologic diseases. In endemic areas, the case of latent leishmaniasis must be considered and serology for Leishmania should be performed before starting immunosuppressive treatment.

Antirheumatic Agents↗