Biomedical subjects

F P Bymaster

Publications and source records attributed to F P Bymaster.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Muscarinic receptor agonists, like dopamine receptor antagonist antipsychotics, inhibit conditioned avoidance response in rats.

The purpose of our studies was to determine the effects of muscarinic receptor agonists on conditioned avoidance responding in the rat. Rats were trained to avoid or escape an electric shock delivered to the feet in a discrete trial procedure. The muscarinic receptor agonists pilocarpine and [2-ethyl-8-methyl-2,8-diazaspiro(4. 5)decane-1,3-dione] hydrochloride (RS86) and the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine all decreased the percentage of avoidance responses at doses that produced less than approximately 30% response failures. Similar results were obtained with the antipsychotic drugs haloperidol, trifluoperazine, chlorpromazine, and clozapine. However, the benzodiazepine anxiolytic diazepam did not decrease avoidance responding up to doses that produced ataxia. On the other hand, oxotremorine and arecoline decreased avoidance responding only by producing response failures, whereas aceclidine produced intermediate changes. The muscarinic receptor antagonists scopolamine, trihexyphenidyl, and benztropine were without effect when administered alone but antagonized the decreases in avoidance responding produced by pilocarpine and RS86. Scopolamine had little effect on the decreases in avoidance responding produced by haloperidol. The newer muscarinic receptor partial agonists or agonist/antagonists [R-(Z)-(+)-alpha-(methoxyimino)-1-azabicyclo[2.2. 2]octane-3-acetonitrile] hydrochloride, talsaclidine, milameline, and xanomeline also produced dose-related decreases in avoidance responding. Our results demonstrate that muscarinic receptor agonists can decrease avoidance responding in a manner similar to dopamine-receptor antipsychotic drugs, suggesting that muscarinic receptor agonists may provide an alternative approach to the treatment of psychosis.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Muscarinic agonists exhibit functional dopamine antagonism in unilaterally 6-OHDA lesioned rats.

(5R,6R) 6-(3-propylthio-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1-azabicyclo[3.2.1]oc tane (PTAC) is a selective muscarinic ligand with high affinity for central muscarinic receptors, agonist mode of action at the muscarinic M2 and M4 receptor subtypes and substantially less or no affinity for central dopamine receptors. In the present study PTAC, as well as the muscarinic agonists oxotremorine, RS86 and pilocarpine, inhibited dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonist induced contralateral rotation in unilaterally 6-OHDA lesioned rats. The dose of SKF 38393 used to induce contralateral rotation also caused an intense Fos protein immunoreactivity in the rat dorsolateral striatum on the lesioned site which was inhibited by PTAC indicating that the inhibition of rotation by PTAC was not due to non-specific peripheral side effects.

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-ben↗

PubMed1998

Muscarinic agonists with antipsychotic-like activity: structure-activity relationships of 1,2,5-thiadiazole analogues with functional dopamine antagonist activity.

Muscarinic agonists were tested in two models indicative of clinical antipsychotic activity: conditioned avoidance responding (CAR) in rats and inhibition of apomorphine-induced climbing in mice. The standard muscarinic agonists oxotremorine and pilocarpine were both active in these tests but showed little separation between efficacy and cholinergic side effects. Structure-activity relationships of the alkylthio-1,2,5-thiadiazole azacyclic type muscarinic partial agonists are shown, revealing the exo-6-(3-propyl/butylthio-1,2, 5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane analogues (4a,b and 9a, b) to be the most potent antipsychotic agents with large separation between efficacy and cholinergic side effects. The lack of enantiomeric selectivity suggests the pharmacophoric elements are in the mirror plane of the compounds. A model explaining the potency differences of closely related compounds is offered. The data suggest that muscarinic agonists act as functional dopamine antagonists and that they could become a novel treatment of psychotic patients.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Identification of side chains on 1,2,5-thiadiazole-azacycles optimal for muscarinic m1 receptor activation.

Series of analogs to the functional m1 selective agonist, xanomeline (hexyloxy-TZTP), were evaluated for their in vitro m1 efficacy in cell lines transfected with the human m1 receptor. Systematic variation of the side chain and the azacyclic ring led to the discovery of potent muscarinic agonists with robust m1 efficacy, all having the phenylpropargyloxy/thio as the side chain. The most selective compound was the phenylpropargylthio-[3.2.1] endo analog 28, which is a potent and efficacious m1 agonist with no m2 activity.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Unexpected antipsychotic-like activity with the muscarinic receptor ligand (5R,6R)6-(3-propylthio-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane .

(5R,6R)6-(3-propylthio-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1-azabicyclo[3 .2.1]octane (PTAC) is a potent muscarinic receptor ligand with high affinity for central muscarinic receptors and no or substantially less affinity for a large number of other receptors or binding sites including dopamine receptors. The ligand exhibits partial agonist effects at muscarinic M2 and M4 receptors and antagonist effects at muscarinic M1, M3 and M5 receptors. PTAC inhibited conditioned avoidance responding, dopamine receptor agonist-induced behavior and D-amphetamine-induced FOS protein M5 expression in the nucleus accumbens without inducing catalepsy, tremor or salivation at pharmacologically relevant doses. The effect of PTAC on conditioned avoidance responding and dopamine receptor agonist-induced behavior was antagonized by the acetylcholine receptor antagonist scopolamine. The compound selectively inhibited dopamine cell firing (acute administration) as well as the number of spontaneously active dopamine cells (chronic administration) in the limbic ventral tegmental area (A10) relative to the non-limbic substantia nigra, pars compacta (A9). The results demonstrate that PTAC exhibits functional dopamine receptor antagonism despite its lack of affinity for the dopamine receptors and indicate that muscarinic receptor partial agonists may be an important new approach in the medical treatment of schizophrenia.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Xanomeline compared to other muscarinic agents on stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis in vivo and other cholinomimetic effects.

Activation of muscarinic m1 receptors which are coupled to the phosphoinositide (PI) second messenger transduction system is the initial objective of cholinergic replacement therapy in Alzheimer's disease. Thus, we evaluated the ability of the selective muscarinic receptor agonist (SMRA) xanomeline to stimulate in vivo phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis and compared it to a number of direct acting muscarinic agonists, two cholinesterase inhibitors and a putative m1 agonist/muscarinic m2 antagonist. Using a radiometric technique, it was determined that administration of xanomeline robustly stimulated in vivo PI hydrolysis and the effect was blocked by muscarinic antagonists, demonstrating mediation by muscarinic receptors. The non-selective muscarinic agonists pilocarpine, oxotremorine, RS-86, S-aceclidine, but not the less active isomer R-aceclidine, also effectively stimulated PI hydrolysis in mice. Amongst the putative m1 agonists, thiopilocarpine, hexylthio-TZTP as well as xanomeline effectively stimulated PI hydrolysis, but milameline, WAL 2014, SKB 202026 and PD 142505 did not significantly alter PI hydrolysis. Furthermore, WAL 2014 and SKB 202026 inhibited agonist-induced PI stimulation, suggesting that they act as antagonists at PI-coupled receptors in vivo. The cholinesterase inhibitors, tacrine and physostigmine, and the mixed muscarinic m1 agonist/m2 antagonist LU25-109 did not activate in vivo PI hydrolysis. Xanomeline, hexylthio-TZTP and thiopilocarpine were relatively free of cholinergic side effects, whereas milameline, WAL 2014 and SKB 202026 produced non-selective effects. Therefore, these data demonstrate that xanomeline selectively activates in vivo PI hydrolysis, consistent with activation of biochemical processes involved in memory and cognition and xanomeline's beneficial clinical effects on cognition in Alzheimers patients.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

1,2,5-Thiadiazole analogues of aceclidine as potent m1 muscarinic agonists.

The acetyl group of the muscarinic agonist aceclidine 4 was replaced by various 1,2,5-thiadiazoles to provide a new series of potent m1 muscarinic agonists 17 and 18. Optimal m1 muscarinic agonist potency was achieved when the 1,2,5-thiadiazole substituent was either a butyloxy, 17d, or butylthio, 18d, group. Although 1,2,5-oxadiazole 37 and pyrazine 39 are iso-pi-electronic with 1,2,5-thiadiazole 17d, both analogues were substantially less active than 17d. Compounds with high muscarinic affinity and/or m1 muscarinic agonist efficacy were also obtained when the 3-oxyquinuclidine moiety of 17d or 18c was replaced by ethanolamines, hydroxypyrrolidines, hydroxyazetidine, hydroxyisotropanes, or hydroxyazanorbornanes. The structure-activity data support the participation of the oxygen or sulfur atom in the substituent on the 1,2,5-thiadiazole in the activation of the m1 receptor. Several of these new 1,2,5-thiadiazoles have m1 agonist efficacy, potency, and selectivity comparable to those of xanomeline 2 in the muscarinic tests investigated.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Conformationally constrained analogues of the muscarinic agonist 3-(4-(methylthio)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methylpyr idine. Synthesis, receptor affinity, and antinociceptive activity.

Conformationally constrained analogues of the potent muscarinic agonist 3-(4-methylthio)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methy lpyridine (methylthio-TZTP, 17) were designed and synthesized with the aim of (a) improving the antinociceptive selectivity over salivation and tremor and (b) predicting the active conformation of 17 with respect to the dihedral angle C4-C3-C3'-N2'. Using MOPAC 6.0 tricyclic analogues (7, 15, 16) with C4-C3-C3'-N2' dihedral angles close to 180 degrees and a rotation hindered analogue (9) with a C4-C3-C3'-N2' dihedral angle close to 274 degrees were designed, as these conformations had previously been suggested as being the active conformations. The analogues were tested for central muscarinic receptor binding affinity, for their antinociceptive activity in the mouse grid shock test, and, in the same assay, for their ability to induce tremor and salivation. The data showed that the tricyclic analogues (7, 15, 16) were equipotent with 17 as analgesics, but with no improved side effect profiles. The rotation-hindered analogue 9 had neither muscarinic receptor binding affinity nor antinociceptive activity. These results suggest that the active conformation of 17 has a C3-C4-C3'-N2' dihedral angle close to 180 degrees.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1998

Olanzapine increases in vivo dopamine and norepinephrine release in rat prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and striatum.

The in vivo effects of olanzapine on the extracellular monoamine levels in rat prefrontal cortex (Pfc), nucleus accumbens (Acb) and striatum (Cpu) were investigated by means of microdialysis. Sequential doses of olanzapine at 0.5, 3 and 10 mg/kg (s.c.) dose-dependently increased the extracellular dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) levels in all three brain areas. The increases appeared 30 min after olanzapine administration, reached peaks around 60-90 min and lasted for at least 2 h. The highest DA increases in the Acb and Cpu were induced by olanzapine at 3 mg/kg but at 10 mg/kg in the Pfc. The peak DA increase in the Pfc (421% +/- 46 of the baseline) was significantly larger than those in the Acb (287% +/- 24) and Cpu (278% +/- 28). Similarly, the highest NE increase in the Pfc (414% +/- 40) induced by 10 mg/kg olanzapine was larger than those in the Acb (233% +/- 39) and Cpu (223% +/- 24). The DA and NE increases in the Pfc induced by olanzapine at 3 and 10 mg/kg (s.c.) were slightly larger than those induced by clozapine at the same doses. In contrast, haloperidol (0.5 and 2 mg/kg, s.c.) did not change Pfc DA and NE levels. Extracellular levels of a DA metabolite, DOPAC, and tissue concentrations of a released DA metabolite, 3-methoxytyramine, were also increased by olanzapine, consistent with enhanced DA release. However, olanzapine at the three sequential doses did not alter the extracellular levels of either 5-HT or its metabolite, 5-HIAA, in any of the three brain areas. In conclusion, the present studies demonstrate that in the case of sequential dosing olanzapine more effectively enhances DA and NE release in the Pfc than in the subcortical areas, which may have an impact on its atypical antipsychotic actions.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Muscarinic analgesics with potent and selective effects on the gastrointestinal tract: potential application for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a pathopysiolocal condition characterized by abnormal bowel habits that are frequently accompanied by abdominal pain. Current therapy based on reducing high-amplitude GI contractions with nonselective muscarinic antagonists is limited in efficacy due to typical muscarinic side effects and provides no pain relief. We have previously found potent antinociceptive agents acting through muscarinic receptors. In the present work, new 1,2,5-thiadiazole-based structures with muscarinic activity have been evaluated both for activity as analgesics in the mouse withing assay and for activity in normalizing spontaneous cluster contractions in ferret jejunum as a model of IBS in humans. (5R,6R)-exo-6-[4-[(4,4,4-Trifluorobutyl)thio]-1,2,5-thiadiazol+ ++-3-yl] -1-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane (35, LY316108/NNC11-2192) was found to offer an exceptional profile combining analgesic potency in mouse writhing (ED50 = 0.1 mg/kg) along with potency for normalization of GI motility (ED50 = 0.17 mg/kg). This combination of GI and analgesic potency suggests 35 as an excellent candidate for evaluation as a potential treatment of IBS.

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗

PubMed1997

Effects of xanomeline, a selective muscarinic receptor agonist, on cognitive function and behavioral symptoms in Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of selective cholinergic replacement with xanomeline tartrate, an m1 and m4 selective muscarinic receptor (mAChR) agonist in patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: A 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial followed by a 1-month, single-blind, placebo washout. SETTING: Outpatients at 17 centers in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 343 men and women at least 60 years of age with mild to moderate AD. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 75, 150, or 225 mg (low, medium, and high doses) of xanomeline per day or placebo for 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC+), the Alzheimer's Disease Symptomatology Scale (ADSS), and the Nurses' Observational Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER). RESULTS: A significant treatment effect existed for ADAS-Cog (high dose vs placebo; P < or = .05), and CIBIC+ (high dose vs placebo; P < or = .02). Treatment Emergent Signs and Symptoms analysis of the ADSS, which assesses behavioral symptoms in patients with AD, disclosed significant (P < or = .002) dose-dependent reductions in vocal outbursts, suspiciousness, delusions, agitation, and hallucinations. On end-point analysis, NOSGER, which assesses memory, instrumental activities of daily living, self-care, mood, social behavior, and disturbing behavior in the elderly, also showed a significant dose-response relationship (P < or = .02). In the high-dose arm, 52% of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events; dose-dependent adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal in nature. Syncope, defined as loss of consciousness and muscle tone, occurred in 12.6% of patients in the high-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: The observed improvements in ADAS-Cog and CIBIC+ following treatment with xanomeline provide the first evidence, from a large-scale, placebo-controlled clinical trial, that a direct-acting muscarinic receptor agonist can improve cognitive function in patients with AD. Furthermore, the dramatic and favorable effects on disturbing behaviors in AD suggest a novel approach for treatment of noncognitive symptoms.

Alzheimer Disease↗

PubMed1997

In vivo pharmacology of butylthio[2.2.2] (LY297802 / NNC11-1053), an orally acting antinociceptive muscarinic agonist.

Butylthio[2.2.2] (LY297802 / NNC11-1053) is a mixed muscarinic cholinergic receptor agonist/antagonist that produces antinociception in mice and rats. As such, butylthio[2.2.2] may have therapeutic utility in the treatment of pain. Butylthio[2.2.2] was fully efficacious in the mouse grid shock, writhing, tail-flick and hot plate tests with ED50 values ranging from 1.5 to 12.2 mg/kg after oral administration. In contrast, the ED50 values for morphine ranged from 7.3 to 72 mg/kg after oral administration. Scopolamine was a competitive antagonist of the antinociceptive effects of butylthio[2.2.2]. Butylthio[2.2.2] did not produce either salivation or tremor at therapeutic doses; rather, there was a 50- to >100-fold separation between therapeutic doses and doses which produced side-effects. Butylthio[2.2.2] had high affinity for muscarinic receptors, but little if any affinity for other neurotransmitter receptors or uptake sites. In isolated tissues, butylthio[2.2.2] was an agonist with high affinity at M1 receptors in rabbit vas deferens, an antagonist at M2 receptors in guinea pig atria as well as an antagonist at M3 receptors in guinea pig urinary bladder. Although it has been suggested that M1 receptors mediate the antinociceptive effects of muscarinic agonists, M1 efficacy is not a requirement for antinociception, and, in vivo, the antinociceptive effects of muscarinic agonists are blocked by the intrathecal administration of pertussis toxin, indicating the involvement of m2 or m4 receptors. Since butylthio[2.2.2] is an M2 antagonist, antinociception is therefore most likely mediated by m4 receptors. Butylthio[2.2.2] is currently undergoing clinical development as a novel analgesic.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1997

M1 receptor agonist activity is not a requirement for muscarinic antinociception.

The analgesic effects of a series of muscarinic agonists were investigated by use of the mouse acetic acid writhing, grid-shock, hot-plate and tail-flick tests. The compounds tested were oxotremorine, pilocarpine, arecoline, aceclidine, RS86 and four 3-3(substituted-1,2,5-thiadiazol-4-yl)-1,2,5,6-tetrahy-dro-1 -methyl pyridines (substituted TZTP), these being propoxy-TZTP, 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP, xanomeline (hexyloxy-TZTP) and hexylthio-TZTP. These agonists were also assayed for their ability to displace [3H]oxotremorine-M and [3H]pirenz-epine binding and for their functional selectivity at pharmaco-logic M1, M2 and M3 receptors. These compounds all produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in all of the mouse analgesia tests. The effects of oxotremorine in the writhing test were fully antagonized by the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (0.1 mg/kg), but only partially antagonized by methsco-polamine (10 mg/kg) and unaffected by the opioid antagonist naltrexone. 3-Cl-propylthio-TZTP and propoxy-TZTP had virtually no effect at the M1 receptor subtype as measured by the human m1 clone expressed in baby hamster kidney cells or the rabbit vas deferens assay. These compounds, however, were more potent in the analgesia tests than the selective M1 agonists xanomeline and hexylthio-TZTP. These data suggest that muscarinic analgesia is mediated by central muscarinic receptors. However, activity at the M1 receptor subtype is not a requirement for antinociceptive activity.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1997

Butylthio[2.2.2] (NNC 11-1053/LY297802): an orally active muscarinic agonist analgesic.

Butylthio[2.2.2] ((+)-(S)-3-(4-(Butylthio)-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2. 2] octane) is an agonist/antagonist at muscarinic receptors. The analgesic potential of butylthio[2.2.2] was assessed in the mouse by use of the grid-shock, tail-flick, hotplate and writhing tests. The ED50 values ranged from 0.19 to 1.47 mg/kg and 1.51 to 12.23 mg/kg 30 min after s.c. and p.o. administration, respectively, yielding p.o./s.c. ratios ranging from 7 to 27. The ED50 values for salivation and tremor were > 30 and 12.31 mg/kg s.c., and > 60 and > 60 mg/kg p.o., yielding therapeutic windows > 130 and 54, and, > 40 and > 40, after s.c. and p.o. administration, respectively. Motor impairment or lethality were only seen at doses 116 and 254 times higher than the antinociceptive doses. Butylthio[2.2.2] was equieffective to, and 3- to 24-fold more potent than morphine. The duration of action was similar to that of morphine. The dose-response curve was shifted dose dependently to the right by the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine but not by the opioid antagonist naltrexone. The antinociceptive effect of butylthio[2.2.2] was reversed by the centrally acting muscarinic antagonist scopolamine but not by the peripherally acting muscarinic antagonist methscopolamine. After 6.5 days repeated dosing in mice, morphine produced marked tolerance, whereas butylthio[2.2.2] produced minimal, if any, tolerance. In the rat grid-shock test, ED50 values of 0.26 mg/kg s.c. and 25.28 mg/kg p.o. were obtained. These data show that butylthio[2.2.2] is a potent and efficacious antinociceptive with a very favorable therapeutic window after s.c. and p.o. administration in mice, and with good efficacy in rats.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1997

Pharmacology of butylthio[2.2.2] (LY297802/NNC11-1053): a novel analgesic with mixed muscarinic receptor agonist and antagonist activity.

Butylthio[2.2.2], ((+)-(S)-3-(4-butylthio-1,2,5-thiadiazol-3-yl)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2] octane; LY297802/NNC11-1053) is a muscarinic receptor ligand which is equiefficacious to morphine in producing antinociception. In vitro, butylthio[2.2.2] had high affinity for muscarinic receptors in brain homogenates, but had substantially less or no affinity for several other neurotransmiter receptors and uptake sites. In isolated tissues, butylthio[2.2.2] was an agonist with high affinity for M1 receptors in the rabbit vas deferens (IC50 = 0.33 nM), but it was an antagonist at M2 receptors in guinea pig atria (pA2 = 6.9) and at M3 receptors in guinea pig urinary bladder (pA2 = 7.4) and a weak partial agonist in guinea pig ileum, which contains a heterogeneous population of muscarinic receptors. In vivo, butylthio[2.2.2] was without effect on acetylcholine, dopamine and serotonin levels in rat brain. Moreover, butylthio[2.2.2] did not decrease charcoal meal transit in mice, nor did it significantly alter heart rate in rats. Further, butylthio[2.2.2] did not produce parasympathomimetic effects such as salivation or tremor in mice, but it antagonized salivation and tremor produced by the nonselective muscarinic agonist oxotremorine. The present data demonstrate that butylthio[2.2.2] is a novel muscarinic receptor mixed agonist/antagonist and its pharmacological profile suggests that it may have clinical utility in the management of pain as an alternative to opioids.

Analgesics↗

PubMed1997

In vitro and in vivo biochemistry of olanzapine: a novel, atypical antipsychotic drug.

BACKGROUND: Classical (typical) antipsychotic drugs are in wide use clinically, but some patients do not respond at all to treatment, while in others, negative symptoms and cognitive deficits fail to respond. Also, these drugs often cause serious motor disturbances. Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic, appears to correct many of these deficiencies, but has a significant incidence of potentially fatal agranulocytosis. Accordingly, we attempted to develop a prototype of a new generation of antipsychotics that is both more efficacious and safe. Our strategy was to create a compound that is not only active in behavioral tests that predict antipsychotic action but also shares the rich, multifaceted receptor pharmacology of clozapine without its side effects. To this end, Eli Lilly and Co. developed olanzapine. In this article we characterize the in vitro and in vivo receptor pharmacology of olanzapine. METHOD: We evaluated olanzapine interactions with neuronal receptors using standard assays of radioreceptor binding in vitro and well-established in vivo (functional) assays. RESULTS: Binding studies showed that olanzapine interacts with key receptors of interest in schizophrenia, having a nanomolar affinity for dopaminergic, serotonergic, alpha 1-adrenergic, and muscarinic receptors. In vivo olanzapine is a potent antagonist at DA receptors (DOPAC levels; pergolide-stimulated increases in plasma corticosterone) and 5-HT receptors (quipazine-stimulated increases in corticosterone), but is weaker at alpha-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors. Olanzapine has little or no effect at other receptors, enzymes, or key proteins in neuronal function. Olanzapine has a receptor profile that is similar to that of clozapine: it is relatively nonselective at dopamine receptor subtypes and it shows selectivity for mesolimbic and mesocortical over striatal dopamine tracts (electrophysiology; Fos). CONCLUSION: The binding and functional profile of olanzapine (1) is similar to that of clozapine, (2) indicates that olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug, and (3) is consistent with clinical efficacy. If olanzapine also proves to be safe, then it will have high potential to become a more ideal antipsychotic drug.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Neurochemical evidence for antagonism by olanzapine of dopamine, serotonin, alpha 1-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in vivo in rats.

The ability of the atypical antipsychotic drug candidate olanzapine to antagonize dopamine, serotonin, alpha-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in vivo was assessed by various neurochemical measurements in rat brain. Olanzapine increased the concentrations of the dopamine metabolites DOPAC and HVA in striatum and nucleus accumbens. Olanzapine antagonized the pergolide-induced decrease of striatal DOPA concentrations in rats treated with gammabutyrolactone and NSD1015 and increased striatal 3-methoxytyramine concentrations in nomifensine-treated rats (but not after gammabutyrolactone administration), suggesting that olanzapine blocked terminal and somatodendritic autoreceptors on dopamine neurons. Inactivation of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors by EEDQ was antagonized by olanzapine. The ex vivo binding of the 5HT2 radioligand [3H]-ketanserin was inhibited by olanzapine treatment, as was quipazine-induced increases in MHPG-SO4, evidence suggesting that olanzapine antagonized 5HT2 receptors. At higher doses, olanzapine increased the concentrations of the norepinephrine metabolite, MHPG-SO4, probably by blocking alpha 1-adrenergic receptors. Olanzapine inhibited ex vivo binding of the muscarinic antagonist radioligand [3H]-pirenzepine and lowered concentrations of striatal, but not hippocampal, acetylcholine levels. The findings provide evidence that olanzapine antagonized dopamine, serotonin, alpha-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in vivo, consistent with its high affinity for these receptor sites in vitro.

Adrenergic Antagonists↗

PubMed1996

Radioreceptor binding profile of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine.

The affinities of olanzapine, clozapine, haloperidol, and four potential antipsychotics were compared on binding to the neuronal receptors of a number of neurotransmitters. In both rat tissues and cell lines transfected with human receptors olanzapine had high affinity for dopamine D1, D2, D4, serotonin (5HT)2A, 5HT2C, 5HT3, alpha 1-adrenergic, histamine H1, and five muscarinic receptor subtypes. Olanzapine had lower affinity for alpha 2-adrenergic receptors and relatively low affinity for 5HT1 subtypes, GABAA, beta-adrenergic receptors, and benzodiazepine binding sites. The receptor binding affinities for olanzapine was quite similar in tissues from rat and human brain. The binding profile of olanzapine was comparable to the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, while the binding profiles for haloperidol, resperidone, remoxipride, Org 5222, and seroquel were substantially different from that of clozapine. The receptor binding profile of olanzapine is consistent with the antidopaminergic, antiserotonergic, and antimuscarinic activity observed in animal models and predicts atypical antipsychotic activity in man.

Animals↗