[Possibilities of radiologic examination in respiratory insufficiency of the newborn infant].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Priolo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Primary tumors of the spine are relatively infrequent lesions compared with metastatic disease, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma which are the more frequent neoplasms of the spine and usually manifest with multifocal lesions and thus pose little diagnostic dilemma. However, in the presence of a solitary spinal lesion, the more uncommon primary tumors of the spine represent an important group of entities for diagnostic consideration. The most common benign and malignant primary tumors of the spine are enostosis, osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, giant cell tumor, aneurysmal bone cyst, osteochondroma, chordoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, and osteosarcoma. The imaging features of these lesions are often characteristic. Radiologists should be aware of the appearance of these unusual tumors in order to provide a complete differential diagnosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The clinical radiological and anatomohistological features of fourteen cases of epiphyseal chondroblastoma are described. The seat, origin, and evolution of the tumor are discussed. The diagnosis of the epiphyseal localization is easy, but there are same problems in the differential diagnosis of the epiphyseal-metaphyseal of metaphyseal forms.
Antirheumatic therapy has changed from a rather conservative approach towards more aggressive early intervention. Objective measures of the course and outcome of rheumatoid arthritis are essential to understand the disease process and evaluate the therapeutic response. Radiological evaluation fulfils many of the criteria of objectivity: the films provide a permanent record and can be evaluated serially and repeatedly; the changes do not fluctuate with disease activity; and good technique and correct timing can keep the radiation load to a very acceptable level. Consequently, therapies can be evaluated on the basis of their efficacy on radiological progression. In clinical practice, a visual qualitative assessment is usually sufficient, but for therapeutic trials or studies of disease progression in certain patient groups, quantitative methods are needed. A number of different evaluation systems have been introduced, but none of these have gained universal acceptance. No ideal evaluation method (which should be rapid, easy to use and have a good level of reproducibility) has yet been found. Here we make provisional recommendations on the conduct of future therapeutic trials to maximise the likelihood that they will give conclusive results using radiographic outcome assessments.
Any cervical spine segment may be affected by rheumatoid arthritis, but destructive changes are most prominent at the craniocervical junction. Cervical involvement is a devastating complication of the disease, because of the risk of a range of neurological complications (paresthesia, cervical myelopathy, vertebro-basilar insufficiency), and even sudden death from medullary compression. However, the incidence of both cervical rheumatoid arthritis and its neurological complications are still debated, being respectively reported in 17-86% and 11-70% of the patients, according to the variability in neurological and radiologic classification systems adopted by the authors. To assess the incidence of cervical rheumatoid arthritis and the integrated role of different imaging techniques in its diagnosis, 38 consecutive patients (29 women and 9 men) with rheumatoid arthritis according to the American Rheumatism Association criteria were examined. The average age was 60 years (range: 27-70 years) with a mean disease duration of 6.6 years (range: 6 months-25 years). All the patients underwent conventional radiography of the cervical spine, unenhanced Computed Tomography (CT) of the craniocervical junction and unenhanced and Gadolinium-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. Cervical spine involvement was demonstrated in 25/38 (66%) patients 20 women and 5 men, with an average age of 57 years and a mean disease duration of 8.5 years. In 13 of them (mean disease duration: 12.7 years), the diagnosis was made with radiography which showed atlantoaxial and subaxial subluxations and/or erosions. Of the 12 patients with negative conventional radiography (mean disease duration: 2.5 years), 4 were identified with both CT and MRI (synovial pannus and erosions). 3 with MRI only (joint effusion/hypervascularized synovial pannus), and 5 exhibited questionable CT findings which were clarified only by MR demonstration of inflammatory tissue contiguous to suspicious irregularities of the cortical bone of the odontoid process. 52% (13/25) of cervical rheumatoid arthritis patients were identified with plain radiographs, 68% (17/25) with CT and 100% (25/25) with MRI. Our preliminary data show that a specific tool for the diagnosis is recommended even in the early disease phases since rheumatoid arthritis commonly affects the craniocervical junction. Studying the craniocervical region is clinically difficult, and diagnostic imaging assessment is essential. Conventional radiography allowed to detect more than half the patients with cervical rheumatoid arthritis, but only in advanced disease stages. On the contrary, MRI had the unique potential of direct and detailed synovial visualization, thus permitting the diagnosis of cervical involvement even in the early phases of the inflammatory process, when CT findings were still negative or questionable.
Diagnostic imaging plays a major role in the osteoarticular disease of the foot in diabetics, allowing the diagnosis and evaluation of alterations for therapy planning. To-date conventional radiology is still of first choice in the study of the diabetic foot with the evaluation of osteoarticular damage caused by neuropathy and vascular disease. Major radiographic patterns are neuroarthropathy and osteomyelitis. Main locations are at the level of forefoot and less frequently of tarsus and tibiotarsal joint. Second choice procedures as US, CT and MRI are useful for a more accurate evaluation of soft tissue lesions and articular structures. US is the first choice procedure in soft tissue evaluation to rule out the presence of abscesses which require surgery. MRI with some limitations represents the gold standard for the study of joints and medullary disease. Spiral CT though less specific and sensitive than MRI for soft tissue and bone marrow study is still the exam of reference for the study of bone structures with three-dimensional reconstructions useful to plan orthopedic surgery.