PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Procacciante

Publications and source records attributed to F Procacciante.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Diagnostic problems and results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in chronic acalculous cholecystitis].

We report on our experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 15 patients, 12 females and 3 males (mean age: 44 years), with chronic acalculous cholecystitis. These patients presented with recurrent episodes of biliary colic together with a dysmorphic or dysfunctioning gallbladder as confirmed by ultrasound and/or cholescintiscan with 99m-Tc HIDA performed in fasting conditions and after meals. First of all, we considered the possible presence of concomitant digestive disease (peptic ulcer disease, recurrent pancreatitis, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic hepatitis) potentially responsible for the pain. Ultrasound investigations revealed a pathological gallbladder in 10 patients. Cholecystectomy was curative in 8/10. Cholescintiscan revealed a pathological gallbladder in 8 patients and cholecystectomy was curative in only 5 of these. No postoperative deaths or significant complications occurred. The mean duration of the operation (35 vs 48 min) and hospital stay (2.1 vs 2.8 days) were reduced in comparison to 346 cholecystectomies performed for gallstones. After 6-36 months' follow-up, resolution of symptoms was successful in 10/15 cases (66.6%); in 3 cases, only dyspepsia was reduced, whilst in the other 2 cases, who also presented concomitant irritable bowel syndrome and gastroduodenitis, there was no improvement in pain. In all but the latter two cases (86.6%), histological examination revealed chronic gallbladder inflammation. In conclusion, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was curative (66.6%) or led to an improvement in symptoms (20%) in patients with chronic acalculous cholcystitis. Cholescintiscans were not always diagnostic for the disease, whereas ultrasound findings were more useful as an indication for surgery.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Intestinal infarction. Retrospective clinical study].

Acute mesenteric ischaemia is the result of inadequate blood flow to all or part of the small intestine and the right half of the colon. Irrespective of the cause of the ischaemic insult, the end results are similar, namely, a spectrum of bowel injury ranging from completely reversible alterations of bowel function to transmural haemorrhagic necrosis of the intestinal wall. Depending on the degree of ischaemia and the length of bowel involved, a wide variety of clinical presentations are observed. Mesenteric infarction is a pathology which is encountered fairly often in elderly patients where the concomitance of other diseases make its prognosis more severe, especially since the diagnosis is usually late. The pessimism expressed more than 70 years ago concerning this disease is still shared by many physicians today. The authors report on their experience with 37 cases of mesenteric infarction. The median age of the patients was 77 years (range: 66-91). The mortality rate was 67.5% (25 deaths) which is in line with the results in the literature. The median hospital stay was 17 days (range: 10-71). The authors emphasise the difficulty of diagnosing and treating this entity, also in view of the fact that, in most centres, it is impossible to perform emergency selective angiography of the superior mesenteric artery. The need for an early specific diagnosis is stressed, because the therapeutic options may vary widely in relation to the different causes of acute intestinal ischaemia.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Multicenter prospective study of informed consent in general surgery].

To understand the level of acceptance, awareness and usefulness of informed consent, a group of 119 patients (59 men and 60 women) from different types of hospitals were given a questionnaire which required only 'YES or NO' answers, both before and after surgery. The questionnaire concerned the patient's knowledge about pathology, operative risks, approval, anxiety caused, understanding of information received and consent given, and also if he would inform a relative in the same condition. From the analysis of the results it was established that: the more information a patient has about his illness and operation risks, the more he will want to have; the less he knows the less he will want to know, and he will also have more faith in the doctors. Some patients would not inform a relative with a similar pathology. To conclude, informed consent, instead of being a right of the patient is progressively becoming more a right of the doctor. It does not have any real effect on the patient's choice but is useful, as it represents a moment of personalised attention from medical personnel, though the patient may not completely understand the information received. There are few advantages in strictly medical terms but informed consent has increased malpractice litigation.

Female↗