Nickel allergy, a model of food cellular hypersensitivity?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Purello-D'Ambrosio.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy is the only currently available allergen-orientated treatment able to modify the natural history of respiratory allergic diseases. Safety and clinical efficacy of this treatment are well documented, but evidence about the ability to reduce new sensitizations is still poor. OBJECTIVE: We report a retrospective study conducted in order to assess the prevention of new sensitizations in monosensitized subjects treated with specific immunotherapy vs. monosensitized patients treated with anti-allergic drugs. METHODS: 8396 monosensitized patients with respiratory symptoms were selected according to an open, retrospective design. Group A included 7182 patients submitted to specific immunotherapy (and anti-allergic drugs when needed) for 4 years and then treated with drugs for at least 3 years. Group B included 1214 patients treated only with drugs for at least 7 years. All patients underwent prick test with a standard panel of allergens and total and specific IgE determination before and after 4 years of treatment and again 3 years later. RESULTS: Groups were well balanced. Polysensitized subjects were 23.75% in Group A and 68.03% in Group B after 4 years (P < 0.0001) and 26.95% and 76.77%, respectively, after 7 years (P < 0.0001). Asthmatic subjects were more prone to develop polysensitization in comparison to subjects suffering only from rhinitis (32.14% instead of 27.29% after 4 years, 36.5% instead of 31.33% after 7 years; P < 0.0001). Specific IgE decreased by 24.11% in Group A and increased by 23.87% in Group B (P < 0.0001). Total IgE decreased by 17.53% in Group A and increased by 13.71% in Group B (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Specific immunotherapy was observed retrospectively to reduce new sensitizations in monosensitized subjects suffering from respiratory allergic diseases.
BACKGROUND: Anisakis simplex, a fish and cephalopodes parasite, can cause either gastrointestinal symptoms or allergic reactions in humans on eating/handling contaminated fish. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the capacity of Anisakis simplex to induce specific IgE production and allergic reactions following eating and handling fish in a population at risk. METHODS: We determined the levels of total IgE, specific IgE, and eosinophil count in 28 fishermen/fishmongers (group A) and 15 healthy donors (group B). A skin prick test (SPT) with extracts from Anisakis and the most common species of fish in our country, were also carried out. RESULTS: Specific IgE to Anisakis were found in 14 subjects of group A (13 of them had a positive SPT to the same extract) and none of group B (only one subject had a positive SPT). The SPT with fish extracts was positive in 4 patients of group A but in none of group B. Subjects in group A with specific IgE to Anisakis showed higher total IgE levels and eosinophil counts compared with either other individuals of the same group or to those of group B. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that fishermen/fishmongers are a population at risk for Anisakis simplex sensitization and suggest that this kind of sensitization should also be investigated not only in subjects like fishermen/fishmongers who live in countries where fish is likely to be contaminated with Anisakis simplex parasites, but also in those who handle fish for other reasons.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: New routes of administering immunotherapy in respiratory allergy are being studied as an alternative to conventional injective immunotherapy. We carried out a study to evaluate the clinical efficacy and effects of sublingual immunotherapy in patients with Parietaria judaica-induced respiratory allergy. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled design was followed. Thirty patients with P. judaica rhinoconjunctivitis, mild asthma, or both were randomly chosen for sublingual immunotherapy (14 patients) or placebo treatment (16 patients). The patients underwent preseasonal rush induction treatment followed by coseasonal maintenance treatment during the Parietaria pollen season. Symptom and drug scores, as well as specific IgE and specific IgG4, were recorded. RESULTS: Significantly lower symptom and drug scores were found (P=0.04), especially during the Parietaria pollination period, in the immunotherapy group. No significant difference in specific IgE and specific IgG4 was detected between the active and placebo groups; a statistically significant increase of specific IgE was detected in both groups (P=0.05). No patient undergoing active sublingual immunotherapy reported local or systemic side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sublingual immunotherapy is both clinically effective and safe in treating patients with Parietaria-induced rhinoconjunctivitis and mild asthma.
BACKGROUND: Nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (NARES), accounting for some 15% of perennial rhinitis, is a nasal disorder whose main features are eosinophil counts in nasal smear higher than 10% and negative IgE tests. The mainstay of treatment is topical corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adjunctive effect of loratadine, a non-sedating antihistamine with anti-allergic activity, on nasal symptoms and eosinophil counts in nasal secretions in patients with NARES. METHODS: Thirty patients with NARES were divided in two groups, half receiving flunisolide two 25 microg puffs per nostril morning and night plus loratadine 10 mg u.i.d. and half the same doses of flunisolide plus placebo, according to a double-blind fashion, for 3 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatment in the two groups was evaluated by comparing symptom scores and eosinophil counts, and safety was assessed by comparing the adverse effects. RESULTS: The loratadine treated group had better results both in nasal symptoms, with a decrease in sneezing (P < 0.000001) and rhinorrhoea (P < 0.006), respectively, corresponding with 73.4% and 66.7% with respect to 46.6% and 26.7% in the control group, and in eosinophil counts which decreased by 20% compared with 14.3% in patients treated with placebo and flunisolide. As to safety, only nasal irritation in two patients, one in each group, was reported. CONCLUSION: Loratadine improves the effectiveness of flunisolide in treatment of NARES with no change in safety, and with no sedation.
We present the case of bronchospastic reaction to clarithromycin had during a drug challenge test. Personal allergic history was negative for respiratory allergies and positive for adverse drug reactions to general and regional anesthesia and to ceftriaxone. After the administration of 1/4 of therapeutic dose of clarithromycin the patient showed dyspnea, cough and bronchospasm in all the lung fields. The positivity of the test was confirmed by the negativity to the administration of placebo. The quickness and the clinical characteristic of the adverse reaction suggest a pathogenic mechanism of immediate-type hypersensitivity. On reviewing the literature we have found no reports of bronchospastic reaction to clarithromycin. Macrolides are a class of antibiotics mainly used in the last years in place of beta-lactams because of a broad spectrum of action and a low allergic power. In fact, there are few reports on allergic reactions to these molecules. Clarithromycin is one of the latest macrolides, characterised by the presence of a 14-carbon-atom lactone ring as erythromycin, active on a wide spectrum of pathogens.
We report the case of a 32-year-old woman who had pruritic urticarial skin lesions associated with episodes of arthralgia. The first site affected by the eruption was the inside surface of the thighs; the patient also reported the presence of leukorrhea. The woman had previously been treated with H1 antagonist with moderate and transitory results; skin lesions reappeared just after the interruption of the treatment. Her biochemical data showed increased levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, blood eosinophilia and hypocomplementemia. Antinuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, cryoglobulins and serological diagnosis for hepatitis or mononucleosis viruses resulted negative. Considering the initial site of the cutaneous features and the presence of leukorrhea, we requested a vaginal smear and a culture of the cervical secretion, which revealed the presence of a Trichomonas infection. Furthermore, the SDS-PAGE revealed the presence of a molecular mass of 230,000 Da (230-kDa) in the serum, which indicated a Trichomonas surface protein. The following treatment with oral metronidazole caused the eradication of the Trichomonas infection after 3 weeks and subsequently the resolution of the urticarial clinical features. We wish to underline that in the presence of a case of urticaria vasculitis syndrome which seems to be without cause, it is important to investigate every diagnostic suspicion scrupulously.
Fluticasone propionate is a very effective topical treatment for asthma. Interleukin-12, which is produced by monocyte-macrophage and B lymphocytic cell lines, plays an important role in the induction of Th1 cells; whereas interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), mainly produced by Th1 cells, exhibits a crucial effect on macrophage and natural killer cell activation. Since previous studies have demonstrated a reduced production of IL-12 and IFN-gamma in patients with allergic asthma, we examined whether fluticasone propionate therapy could influence the release of these cytokines in asthma. We selected two groups of subjects (15 per group): nonatopic healthy donors (group A) and asthmatic patients (group B). Cytokine release was assessed in sera as well as in supernatants of whole blood cultures after IFN-gamma priming and lipopolysaccharide stimulation. Venous blood and spirometric tests from patients in group B were obtained before and after treatment. Fluticasone propionate therapy significantly increased interleukin-12 levels in both supernatants of blood cultures (1,152.12 +/- 225.57 vs. 540.87 +/- 130.07 pg/ml; p < 0.05) or in sera (72.24 +/- 15.76 vs. 10.83 +/- 2.70 pg/ml; p < 0.05). Patients treated with fluticasone propionate also displayed increased levels of IFN-gamma in either blood culture supernatants (59.12 +/- 16.88 vs. 18.87 +/- 7.53 IU/ml; p < 0.05) or in sera (5.60 +/- 2.87 vs. < 1 IU/ml; p < 0.05). In addition, we observed a significant increase in FEV1 values in asthmatic patients after fluticasone propionate therapy (51.86 +/- 5.31 vs. 71.46 +/- 10.37% predicted). We propose that fluticasone propionate may exert at least in part of its antiinflammatory activity through the modulation of the cytokine output.
Case of a 57-year-old hospital attendant with hand eczema. Patch tests were read at 2 and 3 days using the 1+ to 3+ scoring system recommended by the Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
We report the case of a female denture wearer who was referred to our service due to burning of the lips and tongue but with no visible oral lesions. Her biochemical data, complete blood cell count, sedimentation rate, thyroid and sex hormones were normal. Tongue culture was negative. Patch tests, performed with a panel of 20 potential denture allergens, gave positive results (+++) only to a 2% petrolatum cadmium sulfate, which was present in the denture. Removal of the denture led to the clearing up of oral symptoms in 3 days. In light of these findings, carrying out patch tests with the allergens related to denture materials should be considered in these cases.
Previous studies have demonstrated improvements in health-related quality of life in asthmatic patients after treatment with fluticasone propionate. CD30 is a marker of Th2 lymphocytes, which are key cells in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation. There is also a soluble form of CD30 (sCD30) released by CD30+ cells. Since serum sCD30 levels are high in allergic patients, in our study we examined the possible role of fluticasone propionate in modulating sCD30 release in patients with severe allergic asthma. In addition, we evaluated a possible correlation between sCD30 and FEV1 in these patients. To this end two groups of subjects were enrolled: 20 healthy nonatopic control subjects (group A) and 20 atopic patients with severe bronchial asthma receiving fluticasone propionate at the total dosage of 1 mg/day for 8 weeks (group B). Serum samples were examined before and after the treatment period. sCD30 serum levels were determined by the commercial ELISA-kit (Dako). The limit of detection of the assay was 1 U/ml. Our data show that sCD30 basal serum levels were significantly (p <0.05) higher in patients of group B respect to group A subjects (8.35+/-4.88 vs. <1 IU/ml, respectively). In addition, we found that sCD30 serum levels were undetectable in patients of group B after fluticasone propionate therapy. In group B a positive correlation between serum sCD30 levels and FEV1 values before fluticasone propionate treatment was noted (Rho = -0.644, p <0.005). The fluticasone propionate inhibition of sCD30 release may partly explain how fluticasone propionate exerts its antiinflammatory activity, through the modulation of Th2 cells.