Biomedical subjects

F Rozet

Publications and source records attributed to F Rozet.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

[Vesico-urethral anastomosis during total laparoscopic prostatectomy].

Vesico-urethral anastomosis is the last step of radical prostatectomy. Whatever the approach, radical prostatectomy remains a difficult surgical intervention. The dissection steps are similar whatever the selected access, open or laparostopic. Laparoscopic anastomosis requires specific skills that must be adequately mastered by the surgeon before starting any laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program. Pelvi-trainers allow training on the anastomosis technique, with reproducible results. This chapter presents the key points for laparoscopic vesico-urethral anastomosis.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗

PubMed2004

Feedback from operative performance to improve training program of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We report our preliminary experience identifying factors that contribute to differences in operative performance in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) between trainees and experienced laparoscopic urologists based on objective and subjective feedback. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 2001 and May 2002, six trainees at the Institut Montsouris and Ecole Européenne de Chirurgie, Paris, were evaluated to identify the factors contributing to differences in operative performance in LRP between them and experienced laparoscopic urologists, both objectively and subjectively. Objective evaluation was done by an independent observer who was well versed in laparoscopic surgery, while all the trainees evaluated themselves subjectively. All the trainees had in vitro, in vivo, and didactic training sessions during the evaluation period. RESULTS: The following deficiencies were noted objectively in the trainees compared with experienced laparoscopic urologists: (1) lack of perfect knowledge of each step, (2) lack of synchronized movements of the nondominant hand; and (3) easy physical fatigue. The trainees took a long time to dissect the vas deferens, seminal vesicles, and bladder neck because they did not have perfect knowledge of each step. It was difficult for them to pass the needle for ligation of dorsal venous complex because they tried to hold the needle far away from the needle tip at the wrong angle, and the direction of movement was not correct. For the urethrovesical anastomosis, they struggled to find the right angle to pass the needle on the urethral side. CONCLUSION: Lack of synchronized movement of the nondominant hand, easy physical fatigue, and lack of perfect knowledge of operative steps are crucial limitations for live operative performance of trainees in LRP. Incorporation of intensive well-planned in vitro training into the curriculum to correct these deficiencies and feedback from the operative performance can make a significant contribute to shortening the learning curve.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challenge.

PURPOSE: With our extensive experience of transperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy, we evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of the extraperitoneal approach by comparing 2 consecutive series of each procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 200 consecutive procedures performed by 2 surgeons. A total of 100 transperitoneal procedures (designated group 1) were compared to the first 100 extraperitoneal cases (designated group 2). RESULTS: Mean operating time was 173 minutes in group 1 and shorter in group 2 at 163 minutes (p = 0.003). Mean blood loss (360 ml in group 1,375 ml in group 2) and transfusion rates (4% in group 1, 3% in group 2) were equivalent. There were no major complications. Minor complications were 10% in group 1 and 9% in group 2. There was no statistical difference in positive margin rate between groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 procedures are equivalent in terms of operative, postoperative and pathological data. Each surgeon has to choose considering personal experience, training and standardization.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures.

Radical prostatectomy can be successfully performed by transperitoneal laparoscopy by a urologic team experienced in laparoscopy and radical prostatectomy. Operative and postoperative morbidity rates are low. Postoperative pain is minimal, allowing reduction of the length of hospital stay. The oncologic results seem satisfactory based on short-term follow-up. The improvement of the quality of intraoperative vision related to magnification of the image allows a more precise procedure. This subjective improvement of the quality of dissection should reduce the usual functional sequelae of conventional radical prostatectomy, such as incontinence and impotence. This finding needs to be confirmed by a larger series of patients with longer follow-up. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is now performed routinely and is proposed as a first-line surgical treatment for localized prostatic cancer at the authors' center.

Follow-Up Studies↗

PubMed2000

[Contribution of lumboscopy in the treatment of pyeloureteral junction syndromes. Report of 25 cases].

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the results of lumboscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction syndromes. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study of 25 consecutive lumboscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasties performed over 3 years in 14 women and 11 men with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction syndrome. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 200 minutes (range: 120-360 minutes) and mean blood loss was 60 ml. Surgical conversion was necessary in three cases due to the difficulty of dissection and in one case because of rupture of the ureter. Analgesic prescription was generally only necessary for the first 2 postoperative days. The mean hospital stay was six days (range: 2-16 days). Patients were able to return to work an average of 10 days after the operation. With a mean follow-up of 9 months (range: 6 to 18 months), all patients were asymptomatic except for one patient who reported pain at a trocar site. Follow-up urography at 3 months showed marked improvement in 18 patients (85.7%), moderate pyelocaliceal dilatation in 2 cases and one failure. CONCLUSION: Lumboscopic pyeloplasty is an alternative to endopyelotomy. It provides a comparable success rate to that of conventional surgery, while reducing the morbidity, length of hospital stay and convalescence. However, it requires mastery of intracorporeal suture techniques.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the technical feasibility, oncological efficacy and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. METHOD: We describe an original technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed in 40 patients between 26th January and 12th October, 1998. RESULTS: Radical prostatectomy was performed entirely by laparoscopy in 35 patients (87.5%) and only one conversion was performed in the last 26 patients (4%). Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in the light of preoperative staging data in 14 patients (35%). The median total operating time was 270 min. The only major complication was a rectal injury (patient 8), sutured laparoscopically with an uneventful postoperative course. Postoperative vesical catheterization lasted an average of 7.65 days. Seven patients were transfused (17.5%) with an average of 2.8 units of packed cells (range: 2-3). The reduction of postoperative pain is an element allowing for a rapid discharge of the patients by the 3rd postoperative day. The oncological results were as follows: 36 patients had a pT2 tumor (90%); prostate tumor was staged as N0 in 14 cases and NX in 26 cases. Surgical margins were negative in 33 patients (82.5%). Two patients had a doubtful resection margin (1 at the apex and 1 at the bladder neck) and 5 patients had positive margins. The last PSA level was undetectable (<0.1 ng/ml) in 26 (89.7%) of the 29 patients in whom PSA level was available more than 1 month after the operation. Functional results are not yet available and will be published later. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy is an operation which can be routinely performed by laparoscopy by a team experienced with this technique. Operative and postoperative morbidity was low. Short-term oncological data appear identical to the results of conventional retropubic surgery. The improvement of operative visibility was considerable allowing a much more precise dissection. The laparoscopic approach appears to represent a technical improvement of the radical prostatectomy if the functional results of this operation improve parallel to the quality of dissection. A long-term follow-up is needed to define definitively the place of this new approach to radical prostatectomy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Preliminary evaluation after 28 interventions].

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the technical feasibility of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, its carcinological efficacy and per- and post-operative morbidity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed radical prostatectomy using a new laparoscopic technique in 28 patients between February 1 and August 31, 1998. RESULTS: Radical prostatectomy was achieved totally by a laparoscopic approach in 24 patients (86%). No conversion was required in the last 14 patients. In 9 patients (32%) ilio-obturator node resection was also performed as indicated by preoperative extension work-up. Mean operative time was 270 minutes. The only major complication was one rectal wound (patient n degree 8) which had a benign course after suturing under laparoscopy. The bladder catheter was removed a mean 7.7 days after the procedure. Five patients (18%) required transfusions (mean 2.7 units, range 2-3). Rapid discharge on day 3 was possible due to rapid pain relief postoperatively. Tumor classes were pT2 in 26 patients, NO in 9, NX in 17. The surgical border was doubtful at the apex in one case. The last prostate specific antigen assay was below detectable levels (< 0.1 ng/ml) in 16 patients (89%) among the 18 with levels know prior to the procedure. Continence was assessable in 20 patients after a 1 to 6 month follow-up. Continence was perfect in 18 patients and becoming so in 12. Sexual activity was not assessed in this series due to the short follow-up. CONCLUSION: Radical prostatectomy can be reasonably performed as a routine laparoscopic procedure by a well-trained team. The cancerological results in this series were equivalent to those with conventional retropubic surgery and morbidity was very low. Improved operative vision was considerable, allowing much more precise dissection. The laparoscopic technique appears to be an important improvement for radical prostatectomy and should help improve functional outcome.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

[Benign ureteral polyps in children: apropos of a case].

Ureteric polyp is a benign lesion, and an uncommon cause of hydronephrosis in children. It is associated with intermittent lumbar pain and haematuria. The diagnosis is usually based on intravenous urography or retrograde urography. Treatment must be conservative and consists of simple resection of the polyp, associated with varying degrees of ureteric resection depending on the size of the lesion. No case of recurrence after treatment has been reported to date. The authors report a case in a 7-year-old boy and present a review of the literature.

Child↗

PubMed1997

[Intradiverticular bladder tumors. Five case reports].

OBJECTIVE: To define the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to intradiverticular bladder tumour. METHODS: Five cases are reported in which initial diverticulectomy was followed by cystectomy in one case, systemic MVAC chemotherapy in 2 cases and concomitant radiotherapy-chemotherapy (CRC) in 2 cases. RESULTS: One patient has died (MVAC), one patient is in partial remission (MVAC) and three patients are in complete remission (1 cystectomy and 2 CRC). CONCLUSION: Intradiverticular bladder tumour is a disease with a poor prognosis, whose histological features require aggressive treatment. Concomitant radiotherapy-chemotherapy appears to be a useful alternative.

Aged↗