PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F S Szalay

Publications and source records attributed to F S Szalay.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

New Cretaceous marsupial from Mongolia and the early radiation of Metatheria.

A marsupial mammal from Mongolia representing a previously unreported group, Asiadelphia, offers unequivocal evidence that metatherians were represented on the continent of Asia during the Late Cretaceous (Campanian), even in the northern arid interior. Asiatherium is known by skull, left and right mandibles, and most of its postcranial skeleton. Comparisons of the dentition, ear region, and aspects of the postcranium not only allow its diagnosis as an Asian group of metatherians but also permit a diagnosis of the Metatheria based on the unequivocally apomorphous condition of the dental formula and probable replacement pattern of the protometatherian, in contrast to the more primitive therian dental formula, represented by the few known Aegialodontidae and the first dental eutherians. It appears an inescapable conclusion that the first metatherians had a more derived dental formula (and probably replacement pattern) than the earliest dental eutherians, regardless of what specific derivation from a therian ancestry is contemplated. Such a diagnosis also supports the metatherian status of other Cretaceous Asian and American taxa such as the Deltatheroida and Kokopellia. The hypothesis that Metatheria originated in North America is largely dependent on the preponderance of Cretaceous forms from North America and negative evidence from Asia (i.e., on the lack of lower latitude Early Cretaceous tropical faunas). Conversely, the relative Cretaceous paucity of placentals from North America and their greater abundance in Asia suggests the earliest flowering of the Eutheria in an unspecified region of the Old World. The concept of a holophyletic Theria (= Tribosphenida) employed here, based on the biologically significant apomorphy of the molar form-function of the first therian, entails only the tribosphenic mammals (infraclasses Tribotheria, Metatheria, and Eutheria) but not the sundry quasi-triangular-toothed mammals and their derivatives in the Mesozoic (Eupantotheria, Peramura, Monotremata, etc.). It is suggested that the Asiadelphia and Deltatheroida, the protospecies of both, with the apomorphic therian dental formula, are ancient lineages of Metatheria independent from their North American relatives probably since the early part of the Late Cretaceous.

Animals↗

A critique of some recently proposed paleogene primate taxa and suggested relationships.

The Paleocene mammal from China, Petrolemur brevirostre, is almost certainly not a primate but possibly an early artiodactyl. "Teilhardina americana", described in 1976, is not Teilhardina found in North America but part of the Anemorhysis tenuiculus sample. The genera "Aycrossia" and "Strigorhysis" are the same, single species of Absarokius. The genus "Gazinius" is the same as Anaptomorphus. The cladistics of primate relationships by some authors are based on either embryologically and paleontologically unacceptable dental homologies or assumptions of bizarre character polarities and of numerous parallelisms, unsupported by any evidence.

Animals↗

Phylogeny and the problem of adaptative significance: the case of the earliest primates.

Methods by which adaptations, particularly in fossils, may be ascertained, are discussed in detail. A scheme for evaluating particular types of characters is offered which should facilitate both predicting value and testability of proposed adaptational hypotheses. It is suggested that studies by Kay and Cartmill which analyzed cranial and dental characters of early Paleogene plesiadapiform primates and marshalled evidence to suggest that these features are indicative of a terrestrial habitus are based on (a) nonphylogenetic and static assumptions, (b) misinterpretation of the form and mechanical attributes of the features analyzed, and (c) employment of irrelevant characters for the establishment of substrate preference. The diverse and now studied postcranial evidence, particularly the pedal and elbow morphology of selected groups of eutherians as well as Paleogene plesiadapiforms and euprimates, is reviewed. It appears that morphological features associated with inversion of the foot and increased radiohumeral mobility in Paleogene primates were present in the common ancestor of the Plesiadapiformes. Having uniquely similar, shared and derived, form-function complexes in the upper and lower ankle, astragalonavicular, and calcaneaocuboid joints, as well as in the known remains of radii and humeri, strongly suggests that these traits evolved for biological roles which are almost invariably associated with an arboreal environment.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

Locomotor adaptations as reflected on the humerus of paleogene primates.

Examination of Paleogene distal humeri and a survey of homologous articulations in living primates allows some anatomical correlation with elbow mechanics and the occurrence of these during specific locomotor behaviors in living species. Claw climbing is postulated to be the ancestral primate locomotor mode from which the ancestral euprimate (strepsirhines and haplorhines) evolved a grasp leaping locomotor pattern. This pattern, which depends on a powerful grasp either during climbing or when landing after a jump, is still the most pervasive form of primate locomotion. Morphological evidence of Paleogene humeri suggest that vertical clinging and leaping behavior derived from grasp leaping at least six times independently.

Adaptation, Biological↗

Why did the strepsirhine tooth comb evolve.

The hypothesis that the original strepsirhine tooth comb evolved for scraping gum is examined. The comparative morphology of the anterior dentition does not corroborate this view, and our study suggests that the primitive tooth comb, which was 6-toothed, evolved for the maintenance of the five, evenly distributed narrow spaces in between them. Unlike the incisors of other groups, platyrrhines or catarrhines, for example, the apical extremities in the primitive condition are not closer to one another than the basal portions of these teeth. The biological role responsible for the evolution of the function of the original tooth comb is believed to be fur-combing. Subsequent modifications in numerous lineages altered both morphology and function as a result of new roles, and this tended to obscure the cause of origin of this character complex.

Animals↗

Basicranial morphology of the early tertiary tarsiiform Rooneyia from Texas.

The newly prepared middle ear cavity of Rooneyia viejaensis revealed the enlarged lateral branch of the internal carotid, an ancestral tarsiiform but advanced primate character. The ectotympanic is well inside the bulla proper and it appears that the annulus membrane and the tissues of the external auditory tube became ossified to form the tarsiiform ectotympanic. The polarity of several character clines of tarsiiform basicrania are discussed. Evidence is lacking from basicranial morphology to corroborate the hypothesized special relationship of microchoerine omomyids and Tarsius.

Animals↗

New adapid primate of European affinities from Texas.

The primate Margarita stevensi n. gen. and n. sp. is described from late Eocene sediments of Texas, North America. The crushed skull of the type specimen is in the size range of Lepilemur leucopus, and the most recent relative of the new form appears to be the middle Eocene European adapid Europolemur klatti from the Geiseltal localities of the DDR. There are no indications that Margarita is closely related to the notharctine adapids. The new primate suggests that the Eocene of eastern North America was the homeland of lemuriforms with close European phylogenetic affinities. The posteriorly directed foramen magnum indicates a relatively small brain size and the dentition suggests an insectivorous-carnivorous dietary regime.

Animals↗

Where to draw the nonprimate-primate taxonomic boundary.

The known Cretaceous and Paleocene primates, the Paromomyiformes, although lacking a fully developed postorbital bar, are nevertheless, both cladistically and phenetically, closest to the common ancestor of the living primates. Not only their undisputed phylogenetic ties but also their early experiments inthe arboreal milieu necessitate their balanced evolutionary classification within the order Primates.

Adaptation, Biological↗