[Standards, options and recommendations for the management of patients with infiltrating non metastatic breast cancer (2nd edition, 2001)--summary version].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Spyratos.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aromatase, the product of the CYP19 gene, plays a key role in androgenic steroids transformation into estrogens from various hormonal sensitive tissues. Thus, in situ expression of CYP19 has been suggested to be involved in breast tumor growth especially in post-menopausal patients.We developed a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay based on fluorescent TaqMan methodology to quantify total CYP19 gene expression at the mRNA level in breast tumors. This method, based on nucleic acid quantification in homogeneous solutions, has the potential to become a standard in terms of its sensitivity, wide dynamic range and high-throughput capacity. In a well-defined series of 107 post-menopausal breast tumor samples, relative CYP19 mRNA levels ranged from 1 to 131. Among the four major CYP19 exon I-spliced transcripts, designated I.a, I.b, I.c and I.d, mRNA levels of the latter three correlated positively with total CYP19 mRNA levels. In ER alpha-positive breast tumors, CYP19 and ER alpha mRNA levels correlated negatively with each other (P=0.0078, r=-0.266), while CYP19 and ER beta mRNA levels correlated positively (P=0.00012, r=+0.388). Patients with high CYP19 mRNA levels did not relapse more frequently or have shorter relapse-free survival than other patients. Finally, mRNA levels of IL6, a major CYP19 regulatory factor, were significantly higher in tumors strongly expressing CYP19 than in tumors weakly expressing CYP19 (P=0.018). In conclusion, CYP19 expression did not influence the outcome of post-menopausal patients with breast cancer.
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of french cancer centers (FNCLCC), the 20 french cancer centers, and specialists from french public universities, general hospitals and private clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and the outcome of cancer patients. The methodology is based on a literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for non metastatic breast cancer patients according to the definitions of the Standards, Options and Recommendations project. METHODS: Data were identified by searching Medline, web sites, and using the personal reference lists of members of the expert groups. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 148 independent reviewers. RESULTS: This article presents the chapter radiotherapy resulting from the 2001 update of the version first published in 1996. The modified 2001 version of the standards, options and recommendations takes into account new information published. The main recommendations are: (1) Breast irradiation after conservative surgery significantly decrease the risk of local recurrence (level of evidence A) and the decrease in the risk of local recidive after chest wall irradiation is greater as the number of risk factors for local recurrence increases (level of evidence A). (2) After conservative surgery, a whole breast irradiation should be performed at a minimum dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (standard, level of evidence A). (3) A boost in the tumour bed should be performed in women under 50 years, even if the surgical margins are free (standard, level of evidence B). (4) Internal mammary chain irradiation is indicated for internal or central tumours in the absence of axillary lymph node involvement (expert agreement) and in the presence of lymph node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1). (5) Sub- and supra-claviculr lymph node irradiation is indicated in patients with axillary node involvement (standard, level of evidence B1).
We examined the relation between ERBB2 gene expression (as determined by a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay) and the response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in a well-defined cohort of 125 ERalpha-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. Although ERBB2 overexpression was associated with shorter relapse-free survival in univariate analysis (P=0.00029), ERBB2 did not persist as an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Nevertheless, when we analyzed the ERBB2 mRNA level as a continuous variable, the higher the ERBB2RNA level, the poorer the outcome (P=0.00036). The results point to the need for a quantitative ERBB2 expression assay for use in future studies of ERBB2-based clinical management of breast cancer.
We recently identified CGA (coding for the alpha subunit of glycoprotein hormones) as a new estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha)-responsive gene in human breast tumors. Here, we assessed the relationship between CGA status (as determined by real-time quantitative RT-PCR) and the response to tamoxifen therapy in a well-defined cohort of 125 ER alpha-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with primary surgery followed by adjuvant tamoxifen alone. CGA overexpression, observed in 37.6% of patients, was associated with good relapse-free survival (P=0.037; univariate analysis). CGA status, combined with ERBB2 status (a marker of poor outcome), was an independent predictor of the response to tamoxifen (P=0.020; multivariate analysis). CGA status, especially when combined with ERBB2 status, may thus provide useful predictive information on tamoxifen responsiveness in breast cancer.
Developing a reliable and quantitative assessment of the potential virulence of a malignancy has been a long-standing goal in clinical cytometry. DNA histogram analysis provides valuable information on the cycling activity of a tumor population through S-phase estimates; it also identifies nondiploid populations, a possible indicator of genetic instability and subsequent predisposition to metastasis. Because of conflicting studies in the literature, the clinical relevance of both of these potential prognostic markers has been questioned for the management of breast cancer patients. The purposes of this study are to present a set of 10 adjustments derived from a single large study that optimizes the prognostic strength of both DNA ploidy and S-phase and to test the validity of this approach on two other large multicenter studies. Ten adjustments to both DNA ploidy and S-phase were developed from a single node-negative breast cancer database from Baylor College (n = 961 cases). Seven of the adjustments were used to reclassify histograms into low-risk and high-risk ploidy patterns based on aneuploid fraction and DNA index optimum thresholds resulting in prognostic P values changing from little (P < 0.02) or no significance to P < 0.000005. Other databases from Sweden (n = 210 cases) and France (n = 220 cases) demonstrated similar improvement of DNA ploidy prognostic significance, P < 0.02 to P < 0.0009 and P < 0.12 to P < 0.002, respectively. Three other adjustments were applied to diploid and aneuploid S-phases. These adjustments eliminated a spurious correlation between DNA ploidy and S-phase and enabled them to combine independently into a powerful prognostic model capable of stratifying patients into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups (P < 0.000005). When the Baylor prognostic model was applied to the Sweden and French databases, similar significant patient stratifications were observed (P < 0.0003 and P < 0.00001, respectively). The successful transference of the Baylor prognostic model to other studies suggests that the proposed adjustments may play an important role in standardizing this test and provide valuable prognostic information to those involved in the management of breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of thymidine kinase (TK), an enzyme involved in the DNA synthesis salvage pathway, relative to other prognostic factors in primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved 1,692 patients with operable breast cancer treated in six institutions (median follow-up, 82 months). Among the 857 node-negative patients, 135 received adjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide [FAC] or fluorouracil, etoposide, and cisplatin [FEC]). TK was assayed in cytosol with a quantitative radioenzymatic technique. Disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence-free interval (LRI), and distant-relapse-free interval (DRI) were investigated. RESULTS: High TK levels were associated with large tumor size, high histologic grade, and steroid hormone receptor negativity. Univariate analysis of the entire data set showed that high TK levels were related to shorter DSS (P < 10(-5)), LRI (P < 10(-3)), and DRI (P < 10(-5)). In time-dependent Cox models, high TK levels remained an independent predictor of the three outcomes, both in the overall population and in node-negative patients, although its prognostic value decreased over time. In node-negative patients, the introduction of an interaction term in multivariate analysis suggested that chemotherapy was more efficacious for patients who had tumors with high TK contents. In node-positive patients, high TK levels were related only to an increased risk of LRI. CONCLUSION: High TK values are an important risk factor in node-negative patients and seem to be associated with a beneficial effect of adjuvant FAC or FEC in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The rationale of chemotherapy for patients with slowly proliferating tumors has to be discussed from a risk-benefit point of view.
Since the few data exploring a possible association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and breast cancer are conflicting, we investigated this association together with the influences of geographical areas. 509 breast cancers were sampled from areas with varying risks of nasopharynx carcinoma (NPC) such as North Africa (Algeria and Tunisia, high-risk area); southern France (Marseille, intermediate-risk area); and northern Europe (northern France, the Netherlands and Denmark; low-risk areas). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of a subregion of EBV BamHIC encoding the EBERs demonstrated that 31.8% of the tumours contained the viral genome. No significant differences were observed among the geographical areas. However, positive samples showed higher loads of the EBV genome in the NPC high- and intermediate-risk areas than in the low-risk areas. EBV type 1 was the dominant strain. In situ hybridization studies using a(35)S-labelled riboprobe for EBER1 and a laser capture microdissection, combined with quantitative PCR, showed that EBV localization was restricted to some tumour epithelial cell clusters. EBV could not be detected in the stroma. Considering the whole population covered, the presence of the EBV genome was not correlated with age, menopausal status, tumour, size, nodal status or histological grade.
Before replacing enzyme immunoassay of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunohistochemistry, results of both methods were compared on 437 samples obtained from breast cancer patients (342 primary breast carcinomas, 16 local recurrences, 49 biopsies, and 30 tumor specimens obtained after neoadjuvant treatment). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were first assessed semiquantitatively on the basis of the estimated proportion of positive tumor cells, and then quantitatively using the "quick score." Semiquantitative IHC hormone receptors results (positive > or = 10%) correlated well with enzyme immunoassay status (positive >15 fmol/mg protein) in 358 surgical samples (342 primary tumors and 16 recurrences), with overall concordance rates of 89.9% and 82.1%, respectively. Among the 100 discordant cases, a large intraductal carcinoma component was observed in 7 of 36 cases for estrogen receptor (ER) and 15 of 64 for progesterone receptor (PR). Thirty-five discordant cases also were observed near the cut-off values. Hormone receptor levels by enzyme immunoassay correlated strongly with the quantitative IHC "quick score." Whatever the method, hormone receptor status was associated with histologic grade (SBR) and tumor size, whereas age correlated strongly with ER positivity. Similar results were obtained for biopsy specimens and posttreatment samples. This comparison improved the reliability of the IHC technique, which is currently routinely used for ER and PR determination in the authors' institution.
The lack of a standardized methodology for quantifying DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry is hindering routine use of these markers in breast cancer management. In a retrospective clinical multicenter study, we validated a standardized flow cytometry protocol. We tested 633 frozen T(1)T(2), N(0)N(1), M(0) breast tumors obtained in four institutions. Cell preparation was standardized, and precise rules for data interpretation were followed. Three SPF classes were defined on the basis of tertiles after adjustment for ploidy. DNA aneuploidy was observed in 61.0% of cases. No significant difference was observed among centers. Aneuploidy and high SPF were associated with large tumor size, node involvement, high histological grade, and hormone receptor negativity. In the overall population (median follow-up, 69 months), patients with medium and high SPF values had shorter disease-free survival (DFS) than those with low SPF values (P < 0.0001). Ploidy had no significant influence. By Cox analysis, SPF, pN, and estrogen receptor status were independent predictors of DFS (P = 0.0002, P = 0.001, and P = 0.05). In node-negative patients, SPF was the only predictor of DFS (P = 0.01), whereas in node-positive patients, the risk of relapse increased with both high SPF (P = 0.003) and estrogen receptor negativity (P = 0.004). Low SPF values distinguished grade II tumors with a particularly good outcome. Our results strongly support the use of SPF in multicenter studies and clinical trials and suggest that node-negative patients with slowly proliferating tumors do not require systemic adjuvant therapy.
We assessed the reliability of hormonal receptors (HR) by means of immunohistochemisty (IHC) on cell blocks obtained from diagnostic fine-needle cytopunctures in a group of 142 primary breast carcinoma. The results were compared to biochemical assessment (EIA) on their corresponding tissue samples (118 surgical specimens and 24 core needle biopsies). Percentage of stained nuclei and a score incorporating the proportion and the intensity of positive nuclei were evaluated. A two-group classification (cutoff 10% of stained nuclei) was used to define HR status. Highly positive tumors (>= 50% of stained nuclei) were also individualized. Regarding HR status, concordance rate between immunostaining and biochemical assessment was 86.6% for ER and 76.8% for PR. Major discrepancies were found in 6.3% and 15.5% of cases for ER and PR, respectively. A good correlation was also observed between quantitative values obtained by the two methods (r = 0.69 for ER and 0.60 for PR). Discrepancies were mainly related to weak positive staining, values close to the respective cutoffs and when biochemical evaluation was performed on core needle biopsies. We conclude that IHC on cell blocks prepared from fine-needle cytopuncture specimens of breast carcinomas is useful as a routine procedure for hormonal receptor determination especially when planning neoadjuvant treatment.
Both DNA ploidy and S-phase ploidy are promising prognostic factors for node-negative breast cancer patients. Based largely on the analysis of one large study, much of the reported problems with these factors have been caused by some unappreciated complexities in categorizing DNA ploidy into low- and high-risk groups and the lack of some necessary adjustments to eliminate unwanted correlations between DNA S-phase and ploidy. When both DNA ploidy and S-phase are compensated properly, they become independent prognostic markers, forming a powerful prognostic model.
Among the methodological approaches of tumor proliferation, thymidine kinase (TK) and thymidylate synthase (TS) assays take into account the specific pathways of pyrimidine synthesis. Studies pointing to a prognostic value of TK and TS in breast cancer involved small numbers of patients. We investigated the prognostic value of these enzymes and their combination in a large retrospective multicenter study. Nine hundred eight T1T2, N0N1, M0 primary breast cancer samples (median follow-up 68 months) were tested. TK and TS were measured in cytosols by using standardized radioenzymatic methods. Although a positive correlation was obtained between TK and TS (p<10(-5)), major discrepancies were observed in some tumors. High levels of both enzymes were associated with large tumor size, histological grade III and steroid receptor-negative tumors. Univariate analysis showed that TK, TS and their combination were predictive of poor metastasis-free (MFS) (p < 10(-4); p=0.004; p < 10(-4)) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 10(-4); p=0.007; p=0.0001). TK was selected as an independent factor for MFS in Cox analysis. It was the only variable selected in node-negative patients. Subgroups with specific outcomes, with possible therapeutic implications, were identified: a) in node-negative patients not receiving adjuvant treatment, TK values in the 4th quartile were associated with poor MFS (p=0.0002) and DFS (p=0.0005) as compared to the other quartiles; b) in node-positive patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, low levels of both TK and TS were associated with the highest survival rates (MFS: p=0.04; DFS: p=0. 03).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
CONTEXT: The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR) project, started in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer Centres (FNCLCC), the 20 French Cancer Centres and specialists from French Public Universities, General Hospitals and Private Clinics. The main objective is the development of clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of health care and outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on literature systematic review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of experts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines according to the definitions of Standards, Options and Recommendations for endocrine therapy in patients with non metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Data have been identified by literature search using Medline, Embase, Cancerlit and Cochrane databases - until july 1999 - and the personal reference lists of the expert group. Once the guidelines were defined, the document was submitted for review to 125 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The main recommendations for the endocrine therapy of patients with non metastatic breast cancer are: 1) Endocrine therapy modalities depend on menopausal status or age of women: ovarian suppression for premenopausal women, antiestrogen drug therapy for postmenopausal women (standard). 2) Tamoxifen (20 mg/d - 5 years) is beneficial to women with positive estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). There is no indication of tamoxifen treatment for women with negative estrogen receptor tumor (standard, level of evidence A). 3) For postmenopausal women with positive estrogen receptor tumor, tamoxifen is the standard adjuvant treatment (level of evidence A). For postmenopausal women with negative estrogen receptor, adjuvant chemotherapy has to be considered (option, level of evidence A). No adjuvant treatment has to be considered for women with poor health condition (option). 4) For premenopausal women with estrogen receptor tumor, results of clinical trials of chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy, suggest a benefit for endocrine therapy. However, there is no sufficient evidence to consider endocrine therapy alone as a standard adjuvant treatment. 5) For premenopausal women, chemotherapy + ovarian suppression or chemotherapy + tamoxifen are not better than chemotherapy alone (level of evidence A). 6) For postmenopausal women, administration of chemotherapy plus adjuvant tamoxifen versus the same tamoxifen alone, is of additional benefit in reducing recurrences but not in prolonging overall survival (standard, level of evidence A). 7) Balance of known benefits (delay to recurrence and death) and risks (side-effects of therapy) for adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy has to be taken into consideration before decision making. Chemoendocrine therapy can be indicated for women at high risk of developing metastatic disease (recommendation, experts agreement).
Among the proteases involved in the tumor invasion process, components of the plasminogen activator system (plasminogen activator type-urokinase uPA, its membrane receptor uPAR and its two inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2) appear to define high risk patients in primary breast cancer. As individual analysis of each component of the plasminogen activator system does not reflect the complex interactions between the different components, we studied the prognostic impact of a dissemination risk index combining the four variables. We found that this index was the most powerful prognostic factor, particularly in node-negative patients.
The aim of this study was to evaluate c-erbB-2 overexpression by means of a quantitative biochemical technique in 488 primary breast cancer patients with long-term follow-up (median, 10 years) and its relation to other biochemical prognostic factors (uPA, p53, and epidermal growth factor receptor) and adjuvant therapy. High levels of c-erbB-2 (>500 IU/mg protein) were associated with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor negativity, high histoprognostic SBR grade and high levels of uPA and p53. Univariate analyses showed shorter metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients whose tumors overexpressed c-erbB-2 in the overall population, in subgroups defined by ER and uPA status, and in patients with positive pathological nodal status, SBR grade II, progesterone receptor, and p53-negative tumors. Patients with ER-positive, c-erbB-2-positive tumors had a shorter MFS and OS than those patients with c-erbB-2-negative tumors. No difference was observed between adjuvant-treated and untreated patients (chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy) in the c-erbB-2-negative subgroup. There was a trend toward a longer short-term MFS in c-erbB-2-positive patients treated with chemotherapy, whereas an opposite effect was observed with hormone therapy. Cox multivariate analyses showed that high levels of c-erbB-2 negatively influenced MFS in the overall population as well as in node-positive patients and in tamoxifen-treated patients, along with pN and uPA. Results for OS were comparable with those obtained for MFS. These results suggest that c-erbB-2 overexpression in breast cancer may be a better predictor of the response to tamoxifen than is ER status alone.