PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Vaira

Publications and source records attributed to F Vaira.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Intensified M-VEC chemotherapy with G-CSF support as outpatient treatment for advanced bladder cancer.

The M-VAC regimen (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) is widely used in the treatment of advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. In the present trial, an alternate week regimen of M-VEC (with epidoxorubicin instead of doxorubicin) supported by G-CSF (filgrastim) was evaluated. Eligible patients had metastatic or surgically unresectable bladder cancer, not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of methotrexate 30 mg/m2 day 1, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 day 2, epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2 day 2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 days 2 and 3. G-CSF was administered s.c. at the dose of 300 mcg from day 4 to day 11: the treatment was repeated every 2 weeks for six cycles. Twenty-one patients entered the study, and 19 received more than 1 cycle: 78.9% were able to receive full doses of M-VEC as scheduled. The treatment resulted feasible on an outpatient basis, with mild toxicity. Three complete responses (15.8%) and 9 partial responses (47.4%), with an overall objective response rate of 63.2%, were observed.

Aged↗

A new schedule for etoposide, epidoxorubicin and cisplatin with granulocyte colony stimulating factor for advanced gastric cancer: a feasibility study.

A new polychemotherapy regimen has been developed for gastric cancer. Etoposide at the dose of 120 mg/m2 for three days, Epidoxorubicin at the dose of 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and Cisplatin at the dose of 40 mg/m2 on day 2 were administered to 26 advanced gastric patients every two weeks with the support of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor from day 8 to day 12 of each cycle. The treatment was feasible with most cases (21/25) having received at least four cycles with a dose intensity > 85%, without life-threatening side effects. Toxicity was lower than that observed in the classical combinations of Etoposide-Anthracycline-Cisplatin.

Adult↗

[Low-dose GM-CSF and dose intensity of antineoplastic agents].

Hematopoietic growth factors are cytokines able to modulate proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow progenitors. We have reviewed the effectiveness of GM-CSF in protecting marrow from chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, mainly in the setting of cyclic polychemotherapy; in particular, studies employing low doses of GM-CSF have been considered. G-CSF or GM-CSF may be particularly useful in situations in which the likelihood of a clinically relevant neutropenia is high, both because of higher dose intensity (obtained by intensification of doses of each cycle or by shortening of intervals between cycles) or because of pretreatment patient characteristics (old age, poor performance status, previous extensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, experience of neutropenia in the previous cycles). GM-CSF at the conventional dose of 5 micrograms/kg was utilized to increase the etoposide dose to 900 mg/m2 in a chemotherapy program including also carboplatin and ifosfamide in patients with small cell lung cancer. In a randomized study by Ardizzoni et al., the administration of GM-CSF at the dose of 10 micrograms/kg following CEF program (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil) was effective in reducing from 20 to 16 days the time interval among cycles. Since there is a relationship between GM-CSF dose levels and toxicity, it is attractive to investigate whether GM-CSF at doses lower than 5 micrograms/kg retains its myeloprotective effects, with a substantial reduction in its toxic effects. Grem et al. have observed that 3 micrograms/kg GM-CSF may allow the administration of 425 mg/m2 fluorouracil for five days; Reed et al. demonstrated that 600 mg/m2 carboplatin may be safely administered if protection with 3 micrograms/kg GM-CSF is applied; Kehoe et al. achieved acceleration of cyclophosphamide-cisplatin combination by GM-CSF at the dose of 3 micrograms/kg. We conclude that low dose GM-CSF deserves further evaluation in order to determine effectiveness and potential applications in the clinical practice.

Antineoplastic Agents↗