PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Vincenti

Publications and source records attributed to F Vincenti.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Cyclosporine sparing with mycophenolate mofetil, daclizumab and corticosteroids in renal allograft recipients: the CAESAR Study.

Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed2006

Living donor kidney transplant recipients and clinical trials: participation profiles and impact on post-transplant care.

Many transplant physicians believe that transplant candidates who enroll in clinical trials may have better outcomes than those who do not enroll. We examined a 7-year cohort (1997-2003) of adult primary, non-HLA identical, living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients to determine whether demographic characteristics predisposed to enrollment and whether participation affected posttransplant care intensity and/or allograft function. Overall, 146 of 512 (28.5%) LDKT recipients enrolled in clinical trials. LDKT recipients who were male and those who lived <100 miles from our transplant center were significantly more likely to participate. During the first post-transplant year, study patients (SPs) had more clinic visits (p < 0.0001) and more allograft biopsies (p = 0.024) compared to nonstudy patients (NSPs), but comparable numbers of hospital readmissions and allograft ultrasounds. SPs and NSPs did not differ in 1-year creatinine clearance, delta creatinine or rejection incidence. Overall graft and patient survival were comparable. We conclude that clinical trial participants were disproportionately male, had increased intensity of post-transplant care but comparable outcomes to nonparticipants.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Rifaximin dose-finding study for the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

BACKGROUND: Few controlled studies assessing choice and duration of antibiotic therapy for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth are available. AIM: To assess efficacy, safety and tolerability of different doses of rifaximin, a broad spectrum non-absorbable antibiotic, for intestinal bacterial overgrowth eradication. METHODS: We enrolled 90 consecutive patients affected by small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. The presence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth was based on the occurrence of a rise of H2 values >12 p.p.m. above the basal value after 50 g glucose ingestion. Patients were randomized in three 7-day treatment groups: rifaximin 600 mg/day (group 1); rifaximin 800 mg/day (group 2) and rifaximin 1200 mg/day (group 3). Glucose breath test was reassessed 1 month after the end of therapy. Compliance to the treatment and incidence of side-effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: No drop-outs were observed in the three groups. Glucose breath test normalization rate was significantly higher in group 3 (60%) with respect to group 1 (17%; P < 0.001) and group 2 (27%, P < 0.01). No significant differences in patient compliance and incidence of side-effects were found among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses of rifaximin lead to a significant gain in terms of therapeutic efficacy in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth eradication without increasing the incidence of side-effects.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus and glucose metabolism in patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion versus tacrolimus after de novo kidney transplantation.

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is associated with increased risk of graft failure and death in renal transplant recipients. Some clinical studies have indicated that NODM risk is higher with tacrolimus than cyclosporine, but no comparative trial has used American Diabetic Association (ADA)/World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Incidence After Renal Transplantation, Neoral C2 Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus (DIRECT) study is a 6-month open-label, multicenter trial comparing the impact of tacrolimus and Neoral (cyclosporine microemulsion) on glucose metabolism in 700 de novo kidney transplant recipients, based on ADA/WHO criteria. Patients are randomized to tacrolimus (C0 monitoring) or Neoral (C2 monitoring), stratified by baseline diabetic status and ethnicity. All patients receive basiliximab, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate acid (myfortic). Pooled interim 3-month results from a subset of 115 patients receiving either tacrolimus or Neoral showed that the primary efficacy end-point (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss or death) occurred in 11 patients (10%). There were four graft losses and only one death, which occurred after graft loss. Eight patients experienced BPAR (7.3%). Among 99 patients who were nondiabetic at baseline, 14 developed NODM by month 3, 17 developed impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and another 5 patients received hypoglycemic treatment for at least 14 consecutive days or at the month 3 visit, resulting in a 36% incidence of impaired glucose metabolism. At 3 months, median GFR (Nankivell) was 63.7 mL/min; median serum creatinine was 137 micromol/L. Full complete results are expected in December 2005.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed2003

De novo use of sirolimus in immunosuppression regimens in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplantation at the University of California, San Francisco.

At UCSF, we have used sirolimus in several immunosuppression regimens and protocols, and this article will summarize our experience in four areas. The purpose of the first study was to assess the efficacy of a sirolimus-based, calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen for the first 3 months after transplantation. Patients were treated with a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen that consisted of daclizumab, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and conventional corticosteroids. Of nine patients, one (case #7) had an acute rejection episode (type IA) at 2 months after transplantation, which was fully reversed with corticosteroids. The second study was a prospective trial of calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen in patients with severe delayed graft function (DGF) (requiring dialysis). The immunosuppression regimen consisted of daclizumab, sirolimus, MMF, and corticosteroids. This immunosuppressive regimen was effective in patients with DGF; however, it was effective only in non-African American (non-AA) patients (AA had a significantly higher acute rejection rate at 1 year than non-AA, 63% vs 23%, P =.025). In some patients sirolimus was associated with a prolonged recovery from DGF. The addition of sirolimus to immunosuppressive agents provide the opportunity for safe steroid withdrawal (at day 5). We participated in a sirolimus-based, multicenter open-label trial of very early corticosteroid withdrawal. Primary renal transplant patients were enrolled in an immunosuppression regimen that consisted of basiliximab, sirolimus (target levels 8 to 15 ng/mL, 0 to 5 months, and 6 to 12 ng/mL, 6 to 12 months) and tacrolimus in a dose of 0.05 mg/kg BID (target levels 6 to 9 ng/mL). Two of 14 enrolled patients had an episode of acute rejection before steroids were withdrawn. No acute rejection episodes have occurred after steroids were withdrawn (6-month follow-up). The regimen of sirolimus and tacrolimus was well tolerated. Wound complications were not noted. Another important use of sirolimus has been its incorporation in the immunosuppressive regimens in kidney-pancreas transplantation. Our current protocol consists of thymoglobulin induction, combined with MMF, sirolimus, and low-dose tacrolimus, for maintenance therapy. Steroids are only utilized during the first 5 to 6 days following the transplant. This steroid-free maintenance regimen has been used in the last 30 enteric-drained, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. Using this immunosuppressive approach, rejection rates are less than 10% for either the kidney or the pancreas.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

New monoclonal antibodies in renal transplantation.

A decade of spectacular innovation in maintenance immunosuppression drugs has resulted in dramatic reductions in acute rejection and improvement in short and long term outcome after renal transplantation. However the new drugs continue to lack specificity, many require frequent therapeutic drug monitoring and all are associated with acute and chronic toxicities. The new biologic agents, monoclonal antibodies (chimeric, humanized, and fully human) and receptor-fusion proteins, lack immunogenicity, have long half-life and prolonged biologic effects, require intermittent administration and have minimal toxicity. The specificity and selectively of the targets of the new biologic agents render them less toxic than the oral maintenance drugs and thus could possibly replace the maintenance drugs most associated with long-term toxicity such as the corticosteroids and the calcineurin inhibitors. The recently introduced anti-interleukin 2 receptor (IL-2R) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are the prototype of future biologic agents; selective, safe, and inducing prolonged biologic effects. The IL-2R mAbs have been used with a variety of maintenance immunosuppression regimens double therapy with cyclosporine and prednisone, triple therapy with cyclosporine, azathioprine and prednisone and with newer regimens such as cyclosporine or tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone, and most recently with sirolimus, MMF and prednisone. The major thrust of the new biologics in clinical development is to block the co-stimulatory pathway. The first attempt at blockade of the CD40-CD154 with anti-CD154 mAbs was disappointing. Anti-CD 154 therapy was associated with thromboembolic events and acute rejection. Attempts at blocking the CD28-B7s (CD80-CD86) pathway are currently underway with the receptor fusion protein, LEA29Y a second generation CTL4Aig, and humanized mAbs to CD 80 and CD86. LFA1, an adhesion molecule that also participates in the co-stimulatory pathway, has also been targeted with a mAb that binds to the CD11a chain of LFA1. Efalizumab, a humanized anti-CD11a mAb, was shown in a phase I trial to be potentially effective in renal transplantation. A humanized anti-CD45 RB mAb is currently in pre-clinical studies and will likely be tested in a phase I trial of renal transplantation within 1 year. While excellent results with anti-CD45 RB mAbs have been published in experimental transplantation, the mechanism of action of anti-CD45 RB mAbs remains to be determined. Several antibodies that are currently approved for non-transplant indications are currently used in single center clinical trials in renal transplantation including Campath 1 H, a humanized anti-CD52 mAb, Rituxamab, an anti-CD20 chimeric mAb, and Infliximab an anti-TNFa chimeric mAb. In addition, several humanized mutagenized anti-CD3 mAbs, huOKT3g1, aglycosyl CD3 and HuM291 have been used in limited trials in renal transplantation but have yet to have a formal clinical development. Humanized mAbs and receptor fusion proteins offer the potential of providing renal transplant recipients with a novel algorithm for immunosuppression that relies on chronic intermittent intravenous administration of safe, non-toxic agents replacing oral drug therapy maintenance.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Results of 3-year phase III clinical trials with daclizumab prophylaxis for prevention of acute rejection after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab (Zenapax, Roche Pharmaceuticals), a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin 2 receptor, has been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection at 6 months after renal transplantation in two phase III clinical trials. This report presents the combined 1- and 3-year outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who participated in these two phase III clinical trials. METHODS: Data from two multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were evaluated with regard to graft survival, patient survival, incidence of malignancies (including lymphoma), renal function (serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate [GFR]), and current maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. In addition, the impact of acute rejection and acute rejection requiring treatment with antilymphocyte therapy upon 3-year graft survival was evaluated. Daclizumab was compared to placebo on a background of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine, and corticosteroids (triple therapy, TT) or CsA and corticosteroids (double therapy, DT). RESULTS: Treatment with daclizumab in the pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes at 12 months posttransplant (43% vs. 28%, P<0.001). The 3-year graft survival was not significantly different between placebo and daclizumab-treated patients in the TT trial (83% vs. 84%) or in the DT trial (78% vs. 82%). Pooled patient survival was excellent in both placebo- (91%) and daclizumab- (93%) treated patients. The incidence of malignancies or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in placebo- versus daclizumab-treated groups was comparable in both clinical trials. Renal function was similar between placebo- and daclizumab-treated groups in both the TT and DT trials. The occurrence of delayed graft function, acute rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy at 6 months, and acute rejection at 12 months posttransplant were associated with decreased graft survival rates at 3 years posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effect of daclizumab prophylaxis upon the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplant with TT or with DT was not associated with adverse clinical sequelae, including the development of PTLD, at 3 years posttransplant. There was no beneficial effect of daclizumab on graft survival at 3 years, but the trial was inadequately powered to detect this. Both studies showed excellent graft and patient survival at 3 years.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Daclizumab (humanized anti-IL2Ralpha mAb) prophylaxis for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the benefits of daclizumab, (Zenapax, Roche Pharmaceuticals) a humanized anti-interleukin-2Ralpha (IL-2Ralpha) monoclonal antibody, for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function (DGF). METHODS: Data from two multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trials were pooled. DGF was defined by urine output <30 cc/hour, decline in serum creatinine of <0.5 mg/dl, or the need for dialysis within the first 24 hours after transplantation. RESULTS: At one year posttransplantation, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in patients with DGF was reduced from 44% in the placebo group to 28% in the daclizumab group. (P=0.03) Prophylaxis with daclizumab also delayed the onset of the first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode in patients with DGF from 29+/-43 days in the placebo group to 73+/-70 days in the daclizumab group. (P=0.004) The graft survival rates in patients with DGF at 1 year posttransplantation were 78% in the placebo group and 82% in the daclizumab treated group. (P=ns) Three patients in the placebo-treated group with DGF experienced graft loss due to acute rejection, whereas no patients in the daclizumab-treated group with DGF had graft loss due to acute rejection. The 1-year patient survival rate in those with DGF in the placebo and daclizumab groups were 93% and 98%, respectively. (P=ns) CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab effectively reduced the incidence and delayed the onset of biopsy-proven acute rejection in this high-risk subgroup of patients with DGF after renal transplantation. Graft and patient survival rates were similar between placebo- and daclizumab-treated patients with DGF.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2001

Multicenter trial exploring calcineurin inhibitors avoidance in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The adoption of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) as the mainstay of immunosuppression has resuited in a significant decrease of acute rejection and improvement of short-term graft survival. However, because of the irreversible nephrotoxicity associated with the chronic use of the CNI, the magnitude of the improvement of long-term graft survival has been more modest. Therefore, an effective immunosuppression regimen that does not rely on CNI may result in improvement of long-term outcome and simplification of the management of transplant recipients. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients of primary cadaver or living donor kidneys at low immunologic risk were enrolled in a CNI avoidance study. The immunosuppression regimen consisted of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2Ralpha), administered for a total of five doses at biweekly intervals; 3 gm/day mycophenolate mofetil for the first 6 month and 2 gm thereafter; and conventional corticosteroid therapy. Patients who underwent rejection episodes could be started on CNI. The primary efficacy end-point was biopsy-proven rejection during the first 6 months posttransplant. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven rejection was diagnosed in 48% of patients during the first 6 months after transplantation. The majority of rejection episodes were Banff grade I and IIA and were fully reversed with corticosteroid therapy. The median time to the first biopsy-proven rejection among patients who experienced this event during the first 6 months was 39 days. In 22 patients with delayed graft function, the proportion of patients with biopsy-proven rejection was 50% at 6 months. However in the first 2 weeks posttransplant, only 1 of 22 patients with delayed graft function developed biopsy-proven rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 97% and graft survival was 96%. Only two grafts were lost secondary to rejection. At 1-year posttransplant, 62% of patients had received CNI for more than 7 days. At 1-year posttransplant, the mean serum creatinine in the nonrejectors with no CNI use was 113 micromol/L (95%, confidence interval [CI], 100.7 to 125.3 micromol/L) and in the rejectors or patients with CNI use (more than 7 days) was 154 micromol/L (95% CI, 135.0 to 173.0 micromol/L). In selected patients with rejection, analysis of circulating and intragraft lymphocytes revealed complete IL-2Ralpha saturation. CONCLUSIONS: This CNI avoidance study in immunologic low-risk patients, while only partially successful in preventing acute rejection, provided benefits to a sizable minority of patients who have not required chronic CNI therapy. However, wide acceptance of a CNI-sparing immunosuppression regimen may require a lower rate of acute rejection, possibly through the addition of a non-nephrotoxic dose of CNI. However, because complete IL-2Ralpha blockade was present during rejection, it can be assumed that alternative pathways, such as IL-15, may be responsible for the rejection; thus, the incorporation of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive agents, such as sirolimus, may provide a more strategic approach.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2000

Phase I trial of HuM291, a humanized anti-CD3 antibody, in patients receiving renal allografts from living donors.

BACKGROUND: HuM291 is a humanized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody engineered to reduce binding to Fcgamma receptors and complement fixation. HuM291 has a long serum half-life and mediated profound depletion of circulating T cells in chimpanzees; HuM291 also has significantly less mitogenic and cytokine-releasing activity than OKT3 in vitro. METHODS: A phase I dose-escalation study was conducted in 15 end-stage renal disease patients scheduled for renal allografts from living donors. Patients received one i.v. HuM291 injection before transplantation. Five doses were tested: 0.015 microg/kg, 0.15 microg/kg, 0.0015 mg/kg, 0.0045 mg/kg, and 0.015 mg/kg. Patients were followed for adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, serum cytokine levels, pharmacokinetics, and CD2+, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell counts. RESULTS: HuM291 was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity and included headache, nausea, chills, and fever. These occurred within the first few hours after HuM291 administration, resolved within 24 to 48 hr, and were likely related to cytokine release. In general, peak tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, and interleukin-6 levels were detected 1 to 6 hr postdosing only at the three highest doses and were generally undetectable by 24-hr postdosing. Serious adverse events possibly related to HuM291 included clotting of a fistula (two patients), chemical cellulitis (one patient), and increased serum creatinine/decreased hematocrit (one patient). At doses > or = 0.0015 mg/kg (0.1 mg/70 kg), HuM291 induced rapid, marked depletion of peripheral T cells within 2 hr; duration of T cell depletion was dose dependent. At the two highest dose levels, T cells remained depleted for approximately 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: A single HuM291 dose rapidly depleted circulating T cells in a dose-dependent manner and was associated with only mild to moderate symptoms of cytokine release.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Daclizumab prevents acute rejection and improves patient survival post transplantation: 1 year pooled analysis.

Daclizumab is a genetically engineered human IgG1 monoclonal antibody specific for the alpha chain of the IL-2 receptor. A pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind studies was performed on the efficacy and safety of daclizumab in renal transplantation, given in addition to standard immunosuppression. Patients receiving their first cadaveric renal allograft were randomized to receive 5 doses of daclizumab (n = 267) or placebo (n = 268), starting pre-operatively. Acute rejection at 1 year occurred less frequently with daclizumab (n = 74, 27.7 %) than with placebo (n = 116, 43.3%) (P = 0.0001). Fewer patients treated with daclizumab required anti-lymphocyte therapy for acute rejection (7.9 % vs. 15.3 %; P = 0.005). Mean cumulative doses of corticosteroids were lower with daclizumab (4133 mg) than with placebo (4562 mg). One year graft survival was 91.4 % with daclizumab, compared with 86.6 % on placebo (P = 0.065), with patient survival of 98.5 % and 95.1 % for daclizumab and placebo respectively (P = 0.022). Daclizumab was well tolerated. No increase in infectious episodes or lymphoproliferative disorders was observed with daclizumab. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infections was similar with daclizumab and placebo (15 % vs. 17.5 %). Therapy with daclizumab significantly reduces acute rejection in renal transplantation and improves patient survival without any increase in morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-CD25 mAb provides effective immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation is a significant risk factor for early acute rejection and graft loss. Sirolimus (SRL) can be administered in the setting of DGF without exacerbating the impaired renal function after transplantation. We examined a calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL during the early post-operative period in renal transplant patients with delayed or impaired graft function. A retrospective review of 14 consecutive kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function who received SRL was performed. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of daclizumab induction (2 mg/kg), SRL (5-15 mg load followed by 2 5 mg daily maintenance therapy), corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1.5-3 g/d). Patients were monitored for allograft function, acute rejection, graft survival, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Serum levels of SRL were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography performed at an independent commercial laboratory. Donors were cadaveric in 13 cases and living related in one. The duration of follow-up was 0.5-5.2 months. Nine patients required hemodialysis after transplantation. The mean time to initiation of calcineurin inhibitors was 21 +/- 13 d. Average serum creatinine levels at the initiation of SRL and at 1 month after transplantation were 8.4 +/- 2.7 and 2.1 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, respectively. There were 2 patients (14%) who experienced acute rejection within the first month after transplantation -1 with type I (steroid therapy) and 1 with type II (anti-thymocyte therapy). Serum levels of SRL were initially undetectable in the 2 patients with acute rejection. No grafts were lost during the period of follow-up. Three patients developed thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 x 10(9)) and no patients developed leukopenia. The combination of SRL with anti-CD25 mAb, MMF, and corticosteroids appears to provide effective non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression for kidney transplantation without the need for a lymphocyte-depleting regimen. However, it is important to monitor serum SRL levels to determine the optimal dosing regimen. Furthermore, long-term follow-up of these patients will be helpful to determine whether improved immunosuppression can be achieved with a fully calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Coadministration of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in stable kidney transplant patients: pharmacokinetics and tolerability.

The tolerance and pharmacokinetics (PK) of tacrolimus (T) by the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in stable kidney transplant patients (6/group) on long-term tacrolimus-based therapy were investigated. Patients received combination T and MMF therapy at three MMF doses: 1, 1.5, and 2 g/day administered twice daily. A 12-hour blood PK profile for T was obtained prior to MMF dosing; concomitant 12-hour profiles for T, mycophenolic acid (MPA), and mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) were obtained after 2 weeks of administration. Tolerance was monitored through 3 months. The intra- and intergroup PK of T were variable. The mean AUC0-12 of T for each group was increased after 2 weeks of concomitant MMF administration, but the increase was not statistically significant. Both drugs were well tolerated. Gastrointestinal events were of interest as such have been attributed to both T and MMF. Events reported were diarrhea, nausea, dyspepsia, and vomiting. Other common adverse events were headache, hypomagnesemia, and tremors. Most were mild, although a few were considered to be moderate. There was no apparent relationship between the incidence of any adverse event and MMF treatment group. In the present study, the coadministration of T and MMF did not significantly alter T pharmacokinetics.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The role of daclizumab in balancing resources for inpatient and outpatient transplant services.

Transplant professionals have the dual responsibility of achieving acceptable clinical outcomes and controlling costs. One approach transplant centers have used to control transplant-related costs has been to decrease patients' length of stay, and thus it has decreased significantly in the last 6 years. This reduction in resource consumption has been accomplished by increased efficiency in providing transplantation services, expanding the number of outpatient services available, and integrating new technologies. Future cost containment measures by payers, especially Medicare, will continue to require that transplant centers manage resources and meet financial objectives while achieving acceptable clinical outcomes. Daclizumab, a new immunosuppressive drug, is used as an example in this article, which assesses its value in helping meet resource management and financial goals.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed1999

Recurrent and de novo glomerular disease after renal transplantation: a report from Renal Allograft Disease Registry (RADR).

INTRODUCTION: Short-term and long-term results of renal transplantation have improved over the past 15 years. However, there has been no change in the prevalence of recurrent and de novo diseases. A retrospective study was initiated through the Renal Allograft Disease Registry, to evaluate the prevalence and impact of recurrent and de novo diseases after transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1987 to December 1996, a total of 4913 renal transplants were performed on adults at the Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Cincinnati, University of California at San Francisco, University of Louisville, University of Washington, Seattle, and Washington University School of Medicine. The patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. A total of 167 (3.4%) cases of recurrent and de novo disease were diagnosed by renal biopsy. These patients were compared with other patients who did not have recurrent and de novo disease (n=4746). There were more men (67.7% vs. 59.8%, P<0.035) and a higher number of re-transplants (17% vs. 11.5%, P<0.005) in the recurrent and de novo disease group. There was no difference in the rate of recurrent and de novo disease according to the transplant type (living related donor vs. cadaver, P=NS). Other demographic findings were not significantly different. Common forms of glomerulonephritis seen were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), 57; immunoglobulin A nephritis, 22; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (GN), 18; and membranous nephropathy, 16. Other diagnoses include: diabetic nephropathy, 19; immune complex GN, 12; crescentic GN (vasculitis), 6; hemolytic uremic syndrome-thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (HUS/TTP), 8; systemic lupus erythematosus, 3; Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, 2; oxalosis, 2; and miscellaneous, 2. The diagnosis of recurrent and de novo disease was made after a mean period of 678 days after the transplant. During the follow-up period, there were significantly more graft failures in the recurrent disease group, 55% vs. 25%, P<0.001. The actuarial 1-, 2-, 3-, 4, and 5-year kidney survival rates for patients with recurrent and de novo disease was 86.5%, 78.5%, 65%, 47.7%, and 39.8%. The corresponding survival rates for patients without recurrent and de novo disease were 85.2%, 81.2%, 76.5%, 72%, and 67.6%, respectively (Log-rank test, P<0.0001). The median kidney survival rate for patients with and without recurrent and de novo disease was 1360 vs. 3382 days (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model for graft failure was performed to identify various risk factors. Cadaveric transplants, prolonged cold ischemia time, elevated panel reactive antibody, and recurrent disease were identified as risk factors for allograft failure. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) for graft failure because of recurrent and de novo disease was 1.9 (1.57-2.40), P<0.0001. The relative risk for graft failure because of posttransplant FSGS was 2.25 (1.6-3.1), P<0.0001, for membranoprolifera. tive glomerulonephritis was 2.37 (1.3-4.2), P<0.003, and for HUS/TTP was 5.36 (2.2-12.9), P<0.0002. There was higher graft failure (64.9%) and shorter half-life (1244 days) in patients with recurrent FSGS. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, recurrent and de novo disease are associated with poorer long-term survival, and the relative risk of allograft loss is double. Significant impact on graft survival was seen with recurrent and de novo FSGS, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and HUS/TTP.

Adult↗