Near death. Back from beyond.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to F Wimbush.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Evaluating the independent effects of psychosocial and physiological factors on survival of cardiac patients is difficult because it requires obtaining extensive physiological and psychosocial data and long-term follow-up of high-risk patients. OBJECTIVES: To examine the independent contributions of psychosocial and physiological status to survival of patients who had had myocardial infarction. METHODS: The sample consisted of 348 patients in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial who had asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction. Psychosocial status was assessed with the Social Support Questionnaire-6, Social Readjustment Rating Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Self-Rating Depression Scale, Jenkins Activity Survey, and Expression of Anger Scale. Physiological data included measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction; history of previous myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and diabetes; and results of Holter monitoring. RESULTS: At the first follow-up, after the effect of the physiological predictors was controlled for, psychosocial factors were significant independent predictors of survival. Among men in the nonactive medication group (n = 263), higher state anxiety, lower anger outward, more past life events, and lower expectations of future life events were predictors of mortality. Data suggested that the relationship of anger to mortality might differ for men and women. Increases in past life events and depression from baseline to first follow-up were greater among those who died than among those who lived. CONCLUSION: Among patients who had asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction, psychological status during the period after infarction contributed to mortality beyond the effect of physiological status. The results reaffirm the critical interrelationship between mind and body for cardiovascular health.
Patient adherence to therapy is essential to assess treatment efficacy, particularly in clinical trials. Active treatment usually is expected to benefit patients. The healthy adherer effect, the association or greater adherence to all health-promoting behaviors, including medication and overall concern for health, explains the improved survival of more adherent patients in both active and placebo medication groups of several clinical trials. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), a placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial of post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, in which active medication (encainide or flecainide) led to increased mortality, provided an opportunity to examine the relationship of adherence to survival from a different perspective. We consider whether adherence to active treatment was related to arrhythmic mortality and whether a healthy adherer effect might counteract the effect of treatment on mortality among patients taking active medication. Adherence (average pill count) at the first follow-up visit did not differ in the active treatment (92.2%, standard deviation (SD) = 11.97, n = 574) and placebo (90.8%, SD = 13.66, n = 579) groups. In a Cox proportional hazard regression model, medication adherence predicted arrhythmic mortality among the active (P < 0.0062) but not the placebo medication group. The effect of adherence on arrhythmic mortality was significant beyond the effects of ejection fraction, race, spouse, smoking status, diuretic medication, and history of MI. A 10% increase in adherence led to more than a threefold increase of risk of arrhythmic death. The design of the CAST, which included a titration phase, may have tended to select relatively adherent patients since only those whose arrhythmias were suppressed with active medication were randomized into the trial. The data do not support a strong healthy adherer effect in the CAST. There was no evidence in this study that a healthy adherer effect counterbalanced the effect of the active medication.