PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

F Zuckermann

Publications and source records attributed to F Zuckermann.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Passive transfer of virus-specific antibodies confers protection against reproductive failure induced by a virulent strain of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and establishes sterilizing immunity.

Immune mechanisms mediating protective immunity against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) are not well understood. The PRRSV-specific humoral immune response has been dismissed as being ineffective and perhaps deleterious for the host. The function of PRRSV antibodies in protective immunity against infection with a highly abortifacient strain of this virus was examined by passive transfer experiments in pregnant swine. All of a group of pregnant gilts (n = 6) that received PRRSV immunoglobulin (Ig) from PRRSV-convalescent, hyperimmune animals were fully protected from reproductive failure as judged by 95% viability of offspring at weaning (15 days of age). On the other hand, the totality of animals in a matched control group (n = 6) receiving anti-pseudorabies virus (PRV) Ig exhibited marked reproductive failure with 4% survival at weaning. Besides protecting the pregnant females from clinical reproductive disease, the passive transfer of PRRSV Ig prevented the challenge virus from infecting the dams and precluded its vertical transmission, as evidenced by the complete absence of infectious PRRSV from the tissues of the dams and lack of infection in their offspring. In summary, these results indicate that PRRSV-Igs are capable of conferring protective immunity against PRRSV and furthermore that these Igs can provide sterilizing immunity in vivo.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Summary of workshop findings for porcine T-lymphocyte-specific monoclonal antibodies.

Fifty-seven monoclonal antibodies (mAb) selected after the first round analyses in the Third International Swine CD workshop for their possible reactivity with T-lymphocyte specific antigens were further analysed in a second round. As target cells for flow cytometric analyses served peripheral blood mononuclear cells, nylon-wool enriched T-lymphocytes, thymocytes, splenocytes, and lymphocytes derived from Peyer's patches. These second round analyses revealed 15 different data sets. Together with 22 pre-selected data sets from the first round analyses with the whole panel of monoclonal antibodies, 37 data sets were used for the clustering of the respective mAb. Using the LTDB4 program, 19 preliminary clusters could be defined. Two clusters (C3 and C7) with 4 mAb showed no labelling of resting T-lymphocytes. Seven clusters (C1, C2, C4, C5, C6, C11, and C12) contain mAb (in total: 16 mAb) directed against subsets of CD4(-)CD8(-) T-lymphocytes. These mAb seem to recognise antigens on porcine T-lymphocytes with T-cell receptor (TcR) gamma/delta chains. Three clusters (C8, C9, C10, C13) seem to be artificial. They contain either mAb staining CD4(-)CD8(-) T-lymphocytes and low CD8+ cells (C8, C9), mAb with various reactivity (C10) and mAb with known differences in their reactivity (C13). Cluster C14 contains 3 mAb against the CD4a-epitope, C15 describes mAb directed against porcine CD8c-epitope whereas mAb against CD8a and CD8b-epitopes grouped in C19. The mAb found in C16 seem to recognise CD45R. Cluster C17 is composed of different standards directed against CD2, CD3, CD5 and wCD6. Two additional mAb recognising the CD2a-epitope could be enclosed. C18 contains two mAb directed against SWC2.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Systemic and mucosal immune responses to H1N1 influenza virus infection in pigs.

Influenza is a common respiratory disease in pigs, and since swine influenza viruses are zoonotic pathogens, they also pose human health risks. Pigs infected with influenza virus mount an effective immune response and are protected from subsequent challenge, whereas the currently available, inactivated-virus vaccine does not consistently confer complete protection to challenge. To develop and evaluate new vaccination strategies, it is imperative to fully understand the immune responses that are associated with protection following natural infection. Therefore, we have evaluated the phenotype and kinetics of immune responses to primary and re-challenge infection with H1N1 swine influenza virus in the pig. Through the use of isotype-specific antibody secreting cell ELISPOT assays, interferon-gamma ELISPOT assays and isotype-specific ELISAs on serum, nasal wash and bronchoalveolar lavage samples, we defined the humoral and cellular immune responses, both locally in the respiratory tract and systemically, to this viral infection. Virus-specific serum IgG, IgA, and HI titers all peaked 2-3 weeks after primary infection and did not substantially increase after re-challenge. The predominant virus-specific isotype in serum was IgG. Pigs responded with virus-specific IgG and IgA in both the upper (nasal washes) and lower (bronchoalveolar lavages) airways; IgA was the predominant isotype in both sites. Despite the fact that the pigs were completely protected from re-challenge, the antibody titers in the nasal washes increased. Results of the antibody-secreting cell ELISPOT assays demonstrated that the numbers of both IgG and IgA secreting cells in the nasal mucosa were dramatically higher than in any other tissue examined. In contrast, IFN-gamma secreting cells were predominantly localized to the spleen and tracheobronchial lymph nodes. These data will be helpful in the future development and evaluation of novel vaccines.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Antibody and cellular immune responses of swine following immunisation with plasmid DNA encoding the PRRS virus ORF's 4, 5, 6 and 7.

The objectives of this study was to investigate the role of DNA vaccines in the generation of an immune response and that elicited against individually encoded proteins of PRRSV. The genomic regions encoding ORF s 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the PRRS virus vaccine strain were cloned into the mammalian expression vector pc DNA 3.1 (+). Inoculations with the recombinant plasmids resulted in detection of PRRS virus-specific antibodies in 71 per cent of the immunized animals by ELISA, virus neutralization and/or Western blotting assays. In addition, cellular immune responses were detected in 86 per cent of the immunized pigs by interferon gamma assay and/or proliferation assay. Pigs in the control group had no detectable immune response to PRRS virus. The results obtained demonstrated that DNA immunization against PRRS virus results in the production of both humoral and cell mediated immune responses in pigs. The results also indicate that neutralization epitopes for PRRS virus are present on the viral envelope glycoproteins encoded by ORF 4 and ORF 5.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Analysis of the immunological cross reactivities of 213 well characterized monoclonal antibodies with specificities against various leucocyte surface antigens of human and 11 animal species.

213 Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) raised against leucocyte surface antigens from human and 11 animal species were analyzed for reactivities against leucocytes from human and 15 different animal species. We found 77 mAbs (36%) to cross-react. Altogether, 217 cross reactions were registered out of 3195 possible combinations (7%). Most of the cross reacting mAbs had integrin or MHC class II specificities. This study defined cross reactions on the following markers: CD1a, 1c, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11a, 11b, 14, 18, 20, 21, 23, 29, 31, 41, 43, 44, 45, 45R, 46, 49, 61, 62L, TCR gamma/delta, BCR, Thy-1, MHC class I and MHC class II, Swine-WC7 and Cattle-WC1. In order to characterize the molecular weight (MW) of the corresponding cross reacting antigens, selected mAbs were used to immunoprecipitate the antigens. The MW's of the analyzed precipitated antigens were in good agreement with the MWs of the homologous antigens. The followed strategy was found to be efficient and economical in defining new leucocyte antigen reactive mAbs.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Overview of the Second International Workshop to define swine cluster of differentiation (CD) antigens.

The aim of the Second International Swine Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Workshop, supported by the Veterinary Immunology Committee (VIC) of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS), was to standardize the assignment of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) reactive with porcine leukocyte differentiation antigens and to define new antibody clusters. At the summary meeting of the workshop in July, 1995, revisions in the existing nomenclature for Swine CD were approved, so that the rules are now in accord with those for human and ruminant CD. Swine CD numbers will now be given to clusters of mAb to swine orthologues of human CD molecules when homology is proven by (1) suitable tissue distribution and lymphoid cell subset expression, (2) appropriate molecular mass of the antigen recognized by the mAbs, and (3) reactivity of mAbs with the cloned swine gene products, or cross-reactivity of the mAb on the human gene products. In some cases, this reactivity would not be fully proven, mainly due to the lack of cloned gene products; for these CD antigens, the respective clusters will be assigned by the prefix 'w' which will lead to 'wCD' antigens. As a result of the Second International Swine CD Workshop the assignment of 16 mAb to existing CD groups (CD2a, CD4a, CD5a, wCD6, wCD8, CD14, CD18a, wCD21, wCD25) was confirmed, and 2 mAb to existing swine workshop clusters (SWC). More importantly, for the work on the porcine immune system, was the definition of 5 new swine CD antigens, namely CD3 (recognized by 6 new mAb and 3 epitopes), CD16 (1 new mAb), wCD29 (2 mAb), CD45RA (3 mAb) and CD45RC (1 new mAb). Finally, the demarcation of two new SWC molecules in swine, SWC8 (2 mAb) and SWC9 (2 mAb) was confirmed.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Summary of workshop findings for antibodies reacting with porcine T-cells and activation antigens: results from the Second International Swine CD Workshop.

After initial evaluation of the 176 new and 19 control monoclonal antibodies (mAb) submitted to the Second International Swine CD Workshop, 57 were assigned to the T-cell/activation marker subgroup. These 57 mAb were further analyzed using flow cytometry on whole blood lymphocytes, splenocytes, Peyer's patch lymphocytes, in vitro cell lines, broncho-alveolar lavage cells, Con A and PHA blasts, fetal cell populations, and by 2-color flow cytometry against mAb to porcine CD2, CD4, and CD8. Finally, the molecular weights of the target antigens were characterized when possible. As a result of these analyses, 23 mAb were distributed into 7 CD clusters. Newly confirmed mAb assignments included: two CD2; one CD4; two CD5; one wCD6; and one wCD25. Three new mAb were found that reacted with wCD8, one of which defined a new epitope, wCD8c. For the first time, mAb against porcine CD3 were identified, including 6 mAb that reacted with three different epitopes. Several new mAb reacted with antigens whose expression varied depending on the activation state of the test cell. These will require further characterization in order to assign a CD number.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

Summary of workshop findings for porcine adhesion molecule subgroup.

Fifty-nine monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were assigned to the adhesion section of the Second International Swine CD Workshop. They were analysed for their reactivity to selected lymphoid cell populations, as well as to non-lymphoid cell lines. Cell lysate ELISAS and Western Blot analyses were also carried out. As a result, thirteen separate cluster groups emerged (p > 0.95). Workshop assignments for adhesion molecules were made: wCD29/49 for mAbs UCP1D2 (#133) and FW4-101 (#165), and PNK-I (#194) and MUC76A (#025) could be assigned to wCD18. For one cluster (FQ1D7, #161 and 2F4, #069) the cellular distribution and MW were characteristic for MHC Class II, and another cluster comprising several antibodies which appeared to recognise MHC Class I. Other clusters could not be assigned to cell surface structures known to be linked to cellular adhesion, however, two further antibodies, 335-2 (#112) and FG1F6 (#156), could be added to SWC1, and the new SWC8 was defined by MIL3 (#077) and MUC20A (#029), binding a ligand of 29-32 kDa. Clustering for these two antibodies was confirmed by blocking studies. The cellular distribution is known for MIL3, recognising an epitope present on granulocytes, B cells, and a subset of T cells expressing CD8 at high intensity.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Glycoprotein gI of pseudorabies virus promotes cell fusion and virus spread via direct cell-to-cell transmission.

Mutants of pseudorabies virus defective in either glycoprotein gI or gIII are only slightly less virulent for mice and chickens than is wild-type virus, while mutants defective in both gI and gIII are avirulent. To clarify the reason for the lack of virulence of the gI- gIII- mutants, we have analyzed in some detail the interactions of these mutants with their hosts. The results obtained showed that the gI glycoprotein is an accessory protein that promotes cell fusion. This conclusion is based on the findings that in some cell types, syncytium formation is significantly reduced in mutants deficient in gI. Furthermore, despite efficient replication, gI- mutants form significantly smaller plaques on some cell types. Finally, while wild-type and gI- virus are neutralized similarly by antisera, the size of the plaques formed by gI- mutants, but not by wild-type virus, is reduced by the presence of neutralizing antibodies in the overlay. Passive immunization of mice with neutralizing antipseudorabies virus sera is also considerably more effective in protecting them against challenge with gI- mutants than in protecting them against challenge with wild-type virus. These results show that gI- mutants are deficient in their ability to form syncytia and to spread directly by cell-to-cell transmission and that these mutants spread mainly by adsorption of released virus to uninfected cells. Wild-type virus and gIII- mutants, however, spread mainly via direct cell-to-cell transmission both in vivo and in vitro. We postulate that the lack of virulence of the gIII- gI- virus is attributable to its inability to spread by either mode, the defect in gIII affecting virus spread by adsorption of released virus and the defect in gI affecting cell-to-cell spread. Although a gI- gIII- mutant replicates as well as a gIII- mutant, it will be amplified much less well. Our results with in vitro systems show that this is indeed the case.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Interaction of glycoprotein gIII with a cellular heparinlike substance mediates adsorption of pseudorabies virus.

Glycoprotein gIII is one of the major envelope glycoproteins of pseudorabies virus (PrV) (Suid herpesvirus 1). Although it is dispensable for viral growth, it has been shown to play a prominent role in the attachment of the virus to target cells, since gIII- deletion mutants are severely impaired in adsorption (C. Schreurs, T. C. Mettenleiter, F. Zuckermann, N. Sugg, and T. Ben-Porat, J. Virol. 62:2251-2257, 1988). We show here that during the process of adsorption of PrV, the viral glycoprotein gIII interacts with a cellular heparinlike receptor. This conclusion is based on the following findings. (i) Heparin inhibits plaque formation of PrV by preventing the adsorption of wild-type virions to target cells. However, heparin does not interfere with the plaque formation of PrV mutants that lack glycoprotein gIII. (ii) Wild-type virions readily adsorb to matrix-bound heparin, whereas gIII- mutants do not. (iii) Pretreatment of cells with heparinase reduces considerably the ability of wild-type PrV to adsorb to these cells and to form plaques but does not negatively affect gIII- mutants. (iv) Glycoprotein gIII binds to heparin and appears to do so in conjunction with glycoprotein gII. Although heparin significantly reduces the adsorption of wild-type virus to all cell types tested, quantitative differences in the degree of inhibition of virus adsorption by heparin to different cell types were observed. Different cell types also retain their abilities to adsorb wild-type PrV to a different extent after treatment with heparinase and differ somewhat in their relative abilities to adsorb gIII- mutants. Our results show that while the primary pathway of adsorption of wild-type PrV to cells occurs via the interaction of viral glycoprotein gIII with a cellular heparinlike receptor, an alternative mode of adsorption, which is not dependent on either component, exists. Furthermore, the relative abilities of different cell types to adsorb PrV by the gIII-dependent or the alternative mode vary to some extent.

Adsorption↗
PubMed1989

Early interactions of pseudorabies virus with host cells: functions of glycoprotein gIII.

Adsorption of mutants of pseudorabies virus (PrV) lacking glycoprotein gIII is slower and less efficient than is that of wild-type virus (C. Schreurs, T. C. Mettenleiter, F. Zuckermann, N. Snugg, and T. Ben-Porat, J. Virol. 62:2251-2257, 1988). To ascertain the functions of gIII in the early interactions of PrV with its host cells, we compared the effect on wild-type virus and gIII- mutants of antibodies specific for various PrV proteins. Although adsorption of wild-type virus was inhibited by polyvalent antisera against PrV as well as by sera against gIII and gp50 (but not sera against gII), adsorption of the gIII- mutants was not inhibited by any of these antisera. These results suggest that, in contrast to adsorption of wild-type PrV, the initial interactions of the gIII- mutants with their host cells are not mediated by specific viral proteins. Furthermore, competition experiments showed that wild-type Prv and the gIII- mutants do not compete for attachment to the same cellular components. These findings show that the initial attachment of PrV to its host cells can occur by a least two different modes--one mediated by glycoprotein gIII and the other unspecific. gIII- mutants not only did not adsorb as readily to cells as did wild-type virus but also did not penetrate cells as rapidly as did wild-type virus after having adsorbed. Antibodies against gIII did not inhibit the penetration of adsorbed virus (wild type or gIII-), whereas antibodies against gII and gp50 did. It is unlikely, therefore, that gIII functions directly in virus penetration. Our results support the premises that efficient adsorption of PrV to host cell components is mediated either directly or indirectly by gIII (or a complex of viral proteins for which the presence of gIII is functionally essential) and that this pathway of adsorption promotes the interactions of other viral membrane proteins with the appropriate cellular proteins, leading to the rapid penetration of the virus into the cells. The slower penetration of the gIII- mutants than of wild-type PrV appears to be related to the slower and less efficient alternative mode of adsorption of PrV that occurs in the absence of glycoprotein gIII.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Glycoprotein gIII of pseudorabies virus is multifunctional.

One of the major glycoproteins of pseudorabies virus, gIII, is nonessential for growth in cell culture. Mutants defective in gIII, however, consistently yield lower titers of infectious virus (3- to 20-fold) than does wild-type virus. The interactions of gIII- mutants with their host cells were compared with those of wild-type virus in an attempt to uncover the functions of gIII. We show that gIII plays a major role in the stable adsorption of the virus to its host cell; in the absence of gIII, the rate of adsorption is reduced and adsorption is easily reversed by washing. Thus, adsorption of pseudorabies virus can be said to occur in at least the following two ways: (i) a gIII-mediated rapid adsorption or (ii) a slower and more labile adsorption that is independent of gIII. After virions have been complexed with monoclonal antibodies against gIII (but not some monoclonal antibodies against other glycoproteins), both modes of adsorption were inhibited. Glycoprotein gIII affects virus stability and virus release, as well as adsorption. The effect on virus release is marked when the virus is defective in additional functions. Thus, although we found no obvious difference in the release of virus from gIII- or wild-type virus-infected rabbit kidney cells, release of a gIII-/gI- double mutant from the cells occurred less readily than did release of a gI- mutant. The gIII-/gI- and gIII- mutants, however, adsorbed to cells at a similar rate, indicating that the effects of gIII on adsorption and virus release constitute separate functions. The Bartha vaccine strain of pseudorabies virus has a defective gIII gene and is released poorly from rabbit kidney cells. After the resident Bartha gIII gene was replaced by the gIII gene of wild-type virus, virus release was enhanced considerably. Since inactivation of gIII in wild-type pseudorabies virus did not significantly affect virus release, the Bartha strain must be defective in another function which, in conjunction with gIII, significantly affects virus release. These results indicate again that gIII affects virus release in conjunction with other functions. Also, although the Bartha strain was functionally defective in virus release, it adsorbed to cells as well as wild-type virus did, showing that the effects of gIII on virus adsorption and release constitute separate functions. We conclude that gIII is a multifunctional glycoprotein.

Adsorption↗
PubMed1988

Role of glycoprotein gIII of pseudorabies virus in virulence.

Deletion mutants of pseudorabies virus unable to express glycoprotein gIII, gI, or gp63 or double and triple mutants defective in these glycoproteins were constructed, and their virulence for day-old chickens inoculated intracerebrally was determined. Mutants of wild-type pseudorabies virus defective in glycoprotein gIII, gI, or gp63 were only slightly less virulent (at most, fivefold) for chickens than was the wild-type virus. However, mutants defective in both gIII and gI or gIII and gp63 were avirulent for chickens, despite their ability to grow in cell culture in vitro to about the same extent as mutants defective in gIII alone (which were virulent). These results show that gIII plays a role in virulence and does so in conjunction with gI or gp63. The effect of gIII on virulence was also shown when the resident gIII gene of variants of the Bartha vaccine strain (which codes for gIIIB) was replaced with a gIII gene derived from a virulent wild-type strain (which codes for gIIIKa); gIIIKa significantly enhanced the virulence of a variant of the Bartha strain to which partial virulence had been previously restored by marker rescue. Our results show that viral functions that play a role in the virulence of the virus (as measured by intracerebral inoculation of chickens) may act synergistically to affect the expression of virulence and that the ability of the virus to grow in cell culture is not necessarily correlated with virulence.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Role of pseudorabies virus glycoprotein gI in virus release from infected cells.

The Bartha vaccine strain of pseudorabies virus has a deletion in the short unique (Us) region of its genome which includes the genes that code for glycoproteins gI and gp63 (E. Petrovskis, J. G. Timmins, T. M. Gierman, and L. E. Post, J. Virol. 60:1166-1169, 1986). Restoration of an intact Us to the Bartha strain enhances its ability to be released from infected rabbit kidney cells and increases the size of the plaques formed on these cells (T. Ben-Porat, J. M. DeMarchi, J. Pendrys, R. A. Veach, and A. S. Kaplan, J. Virol. 57:191-196, 1986). To determine which gene function plays a role in virus release from rabbit kidney cells, deletions were introduced into the genomes of both wild-type virus and the "rescued" Bartha strain (Bartha strain to which an intact Us had been restored) that abolish the expression of either the gI gene alone or both gI and gp63 genes. The effect of these deletions on the phenotype of the viruses was studied. Deletion mutants of wild-type virus defective in either gI or gI and gp63 behave like wild-type virus with respect to virus release and plaque size on rabbit kidney cells. Deletion of gI from the rescued Bartha strain, however, strongly affects virus release and causes a decrease in plaque size. We conclude that gI affects virus release but that at least one other viral function also affects this process. This function is defective in the Bartha strain but not in wild-type virus; in its absence gI is essential to efficient release of the virus from rabbit kidney cells.

Cells, Cultured↗