Biomedical subjects

Fabio Guarracino

Publications and source records attributed to Fabio Guarracino.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty: an anatomic study of human coronary sinus and its relation with mitral valve annulus and coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: To allow performance of "stand-alone" mitral annuloplasty with minimal invasiveness, percutaneous techniques consisting of delivery into the coronary sinus (CS) of devices intended to shrink the mitral valve annulus have recently been tested in animal models. These techniques exploit the anatomic proximity of the CS and mitral valve annulus in ovine or dogs. Knowledge of a detailed anatomic relationship between the CS, coronary arteries, and mitral valve annulus in humans is essential to define the safety and efficacy of percutaneous techniques in clinical practice. We sought to determine the qualitative and quantitative anatomic relationships between CS and surrounding structures in human hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: The distance from the CS to the mitral valve annulus and the relationship between the CS and surrounding structures were studied in 61 excised cadaveric human hearts. Maximal distance from the CS to the mitral valve annulus was found to be up to 19 mm (mean, 9.7+/-3.2 mm). A diagonal or ramus branch, main circumflex artery, or its branches were located between anterior interventricular vein/CS and the mitral valve annulus in 16.4% and 63.9% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical anatomy suggests that in humans the CS is located behind the left atrial wall at a significant distance from the mitral valve annulus. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty devices probably shrink the mitral valve annulus only by an indirect traction mediated by the left atrial wall; a theoretical risk of compressing coronary artery branches exists. Chronic studies are needed to address this problem and to determine long-term efficacy of such methods.

Cadaver↗

PubMed2006

Myocardial damage prevented by volatile anesthetics: a multicenter randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of volatile anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia on cardiac troponin release in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). DESIGN: The authors performed a multicenter randomized controlled study to compare cardiac troponin release in patients receiving either volatile anesthetics or total intravenous anesthesia for cardiac surgery on the beating heart, which is an excellent model of human myocardial ischemia. SETTING: Three university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: The authors randomly assigned 57 patients to desflurane (volatile anesthetic) and 55 patients to propofol (intravenous anesthetic) in addition to an opiate-based anesthesia for OPCAB. INTERVENTIONS: The 2 groups of patients received either desflurane (volatile anesthetic) or propofol in addition to an opiate-based anesthesia for OPCAB. Peak postoperative troponin I release was measured as a marker of myocardial necrosis. Prolonged hospitalization was considered as a secondary outcome. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient mean age was 69 years, and 82% were men. There was a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in postoperative median (25th-75th percentiles) peak of troponin I in patients receiving volatile anesthetics, 1.2 (0.9-1.9) ng/dL, compared with patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia, 2.7 (2.1-4.0) ng/dL. This myocardial protection resulted in a reduced (p = 0.04) number (percentage) of patients requiring postoperative inotropes, 20 (35%) versus 31 (56%), and a reduced number (percentage) of patients submitted to prolonged hospitalization (> or =7 days), 7 (12%) versus 20 (36%) in the 2 groups (p = 0.005). One patient receiving total intravenous anesthesia died within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial damage measured by cardiac troponin release could be reduced by volatile anesthetics during OPCAB. Because patients underwent cardiac surgery on the beating heart, these results could have implications for cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Effects of acute hexarelin administration on cardiac performance in patients with coronary artery disease during by-pass surgery.

Growth hormone (GH) secretagogues are synthetic molecules with neuroendocrine but also cardiovascular activities mediated by specific GH secretagogue-receptors. The acute administration of hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, increases left ventricular ejection fraction in normal subjects and even in patients with severe GH deficiency. We evaluated cardiac performances in patients with coronary artery disease after acute administration of hexarelin (2.0 microg/kg, i.v.) compared to that in patients given with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 2.0 microg/kg, i.v.), recombinant human (rh)-GH (10.0 microg/kg, i.v.) or placebo. Cardiac performance was studied in 24 male patients (age [mean +/- S.E.M.]: 59.5 +/- 1.1 years; body mass index: 24.6 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2); left ventricular ejection fraction: 57.2 +/- 1.4%) with coronary artery disease undergoing by-pass surgery during general anesthesia. Left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end diastolic volume, cardiac index and cardiac output were evaluated by intraoperative omniplane transoesophageal echocardiography while wedge pressure, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance index were evaluated by systemic and pulmonary arterial catheterization. RhGH, GHRH and placebo did not exert any hemodynamic effect while hexarelin induced a prompt (after +10 min) increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001), cardiac index (P < 0.001) and cardiac output (P < 0.001) lasting up to +90 min without any variation in left ventricular end diastolic volume. Accordingly, hexarelin induced a reduction of wedge pressure (P < 0.01). These changes occurred in the presence of increased mean arterial pressure (P < 0.05) and transient decrease of central venous pressure (P < 0.05 at +30 min only) but no change in systemic vascular resistance index. Heart rate after hexarelin was similar to that after placebo. Hexarelin induced a slight increase in GH levels which was similar to that after GHRH but far lower (P < 0.01) than that after rhGH. Thus, in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing by-pass surgery, the acute administration of hexarelin clearly improves cardiac performance without any relevant variation in systemic vascular resistance. The cardiotropic effect of hexarelin is not shared by GHRH or by rhGH, indicating that it is not mediated by the increase in circulating GH levels but more likely reflects activation of specific cardiovascular GH secretagogue receptors.

Analysis of Variance↗