Biomedical subjects

Farzaneh Tabnak

Publications and source records attributed to Farzaneh Tabnak.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Improving rescreening in community clinics: does a system approach work?

Community clinics provide inadequate breast cancer screening services to low-income, racially- and ethnically-diverse communities. This study develops and evaluates the effectiveness of multifaceted organizational system interventions--operational assessments, tracking systems, reminder calls, tailored education, physician prompts and a tailored counseling call--on mammography rescreening rates within three community clinics. We used the Chronic Care Model and Put Prevention Into Practice framework to redesign breast screening delivery services within the California Cancer Detection Programs: Every Woman Counts (CDP:EWC), community clinic settings. We used a quasi-experimental design with a random selection of 400 patients at pre-intervention. To establish a post-intervention clinic's rescreening rate a new comparable cross-sectional random sample of 347 women was drawn. Measures A chart abstraction instrument was used to establish clinics' rescreening rates. Subjects participants at pre and post-intervention were low-income women 50 years of age and older who had received normal mammography results and had not been diagnosed with breast cancer in the last five years. General linear mixed model analysis revealed significant improvements for the organizational system redesign condition [pre-intervention rescreening rate: 32.1 percent v. post-intervention rescreening rate 50.2 percent, (p < .001)]. For the organizational system redesign plus tailored counseling call condition, there was maintenance in the rescreening rate following the intervention [pre-intervention: 44.4 percent v. post-intervention: 45.1 percent, (p > 0.05)]. Multilevel interventions directed at redesigning community clinics primary care breast cancer screening services, can improve mammography rescreening rates.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Role of Pap Test terminology and age in the detection of carcinoma invasive and carcinoma in situ in medically underserved California women.

Our goals were to evaluate Pap Test findings classified by the Bethesda system, and follow up biopsies from participants in the California Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program (Ca-BCCCP) for: 1) correlation in the detection of carcinoma in situ (CIS) and carcinoma invasive (CI), and 2) age-related trends, with discussion in the context of the 2001 ASCCP Management Guidelines. Women (n = 52,339) who had their initial screening Pap Tests with Ca-BCCCP between January 1995-December 1999 were followed for diagnostic services through December 2000. Descriptive and analytical methods were used in the analysis. Of the Pap results, 81.9% were negative, 10.6% showed infection, 4.7% showed an epithelial abnormality as defined by the Bethesda system (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)), 0.1% showed squamous-cell cancer (SCC), and 2.7% showed other or unsatisfactory. Subsequent to the initial Pap Test, follow-up results of carcinoma in situ (CIS) and carcinoma invasive (CI) accounted for 0.36% and 0.05% of the population, respectively. Among HSIL Pap Tests (n = 285), 40.7% had follow-up showing CIS. Among SCC Pap Tests, 17.9% had follow-up results of CIS and 28.6% CI. Of the 191 patients with CIS as a follow-up finding, the initial Pap smear showed: HSIL 60.7%, SCC 2.6%, LSIL 10.5%, ASCUS 13.6%, and negative or infection 9.9%. Of the 27 patients with CI, the initial Pap Test showed: HSIL 40.7%, SCC 29.6%, LSIL 7.4%, ASCUS 7.4%, and negative or infection 11.1%. Pap diagnoses of other or unsatisfactory accounted for 2.6% of the Pap results from patients with CIS and 3.7% of Pap results from patients with CI. Except for LSIL, there was an increasing age trend in the number of cases in each of Pap results, with the exception of age 65+ yr. However, the ratio of LSIL and ASCUS to negative cases decreased with age. (P < 0.0001 and 0.0293, respectively). HSIL Pap results indicate a reasonably high probability of CIS and CI. However, approximately 1/3 of patients with CIS and 1/4 of patients with CI presented with Pap diagnoses of less severity than HSIL. When a negative Pap Test result is chosen as reference group, there is a negative age trend for LSIL and ASCUS, and no age trend for other results. These findings all have important implications in the design of follow-up strategies, and support the 2001 ASCCP Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Women with Cervical Abnormalities.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Stage of breast cancer diagnosis among medically underserved women in California receiving mammography through a state screening program.

OBJECTIVE: This study describes breast cancer stage at diagnosis among California women receiving mammograms through a state-administered screening program in comparison to other California women. METHOD: Linked data from California-administered screening programs and the California Cancer Registry were used to identify participants diagnosed with breast cancer between 1994 and 2000. Logistic regression was used to compare the adjusted likelihood of late stage disease among program participants (categorized into four subgroups based on the timing and frequency of mammograms) to non-participants in California diagnosed during the same time period. RESULTS: Program participants were significantly more likely than non-participants to be diagnosed at late stage (adjusted OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1, 1.3), with the highest risk occurring among those diagnosed 0-1 months after initial mammogram (adjusted OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.6, 2.1). The stage distribution among regularly screened participants was similar to non-participants (adjusted OR of late stage disease 0.9; 95% CI 0.7, 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Although program participants were more likely to be diagnosed at late stage than non-participants, their stage distribution was distinctly different according to their pattern of mammography utilization. This likely reflects differential utilization of program diagnostic and screening services, which should be taken into account in program evaluation.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Patient and clinical site factors associated with rescreening behavior among older multiethnic, low-income women.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to identify factors predictive of mammography rescreening within 18 months of baseline screening in multiethnic, low-income older women. DESIGN AND METHODS: We interviewed a cross-sectional survey of staff of 102 randomly selected clinics that provided screening and diagnostic services. We also surveyed a random sample of 391 older women served by these clinics to retrospectively assess their experiences of the screening process. RESULTS: We found that 59% of the sample returned for a repeat mammogram. Education level and the belief it is important to get an annual mammogram were significant patient-level predictors of rescreening. Offering pap smears and using hands-on demonstrations with breast models were significant clinic-level variables predictive of rescreening. Of note, among the variables that did not prove significant in the final model were those reflecting ethnicity and income. IMPLICATIONS: Individual and health-care-delivery-system factors play important roles in the obtaining of regular mammograms by low-income women. These findings highlight the importance of both factors in improving rescreening rates among older women.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2004

Mammography rescreening among women of diverse ethnicities: patient, provider, and health care system factors.

This study identified patient, provider, and health care system factors that influenced mammography rescreening among non-insured, racial/ethnic minority women. Data were collected using a stratified-clustered random sample survey of 1,050 women of five racial/ethnic groups (Latina, Chinese, Filipina, African American, and Caucasian) and 102 primary care clinical sites. Women received screening services through two no-cost screening programs in California. Chi-square tests were used to assess bivariate associations and multiple logistic regressions were used to compute adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Mammography rescreening was associated with living in the United States longer; having higher education levels, better health care access, a history of breast problems, and favorable perceptions of mammography; obtaining regular Pap screening and hormone replacement therapy; having had better communication with clinicians; and attending clinics that conducted in-reach activities. This study suggests that simply removing financial barriers is not enough to improve mammography rescreening among underserved women.

Aged↗