Biomedical subjects

Fatema F Ghasia

Publications and source records attributed to Fatema F Ghasia.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Sensory convergence solves a motion ambiguity problem.

Our inner ear is equipped with a set of linear accelerometers, the otolith organs, that sense the inertial accelerations experienced during self-motion. However, as Einstein pointed out nearly a century ago, this signal would by itself be insufficient to detect our real movement, because gravity, another form of linear acceleration, and self-motion are sensed identically by otolith afferents. To deal with this ambiguity, it was proposed that neural populations in the pons and midline cerebellum compute an independent, internal estimate of gravity using signals arising from the vestibular rotation sensors, the semicircular canals. This hypothesis, regarding a causal relationship between firing rates and postulated sensory contributions to inertial motion estimation, has been directly tested here by recording neural activities before and after inactivation of the semicircular canals. We show that, unlike cells in normal animals, the gravity component of neural responses was nearly absent in canal-inactivated animals. We conclude that, through integration of temporally matched, multimodal information, neurons derive the mathematical signals predicted by the equations describing the physics of the outside world.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Do motoneurons encode the noncommutativity of ocular rotations?

As we look around, the orientation of our eyes depends on the order of the rotations that are carried out, a mathematical feature of rotatory motions known as noncommutativity. Theorists and experimentalists continue to debate how biological systems deal with this property when generating kinematically appropriate movements. Some believe that this is always done by neural commands to a simplified eye plant. Others have postulated that noncommutativity is implemented solely by the mechanical properties of the eyeball. Here we directly examined what the brain tells the muscles, by recording motoneuron activities as monkeys made eye movements. We found that vertical recti and superior/inferior oblique motoneurons, which drive sensory-generated torsional eye movements, do not modulate their firing rates according to the noncommutative-driven torsion during pursuit. We conclude that part of the solution for kinematically appropriate eye movements is found in the mechanical properties of the eyeball, although neural computations remain necessary and become increasingly important during head movements.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2004

Properties of cerebellar fastigial neurons during translation, rotation, and eye movements.

The most medial of the deep cerebellar nuclei, the fastigial nucleus (FN), receives sensory vestibular information and direct inhibition from the cerebellar vermis. We investigated the signal processing in the primate FN by recording single-unit activities during translational motion, rotational motion, and eye movements. Firing rate modulation during horizontal plane translation in the absence of eye movements was observed in all non-eye-movement-sensitive cells and 26% of the pursuit eye-movement-sensitive neurons in the caudal FN. Many non-eye-movement-sensitive cells recorded in the rostral FN of three fascicularis monkeys exhibited convergence of signals from both the otolith organs and the semicircular canals. At low frequencies of translation, the majority of these rostral FN cells changed their firing rates in phase with head velocity rather than linear acceleration. As frequency increased, FN vestibular neurons exhibited a wide range of response dynamics with most cells being characterized by increasing phase leads as a function of frequency. Unlike cells in the vestibular nuclei, none of the rostral FN cells responded to rotational motion alone, without simultaneously exhibiting sensitivity to translational motion. Modulation during earth-horizontal axis rotation was observed in more than half (77%) of the neurons, although with smaller gains than during translation. In contrast, only 47% of the cells changed their firing rates during earth-vertical axis rotations in the absence of a dynamic linear acceleration stimulus. These response properties suggest that the rostral FN represents a main processing center of otolith-driven information for inertial motion detection and spatial orientation.

Action Potentials↗