PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Fermín Mearin

Publications and source records attributed to Fermín Mearin.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Association between achalasia and nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms.

BACKGROUND: Our group previously reported the absence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in the gastroesophageal junction of patients with achalasia. NOS exists in three distinct isoforms: neuronal NOS (nNOS), endothelial NOS (eNOS), and inducible isoform (iNOS). Some studies have shown that NO production is regulated by NOS polymorphisms. AIM: To assess whether some functional polymorphisms in the nNOS, iNOS, or eNOS genes are involved in susceptibility to suffer from achalasia. METHODS: Genomic DNA from 80 unrelated Spanish Caucasian patients with sporadic achalasia and 144 healthy subjects matched for age (+/-5 yr) and gender was typed by PCR and RFLP methods for the 27-bp variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in intron 4 of the eNOS gene, a CA microsatellite repeat and a Nla III (C-->T) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) in exon 29 of the nNOS gene, and two nucleotide substitutions located in exon 16 (C-->T) and exon 22 (G-->A) of the iNOS gene. RESULTS: No significant differences in carriage, genotype, and allele frequencies of the nNOS, iNOS, or eNOS gene polymorphisms were found between patients with achalasia and controls. Individuals homozygous for genotype iNOS22*A/A tended to be more frequent in achalasia (20%vs 11%, odds ratio [OR] 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-3.59, p= 0.09) as were those homozygous for the rare eNOS*4a allele (6.2%vs 1.4%, OR 4.5, 95% CI 0.89-22.67, p= 0.1) although the difference did not reach statistical significance. No differences in genotype and allele distribution were found with respect to epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with achalasia. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that NOS gene polymorphisms are not involved in the susceptibility to and nature of the clinical course of sporadic achalasia. However, studies in a greater number of patients are required to analyze the tendency toward a higher prevalence of genotypes iNOS22*A/A and eNOS*4a4a.

Alleles↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacological treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome and other functional bowel disorders.

Functional digestive disorders constitute one of the main causes of consultation in gastroenterology and primary health care. Is still unclear whether therapy has to be aimed to the gut, to the neural pathways controlling bowel motility and perception, or to the processing mechanisms of symptoms and disease behaviour. It is conceivable that in the next future better understanding of functional bowel disorders pathophysiology will help us to tailor treatment for different patients. At the moment, subclassification of the diverse patterns of symptomatology allows to adjust new treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) according to the clinical predominance for each patient. The knowledge of motor and sensorial response to different stimuli in IBS patients and the pathways to the central nervous system is an important source of information for the development of new molecules. Fiber-enriched diet is frequently given for constipation-predominant IBS. Loperamide, antispasmodic drugs and tricyclic antidepressants are nowadays the basis for pharmacological treatment of diarrhea- predominant IBS. The scientific evidence supporting this therapeutical approach is however limited. Visceral analgesics and serotonin agonists and antagonists may play an important therapeutical role in the near future. However, it is not likely that one single treatment will help every functional bowel disorder patient and many of them will need a more complex approach with a multidisciplinary therapy (diet, psychotherapy, medications).

Colonic Diseases, Functional↗
PubMed2006

Impact of upper digestive symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Functional digestive disorders constitute a sizable proportion of gastroenterology and primary healthcare consultations, and have a negative impact on health-related quality of life. Dyspepsia and heartburn are often associated with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); however, the incidence of these symptoms and their effect on IBS patients have not been evaluated. AIM: To investigate the clinical, psychological and health-related quality of life impact of upper digestive symptoms on IBS patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicentered study was conducted in Spain: 517 IBS patients (Rome II criteria), grouped according to predominant symptoms of constipation (IBS-C), diarrhea (IBS-D) or alternating bowel habit (IBS-A) and 84 controls without IBS were recruited. Upper digestive symptoms were recorded in a 30-day diary. Health-related quality of life was evaluated by Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life and Euro-Quality of Life Five-Dimension Questionnaires; psychological well-being was evaluated by the Psychological General Well-Being Index. RESULTS: IBS patients had greater frequencies of upper digestive symptoms (72.3 vs. 6.0%), dyspepsia (21.1 vs. 4.8%) and heartburn (40.0 vs. 13.1%) (all P < 0.05) than controls. Prevalence of upper digestive symptoms was lower in patients with IBS-D than in those with IBS-C or IBS-A (P < 0.05). Health-related quality of life and psychological status were significantly worse in IBS patients with upper digestive symptoms than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: Upper digestive symptoms, frequently present in IBS patients, impair health-related quality of life and psychological status. This effect is greater in patients with IBS-C and IBS-A than in those with IBS-D. These data emphasize the importance of evaluating the presence of upper digestive symptoms in IBS patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in women who report domestic violence to the police.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Retrospective studies found an association between past sexual, physical, or psychological abuse and functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). However, there are no studies evaluating such an association concurrently with the ongoing abuse. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of the main FGIDs, functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome, in 70 women reporting a situation of domestic violence to the police and to evaluate the level of psychological distress and its relationship with the presence of FGID. METHODS: Through an interview between a social worker and the woman reporting abuse, digestive symptoms, psychological status, and type of abuse were recorded. These data were matched against police records. Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome were diagnosed according to Rome II criteria. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of the women had an FGID: 67% functional dyspepsia, 47% irritable bowel syndrome, and 43% both. In two thirds of the cases, FGID onset occurred simultaneously with or soon after abuse onset. Only 34% of the women had sought medical attention for FGID symptoms. No differences were found between women with or without FGID regarding age and type or duration of abuse; psychological distress tended to be more severe in the group of women with FGIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Most women who suffer domestic violence (reported to the police) have functional dyspepsia and/or irritable bowel syndrome and also have elevated psychological distress. This has important implications, not only for comprehensive health care of women in a situation of abuse, but also for medical treatment of women with FGIDs.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome after a Salmonella gastroenteritis outbreak: one-year follow-up cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It has been reported that some patients develop functional digestive disorders, particularly irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), after acute gastroenteritis (AGE). However, the presence of dyspepsia has not been specifically addressed. We prospectively evaluated development of dyspepsia and IBS during a 1-year follow-up in a cohort of adult patients affected by a Salmonella enteritidis AGE outbreak. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 1878 potential participants at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months; 677 had experienced a Salmonella enteritidis AGE on June 23, 2002, and 1201 had not (randomly selected controls, matched for village of residence, age, and sex). At 12 months, 271 patients and 335 controls returned the questionnaires. Data permitted the establishment of dyspepsia and IBS diagnosis by Rome II criteria. RESULTS: Before the AGE outbreak, the prevalence of dyspepsia was similar in cases and controls (2.5% vs 3.8%); the prevalence of IBS was also similar (2.9% vs 2.3%). At 3, 6, and 12 months, the prevalence of both dyspepsia and IBS had increased significantly in exposed compared with unexposed subjects. Overlap between dyspepsia and IBS was frequent. At 1 year, the relative risk for development of dyspepsia was 5.2 (95% confidence interval, 2.7-9.8) and for IBS was 7.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.1-19.7). Prolonged abdominal pain and vomiting during AGE were positive predictors of dyspepsia. No predictive factors for IBS were found. CONCLUSIONS: Salmonella gastroenteritis is a significant risk factor not only for IBS but also for dyspepsia; at 1 year of follow-up, 1 in 7 and 1 in 10 subjects developed dyspepsia or IBS, respectively.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Bowel habit subtypes and temporal patterns in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review.

UNLABELLED: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by the presence of abdominal discomfort or pain and bowel habit alterations: constipation (C-IBS), diarrhea (D-IBS), or alternating C and D (A-IBS). Its clinical course is poorly known. OBJECTIVES: (i) To compare bowel habit subtypes distribution in IBS according to sample origin and diagnosis criteria; (ii) To evaluate IBS temporal patterns based on follow-up studies. METHODS: A literature search (1966-2003) was conducted in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. A total of 72 studies were found and 22 were finally selected. RESULTS: Population-based studies from the United States (Manning) found similar distribution among C-IBS, D-IBS, and A-IBS, while European studies (Rome I, Rome II, or self-reporting) showed either C-IBS or A-IBS as the most prevalent subtypes. Primary care office-based studies (Rome I or Rome II) showed A-IBS as the most prevalent group. Gastroenterology specialized office-based studies found either C-IBS or D-IBS as the most frequently reported subtype. Prospective follow-up investigations showed that the most frequent IBS temporal pattern profile consists of mild to moderate symptoms appearing in cluster in an intermittent way, about once a week, and lasting 2-5 days on average. CONCLUSION: IBS clinical subtypes distribution differs depending on the population evaluated, the geographical location, and the criteria employed to define IBS and bowel habit subtypes. In most cases, clinical course is characterized by the presence of mild-to-moderate symptoms appearing sequentially. Prospective studies, using clear and stable diagnostic criteria and subtype definitions, and based on daily data collection should further characterize IBS clinical course.

Abdominal Pain↗
PubMed2004

Levosulpiride and cisapride in the treatment of dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia: a randomized, double-masked trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Levosulpiride is a benzamide derivate D(2) dopamine antagonist with prokinetic activity that can accelerate gastric emptying and reduce discomfort in response to gastric distention. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy of levosulpiride and cisapride in patients with dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia. METHODS: In a exploratory pilot study performed as a multicenter, randomized, double-masked trial, the effects of 8 weeks of treatment with either levosulpiride, 25 mg, 3 times daily (n = 69) or cisapride, 10 mg, 3 times daily (n = 71) were compared. Individual symptoms (pain/discomfort, fullness, bloating, early satiety, and nausea/vomiting), global symptom score, effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and anxiety-state and anxiety-trait were evaluated. Adverse events also were recorded. RESULTS: Both levosulpiride and cisapride improved dyspeptic symptoms and decreased total symptom score (79.9% and 71.3%, respectively); no significant statistical difference between treatments was found (P = 0.07 for total symptom score). HRQoL improved similarly after both treatments, whereas no change was observed in anxiety. Medication-related adverse effects were present in 13 of 69 patients (18.8%) in the levosulpiride group and 8 of 71 patients (11.3%) in the cisapride group. Significantly more (P = 0.03) patients treated with cisapride had to abandon the trial because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Levosulpiride is at least as effective as cisapride in the treatment of dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Irritable bowel syndrome subtypes according to bowel habit: revisiting the alternating subtype.

BACKGROUND: Disturbed bowel habit, diarrhoea or constipation is a key manifestation of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In some patients, diarrhoea and constipation alternate, giving rise to the so-called alternating subtype. AIMS: To assess IBS subtype breakdown (constipation (C-IBS), diarrhoea (D-IBS) or alternating (A-IBS)) according to the Rome II criteria and patients' self-assessment, the predominance in the alternating subtype (i.e. constipation, diarrhoea or neither), and the medical and personal impact, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), of the different IBS subtypes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two thousand individuals selected randomly to represent the general population were classified as potential IBS subjects (n = 281) or as non-potential IBS subjects (n = 1719) according to a validated questionnaire. Bowel habit classification was determined using the Rome II IBS supportive symptoms. RESULTS: Among 201 subjects meeting the Rome I criteria, 15% presented with D-IBS, 44% presented with C-IBS, 19% presented with A-IBS, and 22% presented with normal bowel habit. Among the 63 subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 23% presented with A-IBS. According to the subjects' self-assessment, of those meeting the Rome I criteria, 16% considered themselves to have D-IBS, 66% to have C-IBS and 18% to have A-IBS. In subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 24% considered themselves to have A-IBS. Among those classified with A-IBS by the Rome II criteria, most considered themselves to be constipated. Regardless of the subtype self-classification, most subjects reported a normal frequency of bowel movements. Clinical manifestations in A-IBS were very similar to those of C-IBS but with the added presence of defecatory urgency. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians were greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes. HRQoL was affected similarly in all IBS subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-quarter of subjects with IBS belong to the A-IBS subtype by the Rome II criteria, although the majority consider themselves to be constipated; indeed, clinical manifestations are more akin to the C-IBS subtype than to the D-IBS subtype. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians are greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes, while HRQoL is impaired similarly.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Achalasia treatment in the elderly: is botulinum toxin injection the best option?

BACKGROUND: Achalasia treatment in elderly patients is a matter of controversy. Botulinum toxin injection has been proposed as the best option in this group of patients as it is a safe procedure. However, concern persists regarding its short-term effect. AIMS: To analyse the clinical and economic effectiveness of botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of achalasia patients who are elderly. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive achalasia patients older than 65 years were treated with 80 units of botulinum toxin. Clinical follow-up at 1, 6 and 12 months was performed. Control manometry when symptoms recurred was carried out. Results were compared with those of an historical control group of 16 achalasia patients also older than 65 years and who had been treated with endoscopic dilation. The costs of both procedures were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-nine botulinum toxin injections were performed in the 17 patients of the botulinum toxin group (follow-up, 12-36 months). In the dilation group only two patients had to be retreated (follow-up, 12-108 months). No major complications were observed in either group. The average duration of symptom alleviation was 48 +/- 33 months for endoscopic dilation and 13.8 +/- 9.5 months for botulinum toxin injection. Maintaining a patient free of symptoms cost E348.31 per year for botulinum toxin injection, whilst if endoscopic dilation was chosen the cost was only E117.47 per year. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of botulinum toxin injections wanes with time in elderly patients, necessitating repeated injections to keep the patients symptom-free. Due to the required repeated injections this procedure is more expensive than endoscopic dilation.

Aged↗