PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Fernando Frutos-Vivar

Publications and source records attributed to Fernando Frutos-Vivar.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Does sedation practice delay time to extubation?

UNLABELLED: Criteria for performing a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) have not been evaluated in controlled trials. An important component of these criteria is neurological status. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether physicians take mental status into consideration before performing an SBT in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study which included 355 mechanically ventilated patients. Daily assessments were made of whether the patients met criteria for performing a SBT. On the day a patient met the criteria, the level of sedation was evaluated using the Glasgow Coma Scale as modified by Cook and Palma (GCS-Cook) and it was registered whether or not the physician carried out an SBT. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients (57%) underwent an SBT on the day they met the criteria (cohort 1) and in 151 patients (cohort 2) the SBT was delayed a median time of 1 day (interquartile range 1-2). There were differences in the GCS-Cook score on the day the criteria were met for performing an SBT (mean 13+/-3 points in cohort 1 versus 9+/-3 points in cohort 2; P<0.001). There were differences (P<0.001) between the cohorts in days of intubation and length of stay in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Neurological status/level of sedation is a factor in the decision whether or not to perform a spontaneous breathing trial.

APACHE↗
PubMed2006

Pathology of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a clinical-pathological correlation.

Clinical criteria cannot identify all patients who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome, which might indicate the need to develop new tools that improve reliability and diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless, being conscious of the limitations of the American-European consensus conference criteria continues to be useful in clinical daily practice because these patients would benefit from treatments. This and other management strategies have been evaluated in patients who, fulfilling the clinical criteria of acute respiratory distress syndrome, could not have diffuse alveolar damage.

Biopsy↗
PubMed2006

Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Three hundred sixty-one intensive care units (ICUs) from 20 countries. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand eight hundred ninety-seven patients mechanically ventilated for more than 12 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Baseline demographic data, primary indication for mechanical ventilation, daily ventilator settings, multiple organ failure over the course of mechanical ventilation, and outcome were collected. Ventilator-associated pneumonia was present in 439 patients (15%). Patients with VAP were more likely to have chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, aspiration, sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Mortality in patients with VAP was 38%. Factors associated with mortality were severity of illness, limited activity before the onset of mechanical ventilation and development of shock, acute renal failure, and worsening of hypoxemia during the period of mechanical ventilation. Case-control analysis showed no increased mortality in patients with VAP (38.1% vs 37.9%, P = .95) but prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of mechanically ventilated patients, VAP is more likely in patients with underlying lung disease (acute or chronic). Ventilator-associated pneumonia was associated with a significant increase in ICU length of stay but no increase in mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Epidemiology of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous disorder that may be triggered by myriad etiologies (both pulmonary and extrapulmonary). Mortality rates for ARDS range from 30 to 75%, and most deaths are a consequence of multiorgan failure (MOF). Since the sentinel description of ARDS in 1967, criteria for the diagnosis of this entity were refined. In 1992, diagnostic criteria for ARDS were published in an American-European Consensus Conference and the term ACUTE LUNG INJURY (ALI) was adopted to encompass patients with a spectrum of less severe forms of the same pathological entity. This review discusses limitations of various criteria utilized to diagnosis ARDS and ALI, and why some criteria may be problematic when designing clinical trials. Also discussed are the myriad causes of ARDS, incidence, epidemiology, mortality, and factors that influence outcome.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Outcome of older critically ill patients: a matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Admission of older patients to intensive care units is a controversial issue. OBJECTIVE: To estimate age-associated mortality of critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective matched cohort study in the Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary hospital was conducted. We included 100 consecutive patients older than 70 years admitted to the intensive care unit (cases) and 100 patients younger than 70 years (controls). The matching criterion was the severity of illness at admission to the intensive care unit as estimated by the simplified acute physiological score (SAPS II) without including age in its calculation. RESULTS: Mortality in the intensive care unit was higher, but not statistically significant, in the older group: 26% vs. 19% (p = 0.23). Patients older than 70 years had a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (median 7 vs. 3 days) and longer stay in the intensive care unit (median 8 vs. 5 days). There were no differences in organ dysfunctions, except for a higher incidence of respiratory failure in the older group (p < 0.001). The use of invasive procedures was similar in both groups. There were more orders for the withholding/withdrawal of treatment in patients older than 70 years (9 vs. 3%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: In our study, age was not related with a significant higher mortality. In the older patients included in our study the survival was greater than 70% with a similar resource utilization except for a longer stay in the intensive care unit.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Risk factors for extubation failure in patients following a successful spontaneous breathing trial.

BACKGROUND: To assess the factors associated with reintubation in patients who had successfully passed a spontaneous breathing trial. METHODS: We used logistic regression and recursive partitioning analyses of prospectively collected clinical data from adults admitted to ICUs of 37 hospitals in eight countries, who had undergone invasive mechanical ventilation for > 48 h and were deemed ready for extubation. RESULTS: Extubation failure occurred in 121 of the 900 patients (13.4%). The logistic regression analysis identified the following associations with reintubation: rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) [odds ratio (OR), 1.009 per unit; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.003 to 1.015]; positive fluid balance (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.53); and pneumonia as the reason for initiating mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.84). The recursive partitioning analysis allowed the separation of patients into different risk groups for extubation failure: (1) RSBI of > 57 breaths/L/min and positive fluid balance (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.8 to 4.8); (2) RSBI of < 57 breaths/L/min and pneumonia as reason for mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.6); (3) RSBI of > 57 breaths/L/min and negative fluid balance (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.5); and (4) RSBI of < 57 breaths/L/min (OR, 1 [reference value]). CONCLUSIONS: Among routinely measured clinical variables, RSBI, positive fluid balance 24 h prior to extubation, and pneumonia at the initiation of ventilation were the best predictors of extubation failure. However, the combined predictive ability of these variables was weak.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Ventilator settings as a risk factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVE: A single-center retrospective study initial recently identified ventilator settings as a major risk factor for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated patients who do not have ARDS from the outset. We tested this hypothesis in a larger sample of patients prospectively enrolled in a multicenter study on mechanical ventilation. DESIGN AND SETTING: From a large international mechanical ventilation study database we identified patients who required mechanical ventilation for 48 h or more but did not have ARDS at the onset of mechanical ventilation. We extracted information on demographics, initial severity of illness, ventilator settings and major underlying ARDS risk factors. Primary outcome was development of ARDS after the onset of mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of 3,261 mechanically ventilated patients who did not have ARDS at the outset 205 (6.2%) developed ARDS 48 h or more after the onset of mechanical ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, hypoxemia) and underlying ARDS risk factors (sepsis, trauma, pneumonia) found the development of ARDS to be associated with the initial ventilator settings: high tidal volume (odds ratio 2.6 for tidal volume>700 ml), high peak airway pressure (odds ratio 1.6 for peak airway pressure>30 cmH2O), and high positive end-expiratory pressure (odds ratio 1.7 for end-expiratory pressure>5 cmH2O). CONCLUSIONS: The association with the potentially injurious initial ventilator settings, in particular large tidal volumes, suggests that ARDS in mechanically ventilated patients is in part a preventable complication. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a prospective study.

Female↗
PubMed2005

Prognosis factors and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia needing mechanical ventilation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the variables associated with mortality of patients with community-acquired pneumonia who require mechanical ventilation and to determine the attributable morbidity and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality of community-acquired pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study carried out in 361 ICUs from 20 countries including 124 patients who required mechanical ventilation on the first day of admission to the hospital due to acute respiratory failure secondary to severe community-acquired pneumonia. To assess the factors associated with outcome, a forward stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed, and to determine the attributable mortality of community-acquired pneumonia, a matched study design was used. RESULTS: We found 3 independent variables significantly associated with death in patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation: simplified acute physiological score greater than 45 (odds ratio, 5.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.7-12.3]), shock (odds ratio, 5.7 [95% confidence interval, 1.7-10.1]), and acute renal failure (odds ratio, 3.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0]). There was no statistically significant difference in ICU mortality among patients with or without community-acquired pneumonia (32% vs 35%; P=.59). CONCLUSIONS: Community-acquired pneumonia needing mechanical ventilation is not a disease associated with higher mortality. The main determinants of patient outcome were initial severity of illness and the development of shock and/or acute renal failure.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed2005

Outcome of mechanically ventilated patients who require a tracheostomy.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of, the risk factors associated with, and the outcome of tracheostomy in a heterogeneous population of mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: A total of 361 intensive care units from 12 countries. PATIENTS: A cohort of 5,081 patients mechanically ventilated for >12 hrs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 546 patients (10.7%) had a tracheostomy during their stay in the intensive care unit. Tracheostomy was performed at a median time of 12 days (interquartile range, 7-17) from the beginning of mechanical ventilation. Variables associated with the performance of tracheostomy were duration of mechanical ventilation, need for reintubation, and neurologic disease as the primary reason of mechanical ventilation. The intensive care unit stay of patients with or without tracheostomy was a median of 21 days (interquartile range, 12-32) vs. 7 days (interquartile range, 4-12; p < .001), respectively, and the hospital stay was a median 36 days (interquartile range, 23-53) vs. 15 days (interquartile range, 8-26; p < .001), respectively. Adjusting by other variables, tracheostomy was independently related with survival in the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-2.86). Mortality in the hospital was similar in both groups (39% vs. 40%, p = .65). CONCLUSIONS: Tracheostomy is a common surgical procedure in the intensive care unit that is associated with a lower mortality in the unit but with a longer stay and a similar mortality in the hospital than in patients without tracheostomy.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed2005

Airway pressures, tidal volumes, and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usual practice for setting tidal volume and other ventilatory parameters in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the late 1990s and to determine the independent effects of these practices on intensive care unit mortality. DESIGN: Subanalysis of a prospective observational study. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of ventilatory management on mortality. SETTING: A total of 361 intensive care units in 20 countries in March 1998. PATIENTS: A total of 467 mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean tidal volume used in the first week of ARDS was 8.8 mL/kg measured body weight, and there was great variability in these tidal volumes (sd = 2.0). Tidal volumes were significantly lower in patients with (n = 265) than without (n = 202) a recorded plateau pressure (8.6 vs. 9.1 mL/kg, p = .01). The overall intensive care unit mortality rate was 60.2%. In addition to the strong influence of organ failures and higher levels of inspired oxygen, late-onset ARDS (onset after >48 hrs of mechanical ventilation; odds ratio, 2.09) was independently associated with mortality. In addition, lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure were independently associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 0.91; 1 cm of H2O increments). Neither inspiratory pressures nor tidal volumes were independently associated with mortality, and there was no evidence of increased mortality with the use of lower inspiratory pressures. CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive study demonstrated considerable interpatient variability in tidal volumes during the study period. In addition to traditional prognostic indicators, timing of ARDS onset and the use of low levels of positive end-expiratory pressure or no positive end-expiratory pressure during the first week may adversely influence outcome in ARDS patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: underrecognition by clinicians and diagnostic accuracy of three clinical definitions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of three clinical definitions of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): (1) the American-European consensus conference definition; (2) the lung injury score; and (3) a recently developed Delphi definition. A second objective was to determine the accuracy of clinical diagnoses of ARDS made in daily practice. DESIGN: Independent comparison of autopsy findings with the daily status of clinical definitions, constructed with data abstracted retrospectively from medical records. SETTING: Tertiary intensive care unit. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients from the period 1995 through 2001 who were autopsied after being mechanically ventilated. INTERVENTIONS: Clinical ARDS diagnoses were determined daily without knowledge of autopsy results. Charts were reviewed for any mention of ARDS in the clinical notes. Autopsies were reviewed independently by two pathologists for the presence of diffuse alveolar damage. The sensitivity and specificity of the definitions were determined with use of diffuse alveolar damage at autopsy as the reference standard. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Diffuse alveolar damage at autopsy was documented in 42 of 138 cases (30.4%). Only 20 of these 42 patients (47.6%) had any mention of ARDS in their chart. Sensitivities and specificities (95% confidence intervals) were as follows: American-European definition, 0.83 (0.72-0.95), 0.51 (0.41-0.61); lung injury score, 0.74 (0.61-0.87), 0.77 (0.69-0.86); and Delphi definition, 0.69 (0.55-0.83), 0.82 (0.75-0.90). Specificity was significantly higher for both the lung injury score and Delphi definition than for the American-European definition (p < .001 for both), whereas comparisons of sensitivity, which was higher for the American-European definition, were not significantly different (p = .34 and p = .07, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome appears underrecognized by clinicians in patients who die with this syndrome. In this population, the specificities of existing clinical definitions vary considerably, which may be problematic for clinical trials.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Use of sedatives and neuromuscular blockers in a cohort of patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of sedatives and neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBs) and their impact in outcome in an international cohort of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We analyzed the database of a prospective, multicenter cohort of 5,183 adult patients who received mechanical ventilation for > 12 h. We considered that a patient received a given agent when it was administered for at least 3 h in a 24-h period. RESULTS: A total of 3,540 patients (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67 to 69%) received a sedative at any time while receiving mechanical ventilation. The median number of days of use was 3 (interquartile range [IQR], 2 to 6 days). The persistent use of sedative was associated with more days of mechanical ventilation (median, 4 days [IQR, 2 to 8 days], vs 3 days [IQR, 2 to 4 days] in patients who did not receive sedatives [p < 0.001]); more weaning days (median, 2 days [IQR, 1 to 3 days], vs 2 days [IQR, 1 to 5 days] in patients who did not receive sedatives [p < 0.001]); and longer length of stay in the ICU (median, 8 days [IQR, 5 to 15 days], vs 5 days [IQR, 3 to 9 days] in patients who did not receive sedatives [p < 0.001]). Six hundred eighty-six patients (13%; 95% CI, 12 to 14%) received an NMB for at least 1 day. The median number of days of use was 2 (IQR, 1 to 4 days). The administration of an NMB was independently related with age, a normal previous functional status, main reason of mechanical ventilation (patients with ARDS received more NMBs), and with patient management (patients requiring permissive hypercapnia, prone position, high level of positive end-expiratory pressure, and high airways pressure). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sedatives is very common, and their use is associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation, weaning time, and stay in the ICU. NMBs are used in 13% of the patients and are associated with longer duration of mechanical ventilation, weaning time, stay in the ICU, and higher mortality.

Cohort Studies↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of clinical criteria for the acute respiratory distress syndrome with autopsy findings.

BACKGROUND: The American-European Consensus Conference definition for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has never been validated. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical criteria for ARDS with autopsy findings. DESIGN: Independent comparison of autopsy findings with clinical characteristics retrospectively abstracted from medical records. SETTING: Tertiary medical-surgical intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: 382 patients who underwent clinical autopsy. MEASUREMENTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for clinical criteria were calculated in 3 cohorts by using diffuse alveolar damage at autopsy as the reference standard. The 3 cohorts were 1) all patients, 2) patients with any risk factor for ARDS, and 3) patients who were separated according to their pulmonary or extrapulmonary risk factors. RESULTS: 127 patients (33%) met the clinical criteria, and 112 (29%) had diffuse alveolar damage. In all patients, the sensitivity of the clinical definition was 75% (95% CI, 66% to 82%) and the specificity was 84% (CI, 79% to 88%). In 284 patients with risk factors, the sensitivity was 76% (CI, 67% to 83%) and the specificity was 75% (CI, 68% to 81%). Compared with patients with pulmonary risk factors, patients with extrapulmonary risk factors had significantly higher sensitivity (61% vs. 85%; P = 0.009) and the specificity did not statistically significantly differ (69% vs. 78%; P > 0.2). LIMITATIONS: Only patients who died and underwent autopsy could be included in this study, so these results may not apply to less severe cases of ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: In a series of autopsy patients, the accuracy of the American-European Consensus Conference definition of ARDS was only moderate. The definition was more accurate for patients with extrapulmonary risk factors than for patients with pulmonary risk factors.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for respiratory failure after extubation.

BACKGROUND: The need for reintubation after extubation and discontinuation of mechanical ventilation is not uncommon and is associated with increased mortality. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation has been suggested as a promising therapy for patients with respiratory failure after extubation, but a single-center, randomized trial recently found no benefit. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to evaluate the effect of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation on mortality in this clinical setting. METHODS: Patients in 37 centers in eight countries who were electively extubated after at least 48 hours of mechanical ventilation and who had respiratory failure within the subsequent 48 hours were randomly assigned to either noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation by face mask or standard medical therapy. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients with similar baseline characteristics had been randomly assigned to either noninvasive ventilation (114 patients) or standard medical therapy (107 patients) when the trial was stopped early, after an interim analysis. There was no difference between the noninvasive-ventilation group and the standard-therapy group in the need for reintubation (rate of reintubation, 48 percent in both groups; relative risk in the noninvasive-ventilation group, 0.99; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 1.30). The rate of death in the intensive care unit was higher in the noninvasive-ventilation group than in the standard-therapy group (25 percent vs. 14 percent; relative risk, 1.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 3.20; P=0.048), and the median time from respiratory failure to reintubation was longer in the noninvasive-ventilation group (12 hours vs. 2 hours 30 minutes, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation does not prevent the need for reintubation or reduce mortality in unselected patients who have respiratory failure after extubation.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Outcome of older patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the threshold of age that best discriminates the survival of mechanically ventilated patients and to estimate the outcome of mechanically ventilated older patients. DESIGN: International prospective cohort study. SETTING: Three hundred sixty-one intensive care units from 20 countries. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS. Five thousand one hundred eighty-three patients mechanically ventilated for more than 12 h. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Recursive partitioning and logistic regression were used and an outcome model was derived and validated using independent subgroups of the cohort. Two age thresholds (43 and 70 years) were found, by partitioning recursive analysis, to be associated with outcome. This study focuses on the analysis of patients older than 43 years of age, divided in two subgroups: between 43 and 70 years (middle age group) and older than 70 years (elderly group). Survival in hospital was 45% (95% C.I.: 43-48) for the elderly group and 55% (53-57) for the middle age group ( p<0.001). Advanced age was not associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation, weaning or length of stay in the ICU and in hospital ( p>0.05). Variables associated with mortality in the elderly were: acute renal failure, shock, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and a ratio of PaO(2) to FIO(2) more than 150. CONCLUSIONS: Older mechanically ventilated patients (age >70 years) had a lower ICU and hospital survival, but the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital stay were similar to younger patients. Factors associated with the highest risk of mortality in patients older than 70 were the development of complications during the course of mechanical ventilation, such as acute renal failure and shock.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2004

Incidence, risk factors and outcome of barotrauma in mechanically ventilated patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of barotrauma in a cohort of mechanically ventilated patients where limited tidal volumes and airway pressures were used. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort of 361 intensive care units from 20 countries. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5183 patients mechanically ventilated for more than 12 h. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Baseline demographic data, primary indication for mechanical ventilation, daily ventilator settings, multiple-organ failure over the course of mechanical ventilation and outcome were collected. Barotrauma was present in 154 patients (2.9%). The incidence varied according to the reason for mechanical ventilation: 2.9% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 6.3% of patients with asthma; 10.0% of patients with chronic interstitial lung disease (ILD); 6.5% of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); and 4.2% of patients with pneumonia. Patients with and without barotrauma did not differ in any ventilator parameter. Logistic regression analysis identified as factors independently associated with barotrauma: asthma [RR 2.58 (1.05-6.50)], ILD [RR 4.23 (95%CI 1.78-10.03)]; ARDS as primary reason for mechanical ventilation [RR 2.70 (95%CI 1.55-4.70)]; and ARDS as a complication during the course of mechanical ventilation [RR 2.53 (95%CI 1.40-4.57)]. Case-control analysis showed increased mortality in patients with barotrauma (51.4 vs 39.2%; p=0.04) and prolonged ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients in whom airway pressures and tidal volume are limited, barotrauma is more likely in patients ventilated due to underlying lung disease (acute or chronic). Barotrauma was also associated with a significant increase in the ICU length of stay and mortality.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Epidemiology of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are diseases with a significant influence in the public health. A better knowledge of their epidemiology could help to improve the outcome of these diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the clinical criteria of the American-European Consensus Conference definitions for ALI and ARDS are simple, there is a risk of misclassification due to a poor reliability. Except for new emerging infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, the etiology of ALI/ARDS has remained the same for several years. The only recent innovation is the hypothesis that pulmonary ARDS and extrapulmonary ARDS could be different clinical entities. In recent years, there has been a special interest in the study of genetic predisposition to development ALI/ARDS. Recent studies have estimated the incidence of these diseases to be between 15 and 34 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year. This wide range could stem from differences in the methodology used to calculate the incidence or could be a true variation due to regional differences. Mortality rate of ALI/ARDS have remained steady for several years. Respiratory failure is the cause of the death in less than 20% of the patients. SUMMARY: The epidemiology of ALI and ARDS has some issues to improve, such as the accuracy of the clinical criteria of ALI/ARDS. Future research must to include study of genetic polymorphisms of the mediators involve in the development of ALI/ARDS. Studies to define better the population at risk are necessary to estimate better their true incidence.

Acute Disease↗