PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Filippo Mangiapane

Publications and source records attributed to Filippo Mangiapane.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Hepatocellular carcinoma: role of unenhanced and delayed phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with cirrhosis.

PURPOSE: To determine, by using multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT), the added value of obtaining unenhanced and delayed phase scans in addition to biphasic (hepatic arterial and portal venous phases) scans in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local ethical committee approval and patient consent were obtained. One hundred ninety-five patients (129 men, 66 women; mean age, 61 years; age range, 39-78 years) with 250 HCCs underwent multi-detector row helical CT of the liver. A quadruple-phase protocol that included unenhanced, hepatic arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases was performed. Analysis of images from hepatic arterial and portal venous phases combined, hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the unenhanced phase, hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the delayed phase, and all phases combined was performed separately by three independent radiologists. Relative sensitivity, positive predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A(z)) were calculated for each reading session. RESULTS: Mean sensitivity and positive predictive values, respectively, for HCC detection were 88.8% (666 of 750 readings) and 97.8% (666 of 681 readings) for the combined hepatic arterial and portal venous phases, 89.2% (669 of 750 readings) and 97.8% (669 of 684 readings) for hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the unenhanced phase, 92.8% (696 of 750 readings) and 97.3% (696 of 715 readings) for hepatic arterial and portal venous phases with the delayed phase, and 92.8% (696 of 750 readings) and 97.3% (696 of 715 readings) for all four phases combined. The reading sessions in which delayed phase images were available for interpretation showed significantly (P < .05) superior sensitivity and A(z) values. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced phase images are not effective for HCC detection. Because of the significant increase in HCC detection, a delayed phase can be a useful adjunct to biphasic CT in patients at risk for developing HCC.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of low-radiation-dose computed tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps by using two sequential colonoscopies, with the second colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was local ethics committee approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Colonographic images were acquired by using a low-dose multi-detector row CT protocol (effective milliampere-second setting, 10 mAs). Three observers interpreted the CT colonographic data separately and independently by using a two-dimensional technique. Initial conventional colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist unaware of the CT colonographic findings. Second colonoscopy performed within 2 weeks by a colonoscopist aware of both the CT colonographic and the initial colonoscopic findings served as the reference standard. The sensitivities of CT colonography and initial colonoscopy were calculated on a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. Specificities and positive and negative predictive values also were calculated on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent CT colonography and initial conventional colonoscopy on the same day. Per-polyp sensitivities were 62% and 83% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Sensitivities for detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger were 86% and 84% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Initial colonoscopy failed to depict 16 polyps, six of which were correctly detected with CT colonography. For identification of patients with polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively, had sensitivities of 84% and 90%, specificities of 82% and 100%, positive predictive values of 70% and 100%, and negative predictive values of 91% and 95%. CONCLUSION: Low-dose CT colonography compares favorably with colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, with markedly decreased performance for detection of polyps 5 mm in diameter or smaller.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We prospectively compared the performance of low-dose multidetector computed tomographic colonography (CTC) without cathartic preparation with that of colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. METHODS: A total of 203 patients underwent low-dose CTC without cathartic preparation followed by colonoscopy. Before CTC, fecal tagging was achieved by adding diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium to regular meals. No subtraction of tagged feces was performed. Colonoscopy was performed 3-7 days after CTC. Three readers interpreted the CTC examinations separately and independently using a primary 2-dimensional approach using multiplanar reconstructions and 3-dimensional images for further characterization. Colonoscopy with segmental unblinding was used as reference standard. The sensitivity of CTC was calculated both on a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. For the latter, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were also calculated. RESULTS: CTC had an average sensitivity of 95.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.1%-99%) for the identification of colorectal polyps > or =8 mm. With regard to per-patient analysis, CTC yielded an average sensitivity of 89.9% (95% CI, 86%-93.7%), an average specificity of 92.2% (95% CI, 89.5%-94.9%), an average positive predictive value of 88% (95% CI, 83.3%-91.5%), and an average negative predictive value of 93.5% (95% CI, 90.9%-96%). Interobserver agreement was high on a per-polyp basis (kappa statistic range, .61-.74) and high to excellent on a per-patient basis (kappa statistic range, .79-.91). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose multidetector CTC without cathartic preparation compares favorably with colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with triple-phase multi-detector row helical CT in patients with chronic hepatitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the use of two arterial phase image acquisition series, when combined with portal venous phase imaging at multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT), would be superior enough to use of a single arterial phase image acquisition series to warrant the increased radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-detector row CT was performed in 77 patients with 140 foci of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A triple-phase protocol that included an early arterial phase, a late arterial phase, and a portal venous phase was performed. Images were analyzed separately by three radiologists to document the presence and number of HCC nodules. Separate reading sessions were performed for images from the early arterial phase, images from the late arterial phase, images from both arterial phases combined, and images from all three phases. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were calculated for each reading session. RESULTS: The average sensitivity and positive predictive values, respectively, for the detection of HCC were 48.5% and 96.4% for early arterial phase images, 87.1% and 94.0% for late arterial phase images, 87.1% and 94.0% for images from both arterial phases, and 88.5% and 93.4% for images from all three phases. Analysis of images from both arterial phases together yielded no improvement in either sensitivity or positive predictive value compared with analysis of late arterial phase images alone. Analysis of the combination of late arterial and portal venous phase images resulted in the highest sensitivity value. CONCLUSION: The acquisition of images during two arterial contrast phases does not provide additional benefit over timed conventional biphasic CT technique.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of lower-dose multi-detector row helical computed tomographic (CT) colonography with that of conventional colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients underwent multi-detector row helical CT colonography (beam collimation, 4 x 2.5 mm; table feed, 17.5 mm/sec; voltage, 140 kV; and effective dose, 10 mAs) followed by conventional colonoscopy. Conventional colonoscopy served as the reference standard. Two radiologists interpreted CT colonographic images to assess the presence of polyps or carcinomas. Sensitivity was calculated on both a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. In the latter, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. Weighted CT dose index was calculated on the basis of measurements obtained in a standard body phantom. Effective dose was estimated by using commercially available software. RESULTS: CT colonography correctly depicted all 22 carcinomas (sensitivity, 100%) and 52 of 74 polyps (sensitivity, 70.3%). Sensitivity for detection was 100% in all 13 polyps 10 mm or larger in diameter, 83.3% in 20 of 24 polyps 6-9 mm, and 51.3% in 19 of 37 lesions 5 mm or smaller. With regard to the per-patient analysis, CT colonography had a sensitivity of 96.0%, a specificity of 96.6%, a positive predictive value of 94.1%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. The total weighted CT dose index for combined prone and supine acquisitions was 2.74 mGy. The simulated effective doses for complete CT colonography were 1.8 mSv in men and 2.4 mSv in women. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography ensures substantial dose reduction while maintaining excellent sensitivity for detection of colorectal carcinomas and polyps larger than 6 mm in diameter.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience.

Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of ultra-low-dose scanning for multislice CT colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions. Twenty-seven patients (14 men, 13 women) with clinical indication for conventional colonoscopy were recruited. Multislice spiral CT (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom, Siemens, Germany) examinations were performed after standard oral colonoscopic preparation and colonic distension with room air. Images were acquired using 2.5-mm collimation, 3.0-mm slice thickness, standard reconstruction kernel, 140 kVp, and 10 mAs. Supine and prone acquisitions were obtained in all patients. Images were analyzed on a workstation by two gastrointestinal radiologists. Conventional colonoscopy was performed on the same day in all patients and represented the standard of reference. Total radiation exposure was also calculated. All colorectal cancers were correctly identified at CT colonography (9 of 9, sensitivity 100%). The CT colonography also detected 10 of 12 polyps (overall sensitivity 83.3%). Based on polyp diameter, the sensitivity for the detection of polyps 10 mm or larger was 100% (3 of 3); between 6 and 9 mm, 100% (3 of 3); and 5 mm or smaller, 66.6% (4 of 6). Total radiation exposure for prone and supine acquisitions combined was 1.7 mSv (for men) and 2.3 mSv (for women). Although preliminary, our experience suggests that ultra-low-dose scanning for multislice CT colonography is feasible. This technique provides a sensitivity comparable to that of previous experiences with CT colonography but with a 40-70% reduction of the radiation dose delivered to patients.

Butylscopolammonium Bromide↗
PubMed2002

Experimental colonic phantom for the evaluation of the optimal scanning technique for CT colonography using a multidetector spiral CT equipment.

Our objective was to optimize a scanning protocol for CT colonography using a multidetector scanner with an adaptive-array matrix in a phantom study. A colonic phantom with 27 simulated lesions was examined using a multidetector CT scanner (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Three scanning protocols were tested: (a) collimation 1.0 mm, slice thickness 1.0 mm; (b) collimation 2.5 mm, slice thickness 3.0 mm; and (c) collimation 2.5 mm, slice thickness 5.0 mm. Image analysis was performed by two radiologists blinded to the construction of the phantom and to imaging parameters. Sensitivity for lesion detection and image quality was assessed. Computed tomographic colonography detected 27 of 27 lesions with protocol 1 (sensitivity 100%); 26 of 27 lesions with protocol 2 (sensitivity 96.3%); and 23 of 27 lesions with protocol 3 (sensitivity 85.2%). Image quality was graded as optimal for protocol 1, good for protocol 2, and poor for protocol 3. When multidetector CT equipment with an adaptive-array matrix is used, protocols with 1.0- or 3.0-mm slice thickness have a sensitivity for the detection of lesions higher than that obtained with a 5.0-mm slice thickness. Image quality decreases progressively when the slice thickness is increased; therefore, in a clinical setting, we recommend the use of a high-resolution protocol (1.0-mm effective slice thickness) with the highest pitch value in order to reduce scanning time. Dose exposure for such a protocol if combined with 80 mAs is within the range limits recommended by the ICRP for abdominal CT scanning.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed2002

[Study of the mesenteric arteries with multislice spiral CT angiography].

The aim of our study was to optimize an high-resolution CT angiography protocol for the evaluation of mesenteric arteries using a multislice spiral CT equipment. A volumetric dataset was acquired during dynamic i.v. injection of non-ionic iodine contrast medium; images were subsequently reconstructed by means of a dedicated off-line workstation, equipped with volume-rendering software. Excellent depiction of the anatomy of mesenteric arteries and collateral vessels was obtained in all the cases. In conclusion, new multislice spiral CT scanners allow an optimal noninvasive evaluation of mesenteric arteries, possible up to now only with catheter angiography.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Multislice spiral CT colonography in the evaluation of colorectal neoplasms.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of multislice spiral CT colonography: 1) in the diagnosis and staging of colorectal carcinoma; 2) in the evaluation of the proximal colon in patients with stenosing neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 33 patients (21 males and 12 females) with known colorectal carcinoma diagnosed by conventional colonoscopy. All patients enrolled in the study underwent both conventional colonoscopy followed by CT colonography on the same day. CT examination was performed using a multislice spiral CT scanner (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Imaging parameters were: slice collimation, 1 mm; slice thickness, 1 mm; table speed, 8 mm/sec; reconstruction interval, 1 mm; mAs, 80; kVp, 120; acquisition time, 25-32 sec. Image analysis was performed using a software package with volume-rendering capabilities (Vitrea 2.6; Vital Images, Minneapolis, USA). Image analysis consisted in the evaluation of: 1) number, size, and location of the lesions; 2) primary tumor staging. For the purposes of tumor staging, we utilized the TNM staging system. For the evaluation of parameters T and N, histologic examination on resected surgical specimens and lymph nodes served as the standard of reference. The presence of hepatic metastases was confirmed by means of partial surgical resection in patients with single metastasis or by means of intraoperative ultrasonography in patients with multiple metastases. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy detected 33 carcinomas and 4 polyps and was incomplete in 9 cases (27.2% of all examinations) due to stenosing lesions. CT colonography provided adequate visualization of the whole colon in all patients with identification of 35 carcinomas (33 primary and 2 synchronous) and 10 polyps. Therefore, CT colonography correctly detected all lesions seen at conventional colonoscopy and yielded the additional identification of 2 synchronous tumors and 6 polyps located in the colon proximal to the primary stenosing neoplasm. Primary tumor staging with CT colonography was correct in 32 of 33 patients (accuracy, 96.9%) CONCLUSIONS: Multislice spiral CT colonography detected all primary neoplasms, provided correct staging of 96.9% of tumors and visualized the whole colon even in patients with stenosing lesions. Considering the current limitations of the other procedures and the possibility of assessing both the colon and the extracolonic structures, multislice spiral CT colonography can be proposed as the initial diagnostic modality for pre-operative evaluation of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Aged↗