PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Fiona Lynch

Publications and source records attributed to Fiona Lynch.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Whole-genome surveillance supports hazard profiling of Escherichia coli lineages in recycled water treatment systems.

UNLABELLED: The use of treated wastewater is increasingly important for sustainable water management under a changing climate, yet conventional monitoring based on Escherichia coli enumeration provides limited insight into strain diversity and associated public health hazards. Here, we applied longitudinal whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to 180 E. coli isolates collected across the treatment continuum of a recycled water facility, from influent to final effluent. Genomic analysis revealed extensive strain-level heterogeneity, comprising 88 sequence types across eight phylogroups, with greater diversity in influent than in treated effluent. Phylogenetic comparisons with contextual Australian genomes indicated clustering with strains associated with companion animals, wild birds, humans, and livestock, suggesting multiple potential source reservoirs rather than a single dominant origin, although source contributions were not definitive. Despite a >90% reduction in total E. coli loads, isolates recovered from upstream and downstream stages exhibited broadly comparable virulence factor and antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) profiles, suggesting that, within the cultured isolate collection, reductions in abundance exceeded shifts in genomic composition. To assess operational relevance, we prototyped a genomics-informed hazard framework integrating virulence determinants, ARGs, plasmid-associated mobility, and reuse-specific exposure context. Using this framework, 92.8% of isolates were classified as low hazard, and 7.2% as moderate hazard, with no isolates meeting criteria for high or critical hazard classifications. These findings demonstrate that genomic profiling of indicator organisms can reveal population structure and hazard heterogeneity not captured by conventional enumeration alone, and can provide a practical basis for incorporating genomic information into hazard-informed monitoring of recycled water systems. IMPORTANCE: Routine recycled water monitoring relies largely on culture-based E. coli counts, which indicate regulatory compliance but provide limited insight into strain diversity, persistence, and genomic characteristics relevant to public health. Using longitudinal whole-genome sequencing, we show that genetically distinct E. coli lineages, including isolates carrying combinations of virulence and antimicrobial resistance determinants, can persist through advanced treatment despite substantial reductions in overall E. coli loads. While most isolates were classified as low genomic hazard and no high- or critical-hazard isolates were detected, these findings demonstrate that conventional enumeration alone cannot distinguish between genetically diverse lineages with differing hazard potential in highly treated systems. By integrating genomic data into a hazard classification framework, this study demonstrates an applied approach to contextualize E. coli detections and distinguish low-risk background populations from isolates with elevated genomic hazard profiles. This work supports the use of genomic profiling of indicator organisms to improve surveillance, inform treatment performance assessment, and enable more risk-based management of recycled water systems.

Escherichia coli

Offering complex genomic screening in acute pediatric settings: Family decision-making and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Families of children in pediatric acute care who are offered ultrarapid genomic sequencing are making complex decisions during a high-stress period. To reduce complexity for families and clinicians, we offered genomic screening for the child and parents after the completion of diagnostic testing. We evaluated uptake, understanding, and service delivery preferences. METHODS: A cohort of 235 families who had completed ultrarapid diagnostic genomic sequencing at 17 Australian hospitals were offered up to 3 screens on their genomic data: pediatric-onset, adult-onset, and expanded couple carrier screening. We investigated decision making, understanding, and service delivery preferences using surveys at 3 time points (pre counseling, post counseling, and post result) and performed inductive content analysis of pretest genetic counseling transcripts. RESULTS: A total of 119 families (51%) attended genetic counseling with 115 (49%) accepting genomic screening. Survey respondents were more likely to find decisions about couple carrier screening easy (87%) compared with adult (68%; P = .002) or pediatric (71%; P = .01) screening decisions. All respondents with newly detected pathogenic variants accurately recalled this 1 month later. A delayed offer of screening was acceptable to most respondents (78%). CONCLUSION: Separating genomic screening from the stressful diagnostic period is supported by families who demonstrate good knowledge and recall. Our results suggest delaying genomic screening should be trialed more widely.

Humans